Articles | Volume 26, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3863-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3863-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Analysis of high streamflow extremes in climate change studies: how do we calibrate hydrological models?
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
Diego Avesani
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
Patrick Zulian
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
Aldo Fiori
Department of Engineering, Roma Tre University, 00154 Rome, Italy
Alberto Bellin
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy
Related authors
Michael Matiu, Alice Crespi, Giacomo Bertoldi, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Christoph Marty, Samuel Morin, Wolfgang Schöner, Daniele Cat Berro, Gabriele Chiogna, Ludovica De Gregorio, Sven Kotlarski, Bruno Majone, Gernot Resch, Silvia Terzago, Mauro Valt, Walter Beozzo, Paola Cianfarra, Isabelle Gouttevin, Giorgia Marcolini, Claudia Notarnicola, Marcello Petitta, Simon C. Scherrer, Ulrich Strasser, Michael Winkler, Marc Zebisch, Andrea Cicogna, Roberto Cremonini, Andrea Debernardi, Mattia Faletto, Mauro Gaddo, Lorenzo Giovannini, Luca Mercalli, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Andrea Sušnik, Alberto Trenti, Stefano Urbani, and Viktor Weilguni
The Cryosphere, 15, 1343–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The first Alpine-wide assessment of station snow depth has been enabled by a collaborative effort of the research community which involves more than 30 partners, 6 countries, and more than 2000 stations. It shows how snow in the European Alps matches the climatic zones and gives a robust estimate of observed changes: stronger decreases in the snow season at low elevations and in spring at all elevations, however, with considerable regional differences.
Sebastiano Piccolroaz, Michele Di Lazzaro, Antonio Zarlenga, Bruno Majone, Alberto Bellin, and Aldo Fiori
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2047–2061, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We present HYPERstream, an innovative, parsimonious, and computationally efficient streamflow routing scheme based on the width function instantaneous unit hydrograph theory. HYPERstream is designed to be easily coupled with climate models and to preserve the geomorphological dispersion of the river network, irrespective of the model grid size. This makes HYPERstream well suited for multi-scale applications (from catchment up to continental scale) and to investigate extreme events (e.g. floods).
Jiancong Chen, Bhavna Arora, Alberto Bellin, and Yoram Rubin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4127–4146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4127-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4127-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a stochastic framework with indicator random variables to characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of environmental hot spots and hot moments (HSHMs) that represent rare locations and events exerting a disproportionate influence over the environment. HSHMs are characterized by static and dynamic indicators. This framework is advantageous as it allows us to calculate the uncertainty associated with HSHMs based on uncertainty associated with its contributors.
Michael Matiu, Alice Crespi, Giacomo Bertoldi, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Christoph Marty, Samuel Morin, Wolfgang Schöner, Daniele Cat Berro, Gabriele Chiogna, Ludovica De Gregorio, Sven Kotlarski, Bruno Majone, Gernot Resch, Silvia Terzago, Mauro Valt, Walter Beozzo, Paola Cianfarra, Isabelle Gouttevin, Giorgia Marcolini, Claudia Notarnicola, Marcello Petitta, Simon C. Scherrer, Ulrich Strasser, Michael Winkler, Marc Zebisch, Andrea Cicogna, Roberto Cremonini, Andrea Debernardi, Mattia Faletto, Mauro Gaddo, Lorenzo Giovannini, Luca Mercalli, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Andrea Sušnik, Alberto Trenti, Stefano Urbani, and Viktor Weilguni
The Cryosphere, 15, 1343–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The first Alpine-wide assessment of station snow depth has been enabled by a collaborative effort of the research community which involves more than 30 partners, 6 countries, and more than 2000 stations. It shows how snow in the European Alps matches the climatic zones and gives a robust estimate of observed changes: stronger decreases in the snow season at low elevations and in spring at all elevations, however, with considerable regional differences.
Elena Diamantini, Stefano Mallucci, and Alberto Bellin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 573–593, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-573-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-573-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The description of pharmaceutical fate and transport introduced into a watershed is a challenging topic, especially because of the possible adverse effects on human health. In addition, an accurate estimation of solute sources and routes is still missing. This study uses a new promising modeling approach to predict pharmaceutical concentrations in rivers. Results show an interesting relationship between solute concentrations in waters and touristic fluxes.
Flavia Tauro, Andrea Petroselli, Aldo Fiori, Nunzio Romano, Maria Cristina Rulli, Maurizio Porfiri, Mario Palladino, and Salvatore Grimaldi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-501, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-501, 2016
Revised manuscript not accepted
Sebastiano Piccolroaz, Michele Di Lazzaro, Antonio Zarlenga, Bruno Majone, Alberto Bellin, and Aldo Fiori
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2047–2061, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We present HYPERstream, an innovative, parsimonious, and computationally efficient streamflow routing scheme based on the width function instantaneous unit hydrograph theory. HYPERstream is designed to be easily coupled with climate models and to preserve the geomorphological dispersion of the river network, irrespective of the model grid size. This makes HYPERstream well suited for multi-scale applications (from catchment up to continental scale) and to investigate extreme events (e.g. floods).
L. Carturan, C. Baroni, M. Becker, A. Bellin, O. Cainelli, A. Carton, C. Casarotto, G. Dalla Fontana, A. Godio, T. Martinelli, M. C. Salvatore, and R. Seppi
The Cryosphere, 7, 1819–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1819-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1819-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: Testing the connection between hillslope-scale runoff fluctuations and streamflow hydrographs at the outlet of large river basins
Empirical stream thermal sensitivity cluster on the landscape according to geology and climate
Deep learning for monthly rainfall–runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia
On optimization of calibrations of a distributed hydrological model with spatially distributed information on snow
Toward interpretable LSTM-based modeling of hydrological systems
Flow intermittence prediction using a hybrid hydrological modelling approach: influence of observed intermittence data on the training of a random forest model
What controls the tail behaviour of flood series: rainfall or runoff generation?
Seasonal prediction of end-of-dry-season watershed behavior in a highly interconnected alluvial watershed in northern California
Glaciers determine the sensitivity of hydrological processes to perturbed climate in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau
Leveraging gauge networks and strategic discharge measurements to aid the development of continuous streamflow records
On the need for physical constraints in deep learning rainfall–runoff projections under climate change: a sensitivity analysis to warming and shifts in potential evapotranspiration
Evaluation of hydrological models on small mountainous catchments: impact of the meteorological forcings
Projecting sediment export from two highly glacierized alpine catchments under climate change: exploring non-parametric regression as an analysis tool
A framework for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty analysis for holistic hydrologic modeling using SWAT+
On understanding mountainous carbonate basins of the Mediterranean using parsimonious modeling solutions
Comparing quantile regression forest and mixture density long short-term memory models for probabilistic post-processing of satellite precipitation-driven streamflow simulations
Recent ground thermo-hydrological changes in a southern Tibetan endorheic catchment and implications for lake level changes
Towards robust seasonal streamflow forecasts in mountainous catchments: impact of calibration metric selection in hydrological modeling
Modelling flood frequency and magnitude in a glacially conditioned, heterogeneous landscape: testing the importance of land cover and land use
Enhancing LSTM-based streamflow prediction with a spatially distributed approach
Direct integration of reservoirs' operations in a hydrological model for streamflow estimation: coupling a CLSTM model with MOHID-Land
Altitudinal Control of Isotopic Composition and Application in Understanding Hydrologic Processes in the mid Merced River Catchment, Sierra Nevada, California, USA
Modelling the regional sensitivity of snowmelt, soil moisture, and streamflow generation to climate over the Canadian Prairies using a basin classification approach
To what extent does river routing matter in hydrological modeling?
