Based on your replies to the comments in the open discussion, I feel confident that you will be able to address the reviewers' comments in a good way. I noticed that you already uploaded a revised version (which I haven't look at however). The revised version should be uploaded after the discussion phase after the editors decision, together with your replies in one single document, and I invite you hereby to upload these documents.

Best regards,
Jan Seibert

Thanks for your efforts with the revision.

I have two minor comments:
Abstract: delete Unfortunately (at the end)
P4L8, via certain technical means, what is meant by this, clarify

Additionally, I have to admit I got lost when reading the results and discussion section now again. I would strongly recommend to split this into two sections.
Furthermore, I feel that you could strengthen the conclusions by focusing more on what one can learn from your study rather than summarizing the study.
At some places I feel that the English could be improved, but as a non-native speaker I do not feel in the position to make concrete suggestions.

Best regards,
Jan Seibert

Thanks for this good revision. Please check the language carefully or, even better, let it check by a native speaker.