<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-21-2233-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Historical and future trends in wetting and drying <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> in 291 catchments across China</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Historical and future trends in wetting and drying in 291~catchments across China}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z.~Chen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Zhongwang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>Huimin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-2334</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Hanbo</given-names></name>
          <email>yanghanbo@tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-0245</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Dawen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Yongqiang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Urban Planning and Environmental Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hanbo Yang (yanghanbo@tsinghua.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>26</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2233</fpage><lpage>2248</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>An increasingly uneven distribution of hydrometeorological factors related
to climate change has been detected by global climate models (GCMs) in which
the pattern of changes in water availability is commonly described by the
phrase “dry gets drier, wet gets wetter” (DDWW). However, the DDWW pattern
is dominated by oceanic areas; recent studies based on both observed and
modelled data have failed to verify the DDWW pattern on land. This study
confirms the existence of a new DDWW pattern in China after analysing the
observed streamflow data from 291 Chinese catchments from 1956 to 2000,
which reveal that the distribution of water resources has become
increasingly uneven since the 1950s. This pattern can be more accurately
described as “drier regions are more likely to become drier, whereas wetter
regions are more likely to become wetter”. Based on a framework derived
from the Budyko hypothesis, this study estimates runoff trends via
observations of precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and potential evapotranspiration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and predicts the future trends from 2001 to 2050 according to the
projections of five GCMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
Phase 5 (CMIP5) under three scenarios: RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5. The
results show that this framework has a good performance for estimating
runoff trends; such changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> play the most significant role. Most areas
of China, including more than 60 % of catchments, will experience water
resource shortages under the projected climate changes. Despite the
differences among the predicted results of the different models, the DDWW
pattern does not hold in the projections regardless of the model used.
Nevertheless, this conclusion remains tentative owing to the large
uncertainties in the GCM outputs.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Terrestrial water availability is critical to human lives and economic
activities (Milly et al., 2005). In recent decades, changes in water
availability have had significant effects on human society (Piao et al.,
2010) and the environment (Arnell, 1999) in the context of climate change.
Runoff (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a commonly adopted indicator of water availability (Milly et
al., 2005). The response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to climate change has been widely investigated
from basin scale to global scales based on streamflow observations
(e.g. Pasquini and Depetris, 2007; Dai et al., 2009; Stahl et al., 2010) or model
outputs (e.g. Hamlet et al., 2007; Alkama et al., 2013; Greve et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Under climate change, a trend towards more uneven distribution of the
hydrometeorological elements has been detected at the global scale by
global climate models (GCMs), both spatially (Held and Soden, 2006; Chou et
al., 2009) and temporally (Chou et al., 2013), and by observed data (Allan et al.,
2010; Durack et al., 2012; Liu and Allan, 2013). This trend results in probable enhancement
of hydrological extremes such as floods and droughts. This response is known
as the “rich-get-richer mechanism” (Chou and Neelin, 2004), from which
follow-up studies have derived diverse summaries of different elements such
as “dry gets drier, wet gets wetter” for precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Allan et al.,
2010) and precipitation minus evapotranspiration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Held and Soden,
2006), “wet season gets wetter, dry season gets drier” for seasonal
precipitation (Chou et al., 2013), and “fresh gets fresher, salty gets
saltier” for ocean salinity (Durack et al., 2012; Roderick et al., 2014).
Furthermore, these mechanisms have attracted a significant amount of
attention in exploring whether a similar effect in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exists on land as the
“dry gets drier, wet gets wetter” (DDWW) pattern found in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which indicates increasingly uneven distribution of the water resources. The
original DDWW pattern predicted a simple active proportional relationship
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), where the
sign of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> determines whether a region is dry (negative) or wet
(positive). It should be noted that the predicted changes are averages of
latitudinal zones rather than values at the local scale (e.g. grid box or
catchment). This results in dominance of the oceanic components in the DDWW
pattern (Roderick et al., 2014) because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are dominated by exchanges over
the ocean at most latitudes (Lim and Roderick, 2009). Thus, the DDWW pattern
is more appropriately applied to oceans than to land. In fact, because the
long-term mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is overwhelmingly positive on land, the method
of using the sign of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to identify wet and dry regions is no
longer feasible because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can obviously be
negative. Therefore, some scholars attempted to explore a new DDWW pattern
to describe changes in the hydrological cycle on land at the local scale.
Greve et al. (2014) adopted the aridity index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the potential
evapotranspiration) to measure the aridity degree and defined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2
as dry regions and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 as wet
regions. Consequently, the pattern became <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.
However, the results, based on more than 300 combinations of various global
hydrological data sets containing both observed and modelled data, showed
that only 10.8 % of land areas robustly followed the adjusted DDWW
pattern. Nevertheless, the study of Greve et al. (2014) still has some
defects related to two major aspects. The first is the existence of large
uncertainties in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in both satellite-based observations and simulations (Kumar
et al., 2016), and the second is the artificially assigned threshold between
the wet and dry regions, which likely leads to different results when the
threshold is changed. Therefore, a study based on observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data that are
more direct and of relatively low uncertainty should be conducted, and a new
method should be adopted to partition dry and wet regions independent of the
appointed threshold.</p>
      <p>However, it should be noted that the observed changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are responses not
only to climate change but also to other factors such as land cover changes
and human activities, e.g. withdrawal and drainage (Stahl et al., 2010). To
extract the components related only to climate change is an intractable
process because no effective method has been presented thus far. Therefore,
a roundabout means is to compare credibly estimated changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under
climate change with the estimate based on observed data. The Budyko
hypothesis (Budyko, 1948) is an effective and simple tool for modelling the
mean annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within a catchment based only on meteorological information
(Koster and Suarez, 1999). The Budyko hypothesis depicts the long-term
coupled water-energy balance for a catchment as
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-6mm}}?>

