see attached file

Two reviewers have read the new version of the manuscript. Both are generally happy with the new version, but find that several sections can be further shortened to make the paper more concise and focused on the novelty aspects of the work.
Please check the recommendations by the two reviewers and address their comments, making sure to prepare a revised version that is concise and to-the-point. The new revised version will be subject to editor review only.

Dear authors,
The main comment that was made by two reviewers on the previous version of the manuscript (merging two initially separate submissions) is that it was very long and could be shortened considerably. I can see that in the new version you have shortened some sections and removed two figures, but this has not considerably reduced the size of the paper and still keeps large parts of the original two manuscripts in place. I invite you to look more critically at the text to decide which parts are essential to keep and to move other parts to supplementary material. The accessibility of the manuscript will be much improved by keeping the key material in the (more concise) main text, while making supportive material available as supplementary information.