Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3301-2015
Research article
 | 
31 Jul 2015
Research article |  | 31 Jul 2015

Complex network theory, streamflow, and hydrometric monitoring system design

M. J. Halverson and S. W. Fleming

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Guiding community discussions on human–water challenges by serious gaming in the upper Ewaso Ngiro River basin, Kenya
Charles Nduhiu Wamucii, Pieter R. van Oel, Adriaan J. Teuling, Arend Ligtenberg, John Mwangi Gathenya, Gert Jan Hofstede, Meine van Noordwijk, and Erika N. Speelman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3495–3518, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Levee system transformation in coevolution between humans and water systems along the Kiso River, Japan
Shinichiro Nakamura, Fuko Nakai, Yuichiro Ito, Ginga Okada, and Taikan Oki
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2329–2342, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2329-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2329-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reframing water demand management: a new co-governance framework coupling supply-side and demand-side solutions toward sustainability
Yueyi Liu, Hang Zheng, and Jianshi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2223–2238, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2223-2024, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: The unsustainable use of groundwater conceals a “Day Zero”
Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Juan Pablo Boisier, René Garreaud, Javier González, Roberto Rondanelli, Eugenia Gayó, and Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1605–1616, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1605-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1605-2024, 2024
Short summary
Water productivity is in the eye of the beholder: benchmarking the multiple values produced by water use in the Phoenix metropolitan area
Benjamin L. Ruddell and Richard Rushforth
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1089–1106, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1089-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abe, S. and Suzuki, N.: Small-world structure of earthquake network, Physica A, 337, 357–362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.01.059, 2004.
Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., and Stanley, H. E.: Classes of small-world networks, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 11149–11152, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200327197, 2000.
Archfield, S. A. and Kiang, J. E.: Response of the United States streamgauge network to high- and low-flow periods, abstract H41M-08 presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, USA, available at: http://abstractsearch.agu.org/meetings/2011/FM/sections/H/sessions/H41M/abstracts/H41M-08.html, last access: 12 December 2014, 2011.
Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286, 509–512, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509, 1999.
Bras, R. L. and Rodríguez-Iturbe, I.: Rainfall network design for runoff prediction, Water Resour. Res., 12, 1197–1208, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i006p01197, 1976.