Articles | Volume 26, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3863-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3863-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Analysis of high streamflow extremes in climate change studies: how do we calibrate hydrological models?
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
Diego Avesani
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
Patrick Zulian
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
Aldo Fiori
Department of Engineering, Roma Tre University, 00154 Rome, Italy
Alberto Bellin
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
Related authors
Giulio Bongiovanni, Michael Matiu, Alice Crespi, Anna Napoli, Bruno Majone, and Dino Zardi
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-285, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-285, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
EEAR-Clim is a new and unprecedented observational dataset gathering in-situ daily measurements of air temperature and precipitation from a network of about 9000 weather stations covering the European Alps. Data collected, including time series from recordings up to 2020 and significantly enhancing data coverage at high elevations, were tested for quality and homogeneity. The dataset aims to serve as a powerful tool for better understanding climate change over the European Alpine region.
Michael Matiu, Alice Crespi, Giacomo Bertoldi, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Christoph Marty, Samuel Morin, Wolfgang Schöner, Daniele Cat Berro, Gabriele Chiogna, Ludovica De Gregorio, Sven Kotlarski, Bruno Majone, Gernot Resch, Silvia Terzago, Mauro Valt, Walter Beozzo, Paola Cianfarra, Isabelle Gouttevin, Giorgia Marcolini, Claudia Notarnicola, Marcello Petitta, Simon C. Scherrer, Ulrich Strasser, Michael Winkler, Marc Zebisch, Andrea Cicogna, Roberto Cremonini, Andrea Debernardi, Mattia Faletto, Mauro Gaddo, Lorenzo Giovannini, Luca Mercalli, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Andrea Sušnik, Alberto Trenti, Stefano Urbani, and Viktor Weilguni
The Cryosphere, 15, 1343–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The first Alpine-wide assessment of station snow depth has been enabled by a collaborative effort of the research community which involves more than 30 partners, 6 countries, and more than 2000 stations. It shows how snow in the European Alps matches the climatic zones and gives a robust estimate of observed changes: stronger decreases in the snow season at low elevations and in spring at all elevations, however, with considerable regional differences.
Sebastiano Piccolroaz, Michele Di Lazzaro, Antonio Zarlenga, Bruno Majone, Alberto Bellin, and Aldo Fiori
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2047–2061, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We present HYPERstream, an innovative, parsimonious, and computationally efficient streamflow routing scheme based on the width function instantaneous unit hydrograph theory. HYPERstream is designed to be easily coupled with climate models and to preserve the geomorphological dispersion of the river network, irrespective of the model grid size. This makes HYPERstream well suited for multi-scale applications (from catchment up to continental scale) and to investigate extreme events (e.g. floods).
Giulio Bongiovanni, Michael Matiu, Alice Crespi, Anna Napoli, Bruno Majone, and Dino Zardi
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-285, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-285, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
EEAR-Clim is a new and unprecedented observational dataset gathering in-situ daily measurements of air temperature and precipitation from a network of about 9000 weather stations covering the European Alps. Data collected, including time series from recordings up to 2020 and significantly enhancing data coverage at high elevations, were tested for quality and homogeneity. The dataset aims to serve as a powerful tool for better understanding climate change over the European Alpine region.
Luciano Pavesi, Elena Volpi, and Aldo Fiori
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-114, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-114, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
Several sources of uncertainty affect flood risk estimation for reliable assessment for investors, insurance and risk management. Here, we consider the uncertainty of large-scale flood hazard modeling, providing a range of risk values that show significant variability depending on geomorphic factors and land use types. This allows to identify the critical points where single value estimates may underestimate the risk, and the areas of vulnerability to prioritize risk reduction efforts.
Jiancong Chen, Bhavna Arora, Alberto Bellin, and Yoram Rubin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4127–4146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4127-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4127-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a stochastic framework with indicator random variables to characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of environmental hot spots and hot moments (HSHMs) that represent rare locations and events exerting a disproportionate influence over the environment. HSHMs are characterized by static and dynamic indicators. This framework is advantageous as it allows us to calculate the uncertainty associated with HSHMs based on uncertainty associated with its contributors.
Michael Matiu, Alice Crespi, Giacomo Bertoldi, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Christoph Marty, Samuel Morin, Wolfgang Schöner, Daniele Cat Berro, Gabriele Chiogna, Ludovica De Gregorio, Sven Kotlarski, Bruno Majone, Gernot Resch, Silvia Terzago, Mauro Valt, Walter Beozzo, Paola Cianfarra, Isabelle Gouttevin, Giorgia Marcolini, Claudia Notarnicola, Marcello Petitta, Simon C. Scherrer, Ulrich Strasser, Michael Winkler, Marc Zebisch, Andrea Cicogna, Roberto Cremonini, Andrea Debernardi, Mattia Faletto, Mauro Gaddo, Lorenzo Giovannini, Luca Mercalli, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Andrea Sušnik, Alberto Trenti, Stefano Urbani, and Viktor Weilguni
The Cryosphere, 15, 1343–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The first Alpine-wide assessment of station snow depth has been enabled by a collaborative effort of the research community which involves more than 30 partners, 6 countries, and more than 2000 stations. It shows how snow in the European Alps matches the climatic zones and gives a robust estimate of observed changes: stronger decreases in the snow season at low elevations and in spring at all elevations, however, with considerable regional differences.
Elena Diamantini, Stefano Mallucci, and Alberto Bellin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 573–593, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-573-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-573-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The description of pharmaceutical fate and transport introduced into a watershed is a challenging topic, especially because of the possible adverse effects on human health. In addition, an accurate estimation of solute sources and routes is still missing. This study uses a new promising modeling approach to predict pharmaceutical concentrations in rivers. Results show an interesting relationship between solute concentrations in waters and touristic fluxes.
Flavia Tauro, Andrea Petroselli, Aldo Fiori, Nunzio Romano, Maria Cristina Rulli, Maurizio Porfiri, Mario Palladino, and Salvatore Grimaldi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-501, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-501, 2016
Revised manuscript not accepted
Sebastiano Piccolroaz, Michele Di Lazzaro, Antonio Zarlenga, Bruno Majone, Alberto Bellin, and Aldo Fiori
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2047–2061, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We present HYPERstream, an innovative, parsimonious, and computationally efficient streamflow routing scheme based on the width function instantaneous unit hydrograph theory. HYPERstream is designed to be easily coupled with climate models and to preserve the geomorphological dispersion of the river network, irrespective of the model grid size. This makes HYPERstream well suited for multi-scale applications (from catchment up to continental scale) and to investigate extreme events (e.g. floods).
L. Carturan, C. Baroni, M. Becker, A. Bellin, O. Cainelli, A. Carton, C. Casarotto, G. Dalla Fontana, A. Godio, T. Martinelli, M. C. Salvatore, and R. Seppi
The Cryosphere, 7, 1819–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1819-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1819-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
On the use of streamflow transformations for hydrological model calibration
Simulation-based inference for parameter estimation of complex watershed simulators
Multi-scale soil moisture data and process-based modeling reveal the importance of lateral groundwater flow in a subarctic catchment
Catchment response to climatic variability: implications for root zone storage and streamflow predictions
Hybrid hydrological modeling for large alpine basins: a semi-distributed approach
Karst aquifer discharge response to rainfall interpreted as anomalous transport
HESS Opinions: Never train a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network on a single basin
Large-sample hydrology – a few camels or a whole caravan?
