Articles | Volume 20, issue 11
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4547–4559, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4547-2016
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4547–4559, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4547-2016
Research article
14 Nov 2016
Research article | 14 Nov 2016

Benchmark levels for the consumptive water footprint of crop production for different environmental conditions: a case study for winter wheat in China

La Zhuo et al.

Related authors

Spatiotemporal responses of the crop water footprint and its associated benchmarks under different irrigation regimes to climate change scenarios in China
Zhiwei Yue, Xiangxiang Ji, La Zhuo, Wei Wang, Zhibin Li, and Pute Wu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4637–4656, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4637-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4637-2022, 2022
Short summary
Physical versus economic water footprints in crop production: a spatial and temporal analysis for China
Xi Yang, La Zhuo, Pengxuan Xie, Hongrong Huang, Bianbian Feng, and Pute Wu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 169–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-169-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-169-2021, 2021
Short summary
Trade-offs between crop-related (physical and virtual) water flows and the associated economic benefits and values: a case study of the Yellow River Basin
Pute Wu, La Zhuo, Guoping Zhang, Mesfin M. Mekonnen, Arjen Y. Hoekstra, Yoshihide Wada, Xuerui Gao, Xining Zhao, Yubao Wang, and Shikun Sun
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-436,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-436, 2018
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Sensitivity and uncertainty in crop water footprint accounting: a case study for the Yellow River basin
L. Zhuo, M. M. Mekonnen, and A. Y. Hoekstra
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2219–2234, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2219-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2219-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Mathematical applications
A novel objective function DYNO for automatic multivariable calibration of 3D lake models
Wei Xia, Taimoor Akhtar, and Christine A. Shoemaker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3651–3671, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3651-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3651-2022, 2022
Short summary
The importance of non-stationary multiannual periodicities in the North Atlantic Oscillation index for forecasting water resource drought
William Rust, John P. Bloomfield, Mark Cuthbert, Ron Corstanje, and Ian Holman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2449–2467, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2449-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2449-2022, 2022
Short summary
Decreased virtual water outflows from the Yellow River basin are increasingly critical to China
Shuang Song, Shuai Wang, Xutong Wu, Yongyuan Huang, and Bojie Fu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2035–2044, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2035-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2035-2022, 2022
Short summary
AI-based techniques for multi-step streamflow forecasts: application for multi-objective reservoir operation optimization and performance assessment
Yuxue Guo, Xinting Yu, Yue-Ping Xu, Hao Chen, Haiting Gu, and Jingkai Xie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5951–5979, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5951-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5951-2021, 2021
Short summary
Optimal water use strategies for mitigating high urban temperatures
Bin Liu, Zhenghui Xie, Shuang Liu, Yujing Zeng, Ruichao Li, Longhuan Wang, Yan Wang, Binghao Jia, Peihua Qin, Si Chen, Jinbo Xie, and ChunXiang Shi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 387–400, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-387-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-387-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Abedinpour, M., Sarangi, A., Rajput, T. B. S., Singh, M., Pathak, H., and Ahmad, T.: Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment, Agr. Water Manage., 110, 55–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.04.001, 2012.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1998.
Andarzian, B., Bannayan, M., Steduto, P., Mazraeh, H., Barati, M. E., Barati, M. A., and Rahnama, A.: Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran, Agr. Water Manage., 100, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.023, 2011.
Asseng, S., Turner, N. C., and Keating, B. A.: Analysis of water- and nitrogen-use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean climate, Plant Soil, 233, 127–143, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010381602223, 2001.
Batjes, N.: ISRIC-WISE derived soil properties on a 5 by 5 arc-minutes global grid (ver. 1.2), Wageningen, the Netherlands, available at: www.isric.org., 2012.
Download
Short summary
Benchmarks for the water footprint (WF) of crop production can serve as a reference and be helpful in setting WF reduction targets. The study explores which environmental factors should be distinguished when determining benchmarks for the consumptive (green and blue) WF of crops. Through a case study for winter wheat in China over 1961–2008, we find that when determining benchmark levels for the consumptive WF of a crop, it is most useful to distinguish between different climate zones.