Calibrating macroscale hydrological models in poorly gauged and heavily regulated basins
An advanced tool integrating failure and sensitivity analysis into novel modeling of the stormwater flood volume
airGRteaching: an open-source tool for teaching hydrological modeling with R
Stable water isotopes and tritium tracers tell the same tale: no evidence for underestimation of catchment transit times inferred by stable isotopes in StorAge Selection (SAS)-function models
Uncertainty in water transit time estimation with StorAge Selection functions and tracer data interpolation
Changes in Mediterranean flood processes and seasonality
A Network Approach for Multiscale Catchment Classification using Traits
Can the combining of wetlands with reservoir operation reduce the risk of future floods and droughts?
Advancing Understanding of Lake-Watershed Hydrology Through A Fully Coupled Numerical Model
Knowledge-informed deep learning for hydrological model calibration: an application to Coal Creek Watershed in Colorado
When best is the enemy of good – critical evaluation of performance criteria in hydrological models
The suitability of differentiable, physics-informed machine learning hydrologic models for ungauged regions and climate change impact assessment
Producing reliable hydrologic scenarios from raw climate model outputs without resorting to meteorological observations
Afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain
Using normalised difference infrared index patterns to constrain semi-distributed rainfall–runoff models in tropical nested catchments
Revisiting the hydrological basis of the Budyko framework with the principle of hydrologically similar groups
Reconstructing five decades of sediment export from two glacierized high-alpine catchments in Tyrol, Austria, using nonparametric regression
Water and energy budgets over hydrological basins on short and long timescales
Multi-model approach in a variable spatial framework for streamflow simulation
Hydrological response to climate change and human activities in the Three-River Source Region
Incorporating experimentally derived streamflow contributions into model parameterization to improve discharge prediction
Machine-learning- and deep-learning-based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 GCM data
River hydraulic modeling with ICESat-2 land and water surface elevation
Hydrological modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool in urban and peri-urban environments: the case of Kifisos experimental subbasin (Athens, Greece)
Monetizing the role of water in sustaining watershed ecosystem services using a fully integrated subsurface–surface water model
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
Ricardo Mantilla, Morgan Fonley, and Nicolás Velásquez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1373–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists strive to “Be right for the right reasons” when modeling the hydrologic cycle; however, the datasets available to validate hydrological models are sparse, and in many cases, they comprise streamflow observations at the outlets of large catchments. In this work, we show that matching streamflow observations at the outlet of a large basin is not a reliable indicator of a correct description of the small-scale runoff processes.
Lillian M. McGill, E. Ashley Steel, and Aimee H. Fullerton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1351–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the relationship between air and river temperatures in Washington's Snoqualmie and Wenatchee basins. We used classification and regression approaches to show that the sensitivity of river temperature to air temperature is variable across basins and controlled largely by geology and snowmelt. Findings can be used to inform strategies for river basin restoration and conservation, such as identifying climate-insensitive areas of the basin that should be preserved and protected.
Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1191–1213, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To determine if deep learning models are in general a viable alternative to traditional hydrologic modelling techniques in Australian catchments, a comparison of river–runoff predictions is made between traditional conceptual models and deep learning models in almost 500 catchments spread over the continent. It is found that the deep learning models match or outperform the traditional models in over two-thirds of the river catchments, indicating feasibility in a wide variety of conditions.
Dipti Tiwari, Mélanie Trudel, and Robert Leconte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1127–1146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Calibrating hydrological models with multi-objective functions enhances model robustness. By using spatially distributed snow information in the calibration, the model performance can be enhanced without compromising the outputs. In this study the HYDROTEL model was calibrated in seven different experiments, incorporating the SPAEF (spatial efficiency) metric alongside Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE), with the aim of identifying the optimal calibration strategy.
Luis Andres De la Fuente, Mohammad Reza Ehsani, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Laura Elizabeth Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 945–971, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Long short-term memory (LSTM) is a widely used machine-learning model in hydrology, but it is difficult to extract knowledge from it. We propose HydroLSTM, which represents processes like a hydrological reservoir. Models based on HydroLSTM perform similarly to LSTM while requiring fewer cell states. The learned parameters are informative about the dominant hydrology of a catchment. Our results show how parsimony and hydrological knowledge extraction can be achieved by using the new structure.
Louise Mimeau, Annika Künne, Flora Branger, Sven Kralisch, Alexandre Devers, and Jean-Philippe Vidal
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 851–871, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Modelling flow intermittence is essential for predicting the future evolution of drying in river networks and better understanding the ecological and socio-economic impacts. However, modelling flow intermittence is challenging, and observed data on temporary rivers are scarce. This study presents a new modelling approach for predicting flow intermittence in river networks and shows that combining different sources of observed data reduces the model uncertainty.
Elena Macdonald, Bruno Merz, Björn Guse, Viet Dung Nguyen, Xiaoxiang Guan, and Sergiy Vorogushyn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 833–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-833-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-833-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some rivers, the occurrence of extreme flood events is more likely than in other rivers – they have heavy-tailed distributions. We find that threshold processes in the runoff generation lead to such a relatively high occurrence probability of extremes. Further, we find that beyond a certain return period, i.e. for rare events, rainfall is often the dominant control compared to runoff generation. Our results can help to improve the estimation of the occurrence probability of extreme floods.
Claire Kouba and Thomas Harter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 691–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some watersheds, the severity of the dry season has a large impact on aquatic ecosystems. In this study, we design a way to predict, 5–6 months in advance, how severe the dry season will be in a rural watershed in northern California. This early warning can support seasonal adaptive management. To predict these two values, we assess data about snow, rain, groundwater, and river flows. We find that maximum snowpack and total wet season rainfall best predict dry season severity.
Yi Nan and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 669–689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper utilized a tracer-aided model validated by multiple datasets in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau to analyze hydrological sensitivity to climate change. The spatial pattern of the local hydrological sensitivities and the influence factors were analyzed in particular. The main finding of this paper is that the local hydrological sensitivity in mountainous basins is determined by the relationship between the glacier area ratio and the mean annual precipitation.
Michael J. Vlah, Matthew R. V. Ross, Spencer Rhea, and Emily S. Bernhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 545–573, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Virtual stream gauging enables continuous streamflow estimation where a gauge might be difficult or impractical to install. We reconstructed flow at 27 gauges of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), informing ~199 site-months of missing data in the official record and improving that accuracy of official estimates at 11 sites. This study shows that machine learning, but also routine regression methods, can be used to supplement existing gauge networks and reduce monitoring costs.