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes Budyko-like equations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
mean annual potential evapotranspiration, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a parameter characterizing
a particular catchment. There are various types of Budyko-like equations
(e.g. Pike, 1964; Fu, 1981; Choudhury, 1999; Zhang et al., 2001; Yang et
al., 2008; Wang and Tang, 2014; Zhou et al., 2015). The Budyko hypothesis
has been examined and applied in both observation-based (Zhang et al., 2001;
Oudin et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2014) and model-based studies (Zhang et al.,
2008; Teng et al., 2012), producing good consistency between observed and
modelled data. By analysing hydrometeorological data from 108 non-humid
catchments in China, Yang et al. (2007) confirmed that the Budyko hypothesis
is capable of predicting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> both at long-term and annual timescales. Xiong
and Guo (2012) assessed the Budyko hypothesis in 29 humid watersheds in
southern China and found that parametric Budyko formulae can effectively
estimate the long-term average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, it is reasonable to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by
using the Budyko hypothesis in China. The ability of the Budyko hypothesis
to capture the effects of climate change on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as other details, is
described in Sect. 2.3.</p>
      <p>Based on observed streamflow data from 291 catchments in China, this study
first analyses the historical trends in annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to explore the possible
existence of a DDWW pattern via a new method proposed in Sect. 2.2. Then, by
adopting a simple framework derived from the Budyko hypothesis stated in
Sect. 2.3, this study estimates the runoff trends caused by climate change
in the study catchments to reveal that the historical trends are mainly a
response to climate change and to identify the key influencing factor.
Moreover, based on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5)
projections of five GCMs, this study predicts changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> via the framework
to determine whether the DDWW pattern will continue to hold in the future.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of the 291 study catchments across mainland China.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study area and data</title>
      <p>This study collected hydrological and meteorological data from 291 catchments
in mainland China with drainage areas ranging from 372 to 142 963 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
These catchments cover all of the first-level basins of mainland China except
the Huaihe River basin (Fig. 1). Annual restored discharge data from 1956 to 2000 for each catchment
outlet were collected from the Hydrological Bureau of the Ministry of Water
Resources of China. Here, the term “restored” means that the effects of
human activities on discharge have been mostly removed via the water balance
method or other methods. Specifically, the process of restoring the
station-observed discharge consists of two major parts: replenishing the
consumption and removing the supplement. The water consumption includes the
net consumption in agricultural, industrial, and residential sectors as well
as water loss in the reservoir owing to evaporation and leakage. The water
supplement includes the water diverted from other watersheds and the part of
the extracted groundwater supplied back to the river. Changes in the
reservoir storage can depend on whether the change is positive or negative.
Thus, the restored discharge can be considered as the approximate natural
discharge. The records range in length from 21 to 45 years; 261 catchments
have record lengths greater than 40 years.</p>
      <p>Two meteorological data sets were used in this study. The first is the 10 km
gridded data set interpolated by Yang et al. (2014) based on 736 stations of
the China Meteorological Administration, which includes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and potential
evapotranspiration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observations from 1956 to 2000. Based on this
observed data set, the annual areal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of each catchment were
calculated. The other is the daily bias-corrected (Piani et al., 2010;
Hagemann et al., 2011) modelled data set from the Inter-Sectoral Impact
Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP; <uri>http://www.isi-mip.org</uri>)
covering the period 1951–2050 under scenarios RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and
RCP8.5, as released by the CMIP5. The modelled data were initially
downscaled to a 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude–longitude
grid data set and were then extracted and transformed into the ASCII format
by the Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture,
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China. The output data for each
scenario include precipitation; mean, maximum, and minimum air temperature;
solar radiation; wind speed; and relative humidity for the five models
including GFDL-ESM2M, HadGEM2-ES, IPSL-CM5A-LR, MIROC-ESM-CHEM, and
NorESM1-M. The daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of each grid was estimated by adopting the
Penman equation (Penman, 1948; Appendix A) based on the GCM outputs. The
annual series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated as the sum of
every daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over one year. Then, the annual catchment-averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated as the average of gridded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within one catchment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> mean annual runoff and <bold>(b)</bold> aridity
index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 291 study catchments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Runoff trends and DDWW pattern</title>
      <p>In this study, two slightly different methods were used to estimate the
runoff trend for the historical (1956–2000) and projected periods (2001–2050),
respectively. The runoff trend for the historical period was
estimated as the slope of the linear regression of the annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> series,
denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and can be calculated by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M89" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the observed record length of a catchment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th record,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the year of this record, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average of all recorded
years, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> are the observed annual
runoff in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the mean annual runoff in the historical period,
respectively. The significance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was tested by using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test. The
runoff trend of the projected period, denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
defined as the change in mean annual runoff between historical and projected
periods and can be computed as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M101" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the projected mean annual runoff.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In the study of Greve et al. (2014), the DDWW pattern was sensitive to the
assigned threshold for defining the dry and wet regions such that different
thresholds may have led to different, and possibly conflicting, results. To
remove the influence of the threshold, Allan et al. (2010) adopted
percentile bins for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to define wet and dry regions, thereby successfully
avoiding the pitfalls of selecting a convincing threshold. Therefore, this
study does not define absolute wet or dry regions but instead identifies
relatively wetter or drier ones. Specifically, two variables,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, were chosen as indicators of the aridity degree. The
term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was introduced to maintain consistency with studies based on
the climate model data where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is not available. The spatial
distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in Fig. 2, with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> ranging from 0 to 1400 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranging
from 0.5 to 8. We divided <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into six intervals,
where the intervals with larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> values and smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values denoted wetter levels (Table 1). In each interval, the total
catchments and catchments becoming wetter were counted, and then the
proportion of catchments becoming wetter, denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, was calculated. A
larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value implies that more catchments have become wetter in this level.
This study compares the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of different intervals to examine a new DDWW pattern.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Details of the interval partitions based on observed mean annual
runoff <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and aridity index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Interval</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Interval</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sample</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">size</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="center">Based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">141</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">200–400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">400–600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">600–800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">800–1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1000–1400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3" align="center">Based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5–2/3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2/3–1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1–1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.5–2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3–8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Framework for estimating runoff trends under climate change</title>
      <p>Among various types of Budyko-like equations, two analytical equations
proposed by Fu (1981) and Yang et al. (2008) should be highlighted. These
two equations are able to better capture the role of landscape
characteristics because the two studies each introduce a catchment property
parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, as shown by the two examples of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Eq. (1). Yang et al. (2008) showed a high linear correlation between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, this study adopted the equation derived by Yang
et al. (2008), which has been rewritten as
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-6mm}}?>

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M129" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Focusing on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, this study transformed Eq. (4) into

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M131" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated by using the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of each catchment from the period 1956–2000. The
differential form of Eq. (5) was derived as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M136" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote deviations in the
observed or modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to
long-term mean values. Equation (6) has widely been used to estimate changes in
annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. Yang and Yang, 2011; Roderick and Farquhar, 2011; Roderick
et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Because we focused on the effects of climate change, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was assumed to remain
unchanged, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 (Yang and Yang, 2011), and Eq. (6) became