Comment on “Are soils overrated in hydrology?” by Gao et al. (2023)
Multi-decadal fluctuations in root zone storage capacity through vegetation adaptation to hydro-climatic variability have minor effects on the hydrological response in the Neckar River basin, Germany
Projected future changes in the cryosphere and hydrology of a mountainous catchment in the upper Heihe River, China
On the importance of plant phenology in the evaporative process of a semi-arid woodland: could it be why satellite-based evaporation estimates in the miombo differ?
Regionalization of GR4J model parameters for river flow prediction in Paraná, Brazil
Evolution of river regimes in the Mekong River basin over 8 decades and the role of dams in recent hydrological extremes
Skill of seasonal flow forecasts at catchment scale: an assessment across South Korea
To what extent do flood-inducing storm events change future flood hazards?
When ancient numerical demons meet physics-informed machine learning: adjoint-based gradients for implicit differentiable modeling
Assessing the impact of climate change on high return levels of peak flows in Bavaria applying the CRCM5 large ensemble
Impacts of climate and land surface change on catchment evapotranspiration and runoff from 1951 to 2020 in Saxony, Germany
Quantifying and reducing flood forecast uncertainty by the CHUP-BMA method
Developing a tile drainage module for the Cold Regions Hydrological Model: lessons from a farm in southern Ontario, Canada
To bucket or not to bucket? Analyzing the performance and interpretability of hybrid hydrological models with dynamic parameterization
Widespread flooding dynamics under climate change: characterising floods using grid-based hydrological modelling and regional climate projections
HESS Opinions: The sword of Damocles of the impossible flood
Metamorphic testing of machine learning and conceptual hydrologic models
The influence of human activities on streamflow reductions during the megadrought in central Chile
Elevational control of isotopic composition and application in understanding hydrologic processes in the mid Merced River catchment, Sierra Nevada, California, USA
Lack of robustness of hydrological models: A large-sample diagnosis and an attempt to identify the hydrological and climatic drivers
The Significance of the Leaf-Area-Index on the Evapotranspiration Estimation in SWAT-T for Characteristic Land Cover Types of Western Africa
Enhancing long short-term memory (LSTM)-based streamflow prediction with a spatially distributed approach
Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain
Impacts of spatiotemporal resolutions of precipitation on flood event simulation based on multimodel structures – a case study over the Xiang River basin in China
A network approach for multiscale catchment classification using traits
Multi-model approach in a variable spatial framework for streamflow simulation
Advancing understanding of lake–watershed hydrology: a fully coupled numerical model illustrated by Qinghai Lake
Technical note: Testing the connection between hillslope-scale runoff fluctuations and streamflow hydrographs at the outlet of large river basins
Empirical stream thermal sensitivity cluster on the landscape according to geology and climate
Deep learning for monthly rainfall–runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia
A large-sample modelling approach towards integrating streamflow and evaporation data for the Spanish catchments
On optimization of calibrations of a distributed hydrological model with spatially distributed information on snow
Toward interpretable LSTM-based modeling of hydrological systems
Flow intermittence prediction using a hybrid hydrological modelling approach: influence of observed intermittence data on the training of a random forest model
What controls the tail behaviour of flood series: rainfall or runoff generation?
Learning Landscape Features from Streamflow with Autoencoders
Seasonal prediction of end-of-dry-season watershed behavior in a highly interconnected alluvial watershed in northern California
Glaciers determine the sensitivity of hydrological processes to perturbed climate in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau
Leveraging gauge networks and strategic discharge measurements to aid the development of continuous streamflow records
On the need for physical constraints in deep learning rainfall–runoff projections under climate change: a sensitivity analysis to warming and shifts in potential evapotranspiration
Evaluation of hydrological models on small mountainous catchments: impact of the meteorological forcings
Projecting sediment export from two highly glacierized alpine catchments under climate change: exploring non-parametric regression as an analysis tool
Guillaume Thirel, Léonard Santos, Olivier Delaigue, and Charles Perrin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4837–4860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4837-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4837-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We discuss how mathematical transformations impact calibrated hydrological model simulations. We assess how 11 transformations behave over the complete range of streamflows. Extreme transformations lead to models that are specialized for extreme streamflows but show poor performance outside the range of targeted streamflows and are less robust. We show that no a priori assumption about transformations can be taken as warranted.
Robert Hull, Elena Leonarduzzi, Luis De La Fuente, Hoang Viet Tran, Andrew Bennett, Peter Melchior, Reed M. Maxwell, and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4685–4713, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4685-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale hydrologic simulators are a needed tool to explore complex watershed processes and how they may evolve with a changing climate. However, calibrating them can be difficult because they are costly to run and have many unknown parameters. We implement a state-of-the-art approach to model calibration using neural networks with a set of experiments based on streamflow in the upper Colorado River basin.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Kersti Leppä, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-aho, Giulia Mazzotti, Terhikki Manninen, Mika Korkiakoski, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, and Samuli Launiainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We used hydrological models, field measurements, and satellite-based data to study the soil moisture dynamics in a subarctic catchment. The role of groundwater was studied with different ways to model the groundwater dynamics and via comparisons to the observational data. The choice of groundwater model was shown to have a strong impact, and representation of lateral flow was important to capture wet soil conditions. Our results provide insights for ecohydrological studies in boreal regions.
Nienke Tempel, Laurène Bouaziz, Riccardo Taormina, Ellis van Noppen, Jasper Stam, Eric Sprokkereef, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4577–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4577-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4577-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the impact of climatic variability on root zone water storage capacities and, thus, on hydrological predictions. Analysing data from 286 areas in Europe and the US, we found that, despite some variations in root zone storage capacity due to changing climatic conditions over multiple decades, these changes are generally minor and have a limited effect on water storage and river flow predictions.
Bu Li, Ting Sun, Fuqiang Tian, Mahmut Tudaji, Li Qin, and Guangheng Ni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4521–4538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4521-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4521-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper developed hybrid semi-distributed hydrological models by employing a process-based model as the backbone and utilizing deep learning to parameterize and replace internal modules. The main contribution is to provide a high-performance tool enriched with explicit hydrological knowledge for hydrological prediction and to improve understanding about the hydrological sensitivities to climate change in large alpine basins.
Dan Elhanati, Nadine Goeppert, and Brian Berkowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4239–4249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4239-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4239-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A continuous time random walk framework was developed to allow modeling of a karst aquifer discharge response to measured rainfall. The application of the numerical model yielded robust fits between modeled and measured discharge values, especially for the distinctive long tails found during recession times. The findings shed light on the interplay of slow and fast flow in the karst system and establish the application of the model for simulating flow and transport in such systems.
Frederik Kratzert, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, and Grey Nearing
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4187–4201, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4187-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4187-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, a special type of neural-network architecture became increasingly popular in hydrology literature. However, in most applications, this model was applied as a one-to-one replacement for hydrology models without adapting or rethinking the experimental setup. In this opinion paper, we show how this is almost always a bad decision and how using these kinds of models requires the use of large-sample hydrology data sets.
