Articles | Volume 30, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-525-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-525-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Joint calibration of multi-scale hydrological data sets using probabilistic water balance data fusion: methodology and application to the irrigated Hindon River Basin, India
Roya Mourad
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, the Netherlands
Gerrit Schoups
Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, the Netherlands
Vinnarasi Rajendran
Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
Wim Bastiaanssen
Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, the Netherlands
Hydrosat, Wageningen, Agro Business Park 10, 6708 PW, the Netherlands
Related authors
No articles found.
Magali Ponds, Sarah Hanus, Harry Zekollari, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Gerrit Schoups, Roland Kaitna, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3545–3568, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research examines how future climate changes impact root zone storage, a key hydrological model parameter. Root zone storage – the soil water accessible to plants – adapts to climate but is often kept constant in models. We estimated climate-adapted storage in six Austrian Alps catchments. While storage increased, streamflow projections showed minimal change, which suggests that dynamic root zone representation is less critical in humid regions but warrants further study in arid areas.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Root zone storage capacity (Sumax) changes significantly over multiple decades, reflecting vegetation adaptation to climatic variability. However, this temporal evolution of Sumax cannot explain long-term fluctuations in the partitioning of water fluxes as expressed by deviations ΔIE from the parametric Budyko curve over time with different climatic conditions, and it does not have any significant effects on shorter-term hydrological response characteristics of the upper Neckar catchment.
Jessica A. Eisma, Gerrit Schoups, Jeffrey C. Davids, and Nick van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3565–3579, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3565-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3565-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Citizen scientists often submit high-quality data, but a robust method for assessing data quality is needed. This study develops a semi-automated program that characterizes the mistakes made by citizen scientists by grouping them into communities of citizen scientists with similar mistake tendencies and flags potentially erroneous data for further review. This work may help citizen science programs assess the quality of their data and can inform training practices.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, Gerrit Schoups, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3083–3114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that previously reported underestimations of water ages are most likely not due to the use of seasonally variable tracers. Rather, these underestimations can be largely attributed to the choices of model approaches which rely on assumptions not frequently met in catchment hydrology. We therefore strongly advocate avoiding the use of this model type in combination with seasonally variable tracers and instead adopting StorAge Selection (SAS)-based or comparable model formulations.
Punpim Puttaraksa Mapiam, Monton Methaprayun, Thom Bogaard, Gerrit Schoups, and Marie-Claire Ten Veldhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 775–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-775-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-775-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The density of rain gauge networks plays an important role in radar rainfall bias correction. In this work, we aimed to assess the extent to which daily rainfall observations from a dense network of citizen scientists improve the accuracy of hourly radar rainfall estimates in the Tubma Basin, Thailand. Results show that citizen rain gauges significantly enhance the performance of radar rainfall bias adjustment up to a range of about 40 km from the center of the citizen rain gauge network.
Sarah Hanus, Markus Hrachowitz, Harry Zekollari, Gerrit Schoups, Miren Vizcaino, and Roland Kaitna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3429–3453, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the effects of climate change on runoff patterns in six Alpine catchments in Austria at the end of the 21st century. Our results indicate a substantial shift to earlier occurrences in annual maximum and minimum flows in high-elevation catchments. Magnitudes of annual extremes are projected to increase under a moderate emission scenario in all catchments. Changes are generally more pronounced for high-elevation catchments.
Cody C. Routson, Darrell S. Kaufman, Nicholas P. McKay, Michael P. Erb, Stéphanie H. Arcusa, Kendrick J. Brown, Matthew E. Kirby, Jeremiah P. Marsicek, R. Scott Anderson, Gonzalo Jiménez-Moreno, Jessica R. Rodysill, Matthew S. Lachniet, Sherilyn C. Fritz, Joseph R. Bennett, Michelle F. Goman, Sarah E. Metcalfe, Jennifer M. Galloway, Gerrit Schoups, David B. Wahl, Jesse L. Morris, Francisca Staines-Urías, Andria Dawson, Bryan N. Shuman, Daniel G. Gavin, Jeffrey S. Munroe, and Brian F. Cumming
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1613–1632, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1613-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1613-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a curated database of western North American Holocene paleoclimate records, which have been screened on length, resolution, and geochronology. The database gathers paleoclimate time series that reflect temperature, hydroclimate, or circulation features from terrestrial and marine sites, spanning a region from Mexico to Alaska. This publicly accessible collection will facilitate a broad range of paleoclimate inquiry.