Sungwook Wi and Scott Steinschneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 479–503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate whether deep learning (DL) models can produce physically plausible streamflow projections under climate change. We address this question by focusing on modeled responses to increases in temperature and potential evapotranspiration and by employing three DL and three process-based hydrological models. The results suggest that physical constraints regarding model architecture and input are necessary to promote the physical realism of DL hydrological projections under climate change.
Guillaume Evin, Matthieu Le Lay, Catherine Fouchier, David Penot, Francois Colleoni, Alexandre Mas, Pierre-André Garambois, and Olivier Laurantin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 261–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological modelling of mountainous catchments is challenging for many reasons, the main one being the temporal and spatial representation of precipitation forcings. This study presents an evaluation of the hydrological modelling of 55 small mountainous catchments of the northern French Alps, focusing on the influence of the type of precipitation reanalyses used as inputs. These evaluations emphasize the added value of radar measurements, in particular for the reproduction of flood events.
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 139–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
How suspended sediment export from glacierized high-alpine areas responds to future climate change is hardly assessable as many interacting processes are involved, and appropriate physical models are lacking. We present the first study, to our knowledge, exploring machine learning to project sediment export until 2100 in two high-alpine catchments. We find that uncertainties due to methodological limitations are small until 2070. Negative trends imply that peak sediment may have already passed.
Salam A. Abbas, Ryan T. Bailey, Jeremy T. White, Jeffrey G. Arnold, Michael J. White, Natalja Čerkasova, and Jungang Gao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 21–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research highlights.
1. Implemented groundwater module (gwflow) into SWAT+ for four watersheds with different unique hydrologic features across the United States.
2. Presented methods for sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation for coupled models.
3. Sensitivity analysis for streamflow and groundwater head conducted using Morris method.
4. Uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation performed using an iterative ensemble smoother within the PEST framework.
Shima Azimi, Christian Massari, Giuseppe Formetta, Silvia Barbetta, Alberto Tazioli, Davide Fronzi, Sara Modanesi, Angelica Tarpanelli, and Riccardo Rigon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4485–4503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4485-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4485-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the water budget of nested karst catchments using simple methods and modeling. By utilizing the available data on precipitation and discharge, we were able to determine the response lag-time by adopting new techniques. Additionally, we modeled snow cover dynamics and evapotranspiration with the use of Earth observations, providing a concise overview of the water budget for the basin and its subbasins. We have made the data, models, and workflows accessible for further study.
Yuhang Zhang, Aizhong Ye, Bita Analui, Phu Nguyen, Soroosh Sorooshian, Kuolin Hsu, and Yuxuan Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4529–4550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our study shows that while the quantile regression forest (QRF) and countable mixtures of asymmetric Laplacians long short-term memory (CMAL-LSTM) models demonstrate similar proficiency in multipoint probabilistic predictions, QRF excels in smaller watersheds and CMAL-LSTM in larger ones. CMAL-LSTM performs better in single-point deterministic predictions, whereas QRF model is more efficient overall.
Léo C. P. Martin, Sebastian Westermann, Michele Magni, Fanny Brun, Joel Fiddes, Yanbin Lei, Philip Kraaijenbrink, Tamara Mathys, Moritz Langer, Simon Allen, and Walter W. Immerzeel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4409–4436, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4409-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4409-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Across the Tibetan Plateau, many large lakes have been changing level during the last decades as a response to climate change. In high-mountain environments, water fluxes from the land to the lakes are linked to the ground temperature of the land and to the energy fluxes between the ground and the atmosphere, which are modified by climate change. With a numerical model, we test how these water and energy fluxes have changed over the last decades and how they influence the lake level variations.
Diego Araya, Pablo A. Mendoza, Eduardo Muñoz-Castro, and James McPhee
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4385–4408, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Dynamical systems are used by many agencies worldwide to produce seasonal streamflow forecasts, which are critical for decision-making. Such systems rely on hydrology models, which contain parameters that are typically estimated using a target performance metric (i.e., objective function). This study explores the effects of this decision across mountainous basins in Chile, illustrating tradeoffs between seasonal forecast quality and the models' capability to simulate streamflow characteristics.
Pamela E. Tetford and Joseph R. Desloges
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3977–3998, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3977-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An efficient regional flood frequency model relates drainage area to discharge, with a major assumption of similar basin conditions. In a landscape with variable glacial deposits and land use, we characterize varying hydrological function using 28 explanatory variables. We demonstrate that (1) a heterogeneous landscape requires objective model selection criteria to optimize the fit of flow data, and (2) incorporating land use as a predictor variable improves the drainage area to discharge model.
Qiutong Yu, Bryan A. Tolson, Hongren Shen, Ming Han, Juliane Mai, and Jimmy Lin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-237, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to incorporate the spatial distribution information of input variables when implementing LSTM models for streamflow prediction. This paper presents a novel hybrid modeling approach to predict streamflow while accounting for spatial variability. We evaluated the performance against lumped LSTM predictions in 224 basins across the Great Lakes region in North America. This approach shows promise in predicting streamflow at large ungauged basin.
Ana Ramos Oliveira, Tiago Brito Ramos, Lígia Pinto, and Ramiro Neves
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3875–3893, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3875-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3875-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper intends to demonstrate the adequacy of a hybrid solution to overcome the difficulties related to the incorporation of human behavior when modeling hydrological processes. Two models were implemented, one to estimate the outflow of a reservoir and the other to simulate the hydrological processes of the watershed. With both models feeding each other, results show that the proposed approach significantly improved the streamflow estimation downstream of the reservoir.
Fengjing Liu, Martha H. Conklin, and Glenn D. Shaw
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-230, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-230, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snowpack has been declining and more precipitation falls as rain than snow. Using stable isotopes, we found flows and flow duration in Yosemite Creek are most sensitive to climate warming due to strong evaporation of waterfalls, potentially lengthening the dry-up period of water falls in summer and negatively affecting tourism. Groundwater recharge in Yosemite Valley is primarily from the upper snow-rain transition (2,000–2,500m) and very vulnerable to shift in the snow-rain ratio.
Zhihua He, Kevin Shook, Christopher Spence, John W. Pomeroy, and Colin Whitfield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3525–3546, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3525-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3525-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the impacts of climate change on snowmelt, soil moisture, and streamflow over the Canadian Prairies. The entire prairie region was divided into seven basin types. We found strong variations of hydrological sensitivity to precipitation and temperature changes in different land covers and basins, which suggests that different water management and adaptation methods are needed to address enhanced water stress due to expected climate change in different regions of the prairies.
Nicolás Cortés-Salazar, Nicolás Vásquez, Naoki Mizukami, Pablo A. Mendoza, and Ximena Vargas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3505–3524, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3505-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3505-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper shows how important river models can be for water resource applications that involve hydrological models and, in particular, parameter calibration. To this end, we conduct numerical experiments in a pilot basin using a combination of hydrologic model simulations obtained from a large sample of parameter sets and different routing methods. We find that routing can affect streamflow simulations, even at monthly time steps; the choice of parameters; and relevant streamflow metrics.