Franziska Clerc-Schwarzenbach, Giovanni Selleri, Mattia Neri, Elena Toth, Ilja van Meerveld, and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4219–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show that the differences between the forcing data included in three CAMELS datasets (US, BR, GB) and the forcing data included for the same catchments in the Caravan dataset affect model calibration considerably. The model performance dropped when the data from the Caravan dataset were used instead of the original data. Most of the model performance drop could be attributed to the differences in precipitation data. However, differences were largest for the potential evapotranspiration data.
Ying Zhao, Mehdi Rahmati, Harry Vereecken, and Dani Or
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4059–4063, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Gao et al. (2023) question the importance of soil in hydrology, sparking debate. We acknowledge some valid points but critique their broad, unsubstantiated views on soil's role. Our response highlights three key areas: (1) the false divide between ecosystem-centric and soil-centric approaches, (2) the vital yet varied impact of soil properties, and (3) the call for a scale-aware framework. We aim to unify these perspectives, enhancing hydrology's comprehensive understanding.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Root zone storage capacity (Sumax) changes significantly over multiple decades, reflecting vegetation adaptation to climatic variability. However, this temporal evolution of Sumax cannot explain long-term fluctuations in the partitioning of water fluxes as expressed by deviations ΔIE from the parametric Budyko curve over time with different climatic conditions, and it does not have any significant effects on shorter-term hydrological response characteristics of the upper Neckar catchment.
Zehua Chang, Hongkai Gao, Leilei Yong, Kang Wang, Rensheng Chen, Chuntan Han, Otgonbayar Demberel, Batsuren Dorjsuren, Shugui Hou, and Zheng Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3897–3917, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3897-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
An integrated cryospheric–hydrologic model, FLEX-Cryo, was developed that considers glaciers, snow cover, and frozen soil and their dynamic impacts on hydrology. We utilized it to simulate future changes in cryosphere and hydrology in the Hulu catchment. Our projections showed the two glaciers will melt completely around 2050, snow cover will reduce, and permafrost will degrade. For hydrology, runoff will decrease after the glacier has melted, and permafrost degradation will increase baseflow.
Henry M. Zimba, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Kawawa E. Banda, Petra Hulsman, Nick van de Giesen, Imasiku A. Nyambe, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3633–3663, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The fall and flushing of new leaves in the miombo woodlands co-occur in the dry season before the commencement of seasonal rainfall. The miombo species are also said to have access to soil moisture in deep soils, including groundwater in the dry season. Satellite-based evaporation estimates, temporal trends, and magnitudes differ the most in the dry season, most likely due to inadequate understanding and representation of the highlighted miombo species attributes in simulations.
Louise Akemi Kuana, Arlan Scortegagna Almeida, Emílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri, and Steffen Manfred Noe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3367–3390, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3367-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The authors compared regionalization methods for river flow prediction in 126 catchments from the south of Brazil, a region with humid subtropical and hot temperate climate. The regionalization method based on physiographic–climatic similarity had the best performance for predicting daily and Q95 reference flow. We showed that basins without flow monitoring can have a good approximation of streamflow using machine learning and physiographic–climatic information as inputs.
Huy Dang and Yadu Pokhrel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3347–3365, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3347-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3347-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By examining basin-wide simulations of a river regime over 83 years with and without dams, we present evidence that climate variation was a key driver of hydrologic variabilities in the Mekong River basin (MRB) over the long term; however, dams have largely altered the seasonality of the Mekong’s flow regime and annual flooding patterns in major downstream areas in recent years. These findings could help us rethink the planning of future dams and water resource management in the MRB.
Yongshin Lee, Francesca Pianosi, Andres Peñuela, and Miguel Angel Rico-Ramirez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3261–3279, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Following recent advancements in weather prediction technology, we explored how seasonal weather forecasts (1 or more months ahead) could benefit practical water management in South Korea. Our findings highlight that using seasonal weather forecasts for predicting flow patterns 1 to 3 months ahead is effective, especially during dry years. This suggest that seasonal weather forecasts can be helpful in improving the management of water resources.
Mariam Khanam, Giulia Sofia, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3161–3190, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3161-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Flooding worsens due to climate change, with river dynamics being a key in local flood control. Predicting post-storm geomorphic changes is challenging. Using self-organizing maps and machine learning, this study forecasts post-storm alterations in stage–discharge relationships across 3101 US stream gages. The provided framework can aid in updating hazard assessments by identifying rivers prone to change, integrating channel adjustments into flood hazard assessment.
Yalan Song, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Martyn P. Clark, Dapeng Feng, Kathryn Lawson, Kamlesh Sawadekar, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3051–3077, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Differentiable models (DMs) integrate neural networks and physical equations for accuracy, interpretability, and knowledge discovery. We developed an adjoint-based DM for ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for hydrological modeling, reducing distorted fluxes and physical parameters from errors in models that use explicit and operation-splitting schemes. With a better numerical scheme and improved structure, the adjoint-based DM matches or surpasses long short-term memory (LSTM) performance.
Florian Willkofer, Raul R. Wood, and Ralf Ludwig
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2969–2989, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2969-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Severe flood events pose a threat to riverine areas, yet robust estimates of the dynamics of these events in the future due to climate change are rarely available. Hence, this study uses data from a regional climate model, SMILE, to drive a high-resolution hydrological model for 98 catchments of hydrological Bavaria and exploits the large database to derive robust values for the 100-year flood events. Results indicate an increase in frequency and intensity for most catchments in the future.
Maik Renner and Corina Hauffe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2849–2869, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2849-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2849-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate and land surface changes influence the partitioning of water balance components decisively. Their impact is quantified for 71 catchments in Saxony. Germany. Distinct signatures in the joint water and energy budgets are found: (i) past forest dieback caused a decrease in and subsequent recovery of evapotranspiration in the affected regions, and (ii) the recent shift towards higher aridity imposed a large decline in runoff that has not been seen in the observation records before.
Zhen Cui, Shenglian Guo, Hua Chen, Dedi Liu, Yanlai Zhou, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2809–2829, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble forecasting facilitates reliable flood forecasting and warning. This study couples the copula-based hydrologic uncertainty processor (CHUP) with Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and proposes the novel CHUP-BMA method of reducing inflow forecasting uncertainty of the Three Gorges Reservoir. The CHUP-BMA avoids the normal distribution assumption in the HUP-BMA and considers the constraint of initial conditions, which can improve the deterministic and probabilistic forecast performance.
Mazda Kompanizare, Diogo Costa, Merrin L. Macrae, John W. Pomeroy, and Richard M. Petrone
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2785–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2785-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2785-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new agricultural tile drainage module was developed in the Cold Region Hydrological Model platform. Tile flow and water levels are simulated by considering the effect of capillary fringe thickness, drainable water and seasonal regional groundwater dynamics. The model was applied to a small well-instrumented farm in southern Ontario, Canada, where there are concerns about the impacts of agricultural drainage into Lake Erie.
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Nicole Bäuerle, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2705–2719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological hybrid models promise to merge the performance of deep learning methods with the interpretability of process-based models. One hybrid approach is the dynamic parameterization of conceptual models using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. We explored this method to evaluate the effect of the flexibility given by LSTMs on the process-based part.
