Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
5.460
CiteScore value: 7.8
CiteScore
7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
SNIP1.623
IPP value: 4.91
IPP4.91
SJR value: 2.092
SJR2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
index
123
h5-index value: 65
h5-index65
Download
Short summary
Benchmarks for the water footprint (WF) of crop production can serve as a reference and be helpful in setting WF reduction targets. The study explores which environmental factors should be distinguished when determining benchmarks for the consumptive (green and blue) WF of crops. Through a case study for winter wheat in China over 1961–2008, we find that when determining benchmark levels for the consumptive WF of a crop, it is most useful to distinguish between different climate zones.
Articles | Volume 20, issue 11
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4547–4559, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4547-2016
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4547–4559, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4547-2016

Research article 14 Nov 2016

Research article | 14 Nov 2016

Benchmark levels for the consumptive water footprint of crop production for different environmental conditions: a case study for winter wheat in China

La Zhuo et al.

Related authors

Physical versus economic water footprints in crop production: a spatial and temporal analysis for China
Xi Yang, La Zhuo, Pengxuan Xie, Hongrong Huang, Bianbian Feng, and Pute Wu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 169–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-169-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-169-2021, 2021
Short summary
Trade-offs between crop-related (physical and virtual) water flows and the associated economic benefits and values: a case study of the Yellow River Basin
Pute Wu, La Zhuo, Guoping Zhang, Mesfin M. Mekonnen, Arjen Y. Hoekstra, Yoshihide Wada, Xuerui Gao, Xining Zhao, Yubao Wang, and Shikun Sun
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-436,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-436, 2018
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Sensitivity and uncertainty in crop water footprint accounting: a case study for the Yellow River basin
L. Zhuo, M. M. Mekonnen, and A. Y. Hoekstra
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2219–2234, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2219-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2219-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Mathematical applications
Physical versus economic water footprints in crop production: a spatial and temporal analysis for China
Xi Yang, La Zhuo, Pengxuan Xie, Hongrong Huang, Bianbian Feng, and Pute Wu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 169–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-169-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-169-2021, 2021
Short summary
Development of a revised method for indicators of hydrologic alteration for analyzing the cumulative impacts of cascading reservoirs on flow regime
Xingyu Zhou, Xiaorong Huang, Hongbin Zhao, and Kai Ma
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4091–4107, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4091-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4091-2020, 2020
Short summary
Changing global cropping patterns to minimize national blue water scarcity
Hatem Chouchane, Maarten S. Krol, and Arjen Y. Hoekstra
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3015–3031, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3015-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3015-2020, 2020
Short summary
Optimal water use strategies for mitigating high urban temperatures
Bin Liu, Zhenghui Xie, Shuang Liu, Yujing Zeng, Ruichao Li, Longhuan Wang, Yan Wang, Binghao Jia, Peihua Qin, Si Chen, Jinbo Xie, and Chunxiang Shi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-189,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-189, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Climate change impacts on the Water Highway project in Morocco
Nabil El Moçayd, Suchul Kang, and Elfatih A. B. Eltahir
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1467–1483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1467-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1467-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Abedinpour, M., Sarangi, A., Rajput, T. B. S., Singh, M., Pathak, H., and Ahmad, T.: Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment, Agr. Water Manage., 110, 55–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.04.001, 2012.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1998.
Andarzian, B., Bannayan, M., Steduto, P., Mazraeh, H., Barati, M. E., Barati, M. A., and Rahnama, A.: Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran, Agr. Water Manage., 100, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.023, 2011.
Asseng, S., Turner, N. C., and Keating, B. A.: Analysis of water- and nitrogen-use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean climate, Plant Soil, 233, 127–143, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010381602223, 2001.
Batjes, N.: ISRIC-WISE derived soil properties on a 5 by 5 arc-minutes global grid (ver. 1.2), Wageningen, the Netherlands, available at: www.isric.org., 2012.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Benchmarks for the water footprint (WF) of crop production can serve as a reference and be helpful in setting WF reduction targets. The study explores which environmental factors should be distinguished when determining benchmarks for the consumptive (green and blue) WF of crops. Through a case study for winter wheat in China over 1961–2008, we find that when determining benchmark levels for the consumptive WF of a crop, it is most useful to distinguish between different climate zones.
Citation