Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4559-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4559-2015
Research article
 | 
17 Nov 2015
Research article |  | 17 Nov 2015

Large-scale hydrological modelling by using modified PUB recommendations: the India-HYPE case

I. G. Pechlivanidis and B. Arheimer

Related authors

Use of expert elicitation to assign weights to climate and hydrological models in climate impact studies
Eva Sebok, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, Ernesto Pastén-Zapata, Peter Berg, Guillaume Thirel, Anthony Lemoine, Andrea Lira-Loarca, Christiana Photiadou, Rafael Pimentel, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Erik Kjellström, Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, Jean Philippe Vidal, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Markus G. Donat, Giovanni Besio, María José Polo, Simon Stisen, Yvan Caballero, Ilias G. Pechlivanidis, Lars Troldborg, and Jens Christian Refsgaard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5605–5625, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5605-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5605-2022, 2022
Short summary
DEPLOYMENT OF AI-ENHANCED SERVICES IN CLIMATE RESILIENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
N. Hempelmann, C. Ehbrecht, E. Plesiat, G. Hobona, J. Simoes, D. Huard, T. J. Smith, U. S. McKnight, I. G. Pechlivanidis, and C. Alvarez-Castro
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W1-2022, 187–194, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-187-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W1-2022-187-2022, 2022
Comparing seasonal streamflow forecast systems for management of a fresh water reservoir in the Netherlands
Ruud T. W. L. Hurkmans, Bart van den Hurk, Maurice J. Schmeits, Fredrik Wetterhall, and Ilias G. Pechlivanidis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-604,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-604, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Benchmarking an operational hydrological model for providing seasonal forecasts in Sweden
Marc Girons Lopez, Louise Crochemore, and Ilias G. Pechlivanidis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1189–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1189-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1189-2021, 2021
Short summary
From skill to value: isolating the influence of end user behavior on seasonal forecast assessment
Matteo Giuliani, Louise Crochemore, Ilias Pechlivanidis, and Andrea Castelletti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5891–5902, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5891-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5891-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Machine-learning- and deep-learning-based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 GCM data
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1047–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, 2023
Short summary
River hydraulic modeling with ICESat-2 land and water surface elevation
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Hydrological modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool in urban and peri-urban environments: the case of Kifisos experimental subbasin (Athens, Greece)
Evgenia Koltsida, Nikos Mamassis, and Andreas Kallioras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 917–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
A comprehensive open-source course for teaching applied hydrological modelling in Central Asia
Beatrice Sabine Marti, Aidar Zhumabaev, and Tobias Siegfried
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 319–330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Alcamo, J., Döll, P., Henrichs, T., Kaspar, F., Lehner, B., Rösch, T., and Siebert, S.: Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48, 317–337, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.3.317.45290, 2003.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration, Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, in FAO Irrigation and drainage paper, Rome, 56, 1998.
Andreassian, V., Hall, A., Chahinian, N., and Schaake, J.: Large Sample Basin Experiment for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment – MOPEX, IAHS Publication, Wallingford, 307, 2006.
Arheimer, B. and Brandt, M.: Modelling nitrogen transport and retention in the catchments of southern Sweden, Ambio, 27, 471–480, 1998.
Arheimer, B. and Lindström, G.: Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden, in: Runoff Predictions in Ungauged Basins – Synthesis across processes, places and scales, edited by: Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Wagener, T., and Viglione, A., 353–359, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013.
Download
Short summary
We modify the recommendations for flow predictions in ungauged catchments to address the challenges at the large scale. We use examples from the HYPE hydrological model set-up across 6000 subbasins for the Indian subcontinent. Multi-basin modelling reveals the spatial patterns of catchment functioning and dominant flow processes across the hydroclimatic gradient. The model set-up procedure according to the PUB recommendations brought insights into where the single model structure is inadequate.