Adam Griffin, Alison L. Kay, Paul Sayers, Victoria Bell, Elizabeth Stewart, and Sam Carr
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2635–2650, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Widespread flooding is a major problem in the UK and is greatly affected by climate change and land-use change. To look at how widespread flooding changes in the future, climate model data (UKCP18) were used with a hydrological model (Grid-to-Grid) across the UK, and 14 400 events were identified between two time slices: 1980–2010 and 2050–2080. There was a strong increase in the number of winter events in the future time slice and in the peak return periods.
Alberto Montanari, Bruno Merz, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2603–2615, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Floods often take communities by surprise, as they are often considered virtually
impossibleyet are an ever-present threat similar to the sword suspended over the head of Damocles in the classical Greek anecdote. We discuss four reasons why extremely large floods carry a risk that is often larger than expected. We provide suggestions for managing the risk of megafloods by calling for a creative exploration of hazard scenarios and communicating the unknown corners of the reality of floods.
Peter Reichert, Kai Ma, Marvin Höge, Fabrizio Fenicia, Marco Baity-Jesi, Dapeng Feng, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2505–2529, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the predicted change in catchment outlet discharge to precipitation and temperature change for conceptual and machine learning hydrological models. We found that machine learning models, despite providing excellent fit and prediction capabilities, can be unreliable regarding the prediction of the effect of temperature change for low-elevation catchments. This indicates the need for caution when applying them for the prediction of the effect of climate change.
Nicolás Álamos, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Ariel Muñoz, and Álvaro González-Reyes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2483–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we assess the effects of climate and water use on streamflow reductions and drought intensification during the last 3 decades in central Chile. We address this by contrasting streamflow observations with near-natural streamflow simulations. We conclude that while the lack of precipitation dominates streamflow reductions in the megadrought, water uses have not diminished during this time, causing a worsening of the hydrological drought conditions and maladaptation conditions.
Fengjing Liu, Martha H. Conklin, and Glenn D. Shaw
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2239–2258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2239-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2239-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snowpack has been declining and more precipitation falls as rain than snow. Using stable isotopes, we found flows and flow duration in Yosemite Creek are most sensitive to climate warming due to strong evaporation of waterfalls, potentially lengthening the dry-up period of waterfalls in summer and negatively affecting tourism. Groundwater recharge in Yosemite Valley is primarily from the upper snow–rain transition (2000–2500 m) and very vulnerable to a reduction in the snow–rain ratio.
Léonard Santos, Vazken Andréassian, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Göran Lindström, Alban de Lavenne, Charles Perrin, Lila Collet, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-80, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-80, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This work aims at investigating how hydrological models can be transferred to a period in which climatic conditions are different to the ones of the period in which it was set up. The RAT method, built to detect dependencies between model error and climatic drivers, was applied to 3 different hydrological models on 352 catchments in Denmark, France and Sweden. Potential issues are detected for a significant number of catchments for the 3 models even though these catchments differ for each model.
Fabian Merk, Timo Schaffhauser, Faizan Anwar, Ye Tuo, Jean-Martial Cohard, and Markus Disse
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-131, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-131, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
ET is computed from vegetation (plant transpiration) and soil (soil evaporation). In Western Africa, plant transpiration correlates with vegetation growth. Vegetation is often represented with the leaf-area-index (LAI). In this study, we evaluate the importance of LAI for the ET calculation. We take a close look at the LAI-ET interaction and show the relevance to consider both, LAI and ET. Our work contributes to the understanding of the processes of the terrestrial water cycle.
Qiutong Yu, Bryan A. Tolson, Hongren Shen, Ming Han, Juliane Mai, and Jimmy Lin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2107–2122, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2107-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2107-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to incorporate input variables' spatial distribution information when implementing long short-term memory (LSTM) models for streamflow prediction. This work presents a novel hybrid modelling approach to predict streamflow while accounting for spatial variability. We evaluated the performance against lumped LSTM predictions in 224 basins across the Great Lakes region in North America. This approach shows promise for predicting streamflow in large, ungauged basin.
Marcus Buechel, Louise Slater, and Simon Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2081–2105, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Afforestation has been proposed internationally, but the hydrological implications of such large increases in the spatial extent of woodland are not fully understood. In this study, we use a land surface model to simulate hydrology across Great Britain with realistic afforestation scenarios and potential climate changes. Countrywide afforestation minimally influences hydrology, when compared to climate change, and reduces low streamflow whilst not lowering the highest flows.
Qian Zhu, Xiaodong Qin, Dongyang Zhou, Tiantian Yang, and Xinyi Song
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1665–1686, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1665-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Input data, model and calibration strategy can affect the accuracy of flood event simulation and prediction. Satellite-based precipitation with different spatiotemporal resolutions is an important input source. Data-driven models are sometimes proven to be more accurate than hydrological models. Event-based calibration and conventional strategy are two options adopted for flood simulation. This study targets the three concerns for accurate flood event simulation and prediction.
Fabio Ciulla and Charuleka Varadharajan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1617–1651, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new method based on network science for unsupervised classification of large datasets and apply it to classify 9067 US catchments and 274 biophysical traits at multiple scales. We find that our trait-based approach produces catchment classes with distinct streamflow behavior and that spatial patterns emerge amongst pristine and human-impacted catchments. This method can be widely used beyond hydrology to identify patterns, reduce trait redundancy, and select representative sites.
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1539–1566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasting is useful for many applications, ranging from population safety (e.g. floods) to water resource management (e.g. agriculture or hydropower). To this end, hydrological models must be optimized. However, a model is inherently wrong. This study aims to analyse the contribution of a multi-model approach within a variable spatial framework to improve streamflow simulations. The underlying idea is to take advantage of the strength of each modelling framework tested.
Lele Shu, Xiaodong Li, Yan Chang, Xianhong Meng, Hao Chen, Yuan Qi, Hongwei Wang, Zhaoguo Li, and Shihua Lyu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1477–1491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new model to better understand how water moves in a lake basin. Our model improves upon previous methods by accurately capturing the complexity of water movement, both on the surface and subsurface. Our model, tested using data from China's Qinghai Lake, accurately replicates complex water movements and identifies contributing factors of the lake's water balance. The findings provide a robust tool for predicting hydrological processes, aiding water resource planning.
Ricardo Mantilla, Morgan Fonley, and Nicolás Velásquez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1373–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists strive to “Be right for the right reasons” when modeling the hydrologic cycle; however, the datasets available to validate hydrological models are sparse, and in many cases, they comprise streamflow observations at the outlets of large catchments. In this work, we show that matching streamflow observations at the outlet of a large basin is not a reliable indicator of a correct description of the small-scale runoff processes.
Lillian M. McGill, E. Ashley Steel, and Aimee H. Fullerton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1351–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the relationship between air and river temperatures in Washington's Snoqualmie and Wenatchee basins. We used classification and regression approaches to show that the sensitivity of river temperature to air temperature is variable across basins and controlled largely by geology and snowmelt. Findings can be used to inform strategies for river basin restoration and conservation, such as identifying climate-insensitive areas of the basin that should be preserved and protected.
Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1191–1213, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To determine if deep learning models are in general a viable alternative to traditional hydrologic modelling techniques in Australian catchments, a comparison of river–runoff predictions is made between traditional conceptual models and deep learning models in almost 500 catchments spread over the continent. It is found that the deep learning models match or outperform the traditional models in over two-thirds of the river catchments, indicating feasibility in a wide variety of conditions.
Patricio Yeste, Matilde García-Valdecasas Ojeda, Sonia R. Gámiz-Fortis, Yolanda Castro-Díez, Axel Bronstert, and María Jesús Esteban-Parra
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-57, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-57, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Integrating streamflow and evaporation data can help improve the physical realism of hydrologic models. In this work we investigate the capabilities of the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) to reproduce both hydrologic variables for 189 headwater located in Spain. Results from sensitivity analysis indicate that adding two vegetation is enough to improve the representation of evaporation, and the performance of VIC exceeded that of the largest modelling effort currently available in Spain.
Dipti Tiwari, Mélanie Trudel, and Robert Leconte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1127–1146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Calibrating hydrological models with multi-objective functions enhances model robustness. By using spatially distributed snow information in the calibration, the model performance can be enhanced without compromising the outputs. In this study the HYDROTEL model was calibrated in seven different experiments, incorporating the SPAEF (spatial efficiency) metric alongside Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE), with the aim of identifying the optimal calibration strategy.
Luis Andres De la Fuente, Mohammad Reza Ehsani, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Laura Elizabeth Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 945–971, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Long short-term memory (LSTM) is a widely used machine-learning model in hydrology, but it is difficult to extract knowledge from it. We propose HydroLSTM, which represents processes like a hydrological reservoir. Models based on HydroLSTM perform similarly to LSTM while requiring fewer cell states. The learned parameters are informative about the dominant hydrology of a catchment. Our results show how parsimony and hydrological knowledge extraction can be achieved by using the new structure.
Louise Mimeau, Annika Künne, Flora Branger, Sven Kralisch, Alexandre Devers, and Jean-Philippe Vidal
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 851–871, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Modelling flow intermittence is essential for predicting the future evolution of drying in river networks and better understanding the ecological and socio-economic impacts. However, modelling flow intermittence is challenging, and observed data on temporary rivers are scarce. This study presents a new modelling approach for predicting flow intermittence in river networks and shows that combining different sources of observed data reduces the model uncertainty.
Elena Macdonald, Bruno Merz, Björn Guse, Viet Dung Nguyen, Xiaoxiang Guan, and Sergiy Vorogushyn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 833–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-833-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-833-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some rivers, the occurrence of extreme flood events is more likely than in other rivers – they have heavy-tailed distributions. We find that threshold processes in the runoff generation lead to such a relatively high occurrence probability of extremes. Further, we find that beyond a certain return period, i.e. for rare events, rainfall is often the dominant control compared to runoff generation. Our results can help to improve the estimation of the occurrence probability of extreme floods.
Alberto Bassi, Marvin Höge, Antonietta Mira, Fabrizio Fenicia, and Carlo Albert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-47, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-47, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
The goal is to remove the impact of meteorological drivers in order to uncover the unique landscape fingerprints of a catchment from streamflow data. Our results reveal an optimal two-feature summary for most catchments, with a third feature needed for challenging cases, associated with aridity and intermittent flow. Baseflow index, aridity, and soil/vegetation attributes strongly correlate with learned features, indicating their importance for streamflow prediction.
Claire Kouba and Thomas Harter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 691–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some watersheds, the severity of the dry season has a large impact on aquatic ecosystems. In this study, we design a way to predict, 5–6 months in advance, how severe the dry season will be in a rural watershed in northern California. This early warning can support seasonal adaptive management. To predict these two values, we assess data about snow, rain, groundwater, and river flows. We find that maximum snowpack and total wet season rainfall best predict dry season severity.
Yi Nan and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 669–689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper utilized a tracer-aided model validated by multiple datasets in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau to analyze hydrological sensitivity to climate change. The spatial pattern of the local hydrological sensitivities and the influence factors were analyzed in particular. The main finding of this paper is that the local hydrological sensitivity in mountainous basins is determined by the relationship between the glacier area ratio and the mean annual precipitation.
Michael J. Vlah, Matthew R. V. Ross, Spencer Rhea, and Emily S. Bernhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 545–573, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Virtual stream gauging enables continuous streamflow estimation where a gauge might be difficult or impractical to install. We reconstructed flow at 27 gauges of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), informing ~199 site-months of missing data in the official record and improving that accuracy of official estimates at 11 sites. This study shows that machine learning, but also routine regression methods, can be used to supplement existing gauge networks and reduce monitoring costs.
Sungwook Wi and Scott Steinschneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 479–503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate whether deep learning (DL) models can produce physically plausible streamflow projections under climate change. We address this question by focusing on modeled responses to increases in temperature and potential evapotranspiration and by employing three DL and three process-based hydrological models. The results suggest that physical constraints regarding model architecture and input are necessary to promote the physical realism of DL hydrological projections under climate change.
Guillaume Evin, Matthieu Le Lay, Catherine Fouchier, David Penot, Francois Colleoni, Alexandre Mas, Pierre-André Garambois, and Olivier Laurantin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 261–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological modelling of mountainous catchments is challenging for many reasons, the main one being the temporal and spatial representation of precipitation forcings. This study presents an evaluation of the hydrological modelling of 55 small mountainous catchments of the northern French Alps, focusing on the influence of the type of precipitation reanalyses used as inputs. These evaluations emphasize the added value of radar measurements, in particular for the reproduction of flood events.
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 139–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
How suspended sediment export from glacierized high-alpine areas responds to future climate change is hardly assessable as many interacting processes are involved, and appropriate physical models are lacking. We present the first study, to our knowledge, exploring machine learning to project sediment export until 2100 in two high-alpine catchments. We find that uncertainties due to methodological limitations are small until 2070. Negative trends imply that peak sediment may have already passed.
Cited articles
Aich, V., Liersch, S., Vetter, T., Fournet, S., Andersson, J. C. M., Calmanti,
S., Van Weert, F. H. A., Hattermann, F. F., and Paton, E. N.: Flood projections
within the Niger River Basin under future land use and climate change, Sci.
Total Environ., 562, 666–677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.021, 2016.
Arnell, N. W.: Uncertainty in the relationship between climate forcing and hydrological response in UK catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 897–912, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-897-2011, 2011.
Avesani, D., Galletti, A., Piccolroaz, S., Bellin, A., and Majone, B.: A dual
layer MPI continuous large-scale hydrological model including Human Systems,
Environ. Model. Softw., 139, 105003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105003,
2021.
Avesani, D., Zanfei, A., Di Marco, N., Galletti, A., Ravazzolo, F., Righetti, M.,
and Majone, B.: Short-term hydropower optimization driven by innovative
time-adapting econometric model, Appl. Energy, 310, 118510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118510, 2022.
Bard, A., Renard, B., Lang, M., Giuntoli, I., Korck, J., Koboltschnig, G.,
Janža, M., D'Amico, M., and Volken, D.: Trends in the hydrologic regime of
Alpine rivers, J. Hydrol., 529, 1823–1837,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.052, 2015.