Cited articles
Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A., and Hegewisch, K. C.: TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015, Scientific data, 5, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.191, 2018.
Abolafia-Rosenzweig, R., Pan, M., Zeng, J., and Livneh, B.: Remotely sensed ensembles of the terrestrial water budget over major global river basins: An assessment of three closure techniques, Remote Sensing of Environment, 252, 112191, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112191, 2021.
Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A.: Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, US Government printing office, https://archive.org/details/AandS-mono600?utm_source (last access: 1 February 2025), 1968.
Ahmad, F.: Canal Irrigation: Major Legal Issues, Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 33, 589–613, 1991.
Aires, F.: Combining datasets of satellite-retrieved products. Part I: Methodology and water budget closure, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15, 1677–1691, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0148.1, 2014.
Alam, F. and Umar, R.: Groundwater flow modelling of Hindon-Yamuna interfluve region, western Uttar Pradesh, Journal of the Geological Society of India, 82, 80–90, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0113-8, 2013.
Anderson, M. C., Norman, J. M., Mecikalski, J. R., Otkin, J. A., and Kustas, W. P.: A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 2. Surface moisture climatology, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007507, 2007.
Anderson, M. C., Zolin, C. A., Hain, C. R., Semmens, K., Yilmaz, M. T., and Gao, F.: Comparison of satellite-derived LAI and precipitation anomalies over Brazil with a thermal infrared-based Evaporative Stress Index for 2003–2013, Journal of Hydrology, 526, 287–302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.005, 2015.
Barkhordari, H., Dastjerdi, P. A., and Nasseri, M.: Development of a framework estimating regional gridded streamflow and actual evapotranspiration datasets: Fusing Budyko and water balance closure methods using remotely sensed ancillary data, Journal of Hydrology, 133456, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133456, 2025.
Bastiaanssen, W., Cheema, M., Immerzeel, W., Miltenburg, I., and Pelgrum, H.: Surface energy balance and actual evapotranspiration of the transboundary Indus Basin estimated from satellite measurements and the ETLook model, Water Resources Research, 48, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010482, 2012.
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Hoekman, D. H., and Roebeling, R.: A methodology for the assessment of surface resistance and soil water storage variability at mesoscale based on remote sensing measurements. A case study with HAPEX-EFEDA data, Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen0926-230X, 1993.
Beck, H. E., Wood, E. F., Pan, M., Fisher, C. K., Miralles, D. G., Van Dijk, A. I., McVicar, T. R., and Adler, R. F.: MSWEP V2 global 3-hourly 0.1 precipitation: methodology and quantitative assessment, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100, 473–500, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0138.1, 2019.
Cawse-Nicholson, K., Braverman, A., Kang, E. L., Li, M., Johnson, M., Halverson, G., Anderson, M., Hain, C., Gunson, M., and Hook, S.: Sensitivity and uncertainty quantification for the ECOSTRESS evapotranspiration algorithm–DisALEXI, International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 89, 102088, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102088, 2020.
Central Water Commission: Discahrge data for Galeta Station, Obtained from CWC, Government of India [data set], 2024.
Chaube, U. C., Pandey, A., and Singh, V. P.: Canal Irrigation Systems in India: Operation, Maintenance, and Management, Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42812-8, 2023.
Chen, H., Ding, L., and Tuo, R.: Kernel packet: An exact and scalable algorithm for Gaussian process regression with Matérn correlations, Journal of machine learning research, 23, 1–32, https://doi.org/10.5555/3586589.3586716, 2022.
Crosetto, M., Ruiz, J. A. M., and Crippa, B.: Uncertainty propagation in models driven by remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 76, 373–385, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00184-5, 2001.
Dwivedi, P. and Yadav, B. K.: Inference of hydrological modelling and field-based monitoring on dynamics of heavy metals in water of Hindon Basin, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 60, 102488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102488, 2025.
