Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1197–1212, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1197-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue: Restored river corridor dynamics
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1197–1212, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1197-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article 08 Apr 2011
Research article | 08 Apr 2011
Modern comprehensive approach to monitor the morphodynamic evolution of a restored river corridor
N. Pasquale et al.
Related subject area
Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Instruments and observation techniques
Investigating the environmental response to water harvesting structures: a field study in Tanzania
The importance of city trees for reducing net rainfall: comparing measurements and simulations
Small-scale characterization of vine plant root water uptake via 3-D electrical resistivity tomography and mise-à-la-masse method
Hydrogeological controls on spatial patterns of groundwater discharge in peatlands
Monitoring surface water quality using social media in the context of citizen science
Using crowdsourced web content for informing water systems operations in snow-dominated catchments
Learning about water resource sharing through game play
High-resolution monitoring of nutrients in groundwater and surface waters: process understanding, quantification of loads and concentrations, and management applications
Contrasting watershed-scale trends in runoff and sediment yield complicate rangeland water resources planning
The use of semi-structured interviews for the characterisation of farmer irrigation practices
High-frequency monitoring of water fluxes and nutrient loads to assess the effects of controlled drainage on water storage and nutrient transport
Investigating suspended sediment dynamics in contrasting agricultural catchments using ex situ turbidity-based suspended sediment monitoring
Vulnerability of groundwater resources to interaction with river water in a boreal catchment
Drivers of spatial and temporal variability of streamflow in the Incomati River basin
Using high-resolution phosphorus data to investigate mitigation measures in headwater river catchments
Comparison of sampling methodologies for nutrient monitoring in streams: uncertainties, costs and implications for mitigation
Geophysical methods to support correct water sampling locations for salt dilution gauging
Water management simulation games and the construction of knowledge
Tracing the spatial propagation of river inlet water into an agricultural polder area using anthropogenic gadolinium
Transboundary geophysical mapping of geological elements and salinity distribution critical for the assessment of future sea water intrusion in response to sea level rise
Potentials and limits of urban rainwater harvesting in the Middle East
Hydrologic feasibility of artificial forestation in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China
Hydraulic analysis of river training cross-vanes as part of post-restoration monitoring
The effect of physical water quality and water level changes on the occurrence and density of Anopheles mosquito larvae around the shoreline of the Koka reservoir, central Ethiopia
Space-time variability of hydrological drought and wetness in Iran using NCEP/NCAR and GPCC datasets
Relative impacts of key drivers on the response of the water table to a major alley farming experiment
Jessica A. Eisma and Venkatesh M. Merwade
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1891–1906, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1891-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1891-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Sand dams capture and store water for use during the dry season in rural communities. A year long field study of three sand dams in Tanzania showed that sand dams are not a suitable habitat for aquatic insects. They capture plenty of water, but most is evaporated during the first few months of the dry season. Sand dams positively impact vegetation and minimally impact erosion. Community water security can be increased by sand dams, but site characteristics and construction are important factors.
Vincent Smets, Charlotte Wirion, Willy Bauwens, Martin Hermy, Ben Somers, and Boud Verbeiren
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3865–3884, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3865-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3865-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of city trees for intercepting rainfall is quantified using measurements and modeling tools. The measurements show that an important amount of rainfall is intercepted, limiting the amount of water reaching the ground. Models are used to extrapolate the measurement results. The performance of two specialized interception models and one water balance model is evaluated. Our results show that the performance of the water balance model is similar to the specialized interception models.
Benjamin Mary, Luca Peruzzo, Jacopo Boaga, Myriam Schmutz, Yuxin Wu, Susan S. Hubbard, and Giorgio Cassiani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5427–5444, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5427-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5427-2018, 2018
Danielle K. Hare, David F. Boutt, William P. Clement, Christine E. Hatch, Glorianna Davenport, and Alex Hackman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6031–6048, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6031-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6031-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This research examines what processes drive the location and strength of groundwater springs within a peatland environment. Using temperature and geophysical methods, we demonstrate that the relationship between regional groundwater flow gradients and the basin shape below the peatland surface control where groundwater springs occur. Understanding this relationship will support effective restoration efforts, as groundwater spring locations are important to overall peatland function and ecology.
