Articles | Volume 27, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1745-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1745-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical Note: Combining undisturbed soil monoliths for hydrological indoor experiments
Institute for Land and Water Management Research, Federal Agency for
Water Management, Pollnbergstraße 1, 3252 Petzenkirchen, Austria
Peter Strauss
Institute for Land and Water Management Research, Federal Agency for
Water Management, Pollnbergstraße 1, 3252 Petzenkirchen, Austria
Related authors
No articles found.
Hatice Türk, Christine Stumpp, Markus Hrachowitz, Peter Strauss, Günter Blöschl, and Michael Stockinger
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2597, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2597, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that stream flow isotope data (δ2H) were inadequate for distinguishing preferential groundwater flow. Large passive groundwater storage dampened δ2H variations, obscuring signals of fast groundwater flow and complicating the estimation of older water fractions in the streams. Further, weekly-resolution δ2H sampling yielded deceptively high model performance, highlighting the need for complementary and groundwater-level data to improve catchment-scale transit-time estimates.
Christopher Thoma, Borbala Szeles, Miriam Bertola, Elmar Schmaltz, Carmen Krammer, Peter Strauss, and Günter Blöschl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2541, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2541, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how farming practices affect soil and sediment movement in a small Austrian catchment. By monitoring water and sediment during 55 rain events, we found that erosion control worked well in flat fields near the stream, but not in steep or distant fields. Our results show that reducing soil loss requires strategies that consider slope, distance to streams, and how water flows through the landscape.
Hatice Türk, Christine Stumpp, Markus Hrachowitz, Karsten Schulz, Peter Strauss, Günter Blöschl, and Michael Stockinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-359, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-359, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Using advances in transit time estimation and tracer data, we tested if fast-flow transit times are controlled solely by soil moisture or are also controlled by precipitation intensity. We used soil moisture-dependent and precipitation intensity-conditional transfer functions. We showed that significant portion of event water bypasses the soil matrix through fast flow paths (overland flow, tile drains, preferential flow paths) in dry soil conditions for both low and high-intensity precipitation.
Shengping Wang, Borbala Szeles, Carmen Krammer, Elmar Schmaltz, Kepeng Song, Yifan Li, Zhiqiang Zhang, Günter Blöschl, and Peter Strauss
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3021–3036, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study explored the quantitative contribution of agricultural intensification and climate change to the sediment load of a small agricultural watershed. Rather than a change in climatic conditions, changes in the land structure notably altered sediment concentrations under high-flow conditions, thereby contributing most to the increase in annual sediment loads. More consideration of land structure improvement is required when combating the transfer of soil from land to water.
Lovrenc Pavlin, Borbála Széles, Peter Strauss, Alfred Paul Blaschke, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2327–2352, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2327-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2327-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the dynamics of streamflow, groundwater and soil moisture to investigate how different parts of an agricultural catchment in Lower Austria are connected. Groundwater is best connected around the stream and worse uphill, where groundwater is deeper. Soil moisture connectivity increases with increasing catchment wetness but is not influenced by spatial position in the catchment. Groundwater is more connected to the stream on the seasonal scale compared to the event scale.
Maral Khodadadi, Christine Alewell, Mohammad Mirzaei, Ehssan Ehssan-Malahat, Farrokh Asadzadeh, Peter Strauss, and Katrin Meusburger
SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-2, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-2, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Forest soils store carbon and therefore play an important role in mitigating climate change impacts. Yet again, deforestation for farming and grazing purposes has grown rapidly over the last decades. Thus, its impacts on soil erosion and soil quality should be understood in order to adopt sustainable management measures. The results of this study indicated that deforestation can prompt soil loss by multiple orders of magnitude and deteriorate the soil quality in both topsoil and subsoil.
Cited articles
Abrantes, J. R. C. B., Moruzzi, R. B., Silveira, A., and de Lima, J. L. M.
P.: Comparison of thermal, salt and dye tracing to estimate shallow flow
velocities: Novel triple-tracer approach, J. Hydrol., 557, 362–377,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.048, 2018.
Allaire, S. A. and van Bochove, E.: Collecting large soil monoliths, Can. J.
Soil Sci., 86, 885–896, https://doi.org/10.4141/S05-062, 2006.
