Articles | Volume 28, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3161-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3161-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
19 Jul 2024
Research article |
| 19 Jul 2024
| 19 Jul 2024
To what extent do flood-inducing storm events change future flood hazards?
Mariam Khanam
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Related authors
Mariam Khanam, Giulia Sofia, Wilmalis Rodriguez, Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, Binghao Lu, Dongjin Song, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-120, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-120, 2023
Preprint under review for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
This study comprehends and predicts the socioeconomic effects of floods in the High Mountain Asia (HMA) region. We proposed a machine-learning strategy for mapping flood damages. We predicted the Lifeyears Index (LYI), which quantifies the financial cost and loss of life caused by floods, using variables including climate, geomorphology, and population. The study's overall goal is to offer useful information on flood susceptibility and subsequent risk mapping in the HMA region.
Mariam Khanam, Giulia Sofia, Marika Koukoula, Rehenuma Lazin, Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, Xinyi Shen, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 587–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-587-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-587-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers, leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenario events are ignored. In this paper, we present a general framework to investigate current and future climate compound-event flood impact on coastal critical infrastructures such as power grid substations.
Kang He, Xinyi Shen, Cory Merow, Efthymios Nikolopoulos, Rachael V. Gallagher, Feifei Yang, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3337–3355, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3337-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3337-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A framework combining a fire severity classification with a regression model to predict an indicator of fire severity derived from Landsat imagery (difference normalized burning ratio, dNBR) is proposed. The results show that the proposed predictive technique is capable of providing robust fire severity prediction information, which can be used for forecasting seasonal fire severity and, subsequently, impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems under projected future climate conditions.
Kang He, Qing Yang, Xinyi Shen, Elias Dimitriou, Angeliki Mentzafou, Christina Papadaki, Maria Stoumboudi, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2375–2382, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2375-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2375-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
About 820 km2 of agricultural land was inundated in central Greece due to Storm Daniel. A detailed analysis revealed that the crop most affected by the flooding was cotton; the inundated area of more than 282 km2 comprised ~ 30 % of the total area planted with cotton in central Greece. In terms of livestock, we estimate that more than 14 000 ornithoids and 21 500 sheep and goats were affected. Consequences for agriculture and animal husbandry in Greece are expected to be severe.
Kang He, Xinyi Shen, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3061–3081, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3061-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3061-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Forest fire risk is expected to increase as fire weather and drought conditions intensify. To improve quantification of the intensity and extent of forest fire damage, we have developed a global forest burn severity (GFBS) database that provides burn severity spectral indices (dNBR and RdNBR) at a 30 m spatial resolution. This database could be more reliable than prior sources of information for future studies of forest burn severity on the global scale in a computationally cost-effective way.
Mariam Khanam, Giulia Sofia, Wilmalis Rodriguez, Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, Binghao Lu, Dongjin Song, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-120, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-120, 2023
Preprint under review for NHESS
Short summary
Short summary
This study comprehends and predicts the socioeconomic effects of floods in the High Mountain Asia (HMA) region. We proposed a machine-learning strategy for mapping flood damages. We predicted the Lifeyears Index (LYI), which quantifies the financial cost and loss of life caused by floods, using variables including climate, geomorphology, and population. The study's overall goal is to offer useful information on flood susceptibility and subsequent risk mapping in the HMA region.
Kang He, Qing Yang, Xinyi Shen, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2921–2927, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2921-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2921-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study depicts the flood-affected areas in western Europe in July 2021 and particularly the agriculture land that was under flood inundation. The results indicate that the total inundated area over western Europe is about 1920 km2, of which 1320 km2 is in France. Around 64 % of the inundated area is agricultural land. We expect that the agricultural productivity in western Europe will have been severely impacted.
Mariam Khanam, Giulia Sofia, Marika Koukoula, Rehenuma Lazin, Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, Xinyi Shen, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 587–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-587-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-587-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Compound extremes correspond to events with multiple concurrent or consecutive drivers, leading to substantial impacts such as infrastructure failure. In many risk assessment and design applications, however, multihazard scenario events are ignored. In this paper, we present a general framework to investigate current and future climate compound-event flood impact on coastal critical infrastructures such as power grid substations.
A. Masiero, G. Sofia, and P. Tarolli
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2020, 259–264, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-259-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-259-2020, 2020
Diego Cerrai, Qing Yang, Xinyi Shen, Marika Koukoula, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1463–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1463-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1463-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
On 1 September 2019 Hurricane Dorian made landfall on Great Abaco, unleashing unprecedented destruction on the northern Bahamas. Dorian was characterized by extreme winds, extensive coastal flooding, and impressive precipitation. We studied the event through images acquired by the synthetic aperture radars (SARs) mounted on European Space Agency satellites to derive flooding maps showing the extent of the devastation. We found that the flooded area in the Bahamas was at least 3000 km2.
Md Abul Ehsan Bhuiyan, Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, Emmanouil N. Anagnostou, Jan Polcher, Clément Albergel, Emanuel Dutra, Gabriel Fink, Alberto Martínez-de la Torre, and Simon Munier
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1973–1994, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1973-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1973-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the propagation of precipitation uncertainty, and its interaction with hydrologic modeling, in global water resource reanalysis. Analysis is based on ensemble hydrologic simulations for a period of 11 years based on six global hydrologic models and five precipitation datasets. Results show that uncertainties in the model simulations are attributed to both uncertainty in precipitation forcing and the model structure.
Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, Elisa Destro, Md Abul Ehsan Bhuiyan, Marco Borga, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2331–2343, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2331-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2331-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Debris flows, following wildfires, constitute a significant threat to downstream populations and infrastructure. Therefore, developing measures to reduce the vulnerability of local communities to debris flows is of paramount importance. This work proposes a new model for predicting post-fire debris flow occurrence on a regional scale and demonstrates that the proposed model has notably higher skill than the currently used approaches.
Md Abul Ehsan Bhuiyan, Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos, Emmanouil N. Anagnostou, Pere Quintana-Seguí, and Anaïs Barella-Ortiz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1371–1389, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1371-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1371-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the use of a nonparametric model for combining multiple global precipitation datasets and characterizing estimation uncertainty. Inputs to the model included three satellite precipitation products, an atmospheric reanalysis precipitation dataset, satellite-derived near-surface daily soil moisture data, and terrain elevation. We evaluated the technique based on high-resolution reference precipitation data and further used generated ensembles to force a hydrological model.
Francesco Marra, Efrat Morin, Nadav Peleg, Yiwen Mei, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2389–2404, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2389-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2389-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Rainfall frequency analyses from radar and satellite estimates over the eastern Mediterranean are compared examining different climatic conditions. Correlation between radar and satellite results is high for frequent events and decreases with return period. The uncertainty related to record length is larger for drier climates. The agreement between different sensors instills confidence on their use for rainfall frequency analysis in ungauged areas of the Earth.