Hang Zheng, Yang Hong, Di Long, and Hua Jing
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 949–961, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-949-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-949-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Do you feel angry if the river in your living place is polluted by industries? Do you want to do something to save your environment? Just log in to http://www.thuhjjc.com and use the Tsinghua Environment Monitoring Platform (TEMP) to photograph the water pollution actives and make your report. This study established a social media platform to monitor and report surface water quality. The effectiveness of the platform was demonstrated by the 324 water quality reports across 30 provinces in China.
Matteo Giuliani, Andrea Castelletti, Roman Fedorov, and Piero Fraternali
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 5049–5062, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-5049-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-5049-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The unprecedented availability of user-generated data on the Web is opening new opportunities for enhancing real-time monitoring and modeling of environmental systems based on data that are public, low-cost, and spatiotemporally dense. In this paper, we contribute a novel crowdsourcing procedure for extracting snow-related information from public web images. The value of the obtained virtual snow indexes is assessed for a real-world water management problem.
Tracy Ewen and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4079–4091, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4079-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4079-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Games are an optimal way to teach about water resource sharing, as they allow real-world scenarios to be explored. We look at how games can be used to teach about water resource sharing, by both playing and developing water games. An evaluation of the web-based game Irrigania found Irrigania to be an effective and easy tool to incorporate into curriculum, and a course on developing water games encouraged students to think about water resource sharing in a more critical and insightful way.
Frans C. van Geer, Brian Kronvang, and Hans Peter Broers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3619–3629, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3619-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3619-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The paper includes a review of the current state of high-frequency monitoring in groundwater and surface waters as an outcome of a special issue of HESS and four sessions at EGU on this topic. The focus of the paper is to look at how high-frequency monitoring can be used as a valuable support to assess the management efforts under various EU directives. We conclude that we in future will see a transition from research to implementation in operational monitoring use of high-frequency sensors.
Matthew D. Berg, Franco Marcantonio, Mead A. Allison, Jason McAlister, Bradford P. Wilcox, and William E. Fox
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2295–2307, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2295-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2295-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Rangelands, from grasslands to woodlands, cover much of the earth. These areas face great pressure to meet growing water needs. Data on large-scale dynamics that drive water planning remain rare. Our watershed-scale results challenge simplistic hydrological assumptions. Streamflow was resilient to dramatic landscape changes. These changes did shape sediment yield, affecting water storage. Understanding these processes is vital to projections of rangeland water resources in a changing world.
Jimmy O'Keeffe, Wouter Buytaert, Ana Mijic, Nicholas Brozović, and Rajiv Sinha
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1911–1924, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1911-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1911-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Semi-structured interviews provide an effective and efficient way of collecting qualitative and quantitative data on water use practices. Interviews are organised around a topic guide, which helps lead the conversation while allowing sufficient opportunity to identify issues previously unknown to the researcher. The use of semi-structured interviews could significantly and quickly improve insight on water resources, leading to more realistic future management options and increased water security.
J. C. Rozemeijer, A. Visser, W. Borren, M. Winegram, Y. van der Velde, J. Klein, and H. P. Broers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 347–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-347-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-347-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Controlled drainage has been recognized as an effective option to optimize soil moisture conditions for agriculture and to reduce unnecessary losses of fresh water and nutrients. For a grassland field in the Netherlands, we measured the changes in the field water and solute balance after introducing controlled drainage. We concluded that controlled drainage reduced the drain discharge and increased the groundwater storage in the field, but did not have clear positive effects for water quality.
S. C. Sherriff, J. S. Rowan, A. R. Melland, P. Jordan, O. Fenton, and D. Ó hUallacháin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3349–3363, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3349-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3349-2015, 2015
A. Rautio, A.-L. Kivimäki, K. Korkka-Niemi, M. Nygård, V.-P. Salonen, K. Lahti, and H. Vahtera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3015–3032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3015-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3015-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Based on low-altitude aerial infrared surveys, around 370 groundwater–surface water interaction sites were located. Longitudinal temperature patterns, stable isotopes and dissolved silica composition of the studied rivers differed. Interaction sites identified in the proximity of 12 municipal water plants during low-flow seasons should be considered as potential risk areas during flood periods and should be taken under consideration in river basin management under changing climatic situations.