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M149" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          For convenience, we introduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be estimated on the
basis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M157" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="|" open="."><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M158" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="|" open="."><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Roderick et al. (2014) showed that the runoff changes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study) estimated by using Eq. (7) account
for about 82 % of the variation in the GCM projections of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, Eq. (7) can predict a reliable result under
climate change projected by the GCMs. Based on Eq. (7), a framework can then
be constructed to estimate the runoff trends and is interpreted in Appendix B:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" specific-use="align" content-type="subnumberedsingle"><mml:math id="M166" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8.1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8.2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
estimated runoff trends of the historical and projected periods,
respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the linear
regression-calculated trends in annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p>Equation (8a) and (8b) attribute the runoff trend to two major factors: the
precipitation trend and the potential evapotranspiration trend. Equation (8a)
estimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Equation (8b) estimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to the GCM projections, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated as the differences in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 1956–2000 and 2001–2050.
To measure the uncertainty of the GCMs, the coefficient of
variance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in each catchment was estimated. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as
the ratio between the standard deviation and the absolute mean of the five
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outputs of the
respective GCMs. Specifically, a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates less uncertainty in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because the results of the different GCMs are similar.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Observed runoff trends (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the 291 catchments for the
period 1956–2000. The significant catchments are ones experiencing significant
changes in runoff at the significance level of 0.05.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between observed runoff trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mean
annual runoff <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the study catchments during the period 1956–2000. <bold>(b)</bold> Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
each interval according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the proportion of
catchments with positive trends in each interval. Interval numbers 1 to 6
correspond to six intervals of 0–200, 200–400, 400–600, 600–800,
800–1000, and 1000–1400, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between observed runoff trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
aridity index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the study catchments during the period 1956–2000. <bold>(b)</bold> Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
each interval according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Interval numbers 1 to 6 correspond to
six intervals of 0.5–2/3, 2/3–1, 1–1.5, 1.5–2, 2–3, and 3–8, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between mean annual runoff <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and
aridity index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the study catchments during the period 1956–2000. <bold>(b)</bold> Distribution of
catchments with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0. Presenting glaciers are
based on the second glacier inventory data set of China (Guo et al., 2014).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Historical trends in annual runoff</title>
      <p>Figure 3 presents the spatial distribution of the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
291 study catchments. At the significance level of 0.05, 39.9 % (or 116 of
291) of the study catchments are undergoing significant changes in annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
These catchments are hereafter referred to as significant catchments.
Trends towards wetter conditions (positive trends) were found mainly in the
upper and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin and in the basins of the
southwest, southeast, Pearl, and Inland rivers. The annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the lower
reaches of the Yangtze River basin and the northern Xinjiang Uyghur
Autonomous Region robustly increased by more than 2 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
was greater than the rates of most other catchments. The largest increasing
trend of 10.3 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed in the Yangtze River basin. However,
the catchments in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River basin and in
northern and northeastern China experienced the greatest reductions in
runoff, generally with significant trends. Several catchments had negative
trends of over 4 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; the most severe situation was in the Yellow
River basin, where the annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased at a rate of 7.2 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is plotted in Fig. 4,
which also shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each interval. With an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from 0.18 to 0.88, which means that drier regions are more
likely to become drier, whereas wetter regions are more likely to become
wetter. The slight decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.79 in the last interval can be
attributed to the small sample size of this interval; the number of
catchments getting drier is actually equal in intervals 5 and 6 (Table 2).
Therefore, these results indicate a new DDWW pattern, which emphasizes the
fact that the distribution of water resources has become increasingly uneven
in China since the 1950s. The process driving the uneven distribution of
water resources in this study is powerful because nearly all of the wettest
catchments became wetter, and the driest catchments became drier.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of estimated runoff trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with observed
trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <bold>(a)</bold> all catchments and <bold>(b)</bold> significant
catchments. Significant catchments are those experiencing significant changes
in runoff at the significance level of 0.05. The error rate is defined as the
proportion of catchments in which the signs of the observed and estimated trends differ.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Number of catchments with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 and respective <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in each
interval based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the analysis of
the observed trends. Interval numbers based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
are consistent with those in Table 1, as are the interval range and the
sample size of each interval. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the proportion of catchments
becoming wetter in each interval.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Interval</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">catchments</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.79</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.86</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The DDWW pattern was also examined on the basis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
data. Figure 5 shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased from 0.86 to 0.16 as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased, which implies that the DDWW pattern also holds if we adopt
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to describe the aridity degree in a manner similar to that
reported by Greve et al. (2014). This result can be attributed to the
monotonic decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6a). However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased sharply to 0.36 in the last interval, in contrast to the DDWW
pattern. To understand this divergence, we marked 26 total areas of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 in Fig. 6b. Surprisingly,
most of these areas (19 of 26) were located in areas of glaciers. Therefore,
the change in water storage (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the melting of
glacial ice and snow also plays a key role in the runoff generation in such
regions. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> does not consider the influence of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thereby leading to an overestimate of the aridity
degree in these catchments caused by grouped into the wrong intervals. This
reflects the weakness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in assessing the aridity degree with
respect to water resources compared with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, by
acquiring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and redefining an adjustable aridity index
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, these
catchments with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> could also obey the DDWW pattern.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Interpreting trends from the climate change perspective</title>
      <p>Based on the comparison of the Budyko-estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the
observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the coefficients of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Legates and
McCabe, 1999) were determined to be 0.70 and 0.86 for all catchments and for
significant catchments, respectively (Fig. 7). Therefore, the majority of the
runoff trends can be attributed to changes in the atmospheric forcing of
water and energy. However, the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was smaller than 1, at 0.60
and 0.62 for all catchments and significant catchments, respectively, which
implies that the Budyko-based framework underestimates the changes in
runoff. Nevertheless, despite underestimating the runoff trends, the
framework can correctly note the direction of runoff changes in more than
80 % of the study catchments (Fig. 7). This is because the error rates in
all and significant catchments, or the proportions of misestimated
catchments having different signs of the observed and the estimated trends,
are 18.6 and 6.0 %, representing 54 of 291 and 7 of 116, respectively.
Furthermore, the DDWW pattern works well based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 8), which validates the DDWW pattern from the perspective of climate change
based on historical meteorological observations. It also indicates the
feasibility of using only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> information to examine the pattern and
serves as a reference for studies based on climate model outputs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between estimated runoff
trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mean annual runoff <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the study
catchments during the period 1956–2000. <bold>(b)</bold> Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in each
interval according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Interval numbers 1 to 6 correspond to
six intervals of 0–200, 200–400, 400–600, 600–800, 800–1000,
and 1000–1400, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Analysis of the controlling factor in the DDWW pattern according to
the Budyko hypothesis. <bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between the ratio of absolute
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the part of the estimated runoff trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generated from
potential evapotranspiration changes) to absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the part of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
generated from precipitation changes) and the mean annual runoff <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<bold>(b)</bold> Cumulative frequency curve of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between observed precipitation trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and mean annual runoff <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the study catchments during the period 1956–2000. <bold>(b)</bold> Values
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in each interval according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Interval numbers 1 to 6
correspond to six intervals of 0–200, 200–400, 400–600, 600–800, 800–1000,
and 1000–1400, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In catchments where the observed and the estimated signs are consistent, the
parts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were compared to find the factor
controlling the runoff changes owing to climate change. As shown in Fig. 9,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> makes an overwhelming contribution in 88.6 % (or 210 of 237) of these catchments
because the ratios of absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are smaller than 1. Moreover, when linking <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10), we observed a pattern similar to that of DDWW,
i.e. more precipitation in wetter areas and less in drier areas. This
pattern is the result of the dominant position of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the positive
effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the runoff trends. Therefore, from the perspective of
climate change, the more uneven precipitation resulted in more uneven
runoff, thereby producing the DDWW pattern.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Projections of future trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under
RCP2.6 (top panels), RCP4.5 (middle panels), and RCP8.5 (bottom panels) scenarios
for the period 2001–2050. <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> Relationship between projected
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the five models and their means and mean
annual runoff <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in each interval
according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
five models and their means. Interval numbers 1 to 6 correspond to six intervals
of 0–200, 200–400, 400–600, 600–800, 800–1000, and 1000–1400, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of projected future trends <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
under <bold>(a)</bold> RCP2.6, <bold>(b)</bold> RCP4.5, and <bold>(c)</bold> RCP8.5 scenarios.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Analysis of the controlling factor in the projected climate change
under <bold>(a)</bold> RCP2.6, <bold>(b)</bold> RCP4.5, and <bold>(c)</bold> RCP8.5 scenarios.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f13.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Predicting future trends using the GCM projections</title>
      <p>Based on the GCM projections, Eq. (8b) predicts the future runoff trends
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the periods 1956–2000
and 2001–2050. The results showed great discrepancies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among the five GCMs even under the same
scenario, whereas the model-averaged results under different scenarios were
close (Fig. 11). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in each catchment are presented in Fig. 12. Taking the
RCP2.6 scenario as an example, over two-fifths (41.9 %) of the catchments
have a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value larger than 0.5, which is indicative of considerable
uncertainty in the various models reported by previous studies (e.g. Greve
et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2016). However, the proposed DDWW pattern is no
longer suitable under the three scenarios regardless of the model selected