Dung Trung Vu, Thanh Duc Dang, Francesca Pianosi, and Stefano Galelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3485–3504, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3485-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3485-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The calibration of hydrological models over extensive spatial domains is often challenged by the lack of data on river discharge and the operations of hydraulic infrastructures. Here, we use satellite data to address the lack of data that could unintentionally bias the calibration process. Our study is underpinned by a computational framework that quantifies this bias and provides a safe approach to the calibration of models in poorly gauged and heavily regulated basins.
Francesco Fatone, Bartosz Szeląg, Przemysław Kowal, Arthur McGarity, Adam Kiczko, Grzegorz Wałek, Ewa Wojciechowska, Michał Stachura, and Nicolas Caradot
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3329–3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A novel methodology for the development of a stormwater network performance simulator including advanced risk assessment was proposed. The applied tool enables the analysis of the influence of spatial variability in catchment and stormwater network characteristics on the relation between (SWMM) model parameters and specific flood volume, as an alternative approach to mechanistic models. The proposed method can be used at the stage of catchment model development and spatial planning management.
Olivier Delaigue, Pierre Brigode, Guillaume Thirel, and Laurent Coron
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3293–3327, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3293-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3293-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Teaching hydrological modeling is an important, but difficult, matter. It requires appropriate tools and teaching material. In this article, we present the airGRteaching package, which is an open-source software tool relying on widely used hydrological models. This tool proposes an interface and numerous hydrological modeling exercises representing a wide range of hydrological applications. We show how this tool can be applied to simple but real-life cases.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, Gerrit Schoups, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3083–3114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that previously reported underestimations of water ages are most likely not due to the use of seasonally variable tracers. Rather, these underestimations can be largely attributed to the choices of model approaches which rely on assumptions not frequently met in catchment hydrology. We therefore strongly advocate avoiding the use of this model type in combination with seasonally variable tracers and instead adopting StorAge Selection (SAS)-based or comparable model formulations.
Arianna Borriero, Rohini Kumar, Tam V. Nguyen, Jan H. Fleckenstein, and Stefanie R. Lutz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2989–3004, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2989-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2989-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the uncertainty of the water transit time distribution (TTD) arising from model input (interpolated tracer data) and structure (StorAge Selection, SAS, functions). We found that uncertainty was mainly associated with temporal interpolation, choice of SAS function, nonspatial interpolation, and low-flow conditions. It is important to characterize the specific uncertainty sources and their combined effects on TTD, as this has relevant implications for both water quantity and quality.
Yves Tramblay, Patrick Arnaud, Guillaume Artigue, Michel Lang, Emmanuel Paquet, Luc Neppel, and Eric Sauquet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2973–2987, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2973-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2973-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Mediterranean floods are causing major damage, and recent studies have shown that, despite the increase in intense rainfall, there has been no increase in river floods. This study reveals that the seasonality of floods changed in the Mediterranean Basin during 1959–2021. There was also an increased frequency of floods linked to short episodes of intense rain, associated with a decrease in soil moisture. These changes need to be taken into consideration to adapt flood warning systems.
Fabio Ciulla and Charuleka Varadharajan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1675, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1675, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
When studying the behavior of rivers, like their tendency to flood, it is useful to group them using the characteristics of their surrounding areas like geology, climate, land use and human influence. We developed a method that, in addition to this classification, also returns the relevant characteristics of each group and associates them to particular behaviors. In this way we better understand how rivers interact with the environment and can try to improve the predictions of future behaviors.
Yanfeng Wu, Jingxuan Sun, Boting Hu, Y. Jun Xu, Alain N. Rousseau, and Guangxin Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2725–2745, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2725-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2725-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Reservoirs and wetlands are important regulators of watershed hydrology, which should be considered when projecting floods and droughts. We first coupled wetlands and reservoir operations into a semi-spatially-explicit hydrological model and then applied it in a case study involving a large river basin in northeast China. We found that, overall, the risk of future floods and droughts will increase further even under the combined influence of reservoirs and wetlands.
Lele Shu, Xiaodong Li, Yan Chang, Xianhong Meng, Hao Chen, Yuan Qi, Hongwei Wang, Zhaoguo Li, and Shihua Lyu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-166, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-166, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new model to better understand how water moves in a lake basin. Our model improves upon previous methods by accurately capturing the complexity of water movement, both on the surface and subsurface. Our model tested using data from China's Qinghai Lake, accurately replicates complex water movements and identifies contributing factors of lake's water balance. The findings provide a robust tool for predicting hydrological processes, aiding water resource planning.
Peishi Jiang, Pin Shuai, Alexander Sun, Maruti K. Mudunuru, and Xingyuan Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2621–2644, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2621-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2621-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a novel deep learning approach to estimate the parameters of a computationally expensive hydrological model on only a few hundred realizations. Our approach leverages the knowledge obtained by data-driven analysis to guide the design of the deep learning model used for parameter estimation. We demonstrate this approach by calibrating a state-of-the-art hydrological model against streamflow and evapotranspiration observations at a snow-dominated watershed in Colorado.
Guillaume Cinkus, Naomi Mazzilli, Hervé Jourde, Andreas Wunsch, Tanja Liesch, Nataša Ravbar, Zhao Chen, and Nico Goldscheider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2397–2411, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) is a performance criterion extensively used to evaluate hydrological models. We conduct a critical study on the KGE and its variant to examine counterbalancing errors. Results show that, when assessing a simulation, concurrent over- and underestimation of discharge can lead to an overall higher criterion score without an associated increase in model relevance. We suggest that one carefully choose performance criteria and use scaling factors.
Dapeng Feng, Hylke Beck, Kathryn Lawson, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2357–2373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2357-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Powerful hybrid models (called δ or delta models) embrace the fundamental learning capability of AI and can also explain the physical processes. Here we test their performance when applied to regions not in the training data. δ models rivaled the accuracy of state-of-the-art AI models under the data-dense scenario and even surpassed them for the data-sparse one. They generalize well due to the physical structure included. δ models could be ideal candidates for global hydrologic assessment.
Simon Ricard, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Antoine Thiboult, and François Anctil
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2375–2395, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2375-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2375-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A simplified hydroclimatic modelling workflow is proposed to quantify the impact of climate change on water discharge without resorting to meteorological observations. Results confirm that the proposed workflow produces equivalent projections of the seasonal mean flows in comparison to a conventional hydroclimatic modelling approach. The proposed approach supports the participation of end-users in interpreting the impact of climate change on water resources.
Marcus Edmund Henry Buechel, Louise Slater, and Simon Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-138, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-138, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Afforestation has been proposed internationally, but the hydrological implications of such large increases in spatial extent of woodland are not fully understood. In this study we use a land surface model to simulate hydrology across Great Britain with realistic afforestation scenarios and potential climate changes. Countrywide afforestation minimally influences hydrology when compared to climate change, and reduces low streamflow whilst not lowering the highest flows.
