Articles | Volume 25, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2663-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2663-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
20 May 2021
Research article |
| 20 May 2021
| 20 May 2021
A Bayesian approach to understanding the key factors influencing temporal variability in stream water quality – a case study in the Great Barrier Reef catchments
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Dongryeol Ryu
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
J. Angus Webb
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Anna Lintern
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
Danlu Guo
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
David Waters
Queensland Department of Resources, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
Andrew W. Western
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Related authors
Danlu Guo, Camille Minaudo, Anna Lintern, Ulrike Bende-Michl, Shuci Liu, Kefeng Zhang, and Clément Duvert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the impact of baseflow contribution on concentration–flow (C–Q) relationships across the Australian continent. We developed a novel Bayesian hierarchical model for six water quality variables across 157 catchments that span five climate zones. For sediments and nutrients, the C–Q slope is generally steeper for catchments with a higher median and a greater variability of baseflow contribution, highlighting the key role of variable flow pathways in particulate and solute export.
Danlu Guo, Anna Lintern, J. Angus Webb, Dongryeol Ryu, Ulrike Bende-Michl, Shuci Liu, and Andrew William Western
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 827–847, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-827-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-827-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed predictive models to represent the spatial and temporal variation of stream water quality across Victoria, Australia. The model structures were informed by a data-driven approach, which identified the key controls of water quality variations from long-term records. These models are helpful to identify likely future changes in water quality and, in turn, provide critical information for developing management strategies to improve stream water quality.
Tobias F. Selkirk, Andrew W. Western, and J. Angus Webb
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3149, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3149, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigated rainfall in eastern Australia to search for patterns that may aid in predicting flood and drought. The current popular consensus is that such cycles do not exist. We analysed 130 years of rainfall using a very modern technique for identifying cycles in complex signals. The results showed strong evidence for three clear cycles of 12.9, 20.4 and 29.1 years with a confidence of 99.99 %. When combined, they showed an 80 % alignment to years of extremely high and low rainfall.
Theresa Boas, Heye Reemt Bogena, Dongryeol Ryu, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3143–3167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we tested the utility and skill of a state-of-the-art forecasting product for the prediction of regional crop productivity using a land surface model. Our results illustrate the potential value and skill of combining seasonal forecasts with modelling applications to generate variables of interest for stakeholders, such as annual crop yield for specific cash crops and regions. In addition, this study provides useful insights for future technical model evaluations and improvements.
Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, Margarita Saft, Tim J. Peterson, Andrew Western, Lawrence Band, Cuan Petheram, Sandra Dharmadi, Kim Seong Tan, Lu Zhang, Patrick Lane, Anthony Kiem, Lucy Marshall, Anne Griebel, Belinda E. Medlyn, Dongryeol Ryu, Giancarlo Bonotto, Conrad Wasko, Anna Ukkola, Clare Stephens, Andrew Frost, Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Patricia Saco, Hongxing Zheng, Francis Chiew, Edoardo Daly, Glen Walker, R. Willem Vervoort, Justin Hughes, Luca Trotter, Brad Neal, Ian Cartwright, and Rory Nathan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6073–6120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, we have seen multi-year droughts tending to cause shifts in the relationship between rainfall and streamflow. In shifted catchments that have not recovered, an average rainfall year produces less streamflow today than it did pre-drought. We take a multi-disciplinary approach to understand why these shifts occur, focusing on Australia's over-10-year Millennium Drought. We evaluate multiple hypotheses against evidence, with particular focus on the key role of groundwater processes.
Qichun Yang, Quan J. Wang, Andrew W. Western, Wenyan Wu, Yawen Shao, and Kirsti Hakala
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 941–954, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-941-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-941-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts of evaporative water loss in the future are highly valuable for water resource management. These forecasts are often produced using the outputs of climate models. We developed an innovative method to correct errors in these forecasts, particularly the errors caused by deficiencies of climate models in modeling the changing climate. We apply this method to seasonal forecasts of evaporative water loss across Australia and achieve significant improvements in the forecast quality.
Danlu Guo, Camille Minaudo, Anna Lintern, Ulrike Bende-Michl, Shuci Liu, Kefeng Zhang, and Clément Duvert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the impact of baseflow contribution on concentration–flow (C–Q) relationships across the Australian continent. We developed a novel Bayesian hierarchical model for six water quality variables across 157 catchments that span five climate zones. For sediments and nutrients, the C–Q slope is generally steeper for catchments with a higher median and a greater variability of baseflow contribution, highlighting the key role of variable flow pathways in particulate and solute export.
Theresa Boas, Heye Bogena, Thomas Grünwald, Bernard Heinesch, Dongryeol Ryu, Marius Schmidt, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 573–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we were able to significantly improve CLM5 model performance for European cropland sites by adding a winter wheat representation, specific plant parameterizations for important cash crops, and a cover-cropping and crop rotation subroutine to its crop module. Our modifications should be applied in future studies of CLM5 to improve regional yield predictions and to better understand large-scale impacts of agricultural management on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.
Danlu Guo, Anna Lintern, J. Angus Webb, Dongryeol Ryu, Ulrike Bende-Michl, Shuci Liu, and Andrew William Western
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 827–847, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-827-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-827-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed predictive models to represent the spatial and temporal variation of stream water quality across Victoria, Australia. The model structures were informed by a data-driven approach, which identified the key controls of water quality variations from long-term records. These models are helpful to identify likely future changes in water quality and, in turn, provide critical information for developing management strategies to improve stream water quality.
Chinchu Mohan, Andrew W. Western, Yongping Wei, and Margarita Saft
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2689–2703, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2689-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2689-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
To ensure a sustainable supply of groundwater, scientific information about what is going into the system as recharge and what is taken out of the system via pumping is essential. This study identified the most influential factors in groundwater recharge and developed an empirical global recharge model. The meteorological and vegetation factors were the most important factors, and the long-term global average recharge was 134 mm per year. This model will aid in groundwater policy-making.
Danlu Guo, Seth Westra, and Holger R. Maier
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2107–2126, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2107-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2107-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This study assessed the impact of baseline climate conditions on the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration (PET) to a large range of plausible changes in temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation and wind speed at 30 Australian locations. Around 2-fold greater PET changes were observed at cool and humid locations compared to others, indicating potential for elevated water loss in the future. These impacts can be useful to inform the selection of PET models under a changing climate.
Wade T. Crow, Eunjin Han, Dongryeol Ryu, Christopher R. Hain, and Martha C. Anderson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1849–1862, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1849-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1849-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Terrestrial water storage is defined as the total volume of water stored within the land surface and sub-surface and is a key variable for tracking long-term variability in the global water cycle. Currently, annual variations in terrestrial water storage can only be measured at extremely coarse spatial resolutions (> 200 000 km2) using gravity-based remote sensing. Here we provide evidence that microwave-based remote sensing of soil moisture can be applied to enhance this resolution.
Shabnam Saffarpour, Andrew W. Western, Russell Adams, and Jeffrey J. McDonnell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4525–4545, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4525-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4525-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
A variety of threshold mechanisms influence the transfer of rainfall to runoff from catchments. Some of these mechanisms depend on the occurrence of intense rainfall and others depend on the catchment being wet. This article first provides a framework for considering which mechanisms are important in different situations and then uses that framework to examine the behaviour of a catchment in Australia that exhibits a mix of both rainfall intensity and catchment wetness dependent thresholds.
Z. K. Tesemma, Y. Wei, M. C. Peel, and A. W. Western
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2821–2836, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2821-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2821-2015, 2015
Z. Lu, Y. Wei, H. Xiao, S. Zou, J. Xie, J. Ren, and A. Western
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2261–2273, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2261-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2261-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
This paper quantitatively analyzed the evolution of human-water relationships in the Heihe River basin over the past 2000 years by reconstructing the catchment water balance. The results provided the basis for investigating the impacts of human societies on hydrological systems. The evolutionary processes of human-water relationships can be divided into four stages: predevelopment, take-off, acceleration, and rebalancing. And the transition of the human-water relationship had no fixed pattern.
C. Alvarez-Garreton, D. Ryu, A. W. Western, C.-H. Su, W. T. Crow, D. E. Robertson, and C. Leahy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1659–1676, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1659-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1659-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We assimilate satellite soil moisture into a rainfall-runoff model for improving flood prediction within a data-scarce region. We argue that the spatially distributed satellite data can alleviate the model prediction limitations. We show that satellite soil moisture DA reduces the uncertainty of the streamflow ensembles. We propose new techniques for the DA scheme, including seasonal error characterisation, bias correction of the satellite retrievals, and model error representation.
