Articles | Volume 28, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024
Research article
 | 
13 Mar 2024
Research article |  | 13 Mar 2024

Deep learning for monthly rainfall–runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia

Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch

Related authors

How does the time shift between precipitation and evaporation affect annual streamflow variability? A large sample elasticity study
Vazken Andréassian, Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Alban de Lavenne, and Julien Lerat
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-414,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-414, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Technical note: Quadratic solution of the approximate reservoir equation (QuaSoARe)
Julien Lerat
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3184,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3184, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Exploring the potential processes controlling changes in precipitation–runoff relationships in non-stationary environments
Tian Lan, Tongfang Li, Hongbo Zhang, Jiefeng Wu, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 903–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, 2025
Short summary
A diversity-centric strategy for the selection of spatio-temporal training data for LSTM-based streamflow forecasting
Everett Snieder and Usman T. Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 785–798, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-785-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-785-2025, 2025
Short summary
Simulating the Tone River eastward diversion project in Japan carried out 4 centuries ago
Joško Trošelj and Naota Hanasaki
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 753–766, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-753-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-753-2025, 2025
Short summary
Lack of robustness of hydrological models: a large-sample diagnosis and an attempt to identify hydrological and climatic drivers
Léonard Santos, Vazken Andréassian, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Göran Lindström, Alban de Lavenne, Charles Perrin, Lila Collet, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 683–700, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-683-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-683-2025, 2025
Short summary
Achieving water budget closure through physical hydrological process modelling: insights from a large-sample study
Xudong Zheng, Dengfeng Liu, Shengzhi Huang, Hao Wang, and Xianmeng Meng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 627–653, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-627-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-627-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbas, A., Boithias, L., Pachepsky, Y., Kim, K., Chun, J. A., and Cho, K. H.: AI4Water v1.0: an open-source python package for modeling hydrological time series using data-driven methods, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3021–3039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3021-2022, 2022. 
Australian Water Outlook: https://awo.bom.gov.au/, last access: February 2022. 
Bennett, J. C., Wang, Q. J., Robertson, D. E., Schepen, A., Li, M., and Michael, K.: Assessment of an ensemble seasonal streamflow forecasting system for Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6007–6030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6007-2017, 2017. 
Choi, J., Lee, J., and Kim, S.: Utilization of the Long Short-Term Memory network for predicting streamflow in ungauged basins in Korea, Ecol. Eng., 182, 106699, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106699, 2022. 
Clark, M. P., Vogel, R. M., Lamontagne, J. R., Mizukami, N., Knoben, W. J., Tang, G., Gharari, S., Freer, J. E., Whitfield, P. H., and Shook, K. R.: The abuse of popular performance metrics in hydrologic modeling, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029001, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
To determine if deep learning models are in general a viable alternative to traditional hydrologic modelling techniques in Australian catchments, a comparison of river–runoff predictions is made between traditional conceptual models and deep learning models in almost 500 catchments spread over the continent. It is found that the deep learning models match or outperform the traditional models in over two-thirds of the river catchments, indicating feasibility in a wide variety of conditions.
Share