Articles | Volume 25, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-527-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-527-2021
Review article
 | 
02 Feb 2021
Review article |  | 02 Feb 2021

A history of TOPMODEL

Keith J. Beven, Mike J. Kirkby, Jim E. Freer, and Rob Lamb

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (01 Nov 2020) by Okke Batelaan
AR by Keith Beven on behalf of the Authors (17 Nov 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (18 Nov 2020) by Okke Batelaan
AR by Keith Beven on behalf of the Authors (26 Nov 2020)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
The theory that forms the basis of TOPMODEL was first outlined by Mike Kirkby some 45 years ago. This paper recalls some of the early developments: the rejection of the first journal paper, the early days of digital terrain analysis, model calibration and validation, the various criticisms of the simplifying assumptions, and the relaxation of those assumptions in the dynamic forms of TOPMODEL, and it considers what we might do now with the benefit of hindsight.