J. F. Costelloe, T. J. Peterson, K. Halbert, A. W. Western, and J. J. McDonnell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1599–1613, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1599-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1599-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater surface mapping is used as an independent data set to better estimate groundwater discharge to streamflow. The groundwater surfaces indicated when other techniques likely overestimated the groundwater discharge component of baseflow. Groundwater surfaces also identified areas where regional groundwater could not be contributing to tributary streamflow. This method adds significant value to water resource management where sufficient groundwater monitoring data are available.
C.-H. Su and D. Ryu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 17–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-17-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-17-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Global environmental monitoring requires geophysical measurements from a variety of sources and sensors to close the information gap. This paper proposes a novel approach for analysing temporal scale-by-scale differences (biases and errors) between geophysical estimates from disparate sources. This allows assessment of different bias correction schemes, and forms the basis for a multi-scale bias correction scheme and data-adaptive, non-linear de-noising.
Z. K. Tesemma, Y. Wei, M. C. Peel, and A. W. Western
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-10515-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-10515-2014, 2014
Revised manuscript not accepted
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Seasonal variation in land cover estimates reveals sensitivities and opportunities for environmental models
Estimating response times, flow velocities, and roughness coefficients of Canadian Prairie basins
Learning landscape features from streamflow with autoencoders
On the use of streamflow transformations for hydrological model calibration
Simulation-based inference for parameter estimation of complex watershed simulators
Multi-scale soil moisture data and process-based modeling reveal the importance of lateral groundwater flow in a subarctic catchment
Catchment response to climatic variability: implications for root zone storage and streamflow predictions
Hybrid hydrological modeling for large alpine basins: a semi-distributed approach
Karst aquifer discharge response to rainfall interpreted as anomalous transport
HESS Opinions: Never train a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network on a single basin
Large-sample hydrology – a few camels or a whole caravan?
Comment on “Are soils overrated in hydrology?” by Gao et al. (2023)
Multi-decadal fluctuations in root zone storage capacity through vegetation adaptation to hydro-climatic variability have minor effects on the hydrological response in the Neckar River basin, Germany
Projected future changes in the cryosphere and hydrology of a mountainous catchment in the upper Heihe River, China
On the importance of plant phenology in the evaporative process of a semi-arid woodland: could it be why satellite-based evaporation estimates in the miombo differ?
Achieving water budget closure through physical hydrological processes modelling: insights from a large-sample study
Regionalization of GR4J model parameters for river flow prediction in Paraná, Brazil
Heavy-tailed flood peak distributions: What is the effect of the spatial variability of rainfall and runoff generation?
Evolution of river regimes in the Mekong River basin over 8 decades and the role of dams in recent hydrological extremes
Skill of seasonal flow forecasts at catchment scale: an assessment across South Korea
To what extent do flood-inducing storm events change future flood hazards?
State updating in the Xin'anjiang Model: Joint assimilating streamflow and multi-source soil moisture data via Asynchronous Ensemble Kalman Filter with enhanced Error Models
When ancient numerical demons meet physics-informed machine learning: adjoint-based gradients for implicit differentiable modeling
Assessing the impact of climate change on high return levels of peak flows in Bavaria applying the CRCM5 large ensemble
Impacts of climate and land surface change on catchment evapotranspiration and runoff from 1951 to 2020 in Saxony, Germany
Quantifying and reducing flood forecast uncertainty by the CHUP-BMA method
Developing a tile drainage module for the Cold Regions Hydrological Model: lessons from a farm in southern Ontario, Canada
To bucket or not to bucket? Analyzing the performance and interpretability of hybrid hydrological models with dynamic parameterization
Widespread flooding dynamics under climate change: characterising floods using grid-based hydrological modelling and regional climate projections
HESS Opinions: The sword of Damocles of the impossible flood
A diversity centric strategy for the selection of spatio-temporal training data for LSTM-based streamflow forecasting
Metamorphic testing of machine learning and conceptual hydrologic models
The influence of human activities on streamflow reductions during the megadrought in central Chile
Elevational control of isotopic composition and application in understanding hydrologic processes in the mid Merced River catchment, Sierra Nevada, California, USA
Lack of robustness of hydrological models: A large-sample diagnosis and an attempt to identify the hydrological and climatic drivers
The Significance of the Leaf-Area-Index on the Evapotranspiration Estimation in SWAT-T for Characteristic Land Cover Types of Western Africa
Enhancing long short-term memory (LSTM)-based streamflow prediction with a spatially distributed approach
Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain
Simulating the Tone River Eastward Diversion Project in Japan Carried Out Four Centuries Ago
Impacts of spatiotemporal resolutions of precipitation on flood event simulation based on multimodel structures – a case study over the Xiang River basin in China
A network approach for multiscale catchment classification using traits
Multi-model approach in a variable spatial framework for streamflow simulation
Advancing understanding of lake–watershed hydrology: a fully coupled numerical model illustrated by Qinghai Lake
Technical note: Testing the connection between hillslope-scale runoff fluctuations and streamflow hydrographs at the outlet of large river basins
Empirical stream thermal sensitivity cluster on the landscape according to geology and climate
Deep learning for monthly rainfall–runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia
A large-sample modelling approach towards integrating streamflow and evaporation data for the Spanish catchments
On optimization of calibrations of a distributed hydrological model with spatially distributed information on snow
Toward interpretable LSTM-based modeling of hydrological systems
Flow intermittence prediction using a hybrid hydrological modelling approach: influence of observed intermittence data on the training of a random forest model
Daniel T. Myers, David Jones, Diana Oviedo-Vargas, John Paul Schmit, Darren L. Ficklin, and Xuesong Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5295–5310, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5295-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5295-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how streamflow and water quality models respond to land cover data collected by satellites during the growing season versus the non-growing season. The land cover data showed more trees during the growing season and more built areas during the non-growing season. We next found that the use of non-growing season data resulted in a higher modeled nutrient export to streams. Knowledge of these sensitivities would be particularly important when models inform water resource management.
Kevin R. Shook, Paul H. Whitfield, Christopher Spence, and John W. Pomeroy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5173–5192, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5173-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5173-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recent studies suggest that the velocities of water running off landscapes in the Canadian Prairies may be much smaller than generally assumed. Analyses of historical flows for 23 basins in central Alberta show that many of the rivers responded more slowly and that the flows are much slower than would be estimated from equations developed elsewhere. The effects of slow flow velocities on the development of hydrological models of the region are discussed, as are the possible causes.
Alberto Bassi, Marvin Höge, Antonietta Mira, Fabrizio Fenicia, and Carlo Albert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4971–4988, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4971-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4971-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The goal is to remove the impact of meteorological drivers in order to uncover the unique landscape fingerprints of a catchment from streamflow data. Our results reveal an optimal two-feature summary for most catchments, with a third feature associated with aridity and intermittent flow that is needed for challenging cases. Baseflow index, aridity, and soil or vegetation attributes strongly correlate with learnt features, indicating their importance for streamflow prediction.
Guillaume Thirel, Léonard Santos, Olivier Delaigue, and Charles Perrin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4837–4860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4837-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4837-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We discuss how mathematical transformations impact calibrated hydrological model simulations. We assess how 11 transformations behave over the complete range of streamflows. Extreme transformations lead to models that are specialized for extreme streamflows but show poor performance outside the range of targeted streamflows and are less robust. We show that no a priori assumption about transformations can be taken as warranted.
Robert Hull, Elena Leonarduzzi, Luis De La Fuente, Hoang Viet Tran, Andrew Bennett, Peter Melchior, Reed M. Maxwell, and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4685–4713, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4685-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale hydrologic simulators are a needed tool to explore complex watershed processes and how they may evolve with a changing climate. However, calibrating them can be difficult because they are costly to run and have many unknown parameters. We implement a state-of-the-art approach to model calibration using neural networks with a set of experiments based on streamflow in the upper Colorado River basin.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Kersti Leppä, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-aho, Giulia Mazzotti, Terhikki Manninen, Mika Korkiakoski, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, and Samuli Launiainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We used hydrological models, field measurements, and satellite-based data to study the soil moisture dynamics in a subarctic catchment. The role of groundwater was studied with different ways to model the groundwater dynamics and via comparisons to the observational data. The choice of groundwater model was shown to have a strong impact, and representation of lateral flow was important to capture wet soil conditions. Our results provide insights for ecohydrological studies in boreal regions.
Nienke Tempel, Laurène Bouaziz, Riccardo Taormina, Ellis van Noppen, Jasper Stam, Eric Sprokkereef, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4577–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4577-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4577-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the impact of climatic variability on root zone water storage capacities and, thus, on hydrological predictions. Analysing data from 286 areas in Europe and the US, we found that, despite some variations in root zone storage capacity due to changing climatic conditions over multiple decades, these changes are generally minor and have a limited effect on water storage and river flow predictions.