because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> increased except for interval 6, which
showed an increase in contrast to the DDWW pattern. These results do not
imply an obvious alleviation of the uneven water resource distribution.
Conversely, they suggest that most areas of China (more than 60 %, as
calculated from Table 3) will experience water resource shortages under the
projected climate changes, whereas the conditions of the driest (interval 6)
and wettest (interval 1) areas will be relatively slight. Furthermore, the
main meteorological factor controlling the future trends was identified on
the basis of the mean results of the five GCMs. Figure 13 shows that the
trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is no longer the controlling factor
because only 40 % of the catchments had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values smaller than 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of the model-averaged relative changes in mean
annual runoff <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for the period 2001–2050 under <bold>(a)</bold> RCP2.6, <bold>(b)</bold> RCP4.5, and
<bold>(c)</bold> RCP8.5 scenarios.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f14.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The spatial distribution of model-averaged relative changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in
Fig. 14. The results under the three scenarios were similar. Red regions
indicate catchments in which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> will fall by more than 60 %
relative to the historical value; most of these regions are located in the
Yellow River basin with relatively high certainty (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5).
The most severe situation occurred in a catchment situated in the Yangtze
River basin, where the runoff is predicted to be nearly zero and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was less than 0.2. In contrast, dark blue areas indicate catchments in which
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is projected to increase by more than 40 %. These
catchments are located primarily in the Inland River basin, except for
northwest China, where catchments will suffer from a shortage of fresh
water. Instead of continuing to become drier, catchments in northeast and
north China are projected to generate more runoff in the future, whereas
catchments in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin will experience
considerable reductions in runoff despite historical increases. These are
the most obvious distinctions between the projected and historical runoff
changes. Thus, the DDWW pattern failed to accurately characterize these
future patterns.</p>
      <p>An inevitable concern about the GCM outputs is their uncertainty, which
determines the reliability of the projected results. To examine the
uncertainty, one workable method is to compare meteorological observations
with simulations for the same period of 1956–2000. Taking the results of
the GFDL-ESM2M model as an example (Fig. 15), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> was effectively
simulated except for some obvious incorrectly estimated points far from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> line. However, simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show
tremendous deviations, resulting in no obvious linear relationship between
the simulated and observed values. This simple comparison directly
highlights the unreliability of the GCM outputs.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Numbers of catchments with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0
and respective <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in each interval based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of
five GCMs and their means in the analysis of the projected trends under
three scenarios. Interval numbers based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are
consistent with those in Table 1, as are the interval range and the sample
size of each interval. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the proportion of catchments becoming wetter
in each interval.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Interval</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">RCP2.6 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">GFDL-ESM2M</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">74</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.52</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.41</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.63</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">HadGEM2-ES</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">76</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.54</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.63</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">IPSL-CM5A-LR</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">86</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">MIROC-ESM-CHEM</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">93</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.66</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.21</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">NorESM1-M</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.53</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.34</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.68</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Model-averaged</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.57</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.42</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">RCP4.5 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">GFDL-ESM2M</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.58</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">HadGEM2-ES</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.53</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">IPSL-CM5A-LR</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">77</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.55</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.32</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">MIROC-ESM-CHEM</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">97</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.69</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.48</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.25</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.26</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">NorESM1-M</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.43</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.38</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.25</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.53</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Model-averaged</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">71</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.37</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col8" align="center">RCP8.5 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">GFDL-ESM2M</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">84</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.25</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.32</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">HadGEM2-ES</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.53</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.53</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">IPSL-CM5A-LR</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">71</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.24</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.21</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">MIROC-ESM-CHEM</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">76</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.54</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.21</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">NorESM1-M</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">74</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.52</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.53</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">Model-averaged</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">75</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.53</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.32</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><caption><p>Comparison of the observed meteorological data with the simulations
from the GFDL-ESM2M model for the period 1956–2000. <bold>(a)</bold> Mean annual
precipitation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> mean annual potential evapotranspiration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2233/2017/hess-21-2233-2017-f15.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>In the present work, a new method which is not limited to the artificial selection of
the threshold to partition dry and wet regions was proposed to examine the
DDWW pattern. Our results confirm that a feasible DDWW pattern exists in the
historical runoff trends across China. However, if we adopt the same
threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 as in the study of Greve et al. (2014) to check
Fig. 5, the opposite result would be obtained such that the DDWW pattern
would not hold. Therefore, adopting the new method may also verify the
validity of the DDWW pattern in previous studies. Roderick et al. (2014)
plotted the relationship between GCM-based gridded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over land (Fig. 1f in Roderick et al., 2014) to argue that the
proportional relationship between them revealed by Held and Soden (2006)
does not hold over land. Nevertheless, from the perspective of the new
method, the relationship appears to be consistent with the DDWW pattern
including the possibility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 becoming
larger as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases. Additionally, the DDWW pattern might also hold in
the study of Greve et al. (2014) according to Fig. 4c in that study and the
distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> across the world. Therefore, a follow-up study
will adapt the proposed method to the worldwide scale to examine the DDWW
pattern globally.</p>
      <p>Based on a Budyko-based framework, our findings suggest that climate change
is the main factor of the historical runoff trends in China and that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the most significant factor associated with climate change.
Roderick et al. (2014) reported a similar result in their research of GCM
outputs (CMIP3) such that the changes in water availability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
are dominated by the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> globally.
Despite high correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
Budyko-based framework underestimated the observed changes in runoff. This
is because the framework quantifies only the effects of climate change. The
estimated deviations may stem from the neglect of other influencing factors
such as ecological and environmental changes, which result in changes in the
catchment properties (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. 6) which were assumed in this study to be constant.</p>
      <p>In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated by using the Penman equation,
which is considered to be the most effective method (Zhang et al., 2001) and
is strongly recommended by Shuttleworth (2012). This method for estimating
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also adopted by other studies such as Yang et al. (2014)
and Xu et al. (2015). However, Roderick et al. (2015) suggested using
net radiation instead of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Budyko hypothesis. Kumar et
al. (2016) compared runoff change projections obtained by these two
different methods and found similar results. Therefore, it is likely that
the use of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or net radiation had little influence in our results.</p>
      <p>Great discrepancy was noted between the GCM-simulated and observed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas GCM-simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
showed significant agreement (Fig. 15). This substantial distinction in
GCM performance in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
simulations might evoke doubt about the reliability of the bias-corrected
GCM outputs used in this study. Actually, the bias-correction process was
implemented for all GCM outputs, which means that all variables required for
calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were corrected simultaneously. We speculate
that this factor might relate to the disparate effectiveness of the
bias-correction process in the different outputs, resulting in a good fit to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a bad fit to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Based on the analysis of restored discharge in 291 catchments across China
from 1956 to 2000, this study proposed a suitable DDWW pattern of drier
regions being more likely to become drier, and wetter regions being more
likely to become wetter, which implies that the distribution of water
resources in China has become increasingly uneven since the 1950s. This
pattern holds in studies adopting both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the
indicators of water availability. Furthermore, a framework based on the
Budyko hypothesis revealed that the runoff changes can be attributed mainly
to climate change and that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the controlling factor. According to
the projections of five GCMs from CMIP5 during the period 2001–2050, the
proposed DDWW pattern is no longer suitable. The model-averaged results
suggest that more than 60 % of catchments will experience water resource
shortages under future climate change. In addition, only 40 % of the study
catchments will be primarily controlled by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
different from the phenomenon where the runoff change is controlled by
precipitation in about 90 % catchments in the historical period. The
catchments in northeast and north China, which have become drier, will
generate more runoff in the future; those in the lower reaches of the
Yangtze River basin, which have become wetter, will experience considerable
reductions in runoff. These changes represent the most obvious differences
between the projected and historical runoff changes. Nevertheless, the
projected conclusions remain tentative owing to the enormous unreliability
of the GCM outputs as indicated by the extremely low correlations between
the simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the period 1956–2000.</p>
      <p>The results of this study may be helpful in exploring the rule of spatial
heterogeneity in runoff trends and for supplementing the study of the DDWW
pattern under climate change. Although some studies have suspected the
existence of the DDWW pattern on land, this study confirms that the DDWW
pattern has actually existed across China in history. Realizing the more
uneven distribution of water resources across China is essential for the
Chinese government to better cope with climate change and to rationally
manage and utilize water resources. Moreover, the proposed method, which
divides catchments into several intervals representing different aridity
degrees instead of assigning a threshold to partition wet and dry regions,
can be easily adapted to the global study of the DDWW pattern for drawing
more generalized conclusions worldwide.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>Three data sets were used for this study. The annual restored
discharge data set is available online in the Supplement.
The observed meteorological data set is available for research purposes at the
China Meteorological Data Service Center (CMDC) (<uri>http://data.cma.cn/data/cdcdetail/dataCode/SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_DAY_V3.0.html</uri>).
The CMIP5-projected data set is distributed by the ISI-MIP on its own website (<uri>http://www.isi-mip.org</uri>).</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Estimate of $E_{\mathrm{p}}$ by the Penman equation}?><title>Estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the Penman equation</title>
      <p>The procedure for using the Penman equation to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mm day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
based on the GCM outputs is described in detail in this appendix.
The Penman equation can be written as (Yang and Yang, 2011)

