Articles | Volume 25, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-63-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-63-2021
Comment/reply
 | 
04 Jan 2021
Comment/reply |  | 04 Jan 2021

Comment on: “A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions” by Han and Tian (2020)

Richard D. Crago, Jozsef Szilagyi, and Russell Qualls

Related authors

What is the Priestley–Taylor wet-surface evaporation parameter? Testing four hypotheses
Richard D. Crago, Jozsef Szilagyi, and Russell J. Qualls
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3205–3220, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3205-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3205-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Global hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
A hydrologist's guide to open science
Caitlyn A. Hall, Sheila M. Saia, Andrea L. Popp, Nilay Dogulu, Stanislaus J. Schymanski, Niels Drost, Tim van Emmerik, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 647–664, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, 2022
Short summary
From mythology to science: the development of scientific hydrological concepts in Greek antiquity and its relevance to modern hydrology
Demetris Koutsoyiannis and Nikos Mamassis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2419–2444, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2419-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2419-2021, 2021
Short summary
Global distribution of hydrologic controls on forest growth
Caspar T. J. Roebroek, Lieke A. Melsen, Anne J. Hoek van Dijke, Ying Fan, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4625–4639, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4625-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4625-2020, 2020
Short summary
Inter-annual variability of the global terrestrial water cycle
Dongqin Yin and Michael L. Roderick
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 381–396, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-381-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-381-2020, 2020
Short summary
Using R in hydrology: a review of recent developments and future directions
Louise J. Slater, Guillaume Thirel, Shaun Harrigan, Olivier Delaigue, Alexander Hurley, Abdou Khouakhi, Ilaria Prosdocimi, Claudia Vitolo, and Katie Smith
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2939–2963, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2939-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2939-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Bouchet, R.: Epototranspiration reelle et potentielle, signification climatique, Int. Assoc. Hydrolog. Sci. Publ., 62, 134–142, 1963. 
Brutsaert, W.: Evaporation into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1982. 
Brutsaert, W.:Hydrology, An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2005. 
Brutsaert, W.: A generalized complementary principle with physical constraints for landsurface evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 51, 8087–8093, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017720, 2015. 
Crago, R., Szilagyi, J., Qualls, R., and Huntington, J. L.: Rescaling the complementary relationship for land surface evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 52, 8461–8470, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019753, 2016. 
Short summary
The sigmoid-shaped complementary relationship (CR) for regional evaporation proposed by Han and Tian (2018, 2020) is reconsidered in terms of (1) its ability to give reasonable evaporation results from sites worldwide, (2) evidence for the three-state evaporation process it posits, (3) the validity of the proof provided by Han and Tian (2018), and (4) the relevance of model studies that seem to support it. Arguments for the sigmoid shape deserve to be taken seriously but remain unconvincing.