Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 22, issue 6
Articles | Volume 22, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22, issue 6
Research article
 | 
28 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 28 Jun 2018

ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: which one performs better?

Clement Albergel, Emanuel Dutra, Simon Munier, Jean-Christophe Calvet, Joaquin Munoz-Sabater, Patricia de Rosnay, and Gianpaolo Balsamo

Viewed

Total article views: 10,599 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
7,594 2,858 147 10,599 170 206
  • HTML: 7,594
  • PDF: 2,858
  • XML: 147
  • Total: 10,599
  • BibTeX: 170
  • EndNote: 206
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Apr 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 10,599 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 9,716 with geography defined and 883 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
ECMWF recently released the first 7-year segment of its latest atmospheric reanalysis: ERA-5 (2010–2016). ERA-5 has important changes relative to ERA-Interim including higher spatial and temporal resolutions as well as a more recent model and data assimilation system. ERA-5 is foreseen to replace ERA-Interim reanalysis. One of the main goals of this study is to assess whether ERA-5 can enhance the simulation performances with respect to ERA-Interim when it is used to force a land surface model.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Integration of Earth observations and models for global water...