A. M. L. Saraiva Okello, I. Masih, S. Uhlenbrook, G. P. W. Jewitt, P. van der Zaag, and E. Riddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 657–673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-657-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-657-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We studied long-term daily records of rainfall and streamflow of the Incomati River basin in southern Africa. We used statistical analysis and the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration tool to describe the spatial and temporal variability flow regime. We found significant declining trends in October flows, and low flow indicators; however, no significant trend was found in rainfall. Land use and flow regulation are larger drivers of temporal changes in streamflow than climatic forces in the basin.
J. M. Campbell, P. Jordan, and J. Arnscheidt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 453–464, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-453-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-453-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution phosphorus and flow data were used to gauge the effects of diffuse (soil P) and point source (septic tank system) mitigation measures in two flashy headwater river catchments. Over 4 years the data indicated an overall increase in P concentration in defined high flow ranges and low flow P concentration showed little change. The work indicates fractured responses to catchment management advice and mitigation which were also affected by variations in seasonal hydrometeorology.
J. Audet, L. Martinsen, B. Hasler, H. de Jonge, E. Karydi, N. B. Ovesen, and B. Kronvang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4721–4731, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4721-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4721-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
The mitigation of excess nitrogen and phosphorus in river waters requires costly measures. Therefore it is essential to use reliable monitoring methods to select adequate mitigation strategies. Here we show that more development is needed before passive samplers can be considered as reliable alternative for sampling nutrients in stream. We also showed that although continuous sampling is expensive, its reliability precludes unnecessarily high implementation costs of mitigation measures.
C. Comina, M. Lasagna, D. A. De Luca, and L. Sambuelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3195–3203, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3195-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3195-2014, 2014
M. Rusca, J. Heun, and K. Schwartz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2749–2757, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2749-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2749-2012, 2012
J. Rozemeijer, C. Siderius, M. Verheul, and H. Pomarius
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2405–2415, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2405-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2405-2012, 2012
F. Jørgensen, W. Scheer, S. Thomsen, T. O. Sonnenborg, K. Hinsby, H. Wiederhold, C. Schamper, T. Burschil, B. Roth, R. Kirsch, and E. Auken
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1845–1862, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1845-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1845-2012, 2012
J. Lange, S. Husary, A. Gunkel, D. Bastian, and T. Grodek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 715–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-715-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-715-2012, 2012
T. T. Jin, B. J. Fu, G. H. Liu, and Z. Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2519–2530, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2519-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2519-2011, 2011
T. A. Endreny and M. M. Soulman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2119–2126, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2119-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2119-2011, 2011
B. M. Teklu, H. Tekie, M. McCartney, and S. Kibret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2595–2603, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2595-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2595-2010, 2010
T. Raziei, I. Bordi, L. S. Pereira, and A. Sutera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1919–1930, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1919-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1919-2010, 2010
S. L. Noorduijn, K. R. J. Smettem, R. Vogwill, and A. Ghadouani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2095–2104, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2095-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2095-2009, 2009
Cited articles
Allan, D. J. and Castillo, M. M.: Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters, vol. 125, Kluver Academic, Boston, 2nd edition, https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659-125.1.154, 2007.
Ashworth, P. J., Ferguson, R. I., and Powell, M. D.: Bedload transport and sorting in braided channels, in: Dynamics of gravel-bed rivers, edited by: Billi, P., Hey, R. D., Thorne, C. R., and Tacconi, P., John Wiley & Sons LTD, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 497–515, 1992.
Battle-Aguilar, J., Brovelli, A., Luster, J., Shrestha, J., and Barry, D. A.: Carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a variably saturated soil profile, Model application to a restored Swiss riparian area, in preparation, 2011.
Bovee, K. D.: A guide to stream habitat analysis using the in.-stream flow incremental methodology, Fish And Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, CO, US, 1982.
Brasington, J., Rumsby, B. T., and McVey, R. A.: Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel-bed river using high resolution GPS-based survey, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 25, 973–990, 2000.
Brookes, A.: Channelized rivers: Prospectives for Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons LTD, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 344 pp., 1988.
Cairns, J.: The status of the theoretical and applied science of restoration ecology, The Environmental Professional, 13, 186–194, 1991.
Clifford, N. J., Soar, P. J., Harmar, O. P., Gurnell, A. M., Petts, G. E., and Emery, J. C.: Assessment of hydrodynamic simulation results for eco-hydraulic and eco-hydrological applications: a spatial semivariance approach, Hydrol. Process., 19, 3631–3648, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5855, 2005.