Yiwen Mei, Xinyi Shen, and Emmanouil N. Anagnostou
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2277–2299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2277-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2277-2017, 2017
Giulia Sofia, John K. Hillier, and Susan J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 721–725, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-721-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The interdisciplinarity of geomorphometry is its greatest strength and one of its major challenges. This special issue showcases exciting developments that are the building blocks for the next step-change in the field. In reading and compiling the contributions we hope that the scientific community will be inspired to seek out collaborations and share ideas across subject-boundaries, between technique-developers and users, enabling us as a community to gather knowledge from our digital landscape
J. K. Hillier, G. Sofia, and S. J. Conway
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 587–598, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-587-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
How good are measurements of shapes in the landscape? This is not well constrained. We suggest that "synthetic tests" using constructed digital landscapes called synthetic DEMs are a powerful and necessary tool to establish the reliability of these data (e.g. mapped sizes). Thus, the tests have a key, complementary role in determining if conceptual and physics-driven models of processes can be reconciled with morphological observations of reality. A typology of synthetic DEMs is proposed.
H. Seyyedi, E. N. Anagnostou, E. Beighley, and J. McCollum
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 5077–5091, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5077-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5077-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
The paper presents a methodology for using global precipitation products from satellite remote sensing to error-correct and downscale global atmospheric reanalysis precipitation data sets. It is shown that streamflow simulations from the satellite-adjusted precipitation reanalysis give similar statistics to the ones derived by high-resolution ground-based radar rainfall data sets. This approach can be applied globally to derive improved flood frequency maps over data-poor areas.
E. Picciotti, F. S. Marzano, E. N. Anagnostou, J. Kalogiros, Y. Fessas, A. Volpi, V. Cazac, R. Pace, G. Cinque, L. Bernardini, K. De Sanctis, S. Di Fabio, M. Montopoli, M. N. Anagnostou, A. Telleschi, E. Dimitriou, and J. Stella
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1229–1241, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1229-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1229-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Karst aquifer discharge response to rainfall interpreted as anomalous transport
HESS Opinions: Never train a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network on a single basin
Large-sample hydrology – a few camels or a whole caravan?
Comment on “Are soils overrated in hydrology?” by Gao et al. (2023)
Multi-decadal fluctuations in root zone storage capacity through vegetation adaptation to hydro-climatic variability have minor effects on the hydrological response in the Neckar River basin, Germany
Projected future changes in the cryosphere and hydrology of a mountainous catchment in the upper Heihe River, China
On the importance of plant phenology in the evaporative process of a semi-arid woodland: could it be why satellite-based evaporation estimates in the miombo differ?
Regionalization of GR4J model parameters for river flow prediction in Paraná, Brazil
Evolution of river regimes in the Mekong River basin over 8 decades and the role of dams in recent hydrological extremes
Skill of seasonal flow forecasts at catchment scale: an assessment across South Korea
When ancient numerical demons meet physics-informed machine learning: adjoint-based gradients for implicit differentiable modeling
Assessing the impact of climate change on high return levels of peak flows in Bavaria applying the CRCM5 large ensemble
Impacts of climate and land surface change on catchment evapotranspiration and runoff from 1951 to 2020 in Saxony, Germany
Quantifying and reducing flood forecast uncertainty by the CHUP-BMA method
Developing a tile drainage module for the Cold Regions Hydrological Model: lessons from a farm in southern Ontario, Canada
To bucket or not to bucket? Analyzing the performance and interpretability of hybrid hydrological models with dynamic parameterization
Widespread flooding dynamics under climate change: characterising floods using grid-based hydrological modelling and regional climate projections
HESS Opinions: The sword of Damocles of the impossible flood
Metamorphic testing of machine learning and conceptual hydrologic models
The influence of human activities on streamflow reductions during the megadrought in central Chile
Elevational control of isotopic composition and application in understanding hydrologic processes in the mid Merced River catchment, Sierra Nevada, California, USA
Enhancing long short-term memory (LSTM)-based streamflow prediction with a spatially distributed approach
Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain
Hybrid Hydrological Modeling for Large Alpine Basins: A Distributed Approach
Impacts of spatiotemporal resolutions of precipitation on flood event simulation based on multimodel structures – a case study over the Xiang River basin in China
A network approach for multiscale catchment classification using traits
Multi-model approach in a variable spatial framework for streamflow simulation
Advancing understanding of lake–watershed hydrology: a fully coupled numerical model illustrated by Qinghai Lake
Technical note: Testing the connection between hillslope-scale runoff fluctuations and streamflow hydrographs at the outlet of large river basins
Empirical stream thermal sensitivity cluster on the landscape according to geology and climate
Multi-scale soil moisture data and process-based modeling reveal the importance of lateral groundwater flow in a subarctic catchment
Deep learning for monthly rainfall–runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia
On optimization of calibrations of a distributed hydrological model with spatially distributed information on snow
Toward interpretable LSTM-based modeling of hydrological systems
Vegetation Response to Climatic Variability: Implications for Root Zone Storage and Streamflow Predictions
Flow intermittence prediction using a hybrid hydrological modelling approach: influence of observed intermittence data on the training of a random forest model
What controls the tail behaviour of flood series: rainfall or runoff generation?
Learning Landscape Features from Streamflow with Autoencoders
Seasonal prediction of end-of-dry-season watershed behavior in a highly interconnected alluvial watershed in northern California
Glaciers determine the sensitivity of hydrological processes to perturbed climate in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau
Leveraging gauge networks and strategic discharge measurements to aid the development of continuous streamflow records
On the need for physical constraints in deep learning rainfall–runoff projections under climate change: a sensitivity analysis to warming and shifts in potential evapotranspiration
Evaluation of hydrological models on small mountainous catchments: impact of the meteorological forcings
Projecting sediment export from two highly glacierized alpine catchments under climate change: exploring non-parametric regression as an analysis tool
Simulation-Based Inference for Parameter Estimation of Complex Watershed Simulators
A framework for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty analysis for holistic hydrologic modeling using SWAT+
On understanding mountainous carbonate basins of the Mediterranean using parsimonious modeling solutions
Comparing quantile regression forest and mixture density long short-term memory models for probabilistic post-processing of satellite precipitation-driven streamflow simulations
Recent ground thermo-hydrological changes in a southern Tibetan endorheic catchment and implications for lake level changes
Towards robust seasonal streamflow forecasts in mountainous catchments: impact of calibration metric selection in hydrological modeling
Dan Elhanati, Nadine Goeppert, and Brian Berkowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4239–4249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4239-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4239-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A continuous time random walk framework was developed to allow modeling of a karst aquifer discharge response to measured rainfall. The application of the numerical model yielded robust fits between modeled and measured discharge values, especially for the distinctive long tails found during recession times. The findings shed light on the interplay of slow and fast flow in the karst system and establish the application of the model for simulating flow and transport in such systems.
Frederik Kratzert, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, and Grey Nearing
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4187–4201, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4187-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4187-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, a special type of neural-network architecture became increasingly popular in hydrology literature. However, in most applications, this model was applied as a one-to-one replacement for hydrology models without adapting or rethinking the experimental setup. In this opinion paper, we show how this is almost always a bad decision and how using these kinds of models requires the use of large-sample hydrology data sets.