Bu Li, Ting Sun, Fuqiang Tian, Mahmut Tudaji, Li Qin, and Guangheng Ni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4521–4538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4521-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4521-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper developed hybrid semi-distributed hydrological models by employing a process-based model as the backbone and utilizing deep learning to parameterize and replace internal modules. The main contribution is to provide a high-performance tool enriched with explicit hydrological knowledge for hydrological prediction and to improve understanding about the hydrological sensitivities to climate change in large alpine basins.
Dan Elhanati, Nadine Goeppert, and Brian Berkowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4239–4249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4239-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4239-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A continuous time random walk framework was developed to allow modeling of a karst aquifer discharge response to measured rainfall. The application of the numerical model yielded robust fits between modeled and measured discharge values, especially for the distinctive long tails found during recession times. The findings shed light on the interplay of slow and fast flow in the karst system and establish the application of the model for simulating flow and transport in such systems.
Frederik Kratzert, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, and Grey Nearing
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4187–4201, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4187-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4187-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, a special type of neural-network architecture became increasingly popular in hydrology literature. However, in most applications, this model was applied as a one-to-one replacement for hydrology models without adapting or rethinking the experimental setup. In this opinion paper, we show how this is almost always a bad decision and how using these kinds of models requires the use of large-sample hydrology data sets.
Franziska Clerc-Schwarzenbach, Giovanni Selleri, Mattia Neri, Elena Toth, Ilja van Meerveld, and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4219–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show that the differences between the forcing data included in three CAMELS datasets (US, BR, GB) and the forcing data included for the same catchments in the Caravan dataset affect model calibration considerably. The model performance dropped when the data from the Caravan dataset were used instead of the original data. Most of the model performance drop could be attributed to the differences in precipitation data. However, differences were largest for the potential evapotranspiration data.
Ying Zhao, Mehdi Rahmati, Harry Vereecken, and Dani Or
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4059–4063, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Gao et al. (2023) question the importance of soil in hydrology, sparking debate. We acknowledge some valid points but critique their broad, unsubstantiated views on soil's role. Our response highlights three key areas: (1) the false divide between ecosystem-centric and soil-centric approaches, (2) the vital yet varied impact of soil properties, and (3) the call for a scale-aware framework. We aim to unify these perspectives, enhancing hydrology's comprehensive understanding.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Root zone storage capacity (Sumax) changes significantly over multiple decades, reflecting vegetation adaptation to climatic variability. However, this temporal evolution of Sumax cannot explain long-term fluctuations in the partitioning of water fluxes as expressed by deviations ΔIE from the parametric Budyko curve over time with different climatic conditions, and it does not have any significant effects on shorter-term hydrological response characteristics of the upper Neckar catchment.
Zehua Chang, Hongkai Gao, Leilei Yong, Kang Wang, Rensheng Chen, Chuntan Han, Otgonbayar Demberel, Batsuren Dorjsuren, Shugui Hou, and Zheng Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3897–3917, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3897-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
An integrated cryospheric–hydrologic model, FLEX-Cryo, was developed that considers glaciers, snow cover, and frozen soil and their dynamic impacts on hydrology. We utilized it to simulate future changes in cryosphere and hydrology in the Hulu catchment. Our projections showed the two glaciers will melt completely around 2050, snow cover will reduce, and permafrost will degrade. For hydrology, runoff will decrease after the glacier has melted, and permafrost degradation will increase baseflow.
Henry M. Zimba, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Kawawa E. Banda, Petra Hulsman, Nick van de Giesen, Imasiku A. Nyambe, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3633–3663, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The fall and flushing of new leaves in the miombo woodlands co-occur in the dry season before the commencement of seasonal rainfall. The miombo species are also said to have access to soil moisture in deep soils, including groundwater in the dry season. Satellite-based evaporation estimates, temporal trends, and magnitudes differ the most in the dry season, most likely due to inadequate understanding and representation of the highlighted miombo species attributes in simulations.
Xudong Zheng, Dengfeng Liu, Shengzhi Huang, Hao Wang, and Xianmeng Meng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-230, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-230, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Water budget non-closure is a widespread phenomenon among multisource datasets, which undermines the robustness of hydrological inferences. This study proposes a Multisource Datasets Correction Framework grounded in Physical Hydrological Processes Modelling to enhance water budget closure, called PHPM-MDCF. We examined the efficiency and robustness of the framework using the CAMELS dataset, and achieved an average reduction of 49 % in total water budget residuals across 475 CONUS basins.
Louise Akemi Kuana, Arlan Scortegagna Almeida, Emílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri, and Steffen Manfred Noe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3367–3390, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3367-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The authors compared regionalization methods for river flow prediction in 126 catchments from the south of Brazil, a region with humid subtropical and hot temperate climate. The regionalization method based on physiographic–climatic similarity had the best performance for predicting daily and Q95 reference flow. We showed that basins without flow monitoring can have a good approximation of streamflow using machine learning and physiographic–climatic information as inputs.
Elena Macdonald, Bruno Merz, Viet Dung Nguyen, and Sergiy Vorogushyn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-181, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-181, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Flood peak distributions indicate how likely the occurrence of an extreme flood is at a certain river. If the distribution has a so-called heavy tail, extreme floods are more likely than might be anticipated. We find heavier tails in small compared to large catchments, and that spatially variable rainfall leads to a lower occurrence probability of extreme floods. Spatially variable runoff does not show an effect. The results can improve estimations of occurrence probabilities of extreme floods.
Huy Dang and Yadu Pokhrel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3347–3365, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3347-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3347-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By examining basin-wide simulations of a river regime over 83 years with and without dams, we present evidence that climate variation was a key driver of hydrologic variabilities in the Mekong River basin (MRB) over the long term; however, dams have largely altered the seasonality of the Mekong’s flow regime and annual flooding patterns in major downstream areas in recent years. These findings could help us rethink the planning of future dams and water resource management in the MRB.
Yongshin Lee, Francesca Pianosi, Andres Peñuela, and Miguel Angel Rico-Ramirez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3261–3279, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Following recent advancements in weather prediction technology, we explored how seasonal weather forecasts (1 or more months ahead) could benefit practical water management in South Korea. Our findings highlight that using seasonal weather forecasts for predicting flow patterns 1 to 3 months ahead is effective, especially during dry years. This suggest that seasonal weather forecasts can be helpful in improving the management of water resources.
Mariam Khanam, Giulia Sofia, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3161–3190, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3161-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Flooding worsens due to climate change, with river dynamics being a key in local flood control. Predicting post-storm geomorphic changes is challenging. Using self-organizing maps and machine learning, this study forecasts post-storm alterations in stage–discharge relationships across 3101 US stream gages. The provided framework can aid in updating hazard assessments by identifying rivers prone to change, integrating channel adjustments into flood hazard assessment.
Junfu Gong, Xingwen Liu, Cheng Yao, Zhijia Li, Albrecht Weerts, Qiaoling Li, Satish Bastola, Yingchun Huang, and Junzeng Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-211, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-211, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Our study introduces a new method to improve flood forecasting by combining soil moisture and streamflow data using an advanced data assimilation technique. By integrating field and reanalysis soil moisture data and assimilating this with streamflow measurements, we aim to enhance the accuracy of flood predictions. This approach reduces the accumulation of past errors in the initial conditions at the start of the forecast, helping better prepare for and respond to floods.
Yalan Song, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Martyn P. Clark, Dapeng Feng, Kathryn Lawson, Kamlesh Sawadekar, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3051–3077, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Differentiable models (DMs) integrate neural networks and physical equations for accuracy, interpretability, and knowledge discovery. We developed an adjoint-based DM for ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for hydrological modeling, reducing distorted fluxes and physical parameters from errors in models that use explicit and operation-splitting schemes. With a better numerical scheme and improved structure, the adjoint-based DM matches or surpasses long short-term memory (LSTM) performance.
Florian Willkofer, Raul R. Wood, and Ralf Ludwig
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2969–2989, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2969-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Severe flood events pose a threat to riverine areas, yet robust estimates of the dynamics of these events in the future due to climate change are rarely available. Hence, this study uses data from a regional climate model, SMILE, to drive a high-resolution hydrological model for 98 catchments of hydrological Bavaria and exploits the large database to derive robust values for the 100-year flood events. Results indicate an increase in frequency and intensity for most catchments in the future.
Maik Renner and Corina Hauffe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2849–2869, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2849-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2849-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate and land surface changes influence the partitioning of water balance components decisively. Their impact is quantified for 71 catchments in Saxony. Germany. Distinct signatures in the joint water and energy budgets are found: (i) past forest dieback caused a decrease in and subsequent recovery of evapotranspiration in the affected regions, and (ii) the recent shift towards higher aridity imposed a large decline in runoff that has not been seen in the observation records before.