Colombini, M., Seminara, G., and Tubino, M.: Finite-amplitude alternate bars, J. Fluid Mech., 181, 213–232, 1987.
Defries, R. S. and Townshend, J. R.: NDVI derived land-cover classifications at global-scale, Policy, 15, 3567–3586, 1994.
Densmore, R. V. and Karle, K. F.: Flood Effects on an Alaskan Stream Restoration Project: The Value of Long-Term Monitoring, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45, 1424–1433, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00373.x, 2009.
Diplas, P. and Parker, G.: Deposition and removal of fines in gravel-bed streams, in: Dynamic of gravel-bed rivers, edited by: Billi, P., Hey, R. D., Thorne, C. R., and Tacconi, P., John Wiley & Sons LTD, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 313–329, 1992.
Edmaier, K., Burlando, P., and Perona, P.: Mechanisms of vegetation uprooting by flow in alluvial non-cohesive sediment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8, 1365–1398, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-1365-2011, 2011.
Emery, J. C., Gurnell, A. M., Clifford, N. J., Petts, G. E., Morrissey, I. P., and Soar, P. J.: Classifying the hydraulic performance of riffle-pool bedforms for habitat assessment and river rehabilitation design, River Res. Appl., 19, 533–549, https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.744, 2003.
Federici, B. and Seminara, G.: On the convective nature of bar instability, J. Fluid Mech., 487, 125–145, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003004737, 2003.
Fitter, H.: An Architectural Approach to the Comparative Ecology of Plant Root Systems, New Phytol., 106, 61–77, 1987.
Formann, E., Habersack, H., and Schober, S.: Morphodynamic river processes and techniques for assessment channel evolution in Alpine gravel bed rivers, Geomorphology, 90, 340–355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.029, 2007
Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W.: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, Agron. Monogr. 9, ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, 2nd edition, 1986.
Gilvear, D., Francis, R., Willby, N., and Gurnell, A.: Gravel bars: a key habitat of gravel-bed rivers for vegetation, in: Process Understanding to River Restoration, edited by: Habersack, H., Piègay, H., and Rinaldi, M., Elsevier, ISSN: 0928-2025, 2025, 677–700, 2008.
Glenz, C.: Riparian forest dynamics in central Europe – Tool for decision-making in river restoration, Ph.D. thesis, 2005.
Glenz, C., Schlaepfer, R., Iorgulescu, I., and Kienast, F.: Flooding tolerance of Central European tree and shrub species, Forest Ecol. Manag., 235, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.065, 2006.
Gurnell, A. and Petts, G.: Trees as riparian engineers: The Tagliamento River, Italy, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 31, 1558–1574, 2006.
Ikeda, S., Parker, G., and Sawai, K.: Bend theory of river meanders, Part 1. Linear development, J. Fluid Mech., 112, 363–377, 1981.
Inglis, C. C.: The behaviour and control of rivers and canals (with the aid of models), Central Water Power, Irrigation and Navigation Research Station, Poona, India, Research pubblication 13 part 1, 1949.
Jang, C. L. and Shimizu, Y.: Vegetation effects on the morphological behavior of alluvial channels, J. Hydraul. Res., 45, 763–772, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2007.9521814, 2007.
Jowett, I. G.: Hydraulic constraints on habitat suitability for benthic invertebrates in gravel-bed rivers, River Res. Appl., 19, 495–507, https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.734, 2003.
Keim, R.: Digital terrain modeling of small stream channels with a total-station theodolite, Adv. Water Resour., 23, 41–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00007-X, 1999.
Kuo, S.: Phosphorus, in: Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 – chemical methods, edited by: Sparks, D. L., SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, 1996.
Lacey, G.: Stable channel in alluvium, Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers, 229, 259–292, 1930.
Lamouroux, N.: Predicting velocity frequency distributions in stream reaches, Water Resources, 31, 2367–2375, 1995.
Lamouroux, N.: Depth Probability Distributions in Stream Reaches, J. Hydraul. Eng., 124, 224–227, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:2(224), 1998.
Lamouroux, N., Statzner, B., Fuchs, U., Kohmann, F., and Schmedtje, U.: An unconventional approach to modeling the spatial and temporal variability of local shear stress in stream segments, Water Resour. Res., 28, 3251–3258, https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629208722560, 1992.