Bellin, A., Majone, B., Cainelli, O., Alberici, D., and Villa, F.: A
continuous coupled hydrological and water resources management model,
Environ. Model. Softw., 75, 176–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.013,
2016.
Beven, K. J. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model
calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992.
Beven, K. and Westerberg, I.: On red herrings and real herrings:
disinformation and information in hydrological inference, Hydrol. Process.,
25, 1676–1680, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7963, 2011.
Blazkova, S. and Beven, K.: A limits of acceptability approach to model
evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by
continuous simulation: Skalka catchment, Czech Republic, Water Resour. Res.,
45, W00B16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006726, 2009.
Bouwer, L. M.: Projections of Future Extreme Weather Losses Under Changes in
Climate and Exposure, Risk Anal., 33, 915–930,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01880.x, 2013.
Brigode, P., Oudin, L., and Perrin, C.: Hydrological model parameter
instability: a source of additional uncertainty in estimating the
hydrological impacts of climate change?, J. Hydrol., 476, 410–425,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.012, 2013.
Brigode, P., Paquet, E., Bernardara, P., Gailhard, J., Garavaglia, F.,
Ribstein, P., Bourgin, F., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V.: Dependence of
model-based extreme flood estimation on the calibration period: the case
study of the Kamp River (Austria), Hydrolog. Sci. J., 60,
1424–1437, doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1006632, 2015.
Brunner, M. I., Farinotti, D., Zekollari, H., Huss, M., and Zappa, M.: Future shifts in extreme flow regimes in Alpine regions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4471–4489, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4471-2019, 2019.
Buytaert, W. and De Bièvre, B.: Water for cities: the impact of climate
change and demographic growth in the tropical Andes, Water Resour. Res., 48,
W08503, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011755, 2012.
Calenda, G., Mancini, C. P., and Volpi, E.: Selection of the probabilistic
model of extreme floods: The case of the River Tiber in Rome, J. Hydrol.,
371, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.010, 2009.
Chiew, F., Teng, J., Vaze, J., Post, D., Perraud, J., Kirono, D., and Viney,
N.: Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia,
Method, results, and implications of the modeling method, Water Resour.
Res., 45, W10414, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007338, 2009.
Chiogna, G., Majone, B., Cano Paoli, K., Diamantini, E., Stella, E.,
Mallucci, S., Lencioni, V., Zandonai, F., and Bellin, A.: A review of
hydrological and chemical stressors in the Adige basin and its ecological
status, Sci. Tot. Env., 540, 429–443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.149,
2016.
Clark, M. P., Wilby, R. L., Gutmann, E. D., Vano, J. A., Gangopadhyay, S.,
Wood, A. W., Fowler, H. J., Prudhomme, C., Arnold, J. R., and Brekke, L. D.:
Characterizing Uncertainty of the Hydrologic Impacts of Climate Change,
Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 2, 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0034-x, 2016.
Conover, W. J.: Practical Nonparametric Statistics, Third edition, Wiley
Series in Probability and Statistics: Applied Probability and Statistics
Section, John Wiley & Sons. INC., New York, ISBN 9780471160687, 1999.
Diamantini, E., Lutz, S. R., Mallucci, S., Majone, B., Merz, R., and Bellin,
A.: Driver detection of water quality trends in three large European river
basins, Sci. Total Environ., 612, 49–62,
doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.172, 2018.
Di Sante, F., Coppola, E., and Giorgi, F.: Projections of river floods in
Europe using EURO-CORDEX, CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations, Int. J. Climatol., 41, 3203–3221, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7014, 2019.
Earth System Grid Federation: EURO-CORDEX, euro-cordex [data set], https://www.euro-cordex.net/060378/index.php.en, last access: 15 July 2022.
Eden, J. M., Widmann, M., Maraun, D., and Vrac, M.: Comparison of GCM- and
RCM-simulated precipitation following stochastic postprocessing, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 11040–11053, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021732, 2014.
Efron, B.: The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans,
Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics CBMS-NSF Monographs, 38, ISBN 0898711797, 1982.
Fenicia, F., Kavetski, D., Reichert, P., and Albert, C.: Signature-domain
calibration of hydrological models using approximate Bayesian computation:
Empirical analysis of fundamental properties. Water Resour. Res., 54,
3958–3987, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021616, 2018.
Fiori, A., Cvetkovic, V., Dagan, G., Attinger, S., Bellin, A., Dietrich, P.,
Zech, A., and Teutsch, G.: Debates-stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: The
relevance of stochastic subsurface hydrology to practical problems of
contaminant transport and remediation. What is characterization and
stochastic theory good for?, Water Resour. Res., 52, 9228–9234,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017525, 2016.
Galletti, A., Avesani, D., Bellin, A., and Majone, B.: Detailed simulation of
storage hydropower systems in large Alpine watersheds, J. Hydrol., 603,
127125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127125, 2021.
Gampe, D., Nikulin, G., and Ludwig, R.: Using an ensemble of regional climate
models to assess climate change impacts on water scarcity in European river
basins, Sci. Total Environ., 573, 1503–1518, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.053, 2016.
Gobiet, A., Kotlarski, S., Beniston, M., Heinrich, G., Rajczak, J. and
Stoffel, M.: 21st century climate change in the European Alps, A
review, Sci. Total Environ., 493, 1138–1151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.050, 2014.
Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation, Oxford
University Press, 483 p., ISBN 9780195115383, 1997.
Grubbs, F. E.: Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples,
Technometrics 11, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1969.10490657, 1969.
Gumbel, E. J.: The return period of flood flows, Ann. Math Stat., 12,
163–190, 1941.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition
of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, 2009.
Guthke, A.: Defensible model complexity: A call for data-based and
goal-oriented model choice, Groundwater, 55, 646–650,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12554, 2017.
Hargreaves, G. H. and Samani, Z. A.: Estimating potential evapotranspiration,
J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 108, 225–230, 1989.
Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., and Lister, D. H.: Updated
high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10
dataset, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 623–642, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711, 2014.
Hattermann, F. F., Vetter, T., Breuer, L., Su, B., Daggupati, P., Donnelly,
C., Fekete, B., Florke F., Gosling, S.N., Hoffmann, P., Liersch, S., Masaki,
Y., Motovilov, Y., Muller, C., Samaniego, L., Stacke, T., Wada, Y., Yang,
T., and Krysnaova, V.: Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 015006,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9938, 2018.
Haylock, M. R., Hofstra, N., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Klok, E. J., Jones, P.
D., and New, M.: A European daily high-resolution gridded dataset of
surface temperature and precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20119,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010201, 2008.
Heistermann, M. and Kneis, D.: Benchmarking quantitative precipitation
estimation by conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 47,
W06514, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009153, 2011.
Hock, R.: Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas, J. Hydrol.,
282, 104–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9, 2003.
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., and Volinsky, C. T.: Bayesian
model averaging: A tutorial, Stat. Sci., 14, 382–417, 1999.
Hofstra, N., Haylock, M., New, M., and Jones, P. D.: Testing E-OBS European
high-resolution gridded data set of daily precipitation and surface
temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D21101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011799, 2009.
Hofstra, N., New, M., and McSweeney, C.: The influence of interpolation and
station network density on the distributions and trends of climate variables
in gridded daily data, Clim. Dyn. 35, 841–858, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0698-1, 2010.