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M400" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.8}{8.8}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.408</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.624</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.536</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the saturated vapour pressure (kPa), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the slope of the saturated vapour pressure versus the air temperature
curve (kPa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) when the saturated vapour pressure equals
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the net radiation (MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the soil heat flux (MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
a psychometric constant (kPa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
wind speed at a height of 2 m (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and RH is the
relative humidity (%) (Yang and Yang, 2011).</p>
      <p>The form of the saturated vapour pressure versus the air temperature curve is

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M417" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6108</mml:mn><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.27</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">237.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the daily air temperature, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the day
can be calculated by

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M420" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are maximum and minimum
daily air temperatures, respectively.</p>
      <p>The GCM outputs are daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (which can
be used to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
RH. Assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> equals 0, and if we compute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we can use
Eq. (A1) to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The process of utilizing the solar
radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to compute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is described below.</p>
      <p>Firstly, we calculate the incoming net short-wave radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M434" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the albedo.</p>
      <p>Next, the net outgoing long-wave radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is estimated by

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M437" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nl</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.35</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.903 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> MJ K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the actual vapour
pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> RH), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the clear-sky
solar radiation, which can be computed by
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-6mm}}?>

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M450" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the station elevation above sea level (m), which is available from
the GCMs, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the extraterrestrial radiation (MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
determined by Eqs. (21) to (25) in Allen et al. (1998).</p>
      <p>Finally, by subtracting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Derivation of framework for estimating $k_{{Q}}$ and $\Delta\overline{Q}$}?><title>Derivation of framework for estimating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>This appendix provides an explicit description of the derivation of the
framework for estimating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from Eq. (8).
Substituting Eq. (8) into Eq. (2) yields