Nutchanart Sriwongsitanon, Wasana Jandang, James Williams, Thienchart Suwawong, Ekkarin Maekan, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2149–2171, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2149-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2149-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed predictive semi-distributed rainfall–runoff models for nested sub-catchments in the upper Ping basin, which yielded better or similar performance compared to calibrated lumped models. The normalised difference infrared index proves to be an effective proxy for distributed root zone moisture capacity over sub-catchments and is well correlated with the percentage of evergreen forest. In validation, soil moisture simulations appeared to be highly correlated with the soil wetness index.
Yuchan Chen, Xiuzhi Chen, Meimei Xue, Chuanxun Yang, Wei Zheng, Jun Cao, Wenting Yan, and Wenping Yuan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1929–1943, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1929-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1929-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study addresses the quantification and estimation of the watershed-characteristic-related parameter (Pw) in the Budyko framework with the principle of hydrologically similar groups. The results show that Pw is closely related to soil moisture and fractional vegetation cover, and the relationship varies across specific hydrologic similarity groups. The overall satisfactory performance of the Pw estimation model improves the applicability of the Budyko framework for global runoff estimation.
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, Christoph Mayer, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1841–1863, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1841-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1841-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a suitable method to reconstruct sediment export from decadal records of hydroclimatic predictors (discharge, precipitation, temperature) and shorter suspended sediment measurements. This lets us fill the knowledge gap on how sediment export from glacierized high-alpine areas has responded to climate change. We find positive trends in sediment export from the two investigated nested catchments with step-like increases around 1981 which are linked to crucial changes in glacier melt.
Samantha Petch, Bo Dong, Tristan Quaife, Robert P. King, and Keith Haines
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1723–1744, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1723-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Gravitational measurements of water storage from GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) can improve understanding of the water budget. We produce flux estimates over large river catchments based on observations that close the monthly water budget and ensure consistency with GRACE on short and long timescales. We use energy data to provide additional constraints and balance the long-term energy budget. These flux estimates are important for evaluating climate models.
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-569, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-569, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasting is useful for many applications, ranging from population safety (e.g. floods) to water resource management (e.g. agriculture or hydropower). To this end, hydrological models must be optimized. However, a model is inherently wrong. This study aims to analyse the contribution of a multi-model approach within a variable spatial framework to improve streamflow simulations. The underlying idea is to take advantage of the strength of each modelling frameworks tested.
Ting Su, Chiyuan Miao, Qingyun Duan, Jiaojiao Gou, Xiaoying Guo, and Xi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1477–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Three-River Source Region (TRSR) plays an extremely important role in water resources security and ecological and environmental protection in China and even all of Southeast Asia. This study used the variable infiltration capacity (VIC) land surface hydrologic model linked with the degree-day factor algorithm to simulate the runoff change in the TRSR. These results will help to guide current and future regulation and management of water resources in the TRSR.
Andreas Hartmann, Jean-Lionel Payeur-Poirier, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1325–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We advance our understanding of including information derived from environmental tracers into hydrological modeling. We present a simple approach that integrates streamflow observations and tracer-derived streamflow contributions for model parameter estimation. We consider multiple observed streamflow components and their variation over time to quantify the impact of their inclusion for streamflow prediction at the catchment scale.
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1047–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines, for the first time, the potential of various machine learning models in streamflow prediction over the Sutlej River basin (rainfall-dominated zone) in western Himalaya during the period 2041–2070 (2050s) and 2071–2100 (2080s) and its relationship to climate variability. The mean ensemble of the model results shows that the mean annual streamflow of the Sutlej River is expected to rise between the 2050s and 2080s by 0.79 to 1.43 % for SSP585 and by 0.87 to 1.10 % for SSP245.
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses remote sensing data from ICESat-2 to calibrate a 1D hydraulic model. With the model, we can make estimations of discharge and water surface elevation, which are important indicators in flooding risk assessment. ICESat-2 data give an added value, thanks to the 0.7 m resolution, which allows the measurement of narrow river streams. In addition, ICESat-2 provides measurements on the river dry portion geometry that can be included in the model.
Evgenia Koltsida, Nikos Mamassis, and Andreas Kallioras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 917–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Daily and hourly rainfall observations were inputted to a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model to investigate the impacts of rainfall temporal resolution on a discharge simulation. Results indicated that groundwater flow parameters were more sensitive to daily time intervals, and channel routing parameters were more influential for hourly time intervals. This study suggests that the SWAT model appears to be a reliable tool to predict discharge in a mixed-land-use basin.
Tariq Aziz, Steven K. Frey, David R. Lapen, Susan Preston, Hazen A. J. Russell, Omar Khader, Andre R. Erler, and Edward A. Sudicky
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-25, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-25, 2023
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
The study determines the value of water towards ecosystem services production in an agricultural watershed in Ontario, Canada. It uses a computer model and an economic valuation approach to determine how subsurface and surface water affect ecosystem services supply. The results show that subsurface water plays a critical role in maintaining ecosystem services. The study informs on the sustainable use of subsurface water and introduces a new method for managing watershed ecosystem services.
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An important hydrological issue is to identify components of streamflow that react to precipitation with different degrees of attenuation and delay. From the multitude of methods that have been developed for this so-called hydrograph separation, a specific, frequently used one is singled out here. It is shown to be derived from plausible physical principles. This increases confidence in its results.
Cited articles
Aich, V., Liersch, S., Vetter, T., Fournet, S., Andersson, J. C. M., Calmanti,
S., Van Weert, F. H. A., Hattermann, F. F., and Paton, E. N.: Flood projections
within the Niger River Basin under future land use and climate change, Sci.
Total Environ., 562, 666–677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.021, 2016.
Arnell, N. W.: Uncertainty in the relationship between climate forcing and hydrological response in UK catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 897–912, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-897-2011, 2011.
Avesani, D., Galletti, A., Piccolroaz, S., Bellin, A., and Majone, B.: A dual
layer MPI continuous large-scale hydrological model including Human Systems,
Environ. Model. Softw., 139, 105003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105003,
2021.
Avesani, D., Zanfei, A., Di Marco, N., Galletti, A., Ravazzolo, F., Righetti, M.,
and Majone, B.: Short-term hydropower optimization driven by innovative
time-adapting econometric model, Appl. Energy, 310, 118510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118510, 2022.
Bard, A., Renard, B., Lang, M., Giuntoli, I., Korck, J., Koboltschnig, G.,
Janža, M., D'Amico, M., and Volken, D.: Trends in the hydrologic regime of
Alpine rivers, J. Hydrol., 529, 1823–1837,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.052, 2015.
Bellin, A., Majone, B., Cainelli, O., Alberici, D., and Villa, F.: A
continuous coupled hydrological and water resources management model,
Environ. Model. Softw., 75, 176–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.013,
2016.
Beven, K. J. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model
calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992.
Beven, K. and Westerberg, I.: On red herrings and real herrings:
disinformation and information in hydrological inference, Hydrol. Process.,
25, 1676–1680, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7963, 2011.
Blazkova, S. and Beven, K.: A limits of acceptability approach to model
evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by
continuous simulation: Skalka catchment, Czech Republic, Water Resour. Res.,
45, W00B16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006726, 2009.
