Alvisi, S., Mascellani, G., Franchini, M., and Bárdossy, A.: Water level forecasting through fuzzy logic and artificial neural network approaches, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-1-2006, 2006.
Antanasijević, D., Pocajt, V., Perić–Grujić, A., and Ristić, M.: Modelling of dissolved oxygen in the Danube River using artificial neural networks and Monte Carlo Simulation uncertainty analysis, J. Hydrol., 519, 1895–1907, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.009, 2014.
Ay, M. and Kisi, O.: Modeling of dissolved oxygen concentration using different neural network techniques in Foundation Creek, El Paso County, Colorado, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 138, 654–662, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000511, 2011.
Bárdossy, A., Bogardi, I., and Duckstein, L.: Fuzzy regression in hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 26, 1497–1508, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i007p01497, 1990.
Bárdossy, A., Mascellani, G., and Franchini, M.: Fuzzy unit hydrograph, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003751, 2006.
Betrie, G. D., Sadiq, R., Morin, K. A., and Tesfamariam, S.: Uncertainty quantification and integration of machine learning techniques for predicting acid rock drainage chemistry: A probability bounds approach, Sci. Total Environ., 490, 182–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.125, 2014.
Chang, F. J., Tsai, Y. H., Chen, P. A., Coynel, A., and Vachaud, G.: Modeling water quality in an urban river using hydrological factors–Data driven approaches, J. Environ. Manage., 151, 87–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.014, 2015.
Deng, Y., Sadiq, R., Jiang, W., and Tesfamariam, S.: Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: a fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 15438–15446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.018, 2011.
Dorfman, R. and Jacoby, H. D.: An illustrative model of a river basin pollution control, in: Models for Managing Regional Water quality, edited by: Dorfman, R., Jacoby, H. D., and Thomas Jr., H. A., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 84–141, https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674419216.c3, 1972.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Effective and efficient global optimisation for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 28, 1015–1031, https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985, 1992.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets and probability: misunderstandings, bridges and gaps, in: Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 28 March–1 April 1993, San Francisco, USA, 1059–1068, https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1993.327367, 1993.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Possibility Theory and its Applications: Where do we stand?, in: Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence, edited by: Kacprzyk, J. and Pedrycz, W., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 31–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43505-2_3, 2015.
Dubois, D., Prade, H., and Sandri, S.: On possibility/probability transformations, in: Fuzzy logic, edited by: Lowen, R. and Roubens, M., Springer Netherlands, 103–112, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2014-2_10, 1993.
Dubois, D., Foulloy, L., Mauris, G., and Prade, H.: Probability–possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities, Reliab. Comput., 10, 273–297, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REOM.0000032115.22510.b5, 2004.
Elshorbagy, A., Corzo, G., Srinivasulu, S., and Solomatine, D. P.: Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology – Part 1: Concepts and methodology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1931–1941, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1931-2010, 2010.
Environment Canada: Wateroffice Hydrometric Station Meta Data, https://wateroffice.ec.gc.ca/station_metadata/stationList_e.html, last access: 3 September 2015.
Ferrero, A., Prioli, M., Salicone, S., and Vantaggi, B.: A 2-D Metrology-Sound Probability–Possibility Transformation, IEEE T. Instrum. Meas., 62, 982–990, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2013.2246910, 2013.
Golder Associates Ltd.: Bow River Impact Study – Phase 1: Model Development and Calibration, City of Calgary Wastewater, Utilities and Environmental Protection, Calgary, Alberta, 134 pp., 2004.
Guyonnet, D., Bourgine, B., Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Come, B., and Chiles, J.-P.: Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 129, 68–78, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:1(68), 2003.
Hall, M. J.: Urban Hydrology, Elsevier Applied Science, Essex, England, 299 pp., 1984.
Hauer, F. R. and Hill, W. R.: Temperature, light and oxygen, in: Methods in stream ecology, edited by: Hauer, F. R. and Lamberti, G. A., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 103–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012332908-0.50007-3, 2007.
He, J. and Valeo, C.: Comparative study of ANNs versus parametric methods in rainfall frequency analysis, J. Hydrol. Eng., 14, 172–184, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:2(172), 2009.
He, J., Chu, A., Ryan, M. C., Valeo, C., and Zaitlin, B.: Abiotic influences on dissolved oxygen in a riverine environment, Ecol. Eng., 37, 1804–1814, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.022, 2011.
