Articles | Volume 22, issue 6
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3515–3532, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018

Special issue: Integration of Earth observations and models for global water...

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3515–3532, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018

Research article 28 Jun 2018

Research article | 28 Jun 2018

ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: which one performs better?

Clement Albergel et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 4,419 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,984 1,398 37 4,419 65 63
  • HTML: 2,984
  • PDF: 1,398
  • XML: 37
  • Total: 4,419
  • BibTeX: 65
  • EndNote: 63
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Apr 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,837 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,820 with geography defined and 17 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
ECMWF recently released the first 7-year segment of its latest atmospheric reanalysis: ERA-5 (2010–2016). ERA-5 has important changes relative to ERA-Interim including higher spatial and temporal resolutions as well as a more recent model and data assimilation system. ERA-5 is foreseen to replace ERA-Interim reanalysis. One of the main goals of this study is to assess whether ERA-5 can enhance the simulation performances with respect to ERA-Interim when it is used to force a land surface model.