Bouwer, L. M.: Projections of Future Extreme Weather Losses Under Changes in
Climate and Exposure, Risk Anal., 33, 915–930,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01880.x, 2013.
Brigode, P., Oudin, L., and Perrin, C.: Hydrological model parameter
instability: a source of additional uncertainty in estimating the
hydrological impacts of climate change?, J. Hydrol., 476, 410–425,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.012, 2013.
Brigode, P., Paquet, E., Bernardara, P., Gailhard, J., Garavaglia, F.,
Ribstein, P., Bourgin, F., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V.: Dependence of
model-based extreme flood estimation on the calibration period: the case
study of the Kamp River (Austria), Hydrolog. Sci. J., 60,
1424–1437, doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1006632, 2015.
Brunner, M. I., Farinotti, D., Zekollari, H., Huss, M., and Zappa, M.: Future shifts in extreme flow regimes in Alpine regions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4471–4489, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4471-2019, 2019.
Buytaert, W. and De Bièvre, B.: Water for cities: the impact of climate
change and demographic growth in the tropical Andes, Water Resour. Res., 48,
W08503, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011755, 2012.
Calenda, G., Mancini, C. P., and Volpi, E.: Selection of the probabilistic
model of extreme floods: The case of the River Tiber in Rome, J. Hydrol.,
371, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.010, 2009.
Chiew, F., Teng, J., Vaze, J., Post, D., Perraud, J., Kirono, D., and Viney,
N.: Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia,
Method, results, and implications of the modeling method, Water Resour.
Res., 45, W10414, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007338, 2009.
Chiogna, G., Majone, B., Cano Paoli, K., Diamantini, E., Stella, E.,
Mallucci, S., Lencioni, V., Zandonai, F., and Bellin, A.: A review of
hydrological and chemical stressors in the Adige basin and its ecological
status, Sci. Tot. Env., 540, 429–443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.149,
2016.
Clark, M. P., Wilby, R. L., Gutmann, E. D., Vano, J. A., Gangopadhyay, S.,
Wood, A. W., Fowler, H. J., Prudhomme, C., Arnold, J. R., and Brekke, L. D.:
Characterizing Uncertainty of the Hydrologic Impacts of Climate Change,
Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 2, 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0034-x, 2016.
Conover, W. J.: Practical Nonparametric Statistics, Third edition, Wiley
Series in Probability and Statistics: Applied Probability and Statistics
Section, John Wiley & Sons. INC., New York, ISBN 9780471160687, 1999.
Diamantini, E., Lutz, S. R., Mallucci, S., Majone, B., Merz, R., and Bellin,
A.: Driver detection of water quality trends in three large European river
basins, Sci. Total Environ., 612, 49–62,
doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.172, 2018.
Di Sante, F., Coppola, E., and Giorgi, F.: Projections of river floods in
Europe using EURO-CORDEX, CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations, Int. J. Climatol., 41, 3203–3221, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7014, 2019.
Earth System Grid Federation: EURO-CORDEX, euro-cordex [data set], https://www.euro-cordex.net/060378/index.php.en, last access: 15 July 2022.
Eden, J. M., Widmann, M., Maraun, D., and Vrac, M.: Comparison of GCM- and
RCM-simulated precipitation following stochastic postprocessing, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 119, 11040–11053, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021732, 2014.
Efron, B.: The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans,
Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics CBMS-NSF Monographs, 38, ISBN 0898711797, 1982.
Fenicia, F., Kavetski, D., Reichert, P., and Albert, C.: Signature-domain
calibration of hydrological models using approximate Bayesian computation:
Empirical analysis of fundamental properties. Water Resour. Res., 54,
3958–3987, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021616, 2018.
Fiori, A., Cvetkovic, V., Dagan, G., Attinger, S., Bellin, A., Dietrich, P.,
Zech, A., and Teutsch, G.: Debates-stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: The
relevance of stochastic subsurface hydrology to practical problems of
contaminant transport and remediation. What is characterization and
stochastic theory good for?, Water Resour. Res., 52, 9228–9234,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017525, 2016.
Galletti, A., Avesani, D., Bellin, A., and Majone, B.: Detailed simulation of
storage hydropower systems in large Alpine watersheds, J. Hydrol., 603,
127125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127125, 2021.
Gampe, D., Nikulin, G., and Ludwig, R.: Using an ensemble of regional climate
models to assess climate change impacts on water scarcity in European river
basins, Sci. Total Environ., 573, 1503–1518, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.053, 2016.
Gobiet, A., Kotlarski, S., Beniston, M., Heinrich, G., Rajczak, J. and
Stoffel, M.: 21st century climate change in the European Alps, A
review, Sci. Total Environ., 493, 1138–1151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.050, 2014.
Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation, Oxford
University Press, 483 p., ISBN 9780195115383, 1997.
Grubbs, F. E.: Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples,
Technometrics 11, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1969.10490657, 1969.
Gumbel, E. J.: The return period of flood flows, Ann. Math Stat., 12,
163–190, 1941.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition
of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, 2009.
Guthke, A.: Defensible model complexity: A call for data-based and
goal-oriented model choice, Groundwater, 55, 646–650,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12554, 2017.
Hargreaves, G. H. and Samani, Z. A.: Estimating potential evapotranspiration,
J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 108, 225–230, 1989.
Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., and Lister, D. H.: Updated
high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10
dataset, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 623–642, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711, 2014.
Hattermann, F. F., Vetter, T., Breuer, L., Su, B., Daggupati, P., Donnelly,
C., Fekete, B., Florke F., Gosling, S.N., Hoffmann, P., Liersch, S., Masaki,
Y., Motovilov, Y., Muller, C., Samaniego, L., Stacke, T., Wada, Y., Yang,
T., and Krysnaova, V.: Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 015006,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9938, 2018.
Haylock, M. R., Hofstra, N., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Klok, E. J., Jones, P.
D., and New, M.: A European daily high-resolution gridded dataset of
surface temperature and precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20119,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010201, 2008.
Heistermann, M. and Kneis, D.: Benchmarking quantitative precipitation
estimation by conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 47,
W06514, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009153, 2011.
Hock, R.: Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas, J. Hydrol.,
282, 104–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00257-9, 2003.
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., and Volinsky, C. T.: Bayesian
model averaging: A tutorial, Stat. Sci., 14, 382–417, 1999.
Hofstra, N., Haylock, M., New, M., and Jones, P. D.: Testing E-OBS European
high-resolution gridded data set of daily precipitation and surface
temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D21101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011799, 2009.
Hofstra, N., New, M., and McSweeney, C.: The influence of interpolation and
station network density on the distributions and trends of climate variables
in gridded daily data, Clim. Dyn. 35, 841–858, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0698-1, 2010.
Honti, M., Scheidegger, A., and Stamm, C.: The importance of hydrological uncertainty assessment methods in climate change impact studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3301–3317, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3301-2014, 2014.
Hosking, J. R.: Maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of the
generalized extreme-value distribution, Appl. Stat., 34, 301–310,
https://doi.org/10.2307/2347483, 1985.
