Articles | Volume 22, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: which one performs better?
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 28 Jun 2018)
- Preprint (discussion started on 05 Apr 2018)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48d69/48d69e772b8c277f6eb452d059ffb7306048d65f" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b4a3/1b4a3057823b7b8f88fe8bb2036bea6b46d6aa27" alt="Supplement"
-
RC1: 'Excellent paper', Wolfgang Wagner, 24 Apr 2018
-
AC1: 'Responses to Reviewer#1 Wolfgang Wagner', Clément Albergel, 01 Jun 2018
-
AC1: 'Responses to Reviewer#1 Wolfgang Wagner', Clément Albergel, 01 Jun 2018
-
RC2: 'review of hess-2018-117', Anonymous Referee #2, 03 May 2018
-
AC2: 'Responses to Reviewer#2', Clément Albergel, 01 Jun 2018
-
AC2: 'Responses to Reviewer#2', Clément Albergel, 01 Jun 2018
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish as is (17 Jun 2018) by Frederiek Sperna Weiland
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6e3/4a6e34d706350d6cb4e6ced4efaa1f90cde8d17e" alt=""
AR by Clément Albergel on behalf of the Authors (18 Jun 2018)
Author's response
Manuscript