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M462" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        This equation can be transformed into

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M463" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Recalling the definition of the trend in this study, Eq. (B2) can be
considered as a linear combination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M466" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Equation (3) can be rewritten as

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M467" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Recombination of the variables leads to the following expression:

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M468" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Similarly, the substitution of Eq. (8) yields

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M469" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        We finally obtain the target equation:

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math id="M470" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2233-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/hess-21-2233-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-6mm}}?></p></supplementary-material>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was partly supported by funding from the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51622903 and 51379098), the National
Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals, and the Program from
the State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering of China (grant
nos. sklhse-2016-A-02 and 2017-KY-01). The authors are grateful to the
editor, Jan Seibert, as well as Michael Roderick and the other anonymous
referee for providing helpful comments. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: J. Seibert <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: M. Roderick and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alkama, R., Marchand, L., Ribes, A., and Decharme, B.: Detection of global
runoff changes: results from observations and CMIP5 experiments, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 17, 2967–2979, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2967-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-2967-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Allan, R. P., Soden, B. J., John, V. O., Ingram, W., and Good, P.: Current
changes in tropical precipitation, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 025205, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025205</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines
for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arnell, N. W.: Climate change and global water resources, Global Environ. Change,
9, S31–S49, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Budyko, M. I.: Evaporation under Natural Conditions, Israel Program for Scientific
Translations, Jerusalem, 1948.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chou, C. and Neelin, J. D.: Mechanisms of global warming impacts on regional
tropical precipitation, J. Climate, 17, 2688–2701, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017&lt;2688:MOGWIO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017&lt;2688:MOGWIO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chou, C., Neelin, J. D., Chen, C., and Tu, J.: Evaluating the “Rich-Get-Richer”
Mechanism in Tropical Precipitation Change under Global Warming, J. Climate,
22, 1982–2005, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2471.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JCLI2471.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chou, C., Chiang, J. C. H., Lan, C., Chung, C., Liao, Y., and Lee, C.: Increase
in the range between wet and dry season precipitation, Nat. Geosci., 6, 263–267,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1744" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1744</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Choudhury, B. J.: Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation
using field observations and results from a biophysical model, J. Hydrol.,
216, 99–110, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00293-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00293-5</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Dai, A., Qian, T., Trenberth, K. E., and Milliman, J. D.: Changes in continental
freshwater discharge from 1948 to 2004, J. Climate, 22, 2773–2792, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2592.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JCLI2592.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Durack, P. J., Wijffels, S. E., and Matear, R. J.: Ocean Salinities Reveal
Strong Global Water Cycle Intensification During 1950 to 2000, Science, 336,
455–458, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1212222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1212222</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, B.: On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface, Scienta Atmos.
Sin., 5, 23–31, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Greve, P., Orlowsky, B., Mueller, B., Sheffield, J., Reichstein, M., and
Seneviratne, S. I.: Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land,
Nat. Geosci., 7, 716–721, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2247</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Guo, W., Liu, S., Yao, X., Xu, J., Shangguan, D., Wu, L., Zhao, J., Liu, Q.,
Jiang, Z., Wei, J., Bao, W., Yu, P., Ding, L., Li, G., Li, P., Ge, C., and Wang,
Y.: The second glacier inventory dataset of China (Version 1.0), Cold and Arid
Regions Science Data Center, Lanzhou, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3972/glacier.001.2013.db" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3972/glacier.001.2013.db</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hagemann, S., Chen, C., Haerter, J. O., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., and Piani, C.:
Impact of a statistical bias correction on the projected hydrological changes
obtained from three GCMs and two hydrology models, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 556–578, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Hamlet, A. F., Mote, P. W., Clark, M. P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Twentieth-century
trends in runoff, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture in the Western United
States, J. Climate, 20, 1468–1486, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4051.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI4051.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Held, I. M. and Soden, B. J.: Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to
global warming, J. Climate, 19, 5686–5699, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3990.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3990.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Koster, R. D. and Suarez, M. J.: A simple framework for examining the
interannual variability of land surface moisture fluxes, J. Climate, 12,
1911–1917, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;1911:ASFFET&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;1911:ASFFET&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kumar, S., Zwiers, F., Dirmeyer, P. A., Lawrence, D. M., Shrestha, R., and
Werner, A. T.: Terrestrial contribution to the heterogeneity in hydrological
changes under global warming, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3127–3142, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016WR018607</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Legates, D. R. and McCabe, G. J.: Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit”
measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resour. Res.,
35, 233–241, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998WR900018</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, W. H. and Roderick, M. L.: An atlas of the global water cycle: based on
the IPCC AR4 Models, Australian National University Press, Canberra, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Liu, C., and Allan, R. P.: Observed and simulated precipitation responses in
wet and dry regions 1850–2100, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 034002, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034002</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A., and Vecchia, A. V.: Global pattern of trends in
streamflow and water availability in a changing climate, Nature, 438,
347–350, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04312" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04312</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Lerat, J., and Michel, C.: Has land cover a
significant impact on mean annual streamflow? An international assessment using
1508 catchments, J. Hydrol., 357, 303–316, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.021</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Pasquini, A. I. and Depetris, P. J.: Discharge trends and flow dynamics of
South American rivers draining the southern Atlantic seaboard: an overview, J.
Hydrol., 333, 385–399, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.005</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Penman, H. L.: Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass, P. Roy.
Soc. A, 193, 120–145, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.1948.0037</ext-link>, 1948.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Piani, C., Weedon, G. P., Best, M., Gomes, S. M., Viterbo, P., Hagemann, S.,
and Haerter, J. O.: Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily
precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models, J.
Hydrol., 395, 199–215, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Piao, S., Ciais, P., Huang, Y., Shen, Z., Peng, S., Li, J., Zhou, L., Liu, H.,
Ma, Y., Ding, Y., Friedlingstein, P., Liu, C., Tan, K., Yu, Y., Zhang, T., and
Fang, J.: The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in
China, Nature, 467, 43–51, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09364</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Pike, J. G.: The estimation of annual run-off from meteorological data in a
tropical climate, J. Hydrol., 2, 116–123, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Roderick, M. L. and Farquhar, G. D.: A simple framework for relating variations
in runoff to variations in climatic conditions and catchment properties, Water