Zhen Cui, Shenglian Guo, Hua Chen, Dedi Liu, Yanlai Zhou, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2809–2829, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble forecasting facilitates reliable flood forecasting and warning. This study couples the copula-based hydrologic uncertainty processor (CHUP) with Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and proposes the novel CHUP-BMA method of reducing inflow forecasting uncertainty of the Three Gorges Reservoir. The CHUP-BMA avoids the normal distribution assumption in the HUP-BMA and considers the constraint of initial conditions, which can improve the deterministic and probabilistic forecast performance.
Mazda Kompanizare, Diogo Costa, Merrin L. Macrae, John W. Pomeroy, and Richard M. Petrone
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2785–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2785-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2785-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new agricultural tile drainage module was developed in the Cold Region Hydrological Model platform. Tile flow and water levels are simulated by considering the effect of capillary fringe thickness, drainable water and seasonal regional groundwater dynamics. The model was applied to a small well-instrumented farm in southern Ontario, Canada, where there are concerns about the impacts of agricultural drainage into Lake Erie.
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Nicole Bäuerle, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2705–2719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological hybrid models promise to merge the performance of deep learning methods with the interpretability of process-based models. One hybrid approach is the dynamic parameterization of conceptual models using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. We explored this method to evaluate the effect of the flexibility given by LSTMs on the process-based part.
Adam Griffin, Alison L. Kay, Paul Sayers, Victoria Bell, Elizabeth Stewart, and Sam Carr
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2635–2650, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Widespread flooding is a major problem in the UK and is greatly affected by climate change and land-use change. To look at how widespread flooding changes in the future, climate model data (UKCP18) were used with a hydrological model (Grid-to-Grid) across the UK, and 14 400 events were identified between two time slices: 1980–2010 and 2050–2080. There was a strong increase in the number of winter events in the future time slice and in the peak return periods.
Alberto Montanari, Bruno Merz, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2603–2615, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Floods often take communities by surprise, as they are often considered virtually
impossibleyet are an ever-present threat similar to the sword suspended over the head of Damocles in the classical Greek anecdote. We discuss four reasons why extremely large floods carry a risk that is often larger than expected. We provide suggestions for managing the risk of megafloods by calling for a creative exploration of hazard scenarios and communicating the unknown corners of the reality of floods.
Everett Snieder and Usman T. Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-169, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-169, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Improving the accuracy of flood forecasts is paramount to minimising flood damage. Machine-learning models are increasingly being applied for flood forecasting. Such models are typically trained to large historic hydrometeorological datasets. In this work, we evaluate methods for selecting training datasets, that maximise the spatiotemproal diversity of the represented hydrological processes. Empirical results showcase the importance of hydrological diversity in training ML models.
Peter Reichert, Kai Ma, Marvin Höge, Fabrizio Fenicia, Marco Baity-Jesi, Dapeng Feng, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2505–2529, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the predicted change in catchment outlet discharge to precipitation and temperature change for conceptual and machine learning hydrological models. We found that machine learning models, despite providing excellent fit and prediction capabilities, can be unreliable regarding the prediction of the effect of temperature change for low-elevation catchments. This indicates the need for caution when applying them for the prediction of the effect of climate change.
Nicolás Álamos, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Ariel Muñoz, and Álvaro González-Reyes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2483–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we assess the effects of climate and water use on streamflow reductions and drought intensification during the last 3 decades in central Chile. We address this by contrasting streamflow observations with near-natural streamflow simulations. We conclude that while the lack of precipitation dominates streamflow reductions in the megadrought, water uses have not diminished during this time, causing a worsening of the hydrological drought conditions and maladaptation conditions.
Fengjing Liu, Martha H. Conklin, and Glenn D. Shaw
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2239–2258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2239-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2239-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snowpack has been declining and more precipitation falls as rain than snow. Using stable isotopes, we found flows and flow duration in Yosemite Creek are most sensitive to climate warming due to strong evaporation of waterfalls, potentially lengthening the dry-up period of waterfalls in summer and negatively affecting tourism. Groundwater recharge in Yosemite Valley is primarily from the upper snow–rain transition (2000–2500 m) and very vulnerable to a reduction in the snow–rain ratio.
Léonard Santos, Vazken Andréassian, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Göran Lindström, Alban de Lavenne, Charles Perrin, Lila Collet, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-80, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-80, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This work aims at investigating how hydrological models can be transferred to a period in which climatic conditions are different to the ones of the period in which it was set up. The RAT method, built to detect dependencies between model error and climatic drivers, was applied to 3 different hydrological models on 352 catchments in Denmark, France and Sweden. Potential issues are detected for a significant number of catchments for the 3 models even though these catchments differ for each model.
Fabian Merk, Timo Schaffhauser, Faizan Anwar, Ye Tuo, Jean-Martial Cohard, and Markus Disse
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-131, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-131, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
ET is computed from vegetation (plant transpiration) and soil (soil evaporation). In Western Africa, plant transpiration correlates with vegetation growth. Vegetation is often represented with the leaf-area-index (LAI). In this study, we evaluate the importance of LAI for the ET calculation. We take a close look at the LAI-ET interaction and show the relevance to consider both, LAI and ET. Our work contributes to the understanding of the processes of the terrestrial water cycle.
Qiutong Yu, Bryan A. Tolson, Hongren Shen, Ming Han, Juliane Mai, and Jimmy Lin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2107–2122, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2107-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2107-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to incorporate input variables' spatial distribution information when implementing long short-term memory (LSTM) models for streamflow prediction. This work presents a novel hybrid modelling approach to predict streamflow while accounting for spatial variability. We evaluated the performance against lumped LSTM predictions in 224 basins across the Great Lakes region in North America. This approach shows promise for predicting streamflow in large, ungauged basin.
Marcus Buechel, Louise Slater, and Simon Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2081–2105, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Afforestation has been proposed internationally, but the hydrological implications of such large increases in the spatial extent of woodland are not fully understood. In this study, we use a land surface model to simulate hydrology across Great Britain with realistic afforestation scenarios and potential climate changes. Countrywide afforestation minimally influences hydrology, when compared to climate change, and reduces low streamflow whilst not lowering the highest flows.
Joško Trošelj and Naota Hanasaki
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-595, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-595, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents the first distributed hydrological simulation which confirms the claims raised by historians that the Eastward Diversion Project of the Tone River in Japan was conducted four centuries ago to increase low flows and subsequent travelling possibilities surrounding the Capitol Edo (Tokyo) using inland navigation. We reconstructed six historical river maps and indirectly validated the historical simulations with reachable ancient river ports via increased low-flow water levels.
Qian Zhu, Xiaodong Qin, Dongyang Zhou, Tiantian Yang, and Xinyi Song
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1665–1686, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1665-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Input data, model and calibration strategy can affect the accuracy of flood event simulation and prediction. Satellite-based precipitation with different spatiotemporal resolutions is an important input source. Data-driven models are sometimes proven to be more accurate than hydrological models. Event-based calibration and conventional strategy are two options adopted for flood simulation. This study targets the three concerns for accurate flood event simulation and prediction.
Fabio Ciulla and Charuleka Varadharajan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1617–1651, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new method based on network science for unsupervised classification of large datasets and apply it to classify 9067 US catchments and 274 biophysical traits at multiple scales. We find that our trait-based approach produces catchment classes with distinct streamflow behavior and that spatial patterns emerge amongst pristine and human-impacted catchments. This method can be widely used beyond hydrology to identify patterns, reduce trait redundancy, and select representative sites.
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1539–1566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasting is useful for many applications, ranging from population safety (e.g. floods) to water resource management (e.g. agriculture or hydropower). To this end, hydrological models must be optimized. However, a model is inherently wrong. This study aims to analyse the contribution of a multi-model approach within a variable spatial framework to improve streamflow simulations. The underlying idea is to take advantage of the strength of each modelling framework tested.
Lele Shu, Xiaodong Li, Yan Chang, Xianhong Meng, Hao Chen, Yuan Qi, Hongwei Wang, Zhaoguo Li, and Shihua Lyu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1477–1491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new model to better understand how water moves in a lake basin. Our model improves upon previous methods by accurately capturing the complexity of water movement, both on the surface and subsurface. Our model, tested using data from China's Qinghai Lake, accurately replicates complex water movements and identifies contributing factors of the lake's water balance. The findings provide a robust tool for predicting hydrological processes, aiding water resource planning.
Ricardo Mantilla, Morgan Fonley, and Nicolás Velásquez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1373–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists strive to “Be right for the right reasons” when modeling the hydrologic cycle; however, the datasets available to validate hydrological models are sparse, and in many cases, they comprise streamflow observations at the outlets of large catchments. In this work, we show that matching streamflow observations at the outlet of a large basin is not a reliable indicator of a correct description of the small-scale runoff processes.