Isotta, F. A., Frei, C., Weilguni, V., Perčec Tadić, M.,
Lassègues, P., Rudolf, B., Pavan, V., Cacciamani, C., Antolini, G.,
Ratto, S.M., Munari, M., Micheletti, S., Bonati, V., Lussana, C., Ronchi,
C., Panettieri, E., Marigo, G., and Vertačnik, G.: The climate of daily
precipitation in the Alps: development and analysis of a high-resolution
grid dataset from pan-Alpine rain-gauge data, Int. J. Climatol., 34,
1657–1675, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3794, 2014.
Jacob, D., Petersen, J., Eggert, B., Alias, A., Christensen, O. B., Bouwer,
L. M., Braun, A., Georgopoulou, E., Gobiet, A., Menut, L., Nikulin, G.,
Haensler, A., Hempelmann, N., Jones, C., Keuler, K., Kovats, S., Kröner, N., Kotlarski, S.,
Kriegsmann, A., Martin, E., van Meijgaard, E., Moseley, C., Pfeifer, S., Preuschmann, S.,
Radermacher, C., Radtke, K., Rechid, D., Rounsevell, M., Samuelsson, P., Somot, S.,
Soussana, J.-F., Teichmann, C., Valentini, R., Vautard, R., Weber, B., and Yiuou, P.: EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution
climate change projections for European impact research, Reg. Environ.
Chang., 14, 563–578, 2014.
Journel, A. G. and Rossi, M. E.: When do we need a trend model in kriging?,
Math. Geol., 21, 715–739, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00893318, 1989.
Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of
IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Institute of Electrical
& Electronics Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth,
Western Australia, 1942–1948, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968, 1995.
Kleinen, T. and Petschel-Held, G.: Integrated assessment of changes in
flooding probabilities due to climate change, Clim. Change, 81, 283–312,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9159-6, 2007.
Kotlarski, S., Keuler, K., Christensen, O. B., Colette, A., Déqué, M., Gobiet, A., Goergen, K., Jacob, D., Lüthi, D., van Meijgaard, E., Nikulin, G., Schär, C., Teichmann, C., Vautard, R., Warrach-Sagi, K., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Regional climate modeling on European scales: a joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1297–1333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1297-2014, 2014.
Kundzewicz, Z., Mata, L., Arnell, N., Döll, P., Kabat, P., Jiménez,
B., Miller, K., Oki, T., Shen, Z., and Shiklomanov, I.: Freshwater resources
and their management, in: Climate change: Impacts, adaptation and
vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change, edited by: Parry,
M., Canziani, O., Palutikof, J., van der Linden, P., and Hanson, C., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 173–210, 2007.
Laio, F., Allamano, P., and Claps, P.: Exploiting the information content of hydrological ”outliers” for goodness-of-fit testing, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1909–1917, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1909-2010, 2010.
Laiti, L., Mallucci, S., Piccolroaz, S., Bellin, A., Zardi, D., Fiori, A.,
Nikulin, G., and Majone, B.: Testing the hydrological coherence of
high-resolution gridded precipitation and temperature datasets, Water Resour. Res., 54, 1999–2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021633, 2018.
Landelius, T., Dahlgren, P., Gollvik, S., Jansson, A., and Olsson, E.: A
high-resolution regional reanalysis for Europe, Part 2: 2D analysis of
surface temperature, precipitation and wind, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2813, 2016.
Larsen, S., Majone, B., Zulian, P., Stella, E., Bellin, A., Bruno, M. C.,
and Zolezzi, G.: Combining hydrologic simulations and stream-network models
to reveal flow-ecology relationships in a large Alpine catchment, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028496, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028496,
2021.
Lespinas, F., Ludwig, W., and Heussner, S.: Hydrological and climatic
uncertainties associated with modeling the impact of climate change on water
resources of small Mediterranean coastal rivers, J. Hydrol., 511, 403–422,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.033, 2014.
Lindenschmidt, K. E.: Using stage frequency distributions as objective
functions for model calibration and global sensitivity analyses, Environ.
Model. Softw., 92, 169–175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.027,
2017.
Lutz, S. R., Mallucci, S., Diamantini, E., Majone, B., Bellin, A., and Merz,
R.: Hydroclimatic and water quality trends across three Mediterranean river
basins, Sci. Tot. Env., 571, 1392–1406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.102,
2016.
Majone, B., Bertagnoli, A., and Bellin, A.: A non-linear runoff generation
model in small Alpine catchments, J. Hydrol., 385, 300–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.033, 2010.
Majone, B., Bovolo, C. I., Bellin, A., Blenkinsop, S., and Fowler, J.:
Modeling the impacts of future climate change on water resources for the
Gállego river basin, Spain, Water Resour. Res., 48, W01512,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010985, 2012.
Majone, B., Villa, F., Deidda, R., and Bellin, A.: Impact of climate change and
water use policies on hydropower potential in the south-eastern Alpine
region, Sci. Tot. Env., 543, 965–980,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.009, 2016.
Mallucci, S., Majone, B., and Bellin, A.: Detection and attribution of
hydrological changes in a large Alpine river basin, J. Hydrol.,
575, 1214–1229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.020, 2019.
Mcmillan, H., Westerberg, I., and Branger, F.: Five guidelines for
selecting hydrological signatures. Hydrol. Process., 31,
4757–4761, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11300, 2017.
Meresa, H. K. and Romanowicz, R. J.: The critical role of uncertainty in projections of hydrological extremes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4245–4258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4245-2017, 2017.
Michel, C., Andreassian, V., and Perrin, C.: Soil Conservation Service Curve
Number method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure?,
Water Resour. Res., 41, W02011, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003191, 2005.
Mizukami, N., Rakovec, O., Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Wood, A. W., Gupta, H. V., and Kumar, R.: On the choice of calibration metrics for “high-flow” estimation using hydrologic models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2601–2614, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2601-2019, 2019.
Montanari, A. and Toth, E.: Calibration of hydrological models in the
spectral domain: An opportunity for scarcely gauged basins?, Water Resour.
Res., 43, W05434, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005184, 2007.
Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H. H. G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren,
L. L., Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K.,
Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer, B., Boegh, E., Schymanski, S. J., Di Baldassarre, G.,
Yu, B., Hubert, P., Huang, Y., Schumann, A., Post, D. A., Srinivasan, V., Harman, C.,
Thompson, S., Rogger, M., Viglione, A., McMillan, H., Characklis, G., Pang, Z., and Belyaev. V.: “Panta Rhei-Everything Flows”: Change in
hydrology and society – The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1256–1275, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088,
2013.
Muñoz, E., Arumí, J. L., and Rivera, D.: Watersheds are not static:
Implications of climate variability and hydrologic dynamics in modelling,
Bosque (Valdivia), 34, 7–11, https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002013000100002,
2013.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual
models part I. A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
Ngongondo, C., Li, L., Gong, L., Xu, C., and Alemawm, B. F: Flood frequency
under changing climate in the upper Kafue River basin, southern Africa: a
large scale hydrological model application, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk.
Assess., 27, 1883–1898, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0724-z, 2013.