Resour. Res., 47, W00G07, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010WR009826</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Roderick, M. L., Sun, F., Lim, W. H., and Farquhar, G. D.: A general framework
for understanding the response of the water cycle to global warming over land
and ocean, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1575–1589, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1575-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-18-1575-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Roderick, M. L., Greve, P., and Farquhar, G. D.: On the assessment of aridity
with changes in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5450–5463,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015WR017031</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Shuttleworth, W. J.: Daily estimates of evaporation, in: Terrestrial Hydrometeorology,
John Wiley, Chichester, UK, 334–358, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119951933" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9781119951933</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Stahl, K., Hisdal, H., Hannaford, J., Tallaksen, L. M., van Lanen, H. A. J.,
Sauquet, E., Demuth, S., Fendekova, M., and Jódar, J.: Streamflow trends
in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 14, 2367–2382, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Teng, J., Chiew, F. H. S., Vaze, J., Marvanek, S., and Kirono, D. G. C.:
Estimation of climate change impact on mean annual runoff across continental
Australia using Budyko and Fu equations and hydrological models, J. Hydrometeorol.,
13, 1094–1106, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-097.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-11-097.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, D. and Tang, Y.: A one-parameter Budyko model for water balance captures
emergent behavior in Darwinian hydrologic models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4569–4577, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Xiong, L. and Guo, S.: Appraisal of Budyko formula in calculating long-term
water balance in humid watersheds of southern China, Hydrol. Process., 26,
1370–1378, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.8273</ext-link>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Xu, K., Yang, D., Yang, H., Li, Z., Qin, Y., and Shen, Y.: Spatio-temporal
variation of drought in China during 1961–2012: A climatic perspective, J.
Hydrol., 526, 253–264, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.047</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Yang, D., Yang, H., and Lei, H.: Attribution analysis based on the
Budyko hypothesis for detecting the dominant cause of runoff decline in Haihe
basin, J. Hydrol., 510, 530–540, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.052</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Yang, D., Sun, F., Liu, Z., Cong, Z., Ni, G., and Lei, Z.: Analyzing spatial
and temporal variability of annual water-energy balance in nonhumid regions
of China using the Budyko hypothesis, Water Resour. Res., 43, W04426, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006WR005224</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Yang, H. and Yang, D.: Derivation of climate elasticity of runoff to assess the
effects of climate change on annual runoff, Water Resour. Res., 47, W07526,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009287" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010WR009287</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Yang, H., Yang, D., Lei, Z., and Sun, F.: New analytical derivation of the mean
annual water-energy balance equation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03410, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007WR006135</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Yang, H., Qi, J., Xu, X., Yang, D., and Lv, H.: The regional variation in
climate elasticity and climate contribution to runoff across China, J. Hydrol.,
517, 607–616, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.062</ext-link> ,2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., and Walker, G. R.: Response of mean annual
evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale, Water Resour.
Res., 37, 701–708, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000WR900325</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Potter, N., Hickel, K., Zhang, Y., and Shao, Q.: Water balance
modeling over variable time scales based on the Budyko framework – model
development and testing, J. Hydrol., 360, 117–131, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.021</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Yu, B., Huang, Y., and Wang, G.: The complementary relationship and
generation of the Budyko functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1781–1790, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Historical and future trends in wetting and drying  in 291 catchments across China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">An increasingly uneven distribution of hydrometeorological factors related
to climate change has been detected by global climate models (GCMs) in which
the pattern of changes in water availability is commonly described by the
phrase <q>dry gets drier, wet gets wetter</q> (DDWW). However, the DDWW pattern
is dominated by oceanic areas; recent studies based on both observed and
modelled data have failed to verify the DDWW pattern on land. This study
confirms the existence of a new DDWW pattern in China after analysing the
observed streamflow data from 291 Chinese catchments from 1956 to 2000,
which reveal that the distribution of water resources has become
increasingly uneven since the 1950s. This pattern can be more accurately
described as <q>drier regions are more likely to become drier, whereas wetter
regions are more likely to become wetter</q>. Based on a framework derived
from the Budyko hypothesis, this study estimates runoff trends via
observations of precipitation (<i>P</i>) and potential evapotranspiration (<i>E</i><sub>p</sub>)
and predicts the future trends from 2001 to 2050 according to the
projections of five GCMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
Phase 5 (CMIP5) under three scenarios: RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5. The
results show that this framework has a good performance for estimating
runoff trends; such changes in <i>P</i> play the most significant role. Most areas
of China, including more than 60 % of catchments, will experience water
resource shortages under the projected climate changes. Despite the
differences among the predicted results of the different models, the DDWW
pattern does not hold in the projections regardless of the model used.
Nevertheless, this conclusion remains tentative owing to the large
uncertainties in the GCM outputs.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alkama, R., Marchand, L., Ribes, A., and Decharme, B.: Detection of global
runoff changes: results from observations and CMIP5 experiments, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 17, 2967–2979, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2967-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-17-2967-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Allan, R. P., Soden, B. J., John, V. O., Ingram, W., and Good, P.: Current
changes in tropical precipitation, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 025205, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025205" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025205</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines
for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arnell, N. W.: Climate change and global water resources, Global Environ. Change,
9, S31–S49, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Budyko, M. I.: Evaporation under Natural Conditions, Israel Program for Scientific
Translations, Jerusalem, 1948.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, C. and Neelin, J. D.: Mechanisms of global warming impacts on regional
tropical precipitation, J. Climate, 17, 2688–2701, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017&lt;2688:MOGWIO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017&lt;2688:MOGWIO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, C., Neelin, J. D., Chen, C., and Tu, J.: Evaluating the “Rich-Get-Richer”
Mechanism in Tropical Precipitation Change under Global Warming, J. Climate,
22, 1982–2005, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2471.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2471.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chou, C., Chiang, J. C. H., Lan, C., Chung, C., Liao, Y., and Lee, C.: Increase
in the range between wet and dry season precipitation, Nat. Geosci., 6, 263–267,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1744" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo1744</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Choudhury, B. J.: Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation
using field observations and results from a biophysical model, J. Hydrol.,
216, 99–110, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00293-5" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00293-5</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, A., Qian, T., Trenberth, K. E., and Milliman, J. D.: Changes in continental
freshwater discharge from 1948 to 2004, J. Climate, 22, 2773–2792, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2592.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2592.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Durack, P. J., Wijffels, S. E., and Matear, R. J.: Ocean Salinities Reveal
Strong Global Water Cycle Intensification During 1950 to 2000, Science, 336,
455–458, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1212222" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1212222</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, B.: On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface, Scienta Atmos.
Sin., 5, 23–31, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Greve, P., Orlowsky, B., Mueller, B., Sheffield, J., Reichstein, M., and
Seneviratne, S. I.: Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land,
Nat. Geosci., 7, 716–721, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2247" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo2247</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, W., Liu, S., Yao, X., Xu, J., Shangguan, D., Wu, L., Zhao, J., Liu, Q.,
Jiang, Z., Wei, J., Bao, W., Yu, P., Ding, L., Li, G., Li, P., Ge, C., and Wang,
Y.: The second glacier inventory dataset of China (Version 1.0), Cold and Arid