Foken, T.: The energy balance closure problem: An overview, Ecological Applications, 18, 1351–1367, https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0922.1, 2008.
Goteti, G. and Famiglietti, J.: Extent of gross underestimation of precipitation in India, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 28, 3435–3455, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3435-2024, 2024.
Guerschman, J. P., Van Dijk, A. I., Mattersdorf, G., Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Leuning, R., Pipunic, R. C., and Sherman, B. S.: Scaling of potential evapotranspiration with MODIS data reproduces flux observations and catchment water balance observations across Australia, Journal of hydrology, 369, 107–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.013, 2009.
Gumma, M. K., Thenkabail, P. S., Panjala, P., Teluguntla, P., Yamano, T., and Mohammed, I.: Multiple agricultural cropland products of South Asia developed using Landsat-8 30 m and MODIS 250 m data using machine learning on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud and spectral matching techniques (SMTs) in support of food and water security, GIScience & Remote Sensing, 59, 1048–1077, https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2022.2088651, 2022.
Handcock, M. S. and Stein, M. L.: A Bayesian analysis of kriging, Technometrics, 35, 403–410, https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1993.10485354, 1993.
Heberger, M. G., Pellet, V., and Aires, F.: Improving Satellite Remote Sensing Estimates of the Global Terrestrial Hydrologic Cycle via Neural Network Modeling, Authorea Preprints, https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.169049081.19217053/v1, 2023.
Hensman, J., Matthews, A., and Ghahramani, Z.: Scalable variational Gaussian process classification, Artificial intelligence and statistics, 351–360, 2015.
Hessels, T., Davids, J. C., and Bastiaanssen, W.: Scalable Water Balances from Earth Observations (SWEO): results from 50 years of remote sensing in hydrology, Water International, 47, 866–886, https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2117896, 2022.
Hobeichi, S., Abramowitz, G., Contractor, S., and Evans, J.: Evaluating precipitation datasets using surface water and energy budget closure, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21, 989–1009, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0255.1, 2020.
Hong, Y., Hsu, K. L., Moradkhani, H., and Sorooshian, S.: Uncertainty quantification of satellite precipitation estimation and Monte Carlo assessment of the error propagation into hydrologic response, Water resources research, 42, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004398, 2006.
Horner, I., Renard, B., Le Coz, J., Branger, F., McMillan, H., and Pierrefeu, G.: Impact of stage measurement errors on streamflow uncertainty, Water Resources Research, 54, 1952–1976, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022039, 2018.
Hou, A. Y., Kakar, R. K., Neeck, S., Azarbarzin, A. A., Kummerow, C. D., Kojima, M., Oki, R., Nakamura, K., and Iguchi, T.: The global precipitation measurement mission, Bulletin of the American meteorological Society, 95, 701-722, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1, 2014.
Huffman, G., Stocker, E., Bolvin, D., Nelkin, E., and Tan, J.: GPM IMERG Final Precipitation L3 1 month 0.1 degree × 0.1 degree V06, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC): Greenbelt, MD, USA, https://gpm.nasa.gov/data/directory (last access: 14 November 2024), 2019.
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F., Gu, G., Hong, Y., Bowman, K. P., and Stocker, E. F.: The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales, Journal of hydrometeorology, 8, 38–55, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1, 2007.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research: Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Co 0238 – The Wonder Variety of Sugarcane: https://icar.org.in/en/node/4869 (last access: 14 October 2025), 2022.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics: District Level Database (DLD): Crops dataset, http://data.icrisat.org/dld/src/crops.html (last access: 14 October 2025), 2020.
Irrigation & Water Resources Department: Canal discharge data for Hindon River Basin, Obtained from Irrigation & Water Resources Department, Uttar Pradesh, Government of India [data set], 2024.
Joseph, J. and Ghosh, S.: Representing Indian agricultural practices and paddy cultivation in the variable infiltration capacity model, Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR033612, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033612, 2023.
Karimi, P., Bastiaanssen, W. G., Molden, D., and Cheema, M. J. M.: Basin-wide water accounting based on remote sensing data: an application for the Indus Basin, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 2473–2486, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2473-2013, 2013.
Kuczera, G.: Correlated rating curve error in flood frequency inference, Water Resources Research, 32, 2119–2127, https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00804, 1996.