Lane, S. N., Richards, K. S., and Chandler, J. H.: Developments in monitoring and modelling small-scale river bed topography, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 19, 349–368, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290190406, 1994.
Lanzoni, S.: Experiments on bar formation in a straight flume 2. Graded sediment, Water Resources, 36, 3351–3363, 2000.
Lejot, J., Delacourt, C., Piégay, H., Fournier, T., Trémélo, M.-L., and Allemand, P.: Very high spatial resolution imagery for channel bathymetry and topography from an unmanned mapping controlled platform, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 32, 1705–1725, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1595, 2007.
Leopold, B. L. and Wolman, M. G.: River Chanel Patterns: Braided, Meandering and Straight, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 1957.
Lisle, T. E. and Madej, M. A.: Spatial variation in armoring in a channel with high sediment supply, in: Dynamics of gravel-bed rivers, edited by: Billi, P., Hey, R. D., Thorne, C. R., and Tacconi, P., John Wiley & Sons LTD, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 277–293, 1992.
Lisle, T. E., Ikeda, H., and Iseya, F.: Formation of stationary alternate bars in a steep channel with mixed-size sediment – A flume experiment, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 16, 463–469, 1991.
Malmqvist, B. and Rundle, S.: Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world, Environ. Conserv., 29, 134–153, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000097, 2002.
Meyer-Peter, E. and Muller, R.: Formulas for bed-load transport, Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the International Association for Hydraulic Structures Research, 39–64, 1948.
Millar, R. G.: Influence of bank vegetation on alluvial channel patterns, Water Resour. Res., 36, 1109, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900346, 2000.
Mitsch, W.: Ecological engineering: A field whose time has come, Ecol. Eng., 20, 363–377, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.05.001, 2003.
Molnar, P., Favre, V., Perona, P., Burlando, P., Randin, C., and Wolfgang, R.: Floodplain forest dynamics in hydrologically altered mountain river, Peckiana, 5, 17–24, 2008.
Nat, D. V. D., Schmidt, A. P., Tockner, K., Edwards, P. J., and Ward, J. V.: Inundation Dynamics in Braided Floodplains : Tagliamento River, Northeast Italy, Ecosystems, 5, 636–647, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0170-0, 2002.
Olde Venterink, H., Vermaat, J. E., Pronk, M., Wiegman, F., van der Lee, G. E. M., van den Hoorn, M. W., Higler, L., and Verhoeven, J. T. A.: Importance of sediment deposition and denitrification for nutrient retention in floodplain wetlands, Appl. Veg. Sci. 9, 163–174, 2006.
Palmer, A. M., Moenninger, L. H., and Bernhardt, E.: River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice?, Freshwater Biol., 55(Suppl. 1), 205–222, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x, 2010.
Perona, P., Molnar, P., Savina, M., and Burlando, P.: Stochastic sediment – vegetation dynamics in an Alpine braided river, IAHS Publ., 325, 266–274, 2008.
Perona, P., Camporeale, C., Perucca, E., Savina, M., Molnar, P., Burlando, P., and Ridolfi, L.: Modelling river and riparian vegetation interactions and related importance for sustainable ecosystem management, Aquat. Sci., 71, 266–278, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-009-9215-1, 2009a.
Perona, P., Molnar, P., Savina, M., and Burlando, P.: An observation-based stochastic model for sediment and vegetation dynamics in the floodplain of an Alpine braided river, Water Resour. Res., 45, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007550, 2009b.
Peter, A., Kienast, F., and Woolsey, S.: A strategy to assess river restoration success, Archives de Science, 15, 643–656, 2006.
Pollen, N.: Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of streambanks : Accounting for soil shear strength and moisture, Catena, 69, 197–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.05.004, 2007.
Pollen, N. and Simon, A.: Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank stability using a fiber bundle model, Water Resoures, 41, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003801, 2005.
Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A. R., Kerr, Y. H., and Sorooshian, S.: A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index, Remote Sens. Environ., 126, 119–126, 1994.
Quinn, J. M. and Hickey, C. W.: Hydraulic parameters and benthic invertebrate distributions in two gravel-bed New Zealand rivers, Freshwater Biol., 32, 489–500, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01142.x, 1994.
Rodhe, S.: River restoration: potentials and limitations to re-establish riparian landscapes. Assestment and planning, Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich, 2004.