Franziska Clerc-Schwarzenbach, Giovanni Selleri, Mattia Neri, Elena Toth, Ilja van Meerveld, and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4219–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We show that the differences between the forcing data included in three CAMELS datasets (US, BR, GB) and the forcing data included for the same catchments in the Caravan dataset affect model calibration considerably. The model performance dropped when the data from the Caravan dataset were used instead of the original data. Most of the model performance drop could be attributed to the differences in precipitation data. However, differences were largest for the potential evapotranspiration data.
Ying Zhao, Mehdi Rahmati, Harry Vereecken, and Dani Or
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4059–4063, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Gao et al. (2023) question the importance of soil in hydrology, sparking debate. We acknowledge some valid points but critique their broad, unsubstantiated views on soil's role. Our response highlights three key areas: (1) the false divide between ecosystem-centric and soil-centric approaches, (2) the vital yet varied impact of soil properties, and (3) the call for a scale-aware framework. We aim to unify these perspectives, enhancing hydrology's comprehensive understanding.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Root zone storage capacity (Sumax) changes significantly over multiple decades, reflecting vegetation adaptation to climatic variability. However, this temporal evolution of Sumax cannot explain long-term fluctuations in the partitioning of water fluxes as expressed by deviations ΔIE from the parametric Budyko curve over time with different climatic conditions, and it does not have any significant effects on shorter-term hydrological response characteristics of the upper Neckar catchment.
Zehua Chang, Hongkai Gao, Leilei Yong, Kang Wang, Rensheng Chen, Chuntan Han, Otgonbayar Demberel, Batsuren Dorjsuren, Shugui Hou, and Zheng Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3897–3917, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3897-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
An integrated cryospheric–hydrologic model, FLEX-Cryo, was developed that considers glaciers, snow cover, and frozen soil and their dynamic impacts on hydrology. We utilized it to simulate future changes in cryosphere and hydrology in the Hulu catchment. Our projections showed the two glaciers will melt completely around 2050, snow cover will reduce, and permafrost will degrade. For hydrology, runoff will decrease after the glacier has melted, and permafrost degradation will increase baseflow.
Henry M. Zimba, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Kawawa E. Banda, Petra Hulsman, Nick van de Giesen, Imasiku A. Nyambe, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3633–3663, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The fall and flushing of new leaves in the miombo woodlands co-occur in the dry season before the commencement of seasonal rainfall. The miombo species are also said to have access to soil moisture in deep soils, including groundwater in the dry season. Satellite-based evaporation estimates, temporal trends, and magnitudes differ the most in the dry season, most likely due to inadequate understanding and representation of the highlighted miombo species attributes in simulations.
Louise Akemi Kuana, Arlan Scortegagna Almeida, Emílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri, and Steffen Manfred Noe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3367–3390, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3367-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The authors compared regionalization methods for river flow prediction in 126 catchments from the south of Brazil, a region with humid subtropical and hot temperate climate. The regionalization method based on physiographic–climatic similarity had the best performance for predicting daily and Q95 reference flow. We showed that basins without flow monitoring can have a good approximation of streamflow using machine learning and physiographic–climatic information as inputs.
Huy Dang and Yadu Pokhrel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3347–3365, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3347-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3347-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By examining basin-wide simulations of a river regime over 83 years with and without dams, we present evidence that climate variation was a key driver of hydrologic variabilities in the Mekong River basin (MRB) over the long term; however, dams have largely altered the seasonality of the Mekong’s flow regime and annual flooding patterns in major downstream areas in recent years. These findings could help us rethink the planning of future dams and water resource management in the MRB.
Yongshin Lee, Francesca Pianosi, Andres Peñuela, and Miguel Angel Rico-Ramirez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3261–3279, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Following recent advancements in weather prediction technology, we explored how seasonal weather forecasts (1 or more months ahead) could benefit practical water management in South Korea. Our findings highlight that using seasonal weather forecasts for predicting flow patterns 1 to 3 months ahead is effective, especially during dry years. This suggest that seasonal weather forecasts can be helpful in improving the management of water resources.
Yalan Song, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Martyn P. Clark, Dapeng Feng, Kathryn Lawson, Kamlesh Sawadekar, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3051–3077, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Differentiable models (DMs) integrate neural networks and physical equations for accuracy, interpretability, and knowledge discovery. We developed an adjoint-based DM for ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for hydrological modeling, reducing distorted fluxes and physical parameters from errors in models that use explicit and operation-splitting schemes. With a better numerical scheme and improved structure, the adjoint-based DM matches or surpasses long short-term memory (LSTM) performance.
Florian Willkofer, Raul R. Wood, and Ralf Ludwig
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2969–2989, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2969-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Severe flood events pose a threat to riverine areas, yet robust estimates of the dynamics of these events in the future due to climate change are rarely available. Hence, this study uses data from a regional climate model, SMILE, to drive a high-resolution hydrological model for 98 catchments of hydrological Bavaria and exploits the large database to derive robust values for the 100-year flood events. Results indicate an increase in frequency and intensity for most catchments in the future.
Maik Renner and Corina Hauffe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2849–2869, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2849-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2849-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate and land surface changes influence the partitioning of water balance components decisively. Their impact is quantified for 71 catchments in Saxony. Germany. Distinct signatures in the joint water and energy budgets are found: (i) past forest dieback caused a decrease in and subsequent recovery of evapotranspiration in the affected regions, and (ii) the recent shift towards higher aridity imposed a large decline in runoff that has not been seen in the observation records before.
Zhen Cui, Shenglian Guo, Hua Chen, Dedi Liu, Yanlai Zhou, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2809–2829, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble forecasting facilitates reliable flood forecasting and warning. This study couples the copula-based hydrologic uncertainty processor (CHUP) with Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and proposes the novel CHUP-BMA method of reducing inflow forecasting uncertainty of the Three Gorges Reservoir. The CHUP-BMA avoids the normal distribution assumption in the HUP-BMA and considers the constraint of initial conditions, which can improve the deterministic and probabilistic forecast performance.
Mazda Kompanizare, Diogo Costa, Merrin L. Macrae, John W. Pomeroy, and Richard M. Petrone
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2785–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2785-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2785-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new agricultural tile drainage module was developed in the Cold Region Hydrological Model platform. Tile flow and water levels are simulated by considering the effect of capillary fringe thickness, drainable water and seasonal regional groundwater dynamics. The model was applied to a small well-instrumented farm in southern Ontario, Canada, where there are concerns about the impacts of agricultural drainage into Lake Erie.
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Nicole Bäuerle, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2705–2719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological hybrid models promise to merge the performance of deep learning methods with the interpretability of process-based models. One hybrid approach is the dynamic parameterization of conceptual models using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. We explored this method to evaluate the effect of the flexibility given by LSTMs on the process-based part.
