Articles | Volume 29, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5955-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5955-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Deep learning of flood forecasting by considering interpretability and physical constraints
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Ran Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Jianzhu Li
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Ping Feng
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Related authors
Yan Liu, Ting Zhang, Yi Ding, Aiqing Kang, Xiaohui Lei, and Jianzhu Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5541–5555, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5541-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5541-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In coastal cities, rainfall and tides contribute to compound flooding. This study quantifies the impacts of rainfall and tides on compound flooding and analyzes interactions between different flood types. Findings show that rainfall generally has a greater effect on flooding than tide levels. The interaction between fluvial and pluvial flooding amplifies the flood disaster, with tide levels having the most significant impact during the interaction phase.
Siyao Zhang, Jianzhu Li, Ting Zhang, and Ping Feng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-185, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-185, 2024
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Flash drought (FD) in the North China Plain (NCP) from 1981 to 2022 was identified by three methods. It occurs more frequently in central and northern NCP than southern, with longer duration in southern and eastern NCP. FD shows seasonal variations. NCP is prone to severe FDs. There is a decreasing trend in FD, with three hotspots in northwestern, eastern and southwestern NCP. The FD frequency is affected by thresholds in the identification methods. This study may be valuable for FD mitigation.
Yan Liu, Ting Zhang, Yi Ding, Aiqing Kang, Xiaohui Lei, and Jianzhu Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5541–5555, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5541-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5541-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In coastal cities, rainfall and tides contribute to compound flooding. This study quantifies the impacts of rainfall and tides on compound flooding and analyzes interactions between different flood types. Findings show that rainfall generally has a greater effect on flooding than tide levels. The interaction between fluvial and pluvial flooding amplifies the flood disaster, with tide levels having the most significant impact during the interaction phase.
Siyao Zhang, Jianzhu Li, Ting Zhang, and Ping Feng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-185, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-185, 2024
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Flash drought (FD) in the North China Plain (NCP) from 1981 to 2022 was identified by three methods. It occurs more frequently in central and northern NCP than southern, with longer duration in southern and eastern NCP. FD shows seasonal variations. NCP is prone to severe FDs. There is a decreasing trend in FD, with three hotspots in northwestern, eastern and southwestern NCP. The FD frequency is affected by thresholds in the identification methods. This study may be valuable for FD mitigation.
Yanchen Zheng, Gemma Coxon, Ross Woods, Daniel Power, Miguel Angel Rico-Ramirez, David McJannet, Rafael Rosolem, Jianzhu Li, and Ping Feng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1999–2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1999-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1999-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reanalysis soil moisture products are a vital basis for hydrological and environmental research. Previous product evaluation is limited by the scale difference (point and grid scale). This paper adopts cosmic ray neutron sensor observations, a novel technique that provides root-zone soil moisture at field scale. In this paper, global harmonized CRNS observations were used to assess products. ERA5-Land, SMAPL4, CFSv2, CRA40 and GLEAM show better performance than MERRA2, GLDAS-Noah and JRA55.
Cited articles
Beaudoing, H. and Rodell, M.: GLDAS Noah Land Surface Model L4 3 hourly 0.25×0.25 degree V2.0, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/342OHQM9AK6Q, 2019.
Beaudoing, H. and Rodell, M.: GLDAS Noah Land Surface Model L4 3 hourly 0.25×0.25 degree V2.1, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/E7TYRXPJKWOQ, 2020.
Birkholz, S., Muro, M., Jeffrey, P., and Smith, H. M.: Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management, Sci. Total Environ., 478, 12–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061, 2014.
Brauwers, G. and Frasincar, F.: A General Survey on Attention Mechanisms in Deep Learning, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 35, 3279–3298, https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3126456, 2023.
Cao, Q., Zhang, H., Zhu, F., Hao, Z., and Yuan, F.: Multi-step-ahead flood forecasting using an improved BiLSTM-S2S model, J. Flood Risk Manag., 15, e128274, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12827, 2022.
Chen, Y., Ren, Q., Huang, F., Xu, H., and Cluckie, I.: Liuxihe Model and Its Modeling to River Basin Flood, J. Hydrol. Eng., 16, 33–50, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000286, 2011.