Ruf, W., Foglia, L., Perona, P., Molnar, P., Faeh, R., and Burlando, P.: Modelling the interaction between groundwater and river flow in an active alpine floodplain ecosystem, Peckiana, 5, 5–16, 2008.
Samaritani, E., Shrestha, J., Fournier, B., Frossard, E., Gillet, F., Guenat, C., Niklaus, P. A., Tockner, K., Mitchell, E. A. D., and Luster, J.: Heterogeneity of soil carbon pools and fluxes in a channelized and a restored floodplain section (Thur River, Switzerland), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8, 1059–1091, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-1059-2011, 2011.
Schaeppi, B., Perona, P., Schneider, P., and Burlando, P.: Integrating river cross section measurements with Digital Terrain Models for improved flow modelling applications, Comput. Geosciences, 36(6), 707–716, 2010.
Schirmer, M., Luster, J., Linde, N., Perona, P., Mitchell, E., Barry, D. A., Cirpka, O. A., Schneider, P., Vogt, T., Tockner, K., Burlando, P., Pannatier, E. G., Green, A., Hoehn, E., Hollender, J., Kipfer, R., and Durisch-Kaiser, E.: River restoration: Morphological, hydrological, and ecological changes and challenges, in preparation, 2011.
Schneider, P., Vogt, T., Schirmer, M., Doetsch, J. A., Linde, N., Pasquale, N., Perona, P., and Cirpka, O. A.: Towards improved instrumentation for assessing river-groundwater interactions in a restored river corridor, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8, 2503–2553, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-2503-2011, 2011.
Schweizer, S. P.: Predicting the consequences fo river rehabilitation measures on morphology, hydraulics, pheriphyton and on invertebrates Zürich, Switzerland 2007, Ph.D. thesis, 2007.
Schweizer, S. P., Borsuk, M. E., and Reichert, P.: Predicting joint frequency distributions of depth and velocity for instream habitat assessment, River Res. Appl., 23, 287–302, https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.980, 2007.
Soar, P. J. and Thorne, C. R.: Channel restoration design for mendering rivers, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss., 2001.
Steiger, J. and Gurnell, A, M.: Spatial hydrogeomorphological influences on sediment and nutrient deposition in riparian zones: observations from the Garonne River, France, Geomorphology, 49, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00144-7, 2003.
Stewardson, M. J. and McMahon, T. A.: A stochastic model of hydraulic variations within stream channels, Water Resour. Res., 38(1), 1007 https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR000014, 2002.
Tockner, K. and Stanford, J.: Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends, Environ. Conserv., 29, 308–330, https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290200022X, 2002.
Trush, W. J., McBain, S. M., and Leopold, L. B.: Attributes of an alluvial river and their relation to water policy and management, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 11858–11863, 2000.
Tubino, M. and Seminara, G.: Free-forced interactions in developing meanders and suppression of free bars, J. Fluid Mech., 214, 131–159, 1990.
Verones, F.: Experiments on Salix shoot and root growth on river alluvial sediment with programming for image analysis, Master thesis, ETH, Zurich, 2009.
Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., and Kafkafy, U.: Plant roots: The hidden half, 3rd edition, Marcel Dekker, NY, 2002.
Walthert, L., Graf, U., Kammer, A., Luster, J., Pezzotta, D., Zimmermann, S., and Hagedorn, F.: Determination of organic and inorganic carbon, δ13C, and nitrogen in soils containing carbonates after acid fumigation with HCl, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 173, 207–216, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900158, 2010.
Wohl, E., Angermeier, P. L., Bledsoe, B., Kondolf, G. M., Macdonnell, L., Merritt, D. M., Palmer, M. A., Poff, N. L., and Tarboton, D.: River restoration, Water Resources, 41, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003985, 2005.
Woolsey, S., Capelli, F., Gonser, T. O. M., Hoehn, E., Hostmann, M., Junker, B., Paetzold, A., Roulier, C., Schweizer, S., Tiegs, S. D., Tockner, K., Weber, C., and Peter, A.: A strategy to assess river restoration success, Freshwater Biol., 52, 752–769, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01740.x, 2007.
Wu, J. and Tang, A. D.: The influence of water conveyances on restoration of vegetation to the lower reaches of Tarim River, Environ. Earth Sci., 59, 967–975, 2010.
Special issue
