The authors have provided a comprehensive response to the reviewers' constructive comments. After revising the manuscript to address the entirety of the comments, the authors should take care to ensure that the revised manuscript is carefully proof-read to provide a clearly structured and sign-posted narrative that avoids repetition

The authors have made a satisfactory revision of the manuscript, addressing the main concerns of the reviewers regarding placing the research and its aim within the wider literature; correcting the imbalance in level of detail through the manuscript; re-structuring to improve the narrative flow and enhancing the methodological detail (particularly with regard to the processing of the remote sensing data).

However, the methodological description of the derivation of the OIP and IPIs (and the use of the information within Tables 1 and 2) is still insufficiently clear and needs to be improved.

A few additional minor text edits are also required. Also please ensure that all figures are of appropriate resolution /dpi e.g. Figure 5