He, J., Ryan, M. C., and Valeo, C.: Changes in Water Quality Characteristics and Pollutant Sources along a Major River Basin in Canada, in: Environmental Management of River Basin Ecosystems, edited by: Ramkumar, M., Kumaraswamy, K., and Mohanraj, R., Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 525–548, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13425-3_25, 2015.
Heddam, S.: Generalized regression neural network-based approach for modelling hourly dissolved oxygen concentration in the Upper Klamath River, Oregon, USA, Environ. Technol., 35, 1650–1657, https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.878396, 2014.
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H.: Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators, Neural Networks, 2, 359–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8, 1989.
Huang, Y., Chen, X., Li, Y. P., Huang, G. H., and Liu, T.: A fuzzy-based simulation method for modelling hydrological processes under uncertainty, Hydrol. Process., 24, 3718–3732, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7790, 2010.
Iwanyshyn, M., Ryan, M. C., and Chu, A.: Separation of physical loading from photosynthesis/respiration processes in rivers by mass balance, Sci. Total Environ., 390, 205–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.038, 2008.
Jacquin, A. P.: Possibilistic uncertainty analysis of a conceptual model of snowmelt runoff, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1681–1695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1681-2010, 2010.
Kannel, P. R., Lee, S., Lee, Y. S., Kanel, S. R., and Khan, S. P.: Application of water quality indices and dissolved oxygen as indicators for river water classification and urban impact assessment, Environ. Monit. Assess., 132, 93–110, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9505-1, 2007.
Kasiviswanathan, K. S. and Sudheer, K. P.: Quantification of the predictive uncertainty of artificial neural network based river flow forecast models, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A., 27, 137–146, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0600-2, 2013.
Kasiviswanathan, K. S., Cibin, R., Sudheer, K. P., and Chaubey, I.: Constructing prediction interval for artificial neural network rainfall runoff models based on ensemble simulations, J. Hydrol., 499, 275–288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.043, 2013.
Kaufmann, A. and Gupta, M. M.: Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, USA, 351 pp., 1985.
Khan, U. T. and Valeo, C.: Predicting Dissolved Oxygen Concentration in Urban Watersheds: A Comparison of Fuzzy Number Based and Bayesian Data-Driven Approaches, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine and Freshwater Environments, 6–8 August 2014, St John's, Canada, 1–10, 2014a.
Khan, U. T. and Valeo, C.: Peak flow prediction using fuzzy linear regression: Case study of the Bow River, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine and Freshwater Environments, 6–8 August 2014, St Johns, NFLD, Canada, 1–10, 2014b.
Khan, U. T. and Valeo, C.: A new fuzzy linear regression approach for dissolved oxygen prediction, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 60, 1096–1119, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.900558, 2015.
Khan, U. T. and Valeo, C.: Short-term peak flow rate prediction and flood risk assessment using fuzzy linear regression, J. Environ. Inform., in press, 2016.
Khan, U. T., Valeo, C., and He, J.: Non-linear fuzzy-set based uncertainty propagation for improved DO prediction using multiple-linear regression, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A., 27, 599–616, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0626-5, 2013.
Klir, G. J. and Parviz, B.: Probability-possibility transformations: a comparison, Int. J. Gen. Syst., 21, 291–310, https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079208945083, 1992.
Lane, R. J.: The Water Survey of Canada: Hydrometric Technician Career Development Program Lesson Package No. 10.1 – Principles of Discharge Measurement, available at: http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/463990/publication.html (last access: 10 June 2016), 1999.
Maier, H. R., Jain, A., Dandy, G. C., and Sudheer, K. P.: Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: current status and future directions, Environ. Model. Softw., 25, 891–909, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.02.003, 2010.
Martin-Clouaire, R., Cazemier, D. R., and Lagacherie, P.: Representing and processing uncertain soil information for mapping soil hydrological properties, Comput. Electron. Agr., 29, 41–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00135-6, 2000.
Mauris, G.: A review of relationships between possibility and probability representations of uncertainty in measurement, IEEE T. Instrum. Meas., 62, 622–632, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2012.2218057, 2013.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L.: Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, T. ASABE, 50, 885–900, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153, 2007.
Mujumdar, P. P. and Ghosh, S.: Modeling GCM and scenario uncertainty using a possibilistic approach: Application to the Mahanadi River, India, Water Resour. Res., 44, W06407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006137, 2008.