Lillian M. McGill, E. Ashley Steel, and Aimee H. Fullerton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1351–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the relationship between air and river temperatures in Washington's Snoqualmie and Wenatchee basins. We used classification and regression approaches to show that the sensitivity of river temperature to air temperature is variable across basins and controlled largely by geology and snowmelt. Findings can be used to inform strategies for river basin restoration and conservation, such as identifying climate-insensitive areas of the basin that should be preserved and protected.
Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1191–1213, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To determine if deep learning models are in general a viable alternative to traditional hydrologic modelling techniques in Australian catchments, a comparison of river–runoff predictions is made between traditional conceptual models and deep learning models in almost 500 catchments spread over the continent. It is found that the deep learning models match or outperform the traditional models in over two-thirds of the river catchments, indicating feasibility in a wide variety of conditions.
Patricio Yeste, Matilde García-Valdecasas Ojeda, Sonia R. Gámiz-Fortis, Yolanda Castro-Díez, Axel Bronstert, and María Jesús Esteban-Parra
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-57, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-57, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Integrating streamflow and evaporation data can help improve the physical realism of hydrologic models. In this work we investigate the capabilities of the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) to reproduce both hydrologic variables for 189 headwater located in Spain. Results from sensitivity analysis indicate that adding two vegetation is enough to improve the representation of evaporation, and the performance of VIC exceeded that of the largest modelling effort currently available in Spain.
Dipti Tiwari, Mélanie Trudel, and Robert Leconte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1127–1146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Calibrating hydrological models with multi-objective functions enhances model robustness. By using spatially distributed snow information in the calibration, the model performance can be enhanced without compromising the outputs. In this study the HYDROTEL model was calibrated in seven different experiments, incorporating the SPAEF (spatial efficiency) metric alongside Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE), with the aim of identifying the optimal calibration strategy.
Luis Andres De la Fuente, Mohammad Reza Ehsani, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Laura Elizabeth Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 945–971, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Long short-term memory (LSTM) is a widely used machine-learning model in hydrology, but it is difficult to extract knowledge from it. We propose HydroLSTM, which represents processes like a hydrological reservoir. Models based on HydroLSTM perform similarly to LSTM while requiring fewer cell states. The learned parameters are informative about the dominant hydrology of a catchment. Our results show how parsimony and hydrological knowledge extraction can be achieved by using the new structure.
Louise Mimeau, Annika Künne, Flora Branger, Sven Kralisch, Alexandre Devers, and Jean-Philippe Vidal
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 851–871, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Modelling flow intermittence is essential for predicting the future evolution of drying in river networks and better understanding the ecological and socio-economic impacts. However, modelling flow intermittence is challenging, and observed data on temporary rivers are scarce. This study presents a new modelling approach for predicting flow intermittence in river networks and shows that combining different sources of observed data reduces the model uncertainty.
Cited articles
Abbaspour, K. C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H., and Kløve, B.:
A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model,
J. Hydrol.,
524, 733–752, 2015.
Abbott, M., Bathurst, J., Cunge, J., O'connell, P., and Rasmussen, J.:
An introduction to the European Hydrological System—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen,“SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system,
J. Hydrol.,
87, 61–77, 1986.
Arnold, J. G. and Fohrer, N.:
SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling,
Hydrol. Process.,
19, 563–572, 2005.
Atkinson, A. B.:
The box-cox transformation: Review and extensions,
Stat. Sci., 36, 239–255, 2021.
Atkinson, R., Power, R., Lemon, D., O'Hagan, R., Dovey, D., and Kinny, D.: The Australian Hydrological Geospatial Fabric–Development Methodology and Conceptual Architecture, Citeseer, 2008.
Barnard, R., Leadley, P. W., and Hungate, B. A.:
Global change, nitrification, and denitrification: a review,
Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
19, GB1007, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002282, 2005.
Bartley, R., Speirs, W. J., Ellis, T. W., and Waters, D. K.:
A review of sediment and nutrient concentration data from Australia for use in catchment water quality models,
Mar. Pollut. Bull.,
65, 101–116, 2012.
Bartley, R., Thompson, C., Croke, J., Pietsch, T., Baker, B., Hughes, K., and Kinsey-Henderson, A.:
Insights into the history and timing of post-European land use disturbance on sedimentation rates in catchments draining to the Great Barrier Reef,
Mar. Pollut. Bull.,
131, 530–546, 2018.
Bayarri, M. J., Berger, J. O., Forte, A., and García-Donato, G.:
Criteria for Bayesian model choice with application to variable selection,
Ann Statist.,
40, 1550–1577, 2012.
Beiter, D., Weiler, M., and Blume, T.: Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5713–5744, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5713-2020, 2020.
Bieger, K., Hörmann, G., and Fohrer, N.:
Simulation of streamflow and sediment with the soil and water assessment tool in a data scarce catchment in the three Gorges region, China,
J. Environ. Qual.,
43, 37–45, 2014.
Box, G. E. and Cox, D. R.:
An analysis of transformations,
J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met.,
26, 211–243, 1964.
Brevik, E. C., Fenton, T. E., and Lazari, A.:
Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping,
Precis. Agric.,
7, 393–404, 2006.
Brodie, J. E., Kroon, F., Schaffelke, B., Wolanski, E., Lewis, S., Devlin, M., Bohnet, I., Bainbridge, Z., Waterhouse, J., and Davis, A.:
Terrestrial pollutant runoff to the Great Barrier Reef: an update of issues, priorities and management responses,
Mar. Pollut. Bull.,
65, 81–100, 2012.
Castillo, I., Schmidt-Hieber, J., and Van der Vaart, A.:
Bayesian linear regression with sparse priors,
Ann Statist.,
43, 1986–2018, 2015.
Chang, F.-J., Tsai, Y.-H., Chen, P.-A., Coynel, A., and Vachaud, G.:
Modeling water quality in an urban river using hydrological factors–Data driven approaches,
J. Environ. Manage.,
151, 87–96, 2015.
Chen, L., Sun, C., Wang, G., Xie, H., and Shen, Z.:
Event-based nonpoint source pollution prediction in a scarce data catchment,
J. Hydrol.,
552, 13–27, 2017.
Clow, D. W. and Sueker, J. K.:
Relations between basin characteristics and stream water chemistry in alpine/subalpine basins in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado,
Water Resour. Res.,
36, 49–61, 2000.
Cooke, S. E., Ahmed, S. M., and MacAlpine, N.:
Introductory guide to surface water quality monitoring in agriculture,
Conservation and Development Branch, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Edmonton, 2000.
Correll, D.: Buffer zones and water quality protection: general principles, Buffer zones: Their processes and potential in water protection, September 1996, Harpenden, England, 7–20, 1996.
Cuomo, A. and Guida, D.:
Using hydro-chemograph analyses to reveal runoff generation processes in a Mediterranean catchment,
Hydrol. Process.,
30, 4462–4476, 2016.
Daoud, J. I.:
Multicollinearity and regression analysis,
J. Phys.-Conf. Ser., 949, 012003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/949/1/012009, 2017.
Davis, A. M., Pearson, R. G., Brodie, J. E., and Butler, B.:
Review and conceptual models of agricultural impacts and water quality in waterways of the Great Barrier Reef catchment area,
Mar. Freshwater Res.,
68, 1–19, 2017.
Day, K. A. and McKeon, G. M.:
An index of summer rainfall for Queensland's grazing lands,
J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
57, 1623–1641, 2018.
De Keersmaecker, W., Lhermitte, S., Tits, L., Honnay, O., Somers, B., and Coppin, P.:
A model quantifying global vegetation resistance and resilience to short-term climate anomalies and their relationship with vegetation cover,
Global Ecol. Biogeogr.,
24, 539–548, 2015.
de Mello, K., Valente, R. A., Randhir, T. O., dos Santos, A. C. A., and Vettorazzi, C. A.:
Effects of land use and land cover on water quality of low-order streams in Southeastern Brazil: Watershed versus riparian zone,
Catena,
167, 130–138, 2018.
Deletic, A. B. and Maksimovic, C.:
Evaluation of water quality factors in storm runoff from paved areas,
J. Environ. Eng.,
124, 869–879, 1998.
Didan, K.:
MOD13A2 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 1km SIN Grid V006, NASA EOSDIS LP DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13A2.006, 2015.
DNRME:
available at: https://water-monitoring.information.qld.gov.au/ (last access: 1 September 2016),
Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy of Queensland, Brisbane, 2016.
Doran, J., Mielke, L., and Stamatiadis, S.:
Microbial activity and N cycling as regulated by soil water-filled pore space, 11th International Conference, Int. Soil Tillage Res. Orgo (ISTRO), Edinburgh, Scotland, 49–54, 1988.
Fernandez, C., Ley, E., and Steel, M. F.:
Benchmark priors for Bayesian model averaging,
J. Econometrics,
100, 381–427, 2001.
