Articles | Volume 22, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3351-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3351-2018
Research article
 | 
18 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 18 Jun 2018

Hydrostratigraphic modeling using multiple-point statistics and airborne transient electromagnetic methods

Adrian A. S. Barfod, Ingelise Møller, Anders V. Christiansen, Anne-Sophie Høyer, Júlio Hoffimann, Julien Straubhaar, and Jef Caers

Related authors

Alleviating interpretational ambiguity in hydrogeology through clustering-based analysis of transient electromagnetic and surface nuclear magnetic resonance data
Mathias Vang, Jakob Juul Larsen, Anders Vest Christiansen, and Denys Grombacher
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5315–5329, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5315-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5315-2025, 2025
Short summary
KarstConduitCatalogue: a dataset of LiDAR derived point clouds for the analysis of karstic conduit geometry and morphology
Tanguy Racine, Celia Trunz, Julien Straubhaar, Stéphane Jaillet, and Philippe Renard
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 4671–4690, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4671-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4671-2025, 2025
Short summary
Incorporating interpretation uncertainties from deterministic 3D hydrostratigraphic models in groundwater models
Trine Enemark, Rasmus Bødker Madsen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Lærke Therese Andersen, Peter B. E. Sandersen, Jacob Kidmose, Ingelise Møller, Thomas Mejer Hansen, Karsten Høgh Jensen, and Anne-Sophie Høyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 505–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Potential of Machine learning techniques compared to MIKE-SHE model for drain flow predictions in tile-drained agricultural areas of Denmark
Hafsa Mahmood, Ty P. A. Ferré, Raphael J. M. Schneider, Simon Stisen, Rasmus R. Frederiksen, and Anders V. Christiansen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1872,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1872, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
DL-RMD: a geophysically constrained electromagnetic resistivity model database (RMD) for deep learning (DL) applications
Muhammad Rizwan Asif, Nikolaj Foged, Thue Bording, Jakob Juul Larsen, and Anders Vest Christiansen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1389–1401, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1389-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1389-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Arpat, G. B. and Caers, J.: A multiple-scale, pattern-based approach to sequential simulation, in: Geostatistics Banff 2004, Springer, 255–264, 2005. 
Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V., Westergaard, J. H., Kirkegaard, C., Foged, N., and Viezzoli, A.: An integrated processing scheme for high-resolution airborne electromagnetic surveys, the SkyTEM system, Explor. Geophys., 40, 184–192, 2009. 
Barfod, A. A., Møller, I., and Christiansen, A. V.: Compiling a national resistivity atlas of Denmark based on airborne and ground-based transient electromagnetic data, J. Appl. Geophys., 134, 199–209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.09.017, 2016. 
Beamish, D.: The bedrock electrical conductivity map of the UK, J. Appl. Geophys., 96, 87–97, 2013. 
Caers, J.: Direct sequential indicator simulation, Geostats, 39–48, 2000. 
Short summary
Three-dimensional geological models are important to securing and managing groundwater. Such models describe the geological architecture, which is used for modeling the flow of groundwater. Common geological modeling approaches result in one model, which does not quantify the architectural uncertainty of the geology. We present a comparison of three different state-of-the-art stochastic multiple-point statistical methods for quantifying the geological uncertainty using real-world datasets.
Share