Adam Griffin, Alison L. Kay, Paul Sayers, Victoria Bell, Elizabeth Stewart, and Sam Carr
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2635–2650, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Widespread flooding is a major problem in the UK and is greatly affected by climate change and land-use change. To look at how widespread flooding changes in the future, climate model data (UKCP18) were used with a hydrological model (Grid-to-Grid) across the UK, and 14 400 events were identified between two time slices: 1980–2010 and 2050–2080. There was a strong increase in the number of winter events in the future time slice and in the peak return periods.
Alberto Montanari, Bruno Merz, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2603–2615, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Floods often take communities by surprise, as they are often considered virtually
impossibleyet are an ever-present threat similar to the sword suspended over the head of Damocles in the classical Greek anecdote. We discuss four reasons why extremely large floods carry a risk that is often larger than expected. We provide suggestions for managing the risk of megafloods by calling for a creative exploration of hazard scenarios and communicating the unknown corners of the reality of floods.
Peter Reichert, Kai Ma, Marvin Höge, Fabrizio Fenicia, Marco Baity-Jesi, Dapeng Feng, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2505–2529, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the predicted change in catchment outlet discharge to precipitation and temperature change for conceptual and machine learning hydrological models. We found that machine learning models, despite providing excellent fit and prediction capabilities, can be unreliable regarding the prediction of the effect of temperature change for low-elevation catchments. This indicates the need for caution when applying them for the prediction of the effect of climate change.
Nicolás Álamos, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Ariel Muñoz, and Álvaro González-Reyes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2483–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we assess the effects of climate and water use on streamflow reductions and drought intensification during the last 3 decades in central Chile. We address this by contrasting streamflow observations with near-natural streamflow simulations. We conclude that while the lack of precipitation dominates streamflow reductions in the megadrought, water uses have not diminished during this time, causing a worsening of the hydrological drought conditions and maladaptation conditions.
Fengjing Liu, Martha H. Conklin, and Glenn D. Shaw
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2239–2258, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2239-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2239-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snowpack has been declining and more precipitation falls as rain than snow. Using stable isotopes, we found flows and flow duration in Yosemite Creek are most sensitive to climate warming due to strong evaporation of waterfalls, potentially lengthening the dry-up period of waterfalls in summer and negatively affecting tourism. Groundwater recharge in Yosemite Valley is primarily from the upper snow–rain transition (2000–2500 m) and very vulnerable to a reduction in the snow–rain ratio.
Qiutong Yu, Bryan A. Tolson, Hongren Shen, Ming Han, Juliane Mai, and Jimmy Lin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2107–2122, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2107-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2107-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to incorporate input variables' spatial distribution information when implementing long short-term memory (LSTM) models for streamflow prediction. This work presents a novel hybrid modelling approach to predict streamflow while accounting for spatial variability. We evaluated the performance against lumped LSTM predictions in 224 basins across the Great Lakes region in North America. This approach shows promise for predicting streamflow in large, ungauged basin.
Marcus Buechel, Louise Slater, and Simon Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2081–2105, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Afforestation has been proposed internationally, but the hydrological implications of such large increases in the spatial extent of woodland are not fully understood. In this study, we use a land surface model to simulate hydrology across Great Britain with realistic afforestation scenarios and potential climate changes. Countrywide afforestation minimally influences hydrology, when compared to climate change, and reduces low streamflow whilst not lowering the highest flows.
Bu Li, Ting Sun, Fuqiang Tian, Mahmut Tudaji, Li Qin, and Guangheng Ni
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-54, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-54, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This paper developed hybrid distributed hydrological models by employing a distributed model as the backbone, and utilizing deep learning to parameterize and replace internal modules. The main contribution is to provide a high-performance tool enriched with explicit hydrological knowledge for hydrological prediction and improves understanding about the hydrological sensitivities to climate change in large alpine basins.
Qian Zhu, Xiaodong Qin, Dongyang Zhou, Tiantian Yang, and Xinyi Song
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1665–1686, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1665-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Input data, model and calibration strategy can affect the accuracy of flood event simulation and prediction. Satellite-based precipitation with different spatiotemporal resolutions is an important input source. Data-driven models are sometimes proven to be more accurate than hydrological models. Event-based calibration and conventional strategy are two options adopted for flood simulation. This study targets the three concerns for accurate flood event simulation and prediction.
Fabio Ciulla and Charuleka Varadharajan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1617–1651, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new method based on network science for unsupervised classification of large datasets and apply it to classify 9067 US catchments and 274 biophysical traits at multiple scales. We find that our trait-based approach produces catchment classes with distinct streamflow behavior and that spatial patterns emerge amongst pristine and human-impacted catchments. This method can be widely used beyond hydrology to identify patterns, reduce trait redundancy, and select representative sites.
Cyril Thébault, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Guillaume Thirel, Sébastien Legrand, and Olivier Delaigue
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1539–1566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasting is useful for many applications, ranging from population safety (e.g. floods) to water resource management (e.g. agriculture or hydropower). To this end, hydrological models must be optimized. However, a model is inherently wrong. This study aims to analyse the contribution of a multi-model approach within a variable spatial framework to improve streamflow simulations. The underlying idea is to take advantage of the strength of each modelling framework tested.
Lele Shu, Xiaodong Li, Yan Chang, Xianhong Meng, Hao Chen, Yuan Qi, Hongwei Wang, Zhaoguo Li, and Shihua Lyu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1477–1491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new model to better understand how water moves in a lake basin. Our model improves upon previous methods by accurately capturing the complexity of water movement, both on the surface and subsurface. Our model, tested using data from China's Qinghai Lake, accurately replicates complex water movements and identifies contributing factors of the lake's water balance. The findings provide a robust tool for predicting hydrological processes, aiding water resource planning.
Ricardo Mantilla, Morgan Fonley, and Nicolás Velásquez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1373–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1373-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists strive to “Be right for the right reasons” when modeling the hydrologic cycle; however, the datasets available to validate hydrological models are sparse, and in many cases, they comprise streamflow observations at the outlets of large catchments. In this work, we show that matching streamflow observations at the outlet of a large basin is not a reliable indicator of a correct description of the small-scale runoff processes.
Lillian M. McGill, E. Ashley Steel, and Aimee H. Fullerton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1351–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1351-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines the relationship between air and river temperatures in Washington's Snoqualmie and Wenatchee basins. We used classification and regression approaches to show that the sensitivity of river temperature to air temperature is variable across basins and controlled largely by geology and snowmelt. Findings can be used to inform strategies for river basin restoration and conservation, such as identifying climate-insensitive areas of the basin that should be preserved and protected.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Kersti Leppä, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-aho, Giulia Mazzotti, Terhikki Manninen, Mika Korkiakoski, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, and Samuli Launiainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-81, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-81, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
We used hydrological models, field measurements and satellite-based data to study the soil moisture dynamics in a subarctic catchment. The role of groundwater was studied with different ways to model the groundwater dynamics, and via comparisons to the observational data. The choice of groundwater model was shown to have a strong impact, and representation of lateral flow was important to capture wet soil conditions. Our results provide insights for ecohydrological studies in boreal regions.