Filoso, S., Vallino, J., Hopkinson, C., Rastetter, E., and Claessens, L.: Modeling nitrogen transport in the Ipswich River Basin, Massachusetts, using a hydrological simulation program in FORTRAN (HSPF) 1, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 40, 1365–1384, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01592.x, 2004.
Fox, J., Weisberg, S., Adler, D., Bates, D., Baud-Bovy, G., Ellison, S., Firth, D., Friendly, M., Gorjanc, G., and Graves, S.:
Package “car”,
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2012.
Francesconi, W., Srinivasan, R., Pérez-Miñana, E., Willcock, S. P., and Quintero, M.:
Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: A systematic review,
J. Hydrol.,
535, 625–636, 2016.
Freckleton, R. P.:
Dealing with collinearity in behavioural and ecological data: model averaging and the problems of measurement error,
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.,
65, 91–101, 2011.
Frost, A., Ramchurn, A., and Smith, A.:
The Bureau's Operational AWRA Landscape (AWRA-L) Model,
Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, 47, 2016.
Fu, B., Merritt, W. S., Croke, B. F., Weber, T., and Jakeman, A. J.:
A review of catchment-scale water quality and erosion models and a synthesis of future prospects,
Environ. Modell. Softw.,
114, 75–97, 2019.
Garzon-Garcia, A., Wallace, R., Huggins, R., Turner, R. D., Smith, R., Orr, D., Ferguson, B., Gardiner, R., Thomson, B., and Warne, M.:
Total suspended solids, nutrient and pesticide loads (2013–2014) for rivers that discharge to the Great Barrier Reef,
Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation,
Brisbane, Australia, 2016.
Gelman, A., Stern, H. S., Carlin, J. B., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., and Rubin, D. B.:
Bayesian data analysis,
Chapman and Hall/CRC, Florida, US, 2013.
Geng, X., Heiss, J. W., Michael, H. A., and Boufadel, M. C.:
Subsurface flow and moisture dynamics in response to swash motions: Effects of beach hydraulic conductivity and capillarity,
Water Resour. Res.,
53, 10317–10335, 2017.
George, E. I. and McCulloch, R. E.:
Variable selection via Gibbs sampling,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.,
88, 881–889, 1993.
Geoscience Australia:
GEODATA 9 second DEM and D8: digital elevation model version 3 and flow direction grid 2008, Bioregion Assessment Source Dataset,
Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia, 2008.
Gilbert, M. and Brodie, J.:
Population and major land use in the Great Barrier Reef catchment area spatial and temporal trends,
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, 2001.
Gorman, D., Russell, B. D., and Connell, S. D.:
Land-to-sea connectivity: linking human-derived terrestrial subsidies to subtidal habitat change on open rocky coasts,
Ecol. Appl.,
19, 1114–1126, 2009.
Granger, S., Bol, R., Anthony, S., Owens, P., White, S., and Haygarth, P.: Towards a holistic classification of diffuse agricultural water pollution from intensively managed grasslands on heavy soils, Adv. Agron., 105, 83–115, 2010.
Griffith, J. A.:
Geographic techniques and recent applications of remote sensing to landscape-water quality studies,
Water Air Soil Poll.,
138, 181–197, 2002.
Griffith, J. A., Martinko, E. A., Whistler, J. L., and Price, K. P.:
Interrelationships among landscapes, NDVI, and stream water quality in the US Central Plains,
Ecol. Appl.,
12, 1702–1718, 2002.
Guo, D., Lintern, A., Webb, J. A., Ryu, D., Liu, S., Bende-Michl, U., Leahy, P., Wilson, P., and Western, A.:
Key Factors Affecting Temporal Variability in Stream Water Quality,
Water Resour. Res.,
55, 112–129, 2019.
Guo, D., Lintern, A., Webb, J. A., Ryu, D., Bende-Michl, U., Liu, S., and Western, A. W.: A data-based predictive model for spatiotemporal variability in stream water quality, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 827–847, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-827-2020, 2020.
Guthke, A.:
Defensible model complexity: A call for data-based and goal-oriented model choice,
Groundwater,
55, 646–650, 2017.
Harris, G. P.:
Biogeochemistry of nitrogen and phosphorus in Australian catchments, rivers and estuaries: effects of land use and flow regulation and comparisons with global patterns,
Mar. Freshwater Res.,
52, 139–149, 2001.
Hem, J. D.:
Fluctuations in concentration of dissolved solids of some southwestern streams,
Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un.,
29, 80–84, 1948.
Hinne, M., Gronau, Q. F., van den Bergh, D., and Wagenmakers, E.-J.:
A Conceptual Introduction to Bayesian Model Averaging,
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,
3, 200–215, 2020.
Hirsch, R. M., Moyer, D. L., and Archfield, S. A.:
Weighted regressions on time, discharge, and season (WRTDS), with an application to Chesapeake Bay river inputs,
J. Am. Water Resour. As.,
46, 857–880, 2010.
Hoeting, J. A., Raftery, A. E., and Madigan, D.:
Bayesian variable and transformation selection in linear regression,
J. Comput. Graph. Stat.,
11, 485–507, 2002.
Höge, M., Guthke, A., and Nowak, W.:
The hydrologist's guide to Bayesian model selection, averaging and combination,
J. Hydrol.,
572, 96–107, 2019.
Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A., and Walker, D.:
Sources of nutrient pollution to coastal waters in the United States: Implications for achieving coastal water quality goals,
Estuaries,
25, 656–676, 2002.
Jarihani, B., Sidle, R., Bartley, R., Roth, C., and Wilkinson, S.:
Characterisation of hydrological response to rainfall at multi spatio-temporal scales in savannas of semi-arid Australia,
Water,
9, 540, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070540, 2017.
Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., and Arnold, J.:
Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management,
Hydrol. Process.,
19, 749–762, 2005.
Kasiviswanathan, K. and Sudheer, K.:
Quantification of the predictive uncertainty of artificial neural network based river flow forecast models,
Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A.,
27, 137–146, 2013.
Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., and Franks, S. W.:
Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory,
Water Resour. Res.,
42, W03407,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004368, 2006.
Khan, U., Cook, F. J., Laugesen, R., Hasan, M. M., Plastow, K., Amirthanathan, G. E., Bari, M. A., and Tuteja, N. K.:
Development of catchment water quality models within a realtime status and forecast system for the Great Barrier Reef,
Environ. Modell. Softw.,
132, 104790, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104790, 2020.
Koci, J., Sidle, R. C., Jarihani, B., and Cashman, M. J.:
Linking hydrological connectivity to gully erosion in savanna rangelands tributary to the Great Barrier Reef using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry,
Land Degrad. Dev.,
31, 20–36, 2019.
Koci, J., Sidle, R. C., Kinsey-Henderson, A. E., Bartley, R., Wilkinson, S. N., Hawdon, A. A., Jarihani, B., Roth, C. H., and Hogarth, L.:
Effect of reduced grazing pressure on sediment and nutrient yields in savanna rangeland streams draining to the Great Barrier Reef,
J. Hydrol.,
582, 124520, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124520, 2020.
Kohavi, R.:
A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection,
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Montreal, Quebec Canada,
1137–1145, 1995.
Kratz, T., Webster, K., Bowser, C., Maguson, J., and Benson, B.:
The influence of landscape position on lakes in northern Wisconsin,
Freshwater Biol.,
37, 209–217, 1997.
Kruschke, J.:
Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan,
Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 2014.
Kuhnert, P., Wang, Y.-G., Henderson, B., Stewart, L., and Wilkinson, S.:
Statistical methods for the estimation of pollutant loads from monitoring data, Final Project Report, Report to the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility,
Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns, 2009.
Ladson, A. R., Brown, R., Neal, B., and Nathan, R.:
A standard approach to baseflow separation using the Lyne and Hollick filter,
Australasian Journal of Water Resources,
17, 25–34, 2013.
Lam, Q., Schmalz, B., and Fohrer, N.:
Modelling point and diffuse source pollution of nitrate in a rural lowland catchment using the SWAT model,
Agr. Water Manage.,
97, 317–325, 2010.
Lessels, J. and Bishop, T.:
A simulation based approach to quantify the difference between event-based and routine water quality monitoring schemes,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies,
4, 439–451, 2015.
Letcher, R. A., Jakeman, A. J., Calfas, M., Linforth, S., Baginska, B., and Lawrence, I.:
A comparison of catchment water quality models and direct estimation techniques,
Environ. Modell. Softw.,
17, 77–85, 2002.
Liang, F., Paulo, R., Molina, G., Clyde, M. A., and Berger, J. O.:
Mixtures of g priors for Bayesian variable selection,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.,
103, 410–423, 2008.
Lintern, A., Webb, J., Ryu, D., Liu, S., Bende-Michl, U., Waters, D., Leahy, P., Wilson, P., and Western, A.:
Key factors influencing differences in stream water quality across space,
WIRES Water,
5, e1260, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1260, 2018a.