Honti, M., Scheidegger, A., and Stamm, C.: The importance of hydrological uncertainty assessment methods in climate change impact studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3301–3317, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3301-2014, 2014.
Hosking, J. R.: Maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of the
generalized extreme-value distribution, Appl. Stat., 34, 301–310,
https://doi.org/10.2307/2347483, 1985.
Isotta, F. A., Frei, C., Weilguni, V., Perčec Tadić, M.,
Lassègues, P., Rudolf, B., Pavan, V., Cacciamani, C., Antolini, G.,
Ratto, S.M., Munari, M., Micheletti, S., Bonati, V., Lussana, C., Ronchi,
C., Panettieri, E., Marigo, G., and Vertačnik, G.: The climate of daily
precipitation in the Alps: development and analysis of a high-resolution
grid dataset from pan-Alpine rain-gauge data, Int. J. Climatol., 34,
1657–1675, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3794, 2014.
Jacob, D., Petersen, J., Eggert, B., Alias, A., Christensen, O. B., Bouwer,
L. M., Braun, A., Georgopoulou, E., Gobiet, A., Menut, L., Nikulin, G.,
Haensler, A., Hempelmann, N., Jones, C., Keuler, K., Kovats, S., Kröner, N., Kotlarski, S.,
Kriegsmann, A., Martin, E., van Meijgaard, E., Moseley, C., Pfeifer, S., Preuschmann, S.,
Radermacher, C., Radtke, K., Rechid, D., Rounsevell, M., Samuelsson, P., Somot, S.,
Soussana, J.-F., Teichmann, C., Valentini, R., Vautard, R., Weber, B., and Yiuou, P.: EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution
climate change projections for European impact research, Reg. Environ.
Chang., 14, 563–578, 2014.
Journel, A. G. and Rossi, M. E.: When do we need a trend model in kriging?,
Math. Geol., 21, 715–739, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00893318, 1989.
Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of
IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Institute of Electrical
& Electronics Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth,
Western Australia, 1942–1948, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968, 1995.
Kleinen, T. and Petschel-Held, G.: Integrated assessment of changes in
flooding probabilities due to climate change, Clim. Change, 81, 283–312,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9159-6, 2007.
Kotlarski, S., Keuler, K., Christensen, O. B., Colette, A., Déqué, M., Gobiet, A., Goergen, K., Jacob, D., Lüthi, D., van Meijgaard, E., Nikulin, G., Schär, C., Teichmann, C., Vautard, R., Warrach-Sagi, K., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1297–1333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014, 2014.
Kundzewicz, Z., Mata, L., Arnell, N., Döll, P., Kabat, P., Jiménez,
B., Miller, K., Oki, T., Shen, Z., and Shiklomanov, I.: Freshwater resources
and their management, in: Climate change: Impacts, adaptation and
vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change, edited by: Parry,
M., Canziani, O., Palutikof, J., van der Linden, P., and Hanson, C., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 173–210, 2007.
Laio, F., Allamano, P., and Claps, P.: Exploiting the information content of hydrological ”outliers” for goodness-of-fit testing, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1909–1917, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1909-2010, 2010.
Laiti, L., Mallucci, S., Piccolroaz, S., Bellin, A., Zardi, D., Fiori, A.,
Nikulin, G., and Majone, B.: Testing the hydrological coherence of
high-resolution gridded precipitation and temperature datasets, Water Resour. Res., 54, 1999–2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021633, 2018.
Landelius, T., Dahlgren, P., Gollvik, S., Jansson, A., and Olsson, E.: A
high-resolution regional reanalysis for Europe, Part 2: 2D analysis of
surface temperature, precipitation and wind, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2813, 2016.
Larsen, S., Majone, B., Zulian, P., Stella, E., Bellin, A., Bruno, M. C.,
and Zolezzi, G.: Combining hydrologic simulations and stream-network models
to reveal flow-ecology relationships in a large Alpine catchment, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028496, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028496,
2021.
Lespinas, F., Ludwig, W., and Heussner, S.: Hydrological and climatic
uncertainties associated with modeling the impact of climate change on water
resources of small Mediterranean coastal rivers, J. Hydrol., 511, 403–422,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.033, 2014.
Lindenschmidt, K. E.: Using stage frequency distributions as objective
functions for model calibration and global sensitivity analyses, Environ.
Model. Softw., 92, 169–175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.027,
2017.
Lutz, S. R., Mallucci, S., Diamantini, E., Majone, B., Bellin, A., and Merz,
R.: Hydroclimatic and water quality trends across three Mediterranean river
basins, Sci. Tot. Env., 571, 1392–1406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.102,
2016.
Majone, B., Bertagnoli, A., and Bellin, A.: A non-linear runoff generation
model in small Alpine catchments, J. Hydrol., 385, 300–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.033, 2010.
Majone, B., Bovolo, C. I., Bellin, A., Blenkinsop, S., and Fowler, J.:
Modeling the impacts of future climate change on water resources for the
Gállego river basin, Spain, Water Resour. Res., 48, W01512,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010985, 2012.
Majone, B., Villa, F., Deidda, R., and Bellin, A.: Impact of climate change and
water use policies on hydropower potential in the south-eastern Alpine
region, Sci. Tot. Env., 543, 965–980,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.009, 2016.
Mallucci, S., Majone, B., and Bellin, A.: Detection and attribution of
hydrological changes in a large Alpine river basin, J. Hydrol.,
575, 1214–1229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.020, 2019.
Mcmillan, H., Westerberg, I., and Branger, F.: Five guidelines for
selecting hydrological signatures. Hydrol. Process., 31,
4757–4761, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11300, 2017.
Meresa, H. K. and Romanowicz, R. J.: The critical role of uncertainty in projections of hydrological extremes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4245–4258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4245-2017, 2017.
Michel, C., Andreassian, V., and Perrin, C.: Soil Conservation Service Curve
Number method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure?,
Water Resour. Res., 41, W02011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003191, 2005.
Mizukami, N., Rakovec, O., Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Wood, A. W., Gupta, H. V., and Kumar, R.: On the choice of calibration metrics for “high-flow” estimation using hydrologic models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2601–2614, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2601-2019, 2019.
Montanari, A. and Toth, E.: Calibration of hydrological models in the
spectral domain: An opportunity for scarcely gauged basins?, Water Resour.
Res., 43, W05434, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005184, 2007.
Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H. H. G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren,
L. L., Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K.,
Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer, B., Boegh, E., Schymanski, S. J., Di Baldassarre, G.,
Yu, B., Hubert, P., Huang, Y., Schumann, A., Post, D. A., Srinivasan, V., Harman, C.,
Thompson, S., Rogger, M., Viglione, A., McMillan, H., Characklis, G., Pang, Z., and Belyaev. V.: “Panta Rhei-Everything Flows”: Change in
hydrology and society – The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1256–1275, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088,
2013.
Muñoz, E., Arumí, J. L., and Rivera, D.: Watersheds are not static:
Implications of climate variability and hydrologic dynamics in modelling,
Bosque (Valdivia), 34, 7–11, https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002013000100002,
2013.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual
models part I. A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
Ngongondo, C., Li, L., Gong, L., Xu, C., and Alemawm, B. F: Flood frequency
under changing climate in the upper Kafue River basin, southern Africa: a
large scale hydrological model application, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk.
