Comment on: “A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions” by Han and Tian (2020)

Crago, Richard D.; Szilagyi, Jozsef; Qualls, Russell

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-63-2021

Articles | Volume 25, issue 1

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-63-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-63-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 25, issue 1

Comment/reply

|

04 Jan 2021

Comment/reply |

| 04 Jan 2021

Comment on: “A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions” by Han and Tian (2020)

Richard D. Crago, Jozsef Szilagyi, and Russell Qualls

Download

Final revised paper (published on 04 Jan 2021)
Preprint (discussion started on 20 Jul 2020)
Corresponding article

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review of hess-2020-310', Songjun Han, 02 Sep 2020
- AC1: 'Response to the review by Han and Tian', Richard Crago, 13 Oct 2020
RC2: 'comments', Fuqiang Tian, 09 Sep 2020
- AC1: 'Response to the review by Han and Tian', Richard Crago, 13 Oct 2020

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (24 Oct 2020) by Alberto Guadagnini

AR by Richard Crago on behalf of the Authors (12 Nov 2020) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (14 Nov 2020) by Alberto Guadagnini

Short summary

The sigmoid-shaped complementary relationship (CR) for regional evaporation proposed by Han and Tian (2018, 2020) is reconsidered in terms of (1) its ability to give reasonable evaporation results from sites worldwide, (2) evidence for the three-state evaporation process it posits, (3) the validity of the proof provided by Han and Tian (2018), and (4) the relevance of model studies that seem to support it. Arguments for the sigmoid shape deserve to be taken seriously but remain unconvincing.