Stephanie R. Clark, Julien Lerat, Jean-Michel Perraud, and Peter Fitch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1191–1213, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To determine if deep learning models are in general a viable alternative to traditional hydrologic modelling techniques in Australian catchments, a comparison of river–runoff predictions is made between traditional conceptual models and deep learning models in almost 500 catchments spread over the continent. It is found that the deep learning models match or outperform the traditional models in over two-thirds of the river catchments, indicating feasibility in a wide variety of conditions.
Dipti Tiwari, Mélanie Trudel, and Robert Leconte
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1127–1146, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1127-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Calibrating hydrological models with multi-objective functions enhances model robustness. By using spatially distributed snow information in the calibration, the model performance can be enhanced without compromising the outputs. In this study the HYDROTEL model was calibrated in seven different experiments, incorporating the SPAEF (spatial efficiency) metric alongside Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE), with the aim of identifying the optimal calibration strategy.
Luis Andres De la Fuente, Mohammad Reza Ehsani, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, and Laura Elizabeth Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 945–971, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-945-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Long short-term memory (LSTM) is a widely used machine-learning model in hydrology, but it is difficult to extract knowledge from it. We propose HydroLSTM, which represents processes like a hydrological reservoir. Models based on HydroLSTM perform similarly to LSTM while requiring fewer cell states. The learned parameters are informative about the dominant hydrology of a catchment. Our results show how parsimony and hydrological knowledge extraction can be achieved by using the new structure.
Nienke Tessa Tempel, Laurene Bouaziz, Riccardo Taormina, Ellis van Noppen, Jasper Stam, Eric Sprokkereef, and Markus Hrachowitz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-115, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-115, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the impact of climatic variability on root zone water storage capacities thus on hydrological predictions. Analysing data from 286 areas in Europe and the US, we found that despite some variations in root zone storage capacity due to changing climatic conditions over multiple decades, these changes are generally minor and have a limited effect on water storage and river flow predictions.
Louise Mimeau, Annika Künne, Flora Branger, Sven Kralisch, Alexandre Devers, and Jean-Philippe Vidal
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 851–871, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Modelling flow intermittence is essential for predicting the future evolution of drying in river networks and better understanding the ecological and socio-economic impacts. However, modelling flow intermittence is challenging, and observed data on temporary rivers are scarce. This study presents a new modelling approach for predicting flow intermittence in river networks and shows that combining different sources of observed data reduces the model uncertainty.
Elena Macdonald, Bruno Merz, Björn Guse, Viet Dung Nguyen, Xiaoxiang Guan, and Sergiy Vorogushyn
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 833–850, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-833-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-833-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some rivers, the occurrence of extreme flood events is more likely than in other rivers – they have heavy-tailed distributions. We find that threshold processes in the runoff generation lead to such a relatively high occurrence probability of extremes. Further, we find that beyond a certain return period, i.e. for rare events, rainfall is often the dominant control compared to runoff generation. Our results can help to improve the estimation of the occurrence probability of extreme floods.
Alberto Bassi, Marvin Höge, Antonietta Mira, Fabrizio Fenicia, and Carlo Albert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-47, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-47, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
The goal is to remove the impact of meteorological drivers in order to uncover the unique landscape fingerprints of a catchment from streamflow data. Our results reveal an optimal two-feature summary for most catchments, with a third feature needed for challenging cases, associated with aridity and intermittent flow. Baseflow index, aridity, and soil/vegetation attributes strongly correlate with learned features, indicating their importance for streamflow prediction.
Claire Kouba and Thomas Harter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 691–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-691-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In some watersheds, the severity of the dry season has a large impact on aquatic ecosystems. In this study, we design a way to predict, 5–6 months in advance, how severe the dry season will be in a rural watershed in northern California. This early warning can support seasonal adaptive management. To predict these two values, we assess data about snow, rain, groundwater, and river flows. We find that maximum snowpack and total wet season rainfall best predict dry season severity.
Yi Nan and Fuqiang Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 669–689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-669-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper utilized a tracer-aided model validated by multiple datasets in a large mountainous basin on the Tibetan Plateau to analyze hydrological sensitivity to climate change. The spatial pattern of the local hydrological sensitivities and the influence factors were analyzed in particular. The main finding of this paper is that the local hydrological sensitivity in mountainous basins is determined by the relationship between the glacier area ratio and the mean annual precipitation.
Michael J. Vlah, Matthew R. V. Ross, Spencer Rhea, and Emily S. Bernhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 545–573, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Virtual stream gauging enables continuous streamflow estimation where a gauge might be difficult or impractical to install. We reconstructed flow at 27 gauges of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), informing ~199 site-months of missing data in the official record and improving that accuracy of official estimates at 11 sites. This study shows that machine learning, but also routine regression methods, can be used to supplement existing gauge networks and reduce monitoring costs.
Sungwook Wi and Scott Steinschneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 479–503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-479-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate whether deep learning (DL) models can produce physically plausible streamflow projections under climate change. We address this question by focusing on modeled responses to increases in temperature and potential evapotranspiration and by employing three DL and three process-based hydrological models. The results suggest that physical constraints regarding model architecture and input are necessary to promote the physical realism of DL hydrological projections under climate change.
Guillaume Evin, Matthieu Le Lay, Catherine Fouchier, David Penot, Francois Colleoni, Alexandre Mas, Pierre-André Garambois, and Olivier Laurantin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 261–281, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological modelling of mountainous catchments is challenging for many reasons, the main one being the temporal and spatial representation of precipitation forcings. This study presents an evaluation of the hydrological modelling of 55 small mountainous catchments of the northern French Alps, focusing on the influence of the type of precipitation reanalyses used as inputs. These evaluations emphasize the added value of radar measurements, in particular for the reproduction of flood events.
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 139–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-139-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
How suspended sediment export from glacierized high-alpine areas responds to future climate change is hardly assessable as many interacting processes are involved, and appropriate physical models are lacking. We present the first study, to our knowledge, exploring machine learning to project sediment export until 2100 in two high-alpine catchments. We find that uncertainties due to methodological limitations are small until 2070. Negative trends imply that peak sediment may have already passed.
Robert Hull, Elena Leonarduzzi, Luis De La Fuente, Hoang Viet Tran, Andrew Bennett, Peter Melchior, Reed M. Maxwell, and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-264, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-264, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale hydrologic a needed tool to explore complex watershed processes and how they may evolve under a changing climate. However, calibrating them can be difficult because they are costly to run and have many unknown parameters. We implement a state-of-the-art approach to model calibration with a set of experiments in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
Salam A. Abbas, Ryan T. Bailey, Jeremy T. White, Jeffrey G. Arnold, Michael J. White, Natalja Čerkasova, and Jungang Gao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 21–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research highlights.
1. Implemented groundwater module (gwflow) into SWAT+ for four watersheds with different unique hydrologic features across the United States.
2. Presented methods for sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation for coupled models.
3. Sensitivity analysis for streamflow and groundwater head conducted using Morris method.
4. Uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation performed using an iterative ensemble smoother within the PEST framework.