Pearson, K.: On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the
probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can
be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling, Philosophical
Magazine Series 5, 302, 157–175, 1900.
Pechlivanidis, I. G., Arheimer, B., Donnelly, C., Hundecha, Y., Huang, S.,
Aich, V., Samaniego, L., Eisner, S., and Shi, P.: Analysis of hydrological
extremes at different hydro-climatic regimes under present and future
conditions, Clim. Change, 141, 467–481, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1723-0,
2017.
Peel, M. C. and Blöschl, G.: Hydrological modelling in a changing
world, Prog. Phys. Geog., 35, 249–261,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311402550, 2011.
Perrin, C., Oudin, L., Andreassian, V., Rojas-Serna, C., Michel, C., and
Mathevet, T.: Impact of limited streamflow data on the efficiency and the
parameters of rainfall-runoff models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52,
131–151, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.1.131, 2007.
Piccolroaz, S., Majone, B., Palmieri, F., Cassiani, G., and Bellin, A.: On
the use of spatially distributed, time-lapse microgravity surveys to inform
hydrological modeling, Water Resour. Res., 51, 7270–7288,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016994, 2015.
Piccolroaz, S., Di Lazzaro, M., Zarlenga, A., Majone, B., Bellin, A., and Fiori, A.: HYPERstream: a multi-scale framework for streamflow routing in large-scale hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2047–2061, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2047-2016, 2016.
Protter, M. H. and Morrey, C. B.: College Calculus with Analytic Geometry, Second Edition (1 January 1970),
Addison-Wesley VLSI Systems Series, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ISBN 9780201060010, 1977.
Rango, A. and Martinec, J.: Revisiting the degree-day method for snowmelt
computations, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 31, 657–669,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03392.x, 1995.
Rinaldo, A., Marani, A., and Rigon, R.: Geomorphological dispersion, Water
Resour. Res., 27, 513–525, https://doi.org/10.1029/90WR02501, 1991.
Schaefli, B. and Gupta, H. V.: Do Nash values have value?, Hydrol.
Process., 21, 2075–2080, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6825, 2007.
Seibert, J. and Beven, K. J.: Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 883–892, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-883-2009, 2009.
Smirnov, N. V.: Estimate of deviation between empirical distribution
functions in two independent samples, (Russian) Bull. Moscow Univ., 2,
3–16, 1939.
Taye, M. T., Ntegeka, V., Ogiramoi, N. P., and Willems, P.: Assessment of climate change impact on hydrological extremes in two source regions of the Nile River Basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-209-2011, 2011.
Thirel, G., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Audouy, J.-N., Berthet, L.,
Edwards, P., Folton, N.,
Furusho, C., Kuentz, A., Lerat, J., Lindström, G., Martin, E., Mathevet, T., Merz, R., Parajka, J.,
Ruelland, D., and Vaze, J.: Hydrology under change: an evaluation
protocol to investigate how hydrological models deal with changing
catchments, Hydrol. Sci. J., 60, 1184–1199,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.967248, 2014.
Thornton, P. K., Ericksen P. J., Herrero M., and Challinor, A. J.: Climate
variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review, Glob. Change
Biol., 20, 3313–3328, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12581, 2014.
Todd, M. C., Taylor, R. G., Osborn, T. J., Kingston, D. G., Arnell, N. W., and Gosling, S. N.: Uncertainty in climate change impacts on basin-scale freshwater resources – preface to the special issue: the QUEST-GSI methodology and synthesis of results, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1035–1046, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1035-2011, 2011.
Vaze, J., Post, D. A., Chiew, F. H. S., Perraud, J. M., Viney, N. R., and Teng, J.:
Climate non-stationarity – validity of calibrated rainfall-runoff models for
use in climate change studies, J. Hydrol. 394, 447–457,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.018, 2010.
Vetter, T., Reinhardt, J., Flörke, M., van Griensven, A., Hattermann,
F., Huang, S., Koch, H., Pechlivanidis, I.G., Plötner, S., Seidou, O.,
Su, B., Vervoort, R. W., and Krysanova, V.: Evaluation of sources of
uncertainty in projected hydrological changes under climate change in
large-scale river basins, Clim. Change, 141, 419–433,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1794-y, 2017.
Vogel, R. M. and Fennessey, N. M.: Flow-Duration Curves. 1: New
Interpretation and Confidence-Intervals, Planning and
Management, J. Water Res., 120, 485–504, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:4(485),
1994.
Vrzel, J., Ludwig, R., Gampe, D., and Ogrinc, N.: Hydrological system
behavior of an alluvial aquifer under climate change, Sci. Total Environ.,
649, 1179–1188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.396, 2019.
Wang, W., Chen, X., Shi, P., and van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M.: Detecting changes in extreme precipitation and extreme streamflow in the Dongjiang River Basin in southern China, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 207–221, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-207-2008, 2008.
Wang, A. and Solomatine, D. P.: Practical Experience of Sensitivity
Analysis: Comparing Six Methods, on Three Hydrological Models, with Three
Performance Criteria, Water, 11, 1062, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051062, 2019.
Weibull, W.: A statistical theory of strength of materials., Ing. Vetensk.
Akad. Handl., 151, 1–45, 1939.
Westerberg, I. K., Guerrero, J.-L., Younger, P. M., Beven, K. J., Seibert, J., Halldin, S., Freer, J. E., and Xu, C.-Y.: Calibration of hydrological models using flow-duration curves, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2205–2227, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2205-2011, 2011.
Wilby, R. L. and Harris, I.: A framework for assessing uncertainties in
climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK, Water
Resour. Res., 42, W02419, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004065, 2006.
Wilcke, R. A. I. and Bärring, L.: Selecting regional climate scenarios for
impact modelling studies, Environ. Model. Softw., 78, 191–201,
10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.01.002, 2016.
Wu, Q., Liu, S., Cai, Y., Li, X., and Jiang, Y.: Improvement of hydrological model calibration by selecting multiple parameter ranges, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 393–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-393-2017, 2017.
Yang, W., Andréasson, J., Graham, L. P., Olsson, J., Rosberg, J., and
Wetterhall, F.: Distribution based scaling to improve usability of regional
climate model projections for hydrological climate change impacts studies,
Hydrol. Res., 41, 211–229, 10.2166/nh.2010.004, 2010.
Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S.: Automatic calibration of conceptual
rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. J. Hydrol. 181,
23–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02918-4, 1996.
Zolezzi, G., Bellin, A., Bruno, M. C., Maiolini, B., and Siviglia, A.:
Assessing hydrological alterations at multiple temporal scales: Adige River,
Italy, Water Resour. Res., 45, W12421, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007266, 2009.
Short summary
In this work, we introduce a methodology for devising reliable future high streamflow scenarios from climate change simulations. The calibration of a hydrological model is carried out to maximize the probability that the modeled and observed high flow extremes belong to the same statistical population. Application to the Adige River catchment (southeastern Alps, Italy) showed that this procedure produces reliable quantiles of the annual maximum streamflow for use in assessment studies.
In this work, we introduce a methodology for devising reliable future high streamflow scenarios...