Cheng, M., Fang, F., Navon, I. M., and Pain, C. C.: A real-time flow forecasting with deep convolutional generative adversarial network: Application to flooding event in Denmark, Phys. Fluids, 33, 0566025, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0051213, 2021.
Cui, Z., Zhou, Y., Guo, S., Wang, J., Ba, H., and He, S.: A novel hybrid XAJ-LSTM model for multi-step-ahead flood forecasting, Hydrol. Res., 52, 1436–1454, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2021.016, 2021.
Ding, Y., Zhu, Y., Feng, J., Zhang, P., and Cheng, Z.: Interpretable spatio-temporal attention LSTM model for flood forecasting, Neurocomputing, 403, 348–359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.110, 2020.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall–runoff models, Water Resour. Res., https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985, 1992.
Grillakis, M. G., Koutroulis, A. G., Komma, J., Tsanis, I. K., Wagner, W., and Bloeschl, G.: Initial soil moisture effects on flash flood generation – A comparison between basins of contrasting hydro-climatic conditions, J. Hydrol., 541, 206–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.007, 2016.
Hu, R., Fang, F., Pain, C. C., and Navon, I. M.: Rapid spatio-temporal flood prediction and uncertainty quantification using a deep learning method, J. Hydrol., 575, 911–920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.087, 2019.
Jiang, S., Zheng, Y., and Solomatine, D.: Improving AI System Awareness of Geoscience Knowledge: Symbiotic Integration of Physical Approaches and Deep Learning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL08822913, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088229, 2020.
Kao, I., Zhou, Y., Chang, L., and Chang, F.: Exploring a Long Short-Term Memory based Encoder-Decoder framework for multi-step-ahead flood forecasting, J. Hydrol., 583, 124631, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124631, 2020.
Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., and Yang, L.: Physics-informed machine learning, Nat. Rev. Phys., 3, 422–440, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5, 2021.
Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., and De Maeyer, P.: Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research: Perception and Communication of Flood Risks, Risk Anal., 33, 24–49, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x, 2013.
Leedal, D., Weerts, A. H., Smith, P. J., and Beven, K. J.: Application of data-based mechanistic modelling for flood forecasting at multiple locations in the Eden catchment in the National Flood Forecasting System (England and Wales), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 177–185, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-177-2013, 2013.
Lima, A. R., Cannon, A. J., and Hsieh, W. W.: Forecasting daily streamflow using online sequential extreme learning machines, J. Hydrol., 537, 431–443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.017, 2016.
Luppichini, M., Barsanti, M., Giannecchini, R., and Bini, M.: Deep learning models to predict flood events in fast-flowing watersheds, Sci. Total Environ., 813, 151885, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151885, 2022.
Lv, N., Liang, X., Chen, C., Zhou, Y., Li, J., Wei, H., and Wang, H.: A long Short-Term memory cyclic model with mutual information for hydrology forecasting: A Case study in the xixian basin, Adv. Water Resour., 141, 103622, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103622, 2020.
Mourato, S., Fernandez, P., Marques, F., Rocha, A., and Pereira, L.: An interactive Web-GIS fluvial flood forecast and alert system in operation in Portugal, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 58, 102201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102201, 2021.
Nair, V., and Hinton, G. E.: Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines, in: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel, 21 June 2010, 807–814, https://icml.cc/Conferences/2010/papers/432.pdf (last access: 13 October 2025), 2010.
Nearing, G. S., Kratzert, F., Sampson, A. K., Pelissier, C. S., Klotz, D., Frame, J. M., Prieto, C., and Gupta, H. V.: What Role Does Hydrological Science Play in the Age of Machine Learning?, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR0280913, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028091, 2021.
Niu, Z., Zhong, G., and Yu, H.: A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning, Neurocomputing, 452, 48–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091, 2021.
Rahimzad, M., Nia, A. M., Zolfonoon, H., Soltani, J., Danandeh Mehr, A., and Kwon, H.: Performance Comparison of an LSTM-based Deep Learning Model versus Conventional Machine Learning Algorithms for Streamflow Forecasting, Water Resour. Manag., 35, 4167–4187, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02937-w, 2021.