L'Ecuyer, T. S. and Stephens, G. L.: An estimation-based precipitation retrieval algorithm for attenuating radars, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 41, 272–285, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0272:AEBPRA>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Landerer, F. W. and Swenson, S.: Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates, Water Resources Research, 48, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011453, 2012.
Long, D., Longuevergne, L., and Scanlon, B. R.: Uncertainty in evapotranspiration from land surface modeling, remote sensing, and GRACE satellites, Water Resources Research, 50, 1131–1151, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014581, 2014.
Luo, Z., Li, H., Zhang, S., Wang, L., Wang, S., and Wang, L.: A Novel Two-Step Method for Enforcing Water Budget Closure and an Intercomparison of Budget Closure Correction Methods Based on Satellite Hydrological Products, Water Resources Research, 59, e2022WR032176, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032176, 2023.
Maggioni, V., Massari, C., and Kidd, C.: Errors and uncertainties associated with quasiglobal satellite precipitation products, in: Precipitation science, Elsevier, 377–390, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822973-6.00023-8, 2022.
Massari, C., Crow, W., and Brocca, L.: An assessment of the performance of global rainfall estimates without ground-based observations, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences , 21, 4347–4361, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4347-2017, 2017.
McMillan, H., Krueger, T., and Freer, J.: Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality, Hydrological Processes, 26, 4078-4111, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9384, 2012.
Mourad, R., Schoups, G., Bastiaanssen, W., and Kumar, D. N.: Expert-based prior uncertainty analysis of gridded water balance components: Application to the irrigated Hindon River Basin, India, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 55, 101935, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101935, 2024.
Mourad, R. and Schoups, G.: Water Balance Prior Uncertainty Analysis Software, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11148992, 2024.
Munier, S., Aires, F., Schlaffer, S., Prigent, C., Papa, F., Maisongrande, P., and Pan, M.: Combining data sets of satellite-retrieved products for basin-scale water balance study: 2. Evaluation on the Mississippi Basin and closure correction model, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119, 12100–112116, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021953, 2014.
Myneni, R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Park, T.: MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid V061, NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC), MOD15A12H [data set], 061, https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2H.061, 2021.
Pai, D., Rajeevan, M., Sreejith, O., Mukhopadhyay, B., and Satbha, N.: Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25×0.25) long period (1901–2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region, Mausam, 65, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v65i1.851, 2014.
Pan, M. and Wood, E. F.: Data assimilation for estimating the terrestrial water budget using a constrained ensemble Kalman filter, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 7, 534–547, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM495.1, 2006.
Pan, M., Sahoo, A. K., Troy, T. J., Vinukollu, R. K., Sheffield, J., and Wood, E. F.: Multisource estimation of long-term terrestrial water budget for major global river basins, Journal of Climate, 25, 3191–3206, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00300.1, 2012.
Pellet, V., Aires, F., Munier, S., Fernández Prieto, D., Jordá, G., Dorigo, W. A., Polcher, J., and Brocca, L.: Integrating multiple satellite observations into a coherent dataset to monitor the full water cycle – application to the Mediterranean region, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23, 465–491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-465-2019, 2019.
Rodell, M., Velicogna, I., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India, Nature, 460, 999–1002, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08238, 2009.
Rodell, M., Beaudoing, H. K., L'ecuyer, T., Olson, W. S., Famiglietti, J. S., Houser, P. R., Adler, R., Bosilovich, M. G., Clayson, C. A., and Chambers, D.: The observed state of the water cycle in the early twenty-first century, Journal of Climate, 28, 8289–8318, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00555.1, 2015.
Rodell, M., Houser, P., Jambor, U., Gottschalck, J., Mitchell, K., Meng, C.-J., Arsenault, K., Cosgrove, B., Radakovich, J., and Bosilovich, M.: The global land data assimilation system, Bulletin of the American Meteorological society, 85, 381–394, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381, 2004.
Sahoo, A. K., Pan, M., Troy, T. J., Vinukollu, R. K., Sheffield, J., and Wood, E. F.: Reconciling the global terrestrial water budget using satellite remote sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 1850–1865, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.03.009, 2011.