Napolitano, G., Serinaldi, F., and See, L.: Impact of EMD decomposition and random initialisation of weights in ANN hindcasting of daily stream flow series: an empirical examination, J. Hydrol., 406, 199–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.015, 2011.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
Neupane, A., Wu, P., Ghanbarpour, R., and Martin, N.: Bow River Phosphorus Management Plan: Water Quality Modeling Scenarios, Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 23 pp., 2014.
Niemczynowicz, J.: Urban hydrology and water management – present and future challenges, Urban Water, 1, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(99)00009-6, 1999.
Oussalah, M.: On the probability/possibility transformations: a comparative analysis, Int. J. Gen. Syst. 29, 671–718, https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070008960969, 2000.
Pogue, T. R. and Anderson, C. W.: Processes controlling dissolved oxygen and pH in the upper Willamette River and major tributaries, Oregon, 1994, Water Resources Investigations Report 95-4205, US Geological Survey, Portland, OR, USA, 77 pp., 1995.
Robinson, K. L., Valeo, C., Ryan, M. C., Chu, A., and Iwanyshyn, M.: Modelling aquatic vegetation and dissolved oxygen after a flood event in the Bow River, Alberta, Canada, Can. J. Civil Eng., 36, 492–503, https://doi.org/10.1139/L08-126, 2009.
Sadiq, R., Rodriguez, M. J., Imran, S. A., and Najjaran, H.: Communicating human health risks associated with disinfection by-products in drinking water supplies: a fuzzy-based approach, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A., 21, 341–353, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0069-y, 2007.
Serrurier, M. and Prade, H.: An informational distance for estimating the faithfulness of a possibility distribution, viewed as a family of probability distributions, with respect to data, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 54, 919–933, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.01.011, 2013.
Shimazaki, H. and Shinomoto, S.: A method for selecting the bin size of a time histogram, Neural Comput., 19, 1503–1527, https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2007.19.6.1503, 2007.
Shrestha, D. L. and Solomatine, D. P.: Data-driven approaches for estimating uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modelling, Int. J. River Basin Manage., 6, 109–122, https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635341, 2008.
Singh, K. P., Basant, A., Malik, A., and Jain, G.: Artificial neural network modelling of the river water quality – a case study, Ecol. Model., 220, 888–895, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.004, 2009.
Solomantine, D. P. and Ostfeld, A.: Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches, J. Hydroinform., 10, 3–22, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2008.015, 2008.
Solomatine, D. P., See, L. M., and Abrahart, R. J.: Data-driven modelling: concepts, approaches and experiences, in: Practical Hydroinformatics, edited by: Abrahart, R. J., See, L. M., and Solomatine, D. P., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 17–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79881-1_2, 2008.
Van Steenbergen, N., Ronsyn, J., and Willems, P.: A non-parametric data-based approach for probabilistic flood forecasting in support of uncertainty communication, Environ. Model. Softw., 33, 92–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.013, 2012.
Verhoest, N. E. C., De Baets, B., Mattia, F., Satalino, G., Lucau, C., and Defourny, P.: A possibilistic approach to soil moisture retrieval from ERS synthetic aperture radar backscattering under soil roughness uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 43, W07435, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005295, 2007.
Wen, X., Fang, J., Diao, M., and Zhang, C.: Artificial neural network modelling of dissolved oxygen in the Heihe River, Northwestern China, Environ. Monit. Assess., 185, 4361–4371, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2874-8, 2013.
YSI Inc.: YSI 5200: A Multiparameter Monitor and Control Specifications, https://www.ysi.com/File_Library/Documents/Specification_Sheets/W45-01-5200A.pdf, last access: 3 September 2015.
Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8, 338–353, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X, 1965.
Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1, 3–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5, 1978.
Zhang, K.: Modeling uncertainty and variability in health risk assessment of contaminated sites, PhD thesis, Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada, 290 pp., 2009.
Zhang, K. and Achari, G.: Correlations between uncertainty theories and their applications in uncertainty propagation, in: Safety, reliability and risk of structures, infrastructures and engineering systems, edited by: Furuta, H., Frangopol, D. M., and Shinozuka, M., Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK, 1337–1344, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439847657-c20, 2010.
Zhang, K., Li, H., and Achari, G.: Fuzzy-stochastic characterisation of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer, J. Contam. Hydrol., 106, 73–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.01.003, 2009.