Assess., 27, 1883–1898, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0724-z, 2013.
Pearson, K.: On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the
probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can
be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling, Philosophical
Magazine Series 5, 302, 157–175, 1900.
Pechlivanidis, I. G., Arheimer, B., Donnelly, C., Hundecha, Y., Huang, S.,
Aich, V., Samaniego, L., Eisner, S., and Shi, P.: Analysis of hydrological
extremes at different hydro-climatic regimes under present and future
conditions, Clim. Change, 141, 467–481, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1723-0,
2017.
Peel, M. C. and Blöschl, G.: Hydrological modelling in a changing
world, Prog. Phys. Geog., 35, 249–261,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311402550, 2011.
Perrin, C., Oudin, L., Andreassian, V., Rojas-Serna, C., Michel, C., and
Mathevet, T.: Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the
parameters of rainfall-runoff models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52,
131–151, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.1.131, 2007.
Piccolroaz, S., Majone, B., Palmieri, F., Cassiani, G., and Bellin, A.: On
the use of spatially distributed, time-lapse microgravity surveys to inform
hydrological modeling, Water Resour. Res., 51, 7270–7288,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016994, 2015.
Piccolroaz, S., Di Lazzaro, M., Zarlenga, A., Majone, B., Bellin, A., and Fiori, A.: HYPERstream: a multi-scale framework for streamflow routing in large-scale hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2047–2061, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, 2016.
Protter, M. H. and Morrey, C. B.: College Calculus with Analytic Geometry, Second Edition (1 January 1970),
Addison-Wesley VLSI Systems Series, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ISBN 9780201060010, 1977.
Rango, A. and Martinec, J.: Revisiting the degree-day method for snowmelt
computations, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 31, 657–669,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03392.x, 1995.
Rinaldo, A., Marani, A., and Rigon, R.: Geomorphological dispersion, Water
Resour. Res., 27, 513–525, https://doi.org/10.1029/90WR02501, 1991.
Schaefli, B. and Gupta, H. V.: Do Nash values have value?, Hydrol.
Process., 21, 2075–2080, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6825, 2007.
Seibert, J. and Beven, K. J.: Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 883–892, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-883-2009, 2009.
Smirnov, N. V.: Estimate of deviation between empirical distribution
functions in two independent samples, (Russian) Bull. Moscow Univ., 2,
3–16, 1939.
Taye, M. T., Ntegeka, V., Ogiramoi, N. P., and Willems, P.: Assessment of climate change impact on hydrological extremes in two source regions of the Nile River Basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-209-2011, 2011.
Thirel, G., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Audouy, J.-N., Berthet, L.,
Edwards, P., Folton, N.,
Furusho, C., Kuentz, A., Lerat, J., Lindström, G., Martin, E., Mathevet, T., Merz, R., Parajka, J.,
Ruelland, D., and Vaze, J.: Hydrology under change: an evaluation
protocol to investigate how hydrological models deal with changing
catchments, Hydrol. Sci. J., 60, 1184–1199,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.967248, 2014.
Thornton, P. K., Ericksen P. J., Herrero M., and Challinor, A. J.: Climate
variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review, Glob. Change
Biol., 20, 3313–3328, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12581, 2014.
Todd, M. C., Taylor, R. G., Osborn, T. J., Kingston, D. G., Arnell, N. W., and Gosling, S. N.: Uncertainty in climate change impacts on basin-scale freshwater resources – preface to the special issue: the QUEST-GSI methodology and synthesis of results, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1035–1046, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1035-2011, 2011.
Vaze, J., Post, D. A., Chiew, F. H. S., Perraud, J. M., Viney, N. R., and Teng, J.:
Climate non-stationarity – validity of calibrated rainfall-runoff models for
use in climate change studies, J. Hydrol. 394, 447–457,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.018, 2010.
Vetter, T., Reinhardt, J., Flörke, M., van Griensven, A., Hattermann,
F., Huang, S., Koch, H., Pechlivanidis, I.G., Plötner, S., Seidou, O.,
Su, B., Vervoort, R. W., and Krysanova, V.: Evaluation of sources of
uncertainty in projected hydrological changes under climate change in
large-scale river basins, Clim. Change, 141, 419–433,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1794-y, 2017.
Vogel, R. M. and Fennessey, N. M.: Flow-Duration Curves. 1: New
Interpretation and Confidence-Intervals, Planning and
Management, J. Water Res., 120, 485–504, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:4(485),
1994.
Vrzel, J., Ludwig, R., Gampe, D., and Ogrinc, N.: Hydrological system
behavior of an alluvial aquifer under climate change, Sci. Total Environ.,
649, 1179–1188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.396, 2019.
Wang, W., Chen, X., Shi, P., and van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M.: Detecting changes in extreme precipitation and extreme streamflow in the Dongjiang River Basin in southern China, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 207–221, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-207-2008, 2008.
Wang, A. and Solomatine, D. P.: Practical Experience of Sensitivity
Analysis: Comparing Six Methods, on Three Hydrological Models, with Three
Performance Criteria, Water, 11, 1062, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051062, 2019.
Weibull, W.: A statistical theory of strength of materials., Ing. Vetensk.
Akad. Handl., 151, 1–45, 1939.
Westerberg, I. K., Guerrero, J.-L., Younger, P. M., Beven, K. J., Seibert, J., Halldin, S., Freer, J. E., and Xu, C.-Y.: Calibration of hydrological models using flow-duration curves, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2205–2227, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2205-2011, 2011.
Wilby, R. L. and Harris, I.: A framework for assessing uncertainties in
climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK, Water
Resour. Res., 42, W02419, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004065, 2006.
Wilcke, R. A. I. and Bärring, L.: Selecting regional climate scenarios for
impact modelling studies, Environ. Model. Softw., 78, 191–201,
10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.01.002, 2016.
Wu, Q., Liu, S., Cai, Y., Li, X., and Jiang, Y.: Improvement of hydrological model calibration by selecting multiple parameter ranges, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 393–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-393-2017, 2017.
Yang, W., Andréasson, J., Graham, L. P., Olsson, J., Rosberg, J., and
Wetterhall, F.: Distribution based scaling to improve usability of regional
climate model projections for hydrological climate change impacts studies,
Hydrol. Res., 41, 211–229, 10.2166/nh.2010.004, 2010.
Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S.: Automatic calibration of conceptual
rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. J. Hydrol. 181,
23–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02918-4, 1996.
Zolezzi, G., Bellin, A., Bruno, M. C., Maiolini, B., and Siviglia, A.:
Assessing hydrological alterations at multiple temporal scales: Adige River,
Italy, Water Resour. Res., 45, W12421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007266, 2009.
Short summary
In this work, we introduce a methodology for devising reliable future high streamflow scenarios from climate change simulations. The calibration of a hydrological model is carried out to maximize the probability that the modeled and observed high flow extremes belong to the same statistical population. Application to the Adige River catchment (southeastern Alps, Italy) showed that this procedure produces reliable quantiles of the annual maximum streamflow for use in assessment studies.
In this work, we introduce a methodology for devising reliable future high streamflow scenarios...