Lintern, A., Webb, J., Ryu, D., Liu, S., Waters, D., Leahy, P., Bende-Michl, U., and Western, A.:
What are the key catchment characteristics affecting spatial differences in riverine water quality?,
Water Resour. Res.,
54, 7252–7272, 2018b.
Lintern, A., McPhillips, L., Winfrey, B., Duncan, J., and Grady, C.:
Best Management Practices for Diffuse Nutrient Pollution: Wicked Problems Across Urban and Agricultural Watersheds,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
54, 9159–9174, 2020.
Liu, S., Ryu, D., Webb, J., Lintern, A., Waters, D., Guo, D., and Western, A.:
Characterisation of spatial variability in water quality in the Great Barrier Reef catchments using multivariate statistical analysis,
Mar. Pollut. Bull.,
137, 137–151, 2018.
Liu, Y., Wang, C., He, N., Wen, X., Gao, Y., Li, S., Niu, S., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Luo, Y., and Yu, G.:
A global synthesis of the rate and temperature sensitivity of soil nitrogen mineralization: latitudinal patterns and mechanisms,
Glob. Change Biol.,
23, 455–464, 2017.
Lloyd, C., Freer, J., Johnes, P., and Collins, A.:
Using hysteresis analysis of high-resolution water quality monitoring data, including uncertainty, to infer controls on nutrient and sediment transfer in catchments,
Sci. Total Environ.,
543, 388–404, 2016.
Ly, K., Metternicht, G., and Marshall, L.:
Transboundary river catchment areas of developing countries: Potential and limitations of watershed models for the simulation of sediment and nutrient loads. A review,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies,
24, 100605, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100605, 2019.
Mainali, J., Chang, H., and Chun, Y.:
A review of spatial statistical approaches to modeling water quality,
Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment,
43, 801–826, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319852003, 2019.
Mantovan, P. and Todini, E.:
Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology,
J. Hydrol.,
330, 368–381, 2006.
Masocha, M., Murwira, A., Magadza, C. H., Hirji, R., and Dube, T.:
Remote sensing of surface water quality in relation to catchment condition in Zimbabwe,
Phys. Chem. Earth Pt. A/B/C,
100, 13–18, 2017.
McCloskey, G., Waters, D., Baheerathan, R., Darr, S., Dougall, C., Ellis, R., Fentie, B., and Hateley, L.: Modelling reductions of pollutant loads due to improved management practices in the great barrier reef catchments: updated methodology and results-technical report for reef report card 2015, Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane, Queensland, 2017.
McCloskey, G., Baheerathan, R., Dougall, C., Ellis, R., Bennett, F., Waters, D., Darr, S., Fentie, B., Hateley, L., and Askildsen, M.:
Modelled estimates of fine sediment and particulate nutrients delivered from the Great Barrier Reef catchments,
Mar. Pollut. Bull.,
165, 112163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112163, 2021.
McGrane, S. J.:
Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: a review,
Hydrolog. Sci. J.,
61, 2295–2311, 2016.
McKergow, L. A., Weaver, D. M., Prosser, I. P., Grayson, R. B., and Reed, A. E.:
Before and after riparian management: sediment and nutrient exports from a small agricultural catchment, Western Australia,
J. Hydrol.,
270, 253–272, 2003.
McKergow, L. A., Prosser, I. P., Hughes, A. O., and Brodie, J.:
Regional scale nutrient modelling: exports to the Great Barrier Reef world heritage area,
Mar. Pollut. Bull.,
51, 186–199, 2005a.
McKergow, L. A., Prosser, I. P., Hughes, A. O., and Brodie, J.:
Sources of sediment to the Great Barrier Reef world heritage area,
Mar. Pollut. Bull.,
51, 200–211, 2005b.
Melland, A., Mellander, P.-E., Murphy, P., Wall, D., Mechan, S., Shine, O., Shortle, G., and Jordan, P.:
Stream water quality in intensive cereal cropping catchments with regulated nutrient management,
Environ. Sci. Policy,
24, 58–70, 2012.
Merritt, W. S., Letcher, R. A., and Jakeman, A. J.:
A review of erosion and sediment transport models,
Environ. Modell. Softw.,
18, 761–799, 2003.
Meyer, D. L., Townsend, E. C., and Thayer, G. W.:
Stabilization and erosion control value of oyster cultch for intertidal marsh,
Restor. Ecol.,
5, 93–99, 1997.
Moriasi, D. N., Gitau, M. W., Pai, N., and Daggupati, P.:
Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria,
T. ASABE,
58, 1763–1785, 2015.
Muro, J., Strauch, A., Heinemann, S., Steinbach, S., Thonfeld, F., Waske, B., and Diekkrüger, B.:
Land surface temperature trends as indicator of land use changes in wetlands,
Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs.,
70, 62–71, 2018.
Musolff, A., Schmidt, C., Selle, B., and Fleckenstein, J. H.:
Catchment controls on solute export,
Adv. Water Resour.,
86, 133–146, 2015.
Nakagawa, S. and Freckleton, R. P.:
Model averaging, missing data and multiple imputation: a case study for behavioural ecology,
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.,
65, 103–116, 2011.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.:
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles,
J. Hydrol.,
10, 282–290, 1970.
Neil, D. T., Orpin, A. R., Ridd, P. V., and Yu, B.:
Sediment yield and impacts from river catchments to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon: a review,
Mar. Freshwater Res.,
53, 733–752, 2002.
O'Hara, R. B. and Sillanpää, M. J.:
A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: what, how and which,
Bayesian Anal.,
4, 85–117, 2009.
Orr, D., Turner, R. D. R., Huggins, R., Vardy, S., and J., W. M. S.: Wet Tropics water quality statistics for high and base flow conditions, Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring Program, Department of Science, Information
Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Brisbane, 2014.
Paliwal, R., Sharma, P., and Kansal, A.:
Water quality modelling of the river Yamuna (India) using QUAL2E-UNCAS,
J. Environ. Manage.,
83, 131–144, 2007.
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., and McMahon, T. A.: Updated world map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1633–1644, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007, 2007.
Pérez-Gutiérrez, J. D., Paz, J. O., and Tagert, M. L. M.:
Seasonal water quality changes in on-farm water storage systems in a south-central US agricultural watershed,
Agr. Water Manage.,
187, 131–139, 2017.
Pilgrim, D. H. and Canterford, R. P.:
Australian rainfall and runoff,
Institution of Engineers, Australia, 1987.
Plummer, M.:
JAGS: Just another Gibbs sampler, version 3.4. 0,
available at: http://mcmc-jags.sourceforge.net (last access: 1 June 2016), 2013a.
Plummer, M.: rjags: Bayesian graphical models using MCMC, R package version, 3, available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rjags (last access: 1 June 2016), 2013b.
Posch, K., Arbeiter, M., and Pilz, J.:
A novel Bayesian approach for variable selection in linear regression models,
Comput. Stat. Data An.,
144, 106881, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2019.106881, 2020.
Qi, J., Li, S., Bourque, C. P.-A., Xing, Z., and Meng, F.-R.: Developing a decision support tool for assessing land use change and BMPs in ungauged watersheds based on decision rules provided by SWAT simulation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3789–3806, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3789-2018, 2018.
Queensland Government: Reef 2050 Water Quality Improvement Plan – Management practices,Department of Environment and Science, Brisbane, 2017.
R Core Team:
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at: http://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 1 June 2016), 2013.
Raftery, A. E., Madigan, D., and Hoeting, J. A.:
Bayesian model averaging for linear regression models,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.,
92, 179–191, 1997.
Raupach, M., Briggs, P., Haverd, V., King, E., Paget, M., and Trudinger, C.:
Australian water availability project (AWAP): CSIRO marine and atmospheric research component: final report for phase 3,
Centre for Australian weather and climate research (bureau of meteorology and CSIRO), Melbourne, 67, 2009.
Ren, W., Zhong, Y., Meligrana, J., Anderson, B., Watt, W. E., Chen, J., and Leung, H.-L.:
Urbanization, land use, and water quality in Shanghai: 1947–1996,
Environ. Int.,
29, 649–659, 2003.
Renard, B., Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., Thyer, M., and Franks, S. W.:
Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors,
Water Resour. Res.,
46, W05521, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008328, 2010.
Richards, R. P. and Baker, D. B.:
Trends in nutrient and suspended sediment concentrations in Lake Erie tributaries, 1975–1990,
J. Great Lakes Res.,
19, 200–211, 1993.
Rockey, J. and Temple, J.:
Growth econometrics for agnostics and true believers,
Eur. Econ. Rev.,
81, 86–102, 2016.
Rode, M., Arhonditsis, G., Balin, D., Kebede, T., Krysanova, V., Van Griensven, A., and Van der Zee, S. E.:
New challenges in integrated water quality modelling,
Hydrol. Process.,
24, 3447–3461, 2010.