Schoups, G. and Nasseri, M.: GRACEfully closing the water balance: A data-driven probabilistic approach applied to river basins in Iran, Water Resources Research, 57, e2020WR029071, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029071, 2021.
Senay, G. B.: Satellite psychrometric formulation of the Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEBop) model for quantifying and mapping evapotranspiration, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 34, 555–566, 10.13031/aea.12614, 2018.
Senay, G. B., Parrish, G. E., Schauer, M., Friedrichs, M., Khand, K., Boiko, O., Kagone, S., Dittmeier, R., Arab, S., and Ji, L.: Improving the Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance Evapotranspiration Model Using the Forcing and Normalizing Operation, Remote Sensing, 15, 260, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010260, 2023.
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Pan, M., Beck, H., Coccia, G., Serrat-Capdevila, A., and Verbist, K.: Satellite remote sensing for water resources management: Potential for supporting sustainable development in data-poor regions, Water Resources Research, 54, 9724–9758, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022437, 2018.
Sobol, I. M.: Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates, Mathematics and computers in simulation, 55, 271–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6, 2001.
Sun, Q., Miao, C., Duan, Q., Ashouri, H., Sorooshian, S., and Hsu, K. L.: A review of global precipitation data sets: Data sources, estimation, and intercomparisons, Reviews of Geophysics, 56, 79–107, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000574, 2018.
Sun, Y., Bowman, K. P., Genton, M. G., and Tokay, A.: A Matérn model of the spatial covariance structure of point rain rates, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29, 411–416, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0923-2, 2015.
Swenson, S. and Wahr, J.: Post-processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data, Geophysical research letters, 33, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025285, 2006.
Ter Braak, C. J. and Vrugt, J. A.: Differential evolution Markov chain with snooker updater and fewer chains, Statistics and Computing, 18, 435–446, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-008-9104-9, 2008.
Tian, Y. and Peters-Lidard, C. D.: A global map of uncertainties in satellite-based precipitation measurements, Geophysical Research Letters, 37, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046008, 2010.
Umar, R., Khan, M. M. A., Ahmed, I., and Ahmed, S.: Implications of Kali-Hindon inter-stream aquifer water balance for groundwater management in western Uttar Pradesh, Journal of earth system science, 117, 69–78, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0014-1, 2008.
Wada, Y., Van Beek, L. P., Van Kempen, C. M., Reckman, J. W., Vasak, S., and Bierkens, M. F.: Global depletion of groundwater resources, Geophysical research letters, 37, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044571, 2010.
Wahr, J., Swenson, S., Zlotnicki, V., and Velicogna, I.: Time-variable gravity from GRACE: First results, Geophysical Research Letters, 31, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019779, 2004.
Yin, G. and Park, J.: The use of triple collocation approach to merge satellite-and model-based terrestrial water storage for flood potential analysis, Journal of Hydrology, 603, 127197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127197, 2021.
Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., and Running, S. W.: A review of remote sensing based actual evapotranspiration estimation, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Water, 3, 834–853, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1168, 2016a.
Zhang, Y., Pan, M., and Wood, E. F.: On creating global gridded terrestrial water budget estimates from satellite remote sensing, Remote sensing and water resources, 59–78, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32449-4_4, 2016b.
Zhang, Y., Pan, M., Sheffield, J., Siemann, A. L., Fisher, C. K., Liang, M., Beck, H. E., Wanders, N., MacCracken, R. F., Houser, P. R., Zhou, T., Lettenmaier, D. P., Pinker, R. T., Bytheway, J., Kummerow, C. D., and Wood, E. F.: A Climate Data Record (CDR) for the global terrestrial water budget: 1984–2010, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22, 241–263, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-241-2018, 2018.
Short summary
Water balance data are affected by various errors (bias and noise). To reduce these errors, this study presents a water balance data fusion approach that combines multi-scale data (from satellites and in-situ sensors) for each water balance variable and jointly calibrates them, resulting in consistent, bias-corrected and noise-filtered, water balance estimates, along with uncertainty bands. These estimates are useful for constraining process-based models and informing water management decisions.
Water balance data are affected by various errors (bias and noise). To reduce these errors, this...