Andersson, H., Bergström, L., Ulén, B., Djodjic, F., and Kirchmann,
H.: The Role of Subsoil as a Source or Sink for Phosphorus Leaching, J.
Environ. Qual., 44, 535–544, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.04.0186, 2015.
Belford, R. K.: Collection and evaluation of large soil monoliths for soil
and crop studies, J. Soil Sci., 30, 363–373,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1979.tb00993.x, 1979.
Boix-Fayos, C., Martínez-Mena, M., Arnau-Rosalén, E., Calvo-Cases,
A., Castillo, V., and Albaladejo, J.: Measuring soil erosion by field plots:
Understanding the sources of variation, Earth-Sci. Rev., 78, 267–285,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.05.005, 2006.
Bottinelli, N., Zhou, H., Boivin, P., Zhang, Z. B., Jouquet, P., Hartmann,
C., and Peng, X.: Macropores generated during shrinkage in two paddy soils
using X-ray micro-computed tomography, Geoderma, 265, 78–86,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.011, 2016.
Bryan, R. B. and Luk, S.-H.: Laboratory experiments on the variation of soil
erosion under simulated rainfall, Geoderma, 26, 245–265,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(81)90023-9, 1981.
Darch, T., Carswell, A., Blackwell, M. S. A., Hawkins, J. M. B., Haygarth,
P. M., and Chadwick, D.: Dissolved Phosphorus Retention in Buffer Strips:
Influence of Slope and Soil Type, J. Environ. Qual., 44, 1216–1224,
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.10.0440, 2015.
Douglas, J. T., Ritchie, R. M., Takken, I., Crawford, C. E., and Henshall, J.
K.: Large Intact Soil Slabs for studying the Effects of Soil and Plant
Properties on Surface Runoff, J. Agric. Eng. Res., 73, 395–401,
https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1999.0433, 1999.
Green, D. L.: Modelling Geomorphic Systems: Scaled Physical Models, in:
Geomorphological Techniques, edited by: Cook, S. J., Clarke, L. E., and
Nield, J. M., Britisch Society for Geomorphology, London, UK, 1–17, ISSN 2047-0371, 2014.
Jégou, D., Brunotte, J., Rogasik, H., Capowiez, Y., Diestel, H.,
Schrader, S., and Cluzeau, D.: Impact of soil compaction on earthworm burrow
systems using X-ray computed tomography: preliminary study, Eur. J. Soil
Biol., 38, 329–336, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(02)01148-2, 2002.
Johnson, D. W., Walker, R. F., and Ball, J. T.: Lessons from Lysimeters: Soil
N Release from Disturbance Compromises Controlled Environment Study, Ecol.
Appl., 5, 395–400, https://doi.org/10.2307/1942030, 1995.
Katagi, T.: Soil Column Leaching of Pesticides, in: Reviews of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology, Vol. 221, edited by: Whitacre, D. M., Springer, New York, NY, 1–105, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4448-0_1, 2013.
Kuhn, N. J., Greenwood, P., and Fister, W.: Chapter 5.1 – Use of Field
Experiments in Soil Erosion Research, vol. 18, edited by: Thornbush, M. J., Allen, C. D., and Fitzpatrick, F. A., Elsevier, 175–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63402-3.00011-X, 2014.
Lamandé, M., Labouriau, R., Holmstrup, M., Torp, S. B., Greve, M. H.,
Heckrath, G., Iversen, B. V., de Jonge, L. W., Moldrup, P., and Jacobsen, O.
H.: Density of macropores as related to soil and earthworm community
parameters in cultivated grasslands, Geoderma, 162, 319–326,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.03.004, 2011.
Lewis, J. and Sjöstrom, J.: Optimizing the experimental design of soil
columns in saturated and unsaturated transport experiments, J. Contam. Hydrol., 115, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.04.001, 2010.
Luk, S. and Morgan, C.: Spatial variations of rainwash and runoff within
apparently homogeneous areas, Catena, 8, 383–402,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(81)80025-2, 1981.
Menta, C.: Soil Fauna Diversity – Function, Soil Degradation, Biological
Indices, Soil Restoration, in: Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in a
Diverse World, edited by: Lameed, G. A., IntechOpen, London, UK, https://doi.org/10.5772/51091, 2012.
