Articles | Volume 27, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1745-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1745-2023
Technical note
 | 
03 May 2023
Technical note |  | 03 May 2023

Technical Note: Combining undisturbed soil monoliths for hydrological indoor experiments

David Ramler and Peter Strauss

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hess-2022-240', Narryn Thaman, 27 Jul 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on hess-2022-240', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Sep 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on hess-2022-240', Anonymous Referee #3, 11 Sep 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (18 Nov 2022) by Daniel Green
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (28 Nov 2022) by Daniel Green
AR by David Ramler on behalf of the Authors (02 Dec 2022)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (07 Dec 2022) by Daniel Green
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (12 Dec 2022)
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (20 Jan 2023)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (14 Apr 2023) by Daniel Green
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (14 Apr 2023) by Louise Slater (Executive editor)
AR by David Ramler on behalf of the Authors (17 Apr 2023)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Undisturbed soil monoliths combine advantages of outdoor and indoor experiments; however, there are often size limitations. A promising approach is the combination of smaller blocks to form a single large monolith. We compared the runoff properties of monoliths cut in half and recombined with uncut blocks. The effect of the combination procedure was negligible compared to the inherent soil heterogeneity, and we conclude that advantages outweigh possible adverse effects.