Articles | Volume 25, issue 1
04 Jan 2021
Comment/reply |  | 04 Jan 2021

Comment on: “A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions” by Han and Tian (2020)

Richard D. Crago, Jozsef Szilagyi, and Russell Qualls


Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (24 Oct 2020) by Alberto Guadagnini
AR by Richard Crago on behalf of the Authors (12 Nov 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (14 Nov 2020) by Alberto Guadagnini
Short summary
The sigmoid-shaped complementary relationship (CR) for regional evaporation proposed by Han and Tian (2018, 2020) is reconsidered in terms of (1) its ability to give reasonable evaporation results from sites worldwide, (2) evidence for the three-state evaporation process it posits, (3) the validity of the proof provided by Han and Tian (2018), and (4) the relevance of model studies that seem to support it. Arguments for the sigmoid shape deserve to be taken seriously but remain unconvincing.