Read, J. S., Jia, X., Willard, J., Appling, A. P., Zwart, J. A., Oliver, S. K., Karpatne, A., Hansen, G. J. A., Hanson, P. C., Watkins, W., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V.: Process–Guided Deep Learning Predictions of Lake Water Temperature, Water Resour. Res., 55, 9173–9190, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024922, 2019.
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., and Prabhat: Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science, Nature, 566, 195–204, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1, 2019.
Song, S., Lan, C., Xing, J., Zeng, W., and Liu, J.: An End-to-End Spatio-Temporal Attention Model for Human Action Recognition from Skeleton Data, in: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, 4 February 2017, 31, https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11212, 2017.
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I.: Attention Is All You Need, in: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, 4 December 2017, 6000-6010, ISBN 9781510860964, 2017.
Wan, X., Yang, Q., Jiang, P., and Zhong, P.: A Hybrid Model for Real-Time Probabilistic Flood Forecasting Using Elman Neural Network with Heterogeneity of Error Distributions, Water Resour. Manag., 33, 4027–4050, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02351-3, 2019.
Wang, N., Zhang, D., Chang, H., and Li, H.: Deep learning of subsurface flow via theory-guided neural network, J. Hydrol., 584, 124700, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124700, 2020.
Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Xiao, M., Zhou, S., Xiong, B., and Jin, Z.: Medium-long-term prediction of water level based on an improved spatio-temporal attention mechanism for long short-term memory networks, J. Hydrol., 618, 129163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129163, 2023.
Xiang, Z., Yan, J., and Demir, I.: A Rainfall-Runoff Model With LSTM-Based Sequence-to-Sequence Learning, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR0253261, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025326, 2020.
Xie, K., Liu, P., Zhang, J., Han, D., Wang, G., and Shen, C.: Physics-guided deep learning for rainfall-runoff modeling by considering extreme events and monotonic relationships, J. Hydrol., 603, 127043, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127043, 2021.
Xu, Y., Hu, C., Wu, Q., Li, Z., Jian, S., and Chen, Y.: Application of temporal convolutional network for flood forecasting, Hydrol. Res., 52, 1455–1468, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2021.021, 2021.
Yang, S., Yang, D., Chen, J., Santisirisomboon, J., Lu, W., and Zhao, B.: A physical process and machine learning combined hydrological model for daily streamflow simulations of large watersheds with limited observation data, J. Hydrol., 590, 125206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125206, 2020.
Yokoo, K., Ishida, K., Ercan, A., Tu, T., Nagasato, T., Kiyama, M., and Amagasaki, M.: Capabilities of deep learning models on learning physical relationships: Case of rainfall-runoff modeling with LSTM, Sci. Total Environ., 802, 149876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149876, 2022.
Yu, P., Chen, S., and Chang, I.: Support vector regression for real-time flood stage forecasting, J. Hydrol., 328, 704–716, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.01.021, 2006.
Zhang, H., Singh, V. P., Wang, B., and Yu, Y.: CEREF: A hybrid data-driven model for forecasting annual streamflow from a socio-hydrological system, J. Hydrol., 540, 246–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.029, 2016.
Zhang, M., Su, H., and Wen, J.: Classification of flower image based on attention mechanism and multi-loss attention network, Comput. Commun., 179, 307–317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.09.001, 2021.
Zhang, R.: zran1/PHY_FTMA_LSTM: Interpretable physics-guided DL for flood forecasting (v1.0.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17337746, 2025.
Zhao, Z., Chen, W., Wu, X., Chen, P. C. Y., and Liu, J.: LSTM network: a deep learning approach for short-term traffic forecast, Iet Intell. Transp. Syst., 11, 68–75, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2016.0208, 2017.
Zhu, X., Lu, C., Wang, R., and Bai, J.: Artificial neural network model for flood water level forecasting, J. Hydraul. Eng.-Asce, 36, 806–811, 2005.
Short summary
This study presents a model integrating attention mechanisms and physical constraints to improve flood prediction. It forecasts floods up to 6 h in advance. The model enhances accuracy by focusing on critical input features and historical patterns. Results demonstrate its superior performance compared to other models, offering improved flood prediction with greater interpretability and alignment with physical laws.
This study presents a model integrating attention mechanisms and physical constraints to improve...