Schwarz, G., Hoos, A., Alexander, R., and Smith, R.:
The SPARROW surface water-quality model: theory, application and user documentation,
US geological survey techniques and methods report, 6,
USGS, Reston, Virginia, https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6B3, 2006.
Sherriff, S. C., Rowan, J. S., Melland, A. R., Jordan, P., Fenton, O., and Ó hUallacháin, D.: Investigating suspended sediment dynamics in contrasting agricultural catchments using ex situ turbidity-based suspended sediment monitoring, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3349–3363, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3349-2015, 2015.
Sherriff, S. C., Rowan, J. S., Fenton, O., Jordan, P., Melland, A. R., Mellander, P.-E., and Huallachain, D. O.:
Storm event suspended sediment-discharge hysteresis and controls in agricultural watersheds: implications for watershed scale sediment management,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
50, 1769–1778, 2016.
Shi, P., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Li, P., and Xu, G.:
Influence of land use and land cover patterns on seasonal water quality at multi-spatial scales,
Catena,
151, 182–190, 2017.
Singh, A., Jakubowski, A. R., Chidister, I., and Townsend, P. A.:
A MODIS approach to predicting stream water quality in Wisconsin,
Remote Sens. Environ.,
128, 74–86, 2013.
Singh, P., Bhunya, P., Mishra, S., and Chaube, U.:
A sediment graph model based on SCS-CN method,
J. Hydrol.,
349, 244–255, 2008.
Skoulikidis, N. T., Amaxidis, Y., Bertahas, I., Laschou, S., and Gritzalis, K.:
Analysis of factors driving stream water composition and synthesis of management tools—a case study on small/medium Greek catchments,
Sci. Total Environ.,
362, 205–241, 2006.
Snyder, C. S.:
Enhanced nitrogen fertiliser technologies support the '4R'concept to optimise crop production and minimise environmental losses,
Soil Res.,
55, 463–472, 2017.
Srivastav, R., Sudheer, K., and Chaubey, I.:
A simplified approach to quantifying predictive and parametric uncertainty in artificial neural network hydrologic models,
Water Resour. Res.,
43, W10407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005352, 2007.
Steel, M. F.:
Model averaging and its use in economics,
arXiv [preprint] arXiv:1709.08221, 2019.
Tabacchi, E., Lambs, L., Guilloy, H., Planty-Tabacchi, A. M., Muller, E., and Decamps, H.:
Impacts of riparian vegetation on hydrological processes,
Hydrol. Process.,
14, 2959–2976, 2000.
Tang, W. and Carey, S. K.:
HydRun: A MATLAB toolbox for rainfall–runoff analysis,
Hydrol. Process.,
31, 2670–2682, 2017.
Thompson, S., Basu, N., Lascurain, J., Aubeneau, A., and Rao, P.:
Relative dominance of hydrologic versus biogeochemical factors on solute export across impact gradients,
Water Resour. Res.,
47, W00J05, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009605, 2011.
Turner, R., Huggins, R., Wallace, R., Smith, R., Vardy, S., and Warne, M. S. J.:
Sediment, Nutrient and Pesticide Loads: Great Barrier Reef Catchment Loads Monitoring 2009–2010,
Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Brisbane, 53, 2012.
Tweed, S. O., Leblanc, M., Webb, J. A., and Lubczynski, M. W.:
Remote sensing and GIS for mapping groundwater recharge and discharge areas in salinity prone catchments, southeastern Australia,
Hydrogeol. J.,
15, 75–96, 2007.
Ursino, N., Silvestri, S., and Marani, M.:
Subsurface flow and vegetation patterns in tidal environments,
Water Resour. Res.,
40, W05115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002702, 2004.
Ustaoğlu, F., Tepe, Y., and Taş, B.:
Assessment of stream quality and health risk in a subtropical Turkey river system: A combined approach using statistical analysis and water quality index,
Ecol. Indic., 1
13, 105815, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105815, 2020.
Verheyen, D., Van Gaelen, N., Ronchi, B., Batelaan, O., Struyf, E., Govers, G., Merckx, R., and Diels, J.:
Dissolved phosphorus transport from soil to surface water in catchments with different land use,
Ambio,
44, 228–240, 2015.
Vymazal, J.:
Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands,
Sci. Total Environ.,
380, 48–65, 2007.
Wade, A. J., Durand, P., Beaujouan, V., Wessel, W. W., Raat, K. J., Whitehead, P. G., Butterfield, D., Rankinen, K., and Lepisto, A.: A nitrogen model for European catchments: INCA, new model structure and equations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 559–582, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-559-2002, 2002.
Wakelin, S. A., Nelson, P. N., Armour, J. D., Rasiah, V., and Colloff, M. J.:
Bacterial community structure and denitrifier (nir-gene) abundance in soil water and groundwater beneath agricultural land in tropical North Queensland, Australia,
Soil Res.,
49, 65–76, 2011.
Walker, J. A.:
Model-averaged regression coefficients have a straightforward interpretation using causal conditioning,
bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/133785, 133785, 2019.
Walling, D.:
Dissolved loads and their measurement, Erosion and Sediment Yield: Some Methods of Measurement and Modelling,
Geo Books, Regency House Norwich (England), 111–177, 1984.
Wan, Y., Qian, Y., Migliaccio, K. W., Li, Y., and Conrad, C.:
Linking spatial variations in water quality with water and land management using multivariate techniques,
J. Environ. Qual.,
43, 599–610, 2014.
Wang, A., Yang, D., and Tang, L.:
Spatiotemporal variation in nitrogen loads and their impacts on river water quality in the upper Yangtze River basin,
J. Hydrol.,
590, 125487, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125487, 2020.
Wang, Q., Schepen, A., and Robertson, D. E.:
Merging seasonal rainfall forecasts from multiple statistical models through Bayesian model averaging,
J. Climate,
25, 5524–5537, 2012.
Waters, D. and Packett, R.:
Sediment and nutrient generation rates for Queensland rural catchments-an event monitoring program to improve water quality modelling,
Proceedings of the 5th Australian Stream
Management Conference, Australian rivers: making a difference, edited by: Wilson, A. L., Dehaan, R. L., Watts, R. J., Page, K. J., Bowmer, K. H., and Curtis, A., Charles Sturt University, Thurgoona, New South Wales, 425–430, 2007.
Webb, A. and King, E. L.:
A Bayesian hierarchical trend analysis finds strong evidence for large-scale temporal declines in stream ecological condition around Melbourne, Australia,
Ecography,
32, 215–225, 2009.
Weier, K., Doran, J., Power, J., and Walters, D.:
Denitrification and the dinitrogen/nitrous oxide ratio as affected by soil water, available carbon, and nitrate,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
57, 66–72, 1993.
Wellen, C., Kamran-Disfani, A.-R., and Arhonditsis, G. B.:
Evaluation of the current state of distributed watershed nutrient water quality modeling,
Environ. Sci. Technol.,
49, 3278–3290, 2015.
White, R., Edis, R., Bramley, R., and Wood, A.:
Environmentally sound phosphorus management for sugarcane soils: final report on SRDC Project no CSS3S,
Sugar Research and Development Corporation, Brisbane, Australia, 1998.
Wintle, B. A., McCarthy, M. A., Volinsky, C. T., and Kavanagh, R. P.:
The use of Bayesian model averaging to better represent uncertainty in ecological models,
Conserv. Biol.,
17, 1579–1590, 2003.
Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Song, J., and Cheng, L.:
Evaluating relative merits of four baseflow separation methods in Eastern Australia,
J. Hydrol.,
549, 252–263, 2017.
Zhang, Y., Guo, F., Meng, W., and Wang, X.-Q.:
Water quality assessment and source identification of Daliao river basin using multivariate statistical methods,
Environ. Monit Assess.,
152, 105, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0300-z, 2009.
Zhu, G., Wang, S., Wang, C., Zhou, L., Zhao, S., Li, Y., Li, F., Jetten, M. S., Lu, Y., and Schwark, L.:
Resuscitation of anammox bacteria after > 10,000 years of dormancy,
ISME J., 13, 1098–1109, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0316-5, 2019.
Zhu, Q., Castellano, M. J., and Yang, G.:
Coupling soil water processes and nitrogen cycle across spatial scales: Potentials, bottlenecks and solutions,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 187, 248–258,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.10.005, 2018.
Short summary
Riverine water quality can change markedly at one particular location. This study developed predictive models to represent the temporal variation in stream water quality across the Great Barrier Reef catchments, Australia. The model structures were informed by a data-driven approach, which is useful for identifying important factors determining temporal changes in water quality and, in turn, providing critical information for developing management strategies.
Riverine water quality can change markedly at one particular location. This study developed...