Shima Azimi, Christian Massari, Giuseppe Formetta, Silvia Barbetta, Alberto Tazioli, Davide Fronzi, Sara Modanesi, Angelica Tarpanelli, and Riccardo Rigon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4485–4503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4485-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4485-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed the water budget of nested karst catchments using simple methods and modeling. By utilizing the available data on precipitation and discharge, we were able to determine the response lag-time by adopting new techniques. Additionally, we modeled snow cover dynamics and evapotranspiration with the use of Earth observations, providing a concise overview of the water budget for the basin and its subbasins. We have made the data, models, and workflows accessible for further study.
Yuhang Zhang, Aizhong Ye, Bita Analui, Phu Nguyen, Soroosh Sorooshian, Kuolin Hsu, and Yuxuan Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4529–4550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4529-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Our study shows that while the quantile regression forest (QRF) and countable mixtures of asymmetric Laplacians long short-term memory (CMAL-LSTM) models demonstrate similar proficiency in multipoint probabilistic predictions, QRF excels in smaller watersheds and CMAL-LSTM in larger ones. CMAL-LSTM performs better in single-point deterministic predictions, whereas QRF model is more efficient overall.
Léo C. P. Martin, Sebastian Westermann, Michele Magni, Fanny Brun, Joel Fiddes, Yanbin Lei, Philip Kraaijenbrink, Tamara Mathys, Moritz Langer, Simon Allen, and Walter W. Immerzeel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4409–4436, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4409-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4409-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Across the Tibetan Plateau, many large lakes have been changing level during the last decades as a response to climate change. In high-mountain environments, water fluxes from the land to the lakes are linked to the ground temperature of the land and to the energy fluxes between the ground and the atmosphere, which are modified by climate change. With a numerical model, we test how these water and energy fluxes have changed over the last decades and how they influence the lake level variations.
Diego Araya, Pablo A. Mendoza, Eduardo Muñoz-Castro, and James McPhee
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4385–4408, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4385-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Dynamical systems are used by many agencies worldwide to produce seasonal streamflow forecasts, which are critical for decision-making. Such systems rely on hydrology models, which contain parameters that are typically estimated using a target performance metric (i.e., objective function). This study explores the effects of this decision across mountainous basins in Chile, illustrating tradeoffs between seasonal forecast quality and the models' capability to simulate streamflow characteristics.
Cited articles
Ahearn, E. A.: Flood of April 2007 and Flood-Frequency Estimates at Streamflow-Gaging Stations in Western Connecticut, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5108, 40, http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5108 (last access: 16 July 2023), 2009.
Ahrendt, S., Horner-Devine, A. R., Collins, B. D., Morgan, J. A., and Istanbulluoglu, E.: Channel Conveyance Variability can Influence Flood Risk as Much as Streamflow Variability in Western Washington State, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR031890, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031890, 2022.
Alahakoon, D., Halgamuge, S. K., and Srinivasan, B.: Dynamic self-organizing maps with controlled growth for knowledge discovery, IEEE Trans. Neural. Netw., 11, 601–614, https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846732, 2000.
Alfieri, L., Feyen, L., Dottori, F., and Bianchi, A.: Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios, Global Environ. Chang., 35, 199–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.004, 2015.
Anderson, S. W. and Konrad, C. P.: Downstream-Propagating Channel Responses to Decadal-Scale Climate Variability in a Glaciated River Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 124, 902–919, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004734, 2019.
Bação, F., Lobo, V., and Painho, M.: The self-organizing map, the Geo-SOM, and relevant variants for geosciences, Comput. Geosci., 31, 155–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.06.013, 2005.
Baker, V. R.: Geomorphological understanding of floods, Geomorphology, 10, 139–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(94)90013-2, 1994.
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., Mcvicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., and Wood, E. F.: Data Descriptor: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution Background & Summary, Sci. Data, 5, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018.
Benito, G. and Hudson, P. F.: Flood hazards: The context of fluvial geomorphology, Geomorphological Hazards and Disaster Prevention, 111–128, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807527.010, 2010.
Bergen, K. J., Johnson, P. A., De Hoop, M. V., and Beroza, G. C.: Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience, Science, 363, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0323, 2019.
Biecek, P., Gosiewska, A., Baniecki, H., Izdebski, A., and Komosinski, D.: Model Agnostic Instance Level Variable Attributions, R J., 10, 395–409, https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-072, 2019.
Biecek, P., Baniecki, H., Izdebski, A., and Pekala, K.: Ingredients: Effects and importances of model ingredients, R package Version, 2, 2023.
Blench, T.: Mobile-bed fluviology: a regime theory treatment of rivers for engineers and hydrologists, University of Alberta press, Edmonton, Canada, http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:001491885 (last access: 16 July 2024), 1969.
Blöschl, G., Hall, J., Viglione, A., Perdigão, R. A. P., Parajka, J., Merz, B., Lun, D., Arheimer, B., Aronica, G. T., Bilibashi, A., Boháč, M., Bonacci, O., Borga, M., Čanjevac, I., Castellarin, A., Chirico, G. B., Claps, P., Frolova, N., Ganora, D., Gorbachova, L., Gül, A., Hannaford, J., Harrigan, S., Kireeva, M., Kiss, A., Kjeldsen, T. R., Kohnová, S., Koskela, J. J., Ledvinka, O., Macdonald, N., Mavrova-Guirguinova, M., Mediero, L., Merz, R., Molnar, P., Montanari, A., Murphy, C., Osuch, M., Ovcharuk, V., Radevski, I., Salinas, J. L., Sauquet, E., Šraj, M., Szolgay, J., Volpi, E., Wilson, D., Zaimi, K., and Živković, N.: Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods, Nature, 573, 108–111, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1495-6, 2019.
Boothroyd, R. J., Williams, R. D., Hoey, T. B., Barrett, B., and Prasojo, O. A.: Applications of Google Earth Engine in fluvial geomorphology for detecting river channel change, WIRES Water, 8, e21496, https://doi.org/10.1002/WAT2.1496, 2021.
Borga, M., Gaume, E., Creutin, J. D., and Marchi, L.: Surveying flash floods: gauging the ungauged extremes, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3883–3885, https://doi.org/10.1002/HYP.7111, 2008.
Bormann, H., Pinter, N., and Elfert, S.: Hydrological signatures of flood trends on German rivers: Flood frequencies, flood heights and specific stages, J. Hydrol., 404, 50–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2011.04.019, 2011.
Bracken, L. J. and Croke, J.: The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff-dominated geomorphic systems, Hydrol. Process., 21, 1749–1763, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6313, 2007.
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001.
Breiman, L.: RANDOM FORESTS, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7, 1–33, https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070603, 2016.
Brierley, G. J. and Fryirs, K. A.: The Use of Evolutionary Trajectories to Guide “Moving Targets” in the Management of River Futures, River Res. Appl., 32, 823–835, https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2930, 2016.
Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., Reid, H., and Williams, R.: The dark art of interpretation in geomorphology, Geomorphology, 390, 107870, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2021.107870, 2021.
Brinkerhoff, C. B., Gleason, C. J., Feng, D., and Lin, P.: Constraining Remote River Discharge Estimation Using Reach-Scale Geomorphology, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2020WR027949, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027949, 2020.