Regions Science Data Center, Lanzhou, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3972/glacier.001.2013.db" target="_blank">doi:10.3972/glacier.001.2013.db</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hagemann, S., Chen, C., Haerter, J. O., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., and Piani, C.:
Impact of a statistical bias correction on the projected hydrological changes
obtained from three GCMs and two hydrology models, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 556–578, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hamlet, A. F., Mote, P. W., Clark, M. P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Twentieth-century
trends in runoff, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture in the Western United
States, J. Climate, 20, 1468–1486, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4051.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JCLI4051.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Held, I. M. and Soden, B. J.: Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to
global warming, J. Climate, 19, 5686–5699, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3990.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JCLI3990.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Koster, R. D. and Suarez, M. J.: A simple framework for examining the
interannual variability of land surface moisture fluxes, J. Climate, 12,
1911–1917, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;1911:ASFFET&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012&lt;1911:ASFFET&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, S., Zwiers, F., Dirmeyer, P. A., Lawrence, D. M., Shrestha, R., and
Werner, A. T.: Terrestrial contribution to the heterogeneity in hydrological
changes under global warming, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3127–3142, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018607" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2016WR018607</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Legates, D. R. and McCabe, G. J.: Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit”
measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resour. Res.,
35, 233–241, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1998WR900018</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lim, W. H. and Roderick, M. L.: An atlas of the global water cycle: based on
the IPCC AR4 Models, Australian National University Press, Canberra, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, C., and Allan, R. P.: Observed and simulated precipitation responses in
wet and dry regions 1850–2100, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 034002, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034002" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034002</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A., and Vecchia, A. V.: Global pattern of trends in
streamflow and water availability in a changing climate, Nature, 438,
347–350, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04312" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature04312</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Lerat, J., and Michel, C.: Has land cover a
significant impact on mean annual streamflow? An international assessment using
1508 catchments, J. Hydrol., 357, 303–316, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.021" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.021</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Pasquini, A. I. and Depetris, P. J.: Discharge trends and flow dynamics of
South American rivers draining the southern Atlantic seaboard: an overview, J.
Hydrol., 333, 385–399, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.005</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Penman, H. L.: Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass, P. Roy.
Soc. A, 193, 120–145, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037" target="_blank">doi:10.1098/rspa.1948.0037</a>, 1948.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Piani, C., Weedon, G. P., Best, M., Gomes, S. M., Viterbo, P., Hagemann, S.,
and Haerter, J. O.: Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily
precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models, J.
Hydrol., 395, 199–215, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Piao, S., Ciais, P., Huang, Y., Shen, Z., Peng, S., Li, J., Zhou, L., Liu, H.,
Ma, Y., Ding, Y., Friedlingstein, P., Liu, C., Tan, K., Yu, Y., Zhang, T., and
Fang, J.: The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in
China, Nature, 467, 43–51, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09364" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature09364</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Pike, J. G.: The estimation of annual run-off from meteorological data in a
tropical climate, J. Hydrol., 2, 116–123, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Roderick, M. L. and Farquhar, G. D.: A simple framework for relating variations
in runoff to variations in climatic conditions and catchment properties, Water
Resour. Res., 47, W00G07, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009826" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010WR009826</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Roderick, M. L., Sun, F., Lim, W. H., and Farquhar, G. D.: A general framework
for understanding the response of the water cycle to global warming over land
and ocean, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1575–1589, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1575-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-18-1575-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Roderick, M. L., Greve, P., and Farquhar, G. D.: On the assessment of aridity
with changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5450–5463,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017031" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015WR017031</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Shuttleworth, W. J.: Daily estimates of evaporation, in: Terrestrial Hydrometeorology,
John Wiley, Chichester, UK, 334–358, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119951933" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/9781119951933</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Stahl, K., Hisdal, H., Hannaford, J., Tallaksen, L. M., van Lanen, H. A. J.,
Sauquet, E., Demuth, S., Fendekova, M., and Jódar, J.: Streamflow trends
in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 14, 2367–2382, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Teng, J., Chiew, F. H. S., Vaze, J., Marvanek, S., and Kirono, D. G. C.:
Estimation of climate change impact on mean annual runoff across continental
Australia using Budyko and Fu equations and hydrological models, J. Hydrometeorol.,
13, 1094–1106, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-097.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-097.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, D. and Tang, Y.: A one-parameter Budyko model for water balance captures
emergent behavior in Darwinian hydrologic models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4569–4577, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Xiong, L. and Guo, S.: Appraisal of Budyko formula in calculating long-term
water balance in humid watersheds of southern China, Hydrol. Process., 26,
1370–1378, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8273" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/hyp.8273</a>, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, K., Yang, D., Yang, H., Li, Z., Qin, Y., and Shen, Y.: Spatio-temporal
variation of drought in China during 1961–2012: A climatic perspective, J.
Hydrol., 526, 253–264, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.047" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.047</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, X., Yang, D., Yang, H., and Lei, H.: Attribution analysis based on the
Budyko hypothesis for detecting the dominant cause of runoff decline in Haihe
basin, J. Hydrol., 510, 530–540, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.052" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.052</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, D., Sun, F., Liu, Z., Cong, Z., Ni, G., and Lei, Z.: Analyzing spatial
and temporal variability of annual water-energy balance in nonhumid regions
of China using the Budyko hypothesis, Water Resour. Res., 43, W04426, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005224" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006WR005224</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, H. and Yang, D.: Derivation of climate elasticity of runoff to assess the
effects of climate change on annual runoff, Water Resour. Res., 47, W07526,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009287" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010WR009287</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, H., Yang, D., Lei, Z., and Sun, F.: New analytical derivation of the mean
annual water-energy balance equation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03410, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006135" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007WR006135</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, H., Qi, J., Xu, X., Yang, D., and Lv, H.: The regional variation in
climate elasticity and climate contribution to runoff across China, J. Hydrol.,
517, 607–616, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.062" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.062</a> ,2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., and Walker, G. R.: Response of mean annual
evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale, Water Resour.
Res., 37, 701–708, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900325" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2000WR900325</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L., Potter, N., Hickel, K., Zhang, Y., and Shao, Q.: Water balance
modeling over variable time scales based on the Budyko framework – model
development and testing, J. Hydrol., 360, 117–131, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.021" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.021</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Yu, B., Huang, Y., and Wang, G.: The complementary relationship and
generation of the Budyko functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1781–1790, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
