Articles | Volume 20, issue 2
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 921–934, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-921-2016
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 921–934, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-921-2016

Research article 01 Mar 2016

Research article | 01 Mar 2016

Comparing CFSR and conventional weather data for discharge and soil loss modelling with SWAT in small catchments in the Ethiopian Highlands

Vincent Roth and Tatenda Lemann

Related authors

Comparing CFSR and conventional weather data for discharge and sediment loss modelling with SWAT in small catchments in the Ethiopian Highlands
V. Roth and T. Lemann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-2113-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-2113-2015, 2015
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
At which timescale does the complementary principle perform best in evaporation estimation?
Liming Wang, Songjun Han, and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 375–386, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-375-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-375-2021, 2021
Short summary
Uncertainty in nonstationary frequency analysis of South Korea's daily rainfall peak over threshold excesses associated with covariates
Okjeong Lee, Jeonghyeon Choi, Jeongeun Won, and Sangdan Kim
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5077–5093, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5077-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5077-2020, 2020
Short summary
Assessment of extreme flows and uncertainty under climate change: disentangling the uncertainty contribution of representative concentration pathways, global climate models and internal climate variability
Chao Gao, Martijn J. Booij, and Yue-Ping Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3251–3269, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020, 2020
Short summary
The accuracy of weather radar in heavy rain: a comparative study for Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland and Sweden
Marc Schleiss, Jonas Olsson, Peter Berg, Tero Niemi, Teemu Kokkonen, Søren Thorndahl, Rasmus Nielsen, Jesper Ellerbæk Nielsen, Denica Bozhinova, and Seppo Pulkkinen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3157–3188, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3157-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3157-2020, 2020
Short summary
A new uncertainty estimation approach with multiple datasets and implementation for various precipitation products
Xudong Zhou, Jan Polcher, Tao Yang, and Ching-Sheng Huang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2061–2081, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2061-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2061-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbaspour, K. C.: SWAT-CUP 2012: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs-A user manual, Tech. rep., Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Dübendorf, Switzerland, 2015.
Abbaspour, K. C., Johnson, C. A., and van Genuchten, M. T.: Estimating Uncertain Flow and Transport Parameters Using a Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure, Vadose Zone J., 3, 1340–1352, https://doi.org/10.2113/3.4.1340, 2004.
Abbaspour, K. C., Vejdani, M., Haghighat, S., and Yang, J.: SWAT-CUP Calibration and Uncertainty Programs for SWAT, in: The fourth International SWAT conference, Delft, the Netherlands, 1596–1602, 2007.
Alemayehu, T., Griensven, A., and Bauwens, W.: Evaluating CFSR and WATCH Data as Input to SWAT for the Estimation of the Potential Evapotranspiration in a Data-Scarce Eastern-African Catchment, J. Hydrol. Eng., 05015028, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001305, 2015.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part 1: model development, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34, 73–89, 1998.
Download
Short summary
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) suggests using the CFSR global rainfall data for modelling discharge and soil erosion in data-scarce parts of the world. These data are freely available and ready to use for SWAT modelling. However, simulations with the CFSR data in the Ethiopian Highlands were unable to represent the specific regional climates and showed high discrepancies. This article compares SWAT simulations with conventional rainfall data and with CFSR rainfall data.