Articles | Volume 21, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-393-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-393-2017
Research article
 | 
24 Jan 2017
Research article |  | 24 Jan 2017

Improvement of hydrological model calibration by selecting multiple parameter ranges

Qiaofeng Wu, Shuguang Liu, Yi Cai, Xinjian Li, and Yangming Jiang

Related authors

Escalating typhoon risks in Shanghai amid shifting tracks driven by urbanization and sea surface temperature warming
Qi Zhuang, Marika Koukoula, Shuguang Liu, Zhengzheng Zhou, and Nadav Peleg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1002,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1002, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
The impact of the spatiotemporal structure of rainfall on flood frequency over a small urban watershed: an approach coupling stochastic storm transposition and hydrologic modeling
Zhengzheng Zhou, James A. Smith, Mary Lynn Baeck, Daniel B. Wright, Brianne K. Smith, and Shuguang Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4701–4717, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4701-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4701-2021, 2021
Short summary
The role of storm scale, position and movement in controlling urban flood response
Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Zhengzheng Zhou, Long Yang, Shuguang Liu, and James Smith
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 417–436, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-417-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-417-2018, 2018
Short summary
Model simulations of potential contribution of the proposed Huangpu Gate to flood control in the Lake Taihu basin of China
Hanghui Zhang, Shuguang Liu, Jianchun Ye, and Pat J.-F. Yeh
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5339–5355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5339-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5339-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: How many models do we need to simulate hydrologic processes across large geographical domains?
Wouter J. M. Knoben, Ashwin Raman, Gaby J. Gründemann, Mukesh Kumar, Alain Pietroniro, Chaopeng Shen, Yalan Song, Cyril Thébault, Katie van Werkhoven, Andrew W. Wood, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2361–2375, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2361-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2361-2025, 2025
Short summary
CONCN: a high-resolution, integrated surface water–groundwater ParFlow modeling platform of continental China
Chen Yang, Zitong Jia, Wenjie Xu, Zhongwang Wei, Xiaolang Zhang, Yiguang Zou, Jeffrey McDonnell, Laura Condon, Yongjiu Dai, and Reed Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2201–2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2201-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluating the effects of topography and land use change on hydrological signatures: a comparative study of two adjacent watersheds
Haifan Liu, Haochen Yan, and Mingfu Guan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2109–2132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2109-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2109-2025, 2025
Short summary
Technical note: What does the Standardized Streamflow Index actually reflect? Insights and implications for hydrological drought analysis
Fabián Lema, Pablo A. Mendoza, Nicolás A. Vásquez, Naoki Mizukami, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, and Ximena Vargas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1981–2002, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1981-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1981-2025, 2025
Short summary
Long short-term memory networks for enhancing real-time flood forecasts: a case study for an underperforming hydrologic model
Sebastian Gegenleithner, Manuel Pirker, Clemens Dorfmann, Roman Kern, and Josef Schneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1939–1962, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1939-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1939-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J. A., O'Connell, P. E., and Rasmussen, J.: An introduction to the European Hydrological System – Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE", 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 45–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(86)90114-9, 1986.
Abebe, N. A., Ogden, F. L., and Pradhan, N. R.: Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the conceptual HBV rainfall–runoff model: Implications for parameter estimation, J. Hydrol., 389, 301–310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.007, 2010.
Bao, H., Wang, L., Li, Z., Zhao, L., and Zhang, G.: Hydrological daily rainfall-runoff simulation with BTOPMC model and comparison with Xin'anjiang model, Water Science and Engineering, 3, 121–131, https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.02.001, 2010.
Beck, M. B.: Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 23, 1393–1442, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i008p01393, 1987.
Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3663–3674, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900207, 2000.
Download
Short summary
We proposed a method to calibrate hydrological models by selecting parameter range. The results show the probability distribution can be used to determine the optimal range of a single parameter. Analysis of parameter sensitivity and correlation is helpful to obtain the optimal combination of multi-parameter ranges which contributes to a higher and more concentrated value of the objective function. The findings can provide references for enhancing the precision of hydrological process modelling.
Share