Buraas, E. M., Renshaw, C. E., Magilligan, F. J., and Dade, W. B.: Impact of reach geometry on stream channel sensitivity to extreme floods, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 39, 1778–1789, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3562, 2014.
Ceola, S., Laio, F., and Montanari, A.: Global-scale human pressure evolution imprints on sustainability of river systems, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3933–3944, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3933-2019, 2019.
Chang, S. E., McDaniels, T. L., Mikawoz, J., and Peterson, K.: Infrastructure failure interdependencies in extreme events: power outage consequences in the 1998 Ice Storm, Nat. Hazards, 41, 337–358, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9039-4, 2007.
Chen, S. A., Michaelides, K., Grieve, S. W. D., and Singer, M. B.: Aridity is expressed in river topography globally, Nature, 573, 573–577, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1558-8, 2019.
Cleveland, W. S.: Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74, 829–836, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038, 1979.
Clubb, F. J., Mudd, S. M., Attal, M., Milodowski, D. T., and Grieve, S. W. D.: The relationship between drainage density, erosion rate, and hilltop curvature: Implications for sediment transport processes, J Geophys. Res.-Earth, 121, 1724–1745, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003747, 2016.
Costa, J. A. and Netto, M. L.: Estimating the number of clusters in multivariate data by self-organizing maps, Int. J. Neural Syst., 9, 195–202, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065799000186, 1999.
Criss, R. E. and Shock, E. L.: Flood enhancement through flood control, Geology, 29, 875, https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0875:FETFC>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Croke, J., Fryirs, K., and Thompson, C.: Channel-floodplain connectivity during an extreme flood event: implications for sediment erosion, deposition, and delivery, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 38, 1444–1456, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3430, 2013.
Cunderlik, J. M. and Burn, D. H.: Non-stationary pooled flood frequency analysis, J. Hydrol., 276, 210–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00062-3, 2003.
Death, R. G., Fuller, I. C., and Macklin, M. G.: Resetting the river template: the potential for climate-related extreme floods to transform river geomorphology and ecology, Freshw. Biol., 60, 2477–2496, https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12639, 2015.
Desta, F., Colbert, J. J., Rentch, J. S., and Gottschalk, K. W.: Aspect induced differences in vegetation, soil, and microclimatic characteristics of an Appalachian watershed | Treesearch, Scientific Journal (JRNL) CASTANEA, 69, 92–108, 2004.
Dottori, F., Szewczyk, W., Ciscar, J. C., Zhao, F., Alfieri, L., Hirabayashi, Y., Bianchi, A., Mongelli, I., Frieler, K., Betts, R. A., and Feyen, L.: Increased human and economic losses from river flooding with anthropogenic warming, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 781–786, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0257-z, 1 September 2018.
Dottori, F., Alfieri, L., Bianchi, A., Skoien, J., and Salamon, P.: A new dataset of river flood hazard maps for Europe and the Mediterranean Basin, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1549–1569, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1549-2022, 2022.
Dresp, B., Wandeto, J., and Nyongesa, H.: Using the Quantization Error from Self-Organizing Map (SOM) Output for Fast Detection of Critical Variations in Image Time Series, ISTE OpenScience, Collection from Data to Decisions, Wiley & Sons, London, UK, https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201710.0166.v2, 2018.
East, A. E. and Sankey, J. B.: Geomorphic and Sedimentary Effects of Modern Climate Change: Current and Anticipated Future Conditions in the Western United States, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000692, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000692, 2020.
Falcone, J.: GAGES-II: Geospatial Attributes of Gages for Evaluating Streamflow, U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P96CPHOT, 2011.
FEMA: Reducing Flood Effects in Critical Facilities, HSFE60-13-, 1–11, https://core-es.com/wp-content/uploads/FEMA-RA2-Reducing-Flood-Effects-in-Critical-Facilities.pdf (last access: 16 July 2024), 2023.
Feng, B., Zhang, Y., and Bourke, R.: Urbanization impacts on flood risks based on urban growth data and coupled flood models, Nat. Hazards, 106, 613–627, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04480-0, 2021.
Fenneman, N. M. and Johnson, D. W.: Physiographic divisions of the conterminous U. S., U.S. Geological Survey, https://water.usgs.gov/lookup/getspatial?physio (last access: 29 May 2024), 1946.
Fisher, A., Rudin, C., and Dominici, F.: All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 20, https://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/volume20/18-760/18-760.pdf (last access: 16 July 2024), 2018.
Flores, A. N., Bledsoe, B. P., Cuhaciyan, C. O., Wohl, E. E., Flores, C., Bledsoe, B. P., Cuhaciyan, C. O., and Wohl, E. E.: Channel-reach morphology dependence on energy, scale, and hydroclimatic processes with implications for prediction using geospatial data, Water Resour. Res., 42, 6412, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004226, 2006.
Fryirs, K. and Brierley, G.: Assemblages of geomorphic units: A building block approach to analysis and interpretation of river character, behaviour, condition and recovery, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 47, 92–108, https://doi.org/10.1002/ESP.5264, 2022.
Fytilis, N. and Rizzo, D. M.: Coupling self-organizing maps with a Naïve Bayesian classifier, Stream classification studies using multiple assessment data, Water Resour. Res., 49, 7747–7762, https://doi.org/10.1002/2012WR013422, 2013.
Geem, Z. W., Tseng, C. L., Kim, J., and Bae, C.: Trenchless Water Pipe Condition Assessment Using Artificial Neural Network, Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects – Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, 1–9, 8–11 July 2007, Boston, Massachusetts, https://doi.org/10.1061/40934(252)26, 2007.
Granato, G. E.: Estimating Basin Lagtime and Hydrograph-Timing Indexes Used to Characterize Stormflows for Runoff-Quality Analysis Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5110, Prepared in cooperation with the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Project Development and Environmental Review, http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5110/ (last access: 16 July 2024), 2012.
Grill, G., Lehner, B., Thieme, M., Geenen, B., Tickner, D., Antonelli, F., Babu, S., Borrelli, P., Cheng, L., Crochetiere, H., Ehalt Macedo, H., Filgueiras, R., Goichot, M., Higgins, J., Hogan, Z., Lip, B., McClain, M. E., Meng, J., Mulligan, M., Nilsson, C., Olden, J. D., Opperman, J. J., Petry, P., Reidy Liermann, C., Sáenz, L., Salinas-Rodríguez, S., Schelle, P., Schmitt, R. J. P., Snider, J., Tan, F., Tockner, K., Valdujo, P. H., van Soesbergen, A., and Zarfl, C.: Mapping the world's free-flowing rivers, Nature, 569, 215–221, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9, 2019.
GrowingSOM package | R Documentation: https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/GrowingSOM/versions/0.1.1, last access: 12 July 2020.
Guillon, H., Byrne, C. F., Lane, B. A., Sandoval Solis, S., and Pasternack, G. B.: Machine Learning Predicts Reach-Scale Channel Types From Coarse-Scale Geospatial Data in a Large River Basin, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026691, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026691, 2020.