Palmer, R. E., Meisinger, J. J., and Magette, W. L.: Undisturbed Soil-Columns
for Lysimetry: I. Collection, Field Testing, and Construction, Appl. Eng.
Agric., 27, 379–389, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.37073, 2011.
Pankau, R. C., Schoonover, J. E., Williard, K. W. J., and Edwards, P. J.:
Concentrated flow paths in riparian buffer zones of southern Illinois,
Agroforest. Syst., 84, 191–205, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9457-5, 2012.
Pires, L. F., Bacchi, O. O. S., and Reichardt, K.: Assessment of soil
structure repair due to wetting and drying cycles through 2D tomographic
image analysis, Soil Till. Res., 94, 537–545,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.10.008, 2007.
Poorter, H., Fiorani, F., Pieruschka, R., Wojciechowski, T., van der Putten,
W. H., Kleyer, M., Schurr, U., and Postma, J.: Pampered inside, pestered
outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled
conditions and in the field, New Phytol., 212, 838–855,
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14243, 2016.
Prosser, R. S., Hoekstra, P. F., Gene, S., Truman, C., White, M., and Hanson,
M. L.: A review of the effectiveness of vegetated buffers to mitigate
pesticide and nutrient transport into surface waters from agricultural
areas, J. Environ. Manage., 261, 110210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110210, 2020.
Ramler, D., Stutter, M., Weigelhofer, G., Quinton, J. N., Hood-Nowotny, R.,
and Strauss, P.: Keeping Up with Phosphorus Dynamics: Overdue Conceptual
Changes in Vegetative Filter Strip Research and Management, Front. Environ.
Sci., 10, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.764333, 2022.
Reid, K., Schneider, K., and McConkey, B.: Components of Phosphorus Loss From
Agricultural Landscapes, and How to Incorporate Them Into Risk Assessment
Tools, Front. Earth Sci., 6, 135, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00135, 2018.
Roth, C. H. and Joschko, M.: A note on the reduction of runoff from crusted
soils by earthworm burrows and artificial channels, Z. Pflanzenern. Bodenkd., 154, 101–105, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19911540205, 1991.
Rüttimann, M., Schaub, D., Prasuhn, V., and Rüegg, W.: Measurement of
runoff and soil erosion on regularly cultivated fields in Switzerland —
some critical considerations, Catena, 25, 127–139,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(95)00005-D, 1995.
Sarmah, A. K., Pillai-McGarry, U., and McGarry, D.: Repair of the structure
of a compacted Vertisol via wet/dry cycles, Soil Till. Res., 38, 17–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(96)01018-5, 1996.
Schneider, A. D., Marek, T. H., Ebeling, L. L., Howell, T. A., and Steiner,
J. L.: Hydraulic Pulldown Procedure for Collecting Large Soil Monoliths, T. ASAE, 31, 1092–1097, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30828, 1988.
Sharpley, A. N.: Rainfall Frequency and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Runoff from
Soil Amended with Poultry Litter, J. Environ. Qual., 26, 1127–1132,
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600040026x, 1997.
Singh, G., Kaur, G., Williard, K., Schoonover, J., and Kang, J.: Monitoring
of Water and Solute Transport in the Vadose Zone: A Review, Vadose Zone J.,
17, 160058, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.07.0058, 2018.
Tiefenbacher, A., Weigelhofer, G., Klik, A., Mabit, L., Santner, J., Wenzel,
W., and Strauss, P.: Antecedent soil moisture and rain intensity control
pathways and quality of organic carbon exports from arable land, Catena, 202, 105297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105297, 2021.
Weiler, M. and Naef, F.: An experimental tracer study of the role of macropores in infiltration in grassland soils, Hydrol. Process., 17, 477–493, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1136, 2003.
Short summary
Undisturbed soil monoliths combine advantages of outdoor and indoor experiments; however, there are often size limitations. A promising approach is the combination of smaller blocks to form a single large monolith. We compared the runoff properties of monoliths cut in half and recombined with uncut blocks. The effect of the combination procedure was negligible compared to the inherent soil heterogeneity, and we conclude that advantages outweigh possible adverse effects.
Undisturbed soil monoliths combine advantages of outdoor and indoor experiments; however, there...
Special issue