Gupta, V. K. and Dawdy, D. R.: Physical interpretations of regional variations in the scaling exponents of flood quantiles, Hydrol. Process., 9, 347–361, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090309, 1995.
Harrison, S., Mighall, T., Stainforth, D. A., Allen, P., Macklin, M., Anderson, E., Knight, J., Mauquoy, D., Passmore, D., Rea, B., Spagnolo, M., and Shannon, S.: Uncertainty in geomorphological responses to climate change, Clim. Change, 156, 69–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02520-8, 2019.
Hassan, M. A., Egozi, R., and Parker, G.: Experiments on the effect of hydrograph characteristics on vertical grain sorting in gravel bed rivers, Water Resour. Res., 42, 9408, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004707, 2006.
Hattermann, F. F., Huang, S., Burghoff, O., Willems, W., Österle, H., Büchner, M., and Kundzewicz, Z.: Modelling flood damages under climate change conditions – a case study for Germany, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 3151–3168, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3151-2014, 2014.
Houser, C., Lehner, J., and Smith, A.: The Field Geomorphologist in a Time of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr., 112, 1260–1277, https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1985956, 2022.
Hurvich, C. M., Simonoff, J. S., and Tsai, C.-L.: Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterion, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol., 60, 271–293, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00125, 1998.
Kalantari, Z., Ferreira, C. S. S., Koutsouris, A. J., Ahmer, A. K., Cerdà, A., and Destouni, G.: Assessing flood probability for transportation infrastructure based on catchment characteristics, sediment connectivity and remotely sensed soil moisture, Sci. Total Environ., 661, 393–406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.009, 2019.
Karagiannis, G. M., Chondrogiannis, S., Krausmann, E., and Turksezer, Z. I.: Power grid recovery after natural hazard impact, EUR 28844 EN, European Commission, Luxembourg, https://doi.org/10.2760/87402, 2017.
Karpatne, A., Ebert-Uphoff, I., Ravela, S., Babaie, H. A., and Kumar, V.: Machine Learning for the Geosciences: Challenges and Opportunities, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 31, 1544–1554, https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2861006, 2019.
Khanam, M., Sofia, G., Koukoula, M., Lazin, R., Nikolopoulos, E. I., Shen, X., and Anagnostou, E. N.: Impact of compound flood event on coastal critical infrastructures considering current and future climate, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 587–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-587-2021, 2021.
Kiang, J. E., Stewart, D. W., Archfield, S. A., Osborne, E. B., Eng, K., and Survey, U. S. G.: A national streamflow network gap analysis, Scientific Investigations Report, Reston, VA, https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20135013, 2013.
Knight, J. and Harrison, S.: Evaluating the Impacts of Global Warming on Geomorphological Systems, Ambio, 41, 206, https://doi.org/10.1007/S13280-011-0178-9, 2012.
Kohonen, T.: Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biol. Cybern., 43, 59–69, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337288, 1982.
Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd Edn., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 501 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2, 2001.
Lane, S. N., Tayefi, V., Reid, S. C., Yu, D., and Hardy, R. J.: Interactions between sediment delivery, channel change, climate change and flood risk in a temperate upland environment, Earth. Surf. Process. Landf., 32, 429–446, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1404, 2007.
Li, Y., Wright, D. B., and Byrne, P. K.: The Influence of Tropical Cyclones on the Evolution of River Conveyance Capacity in Puerto Rico, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2020WR027971, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027971, 2020.
Lisenby, P. E. and Fryirs, K. A.: Catchment- and reach-scale controls on the distribution and expectation of geomorphic channel adjustment, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3408–3427, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017747, 2016.
Lisenby, P. E., Croke, J., and Fryirs, K. A.: Geomorphic effectiveness: a linear concept in a non-linear world, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 43, 4–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4096, 2018.
Luo, W., Jasiewicz, J., Stepinski, T., Wang, J., Xu, C., and Cang, X.: Spatial association between dissection density and environmental factors over the entire conterminous United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 692–700, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066941, 2016.
Mallakpour, I. and Villarini, G.: The changing nature of flooding across the central United States, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 250–254, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2516, 2015.
Mazzoleni, M., Dottori, F., Cloke, H. L., and Di Baldassarre, G.: Deciphering human influence on annual maximum flood extent at the global level, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00598-0, 2022.
McEvoy, D., Ahmed, I., and Mullett, J.: The impact of the 2009 heat wave on Melbourne's critical infrastructure, Local Environ., 17, 783–796, https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.678320, 2012.
Merz, B., Vorogushyn, S., Uhlemann, S., Delgado, J., and Hundecha, Y.: HESS Opinions “More efforts and scientific rigour are needed to attribute trends in flood time series”, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1379–1387, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1379-2012, 2012.
Milly, P. C. D., Wetherald, R. T., Dunne, K. A., and Delworth, T. L.: Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate, Nature, 415, 514–517, https://doi.org/10.1038/415514a, 2002.
Moglen, G. E., Eltahir, E. A. B., and Bras, R. L.: On the sensitivity of drainage density to climate change, Water Resour. Res., 34, 855–862, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR02709, 1998.
Molnar, C.: Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable, 2nd edn., https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/ (last access: 16 July 2024), 2022.
Molnar, C. and Schratz, P.: Interpretable Machine Learning, Ann. Appl. Stat., 2, 916–954, https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS148, 2008.
Montgomery, D. R. and Buffington, J. M.: Channel processes, classification, and response, Springer-Verlag, New York, 13–42 pp., 1998.
Mostofi Zadeh, S., Burn, D. H., and O'Brien, N.: Detection of trends in flood magnitude and frequency in Canada, J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., 28, 100673, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100673, 2020.
Munoz, S. E., Giosan, L., Therrell, M. D., Remo, J. W. F., Shen, Z., Sullivan, R. M., Wiman, C., O'Donnell, M., and Donnelly, J. P.: Climatic control of Mississippi River flood hazard amplified by river engineering, Nature, 556, 95–98, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26145, 2018.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Flood stage values, NOAA [data set], https://water.noaa.gov/ (last access: 16 July 2024), 2021.
Naylor, L. A., Spencer, T., Lane, S. N., Darby, S. E., Magilligan, F. J., Macklin, M. G., and Möller, I.: State of Science Stormy geomorphology: geomorphic contributions in an age of climate extremes, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 42, 166–190, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4062, 2016.
Neuhold, C., Stanzel, P., and Nachtnebel, H. P.: Incorporating river morphological changes to flood risk assessment: uncertainties, methodology and application, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 789–799, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-789-2009, 2009.
Nienhuis, J. H., Ashton, A. D., Edmonds, D. A., Hoitink, A. J. F., Kettner, A. J., Rowland, J. C., and Törnqvist, T. E.: Global-scale human impact on delta morphology has led to net land area gain, Nature, 577, 514–518, https://doi.org/10.1038/S41586-019-1905-9, 2020.
Pacheco, F. S., Miranda, M., Pezzi, L. P., Assireu, A., Marinho, M. M., Malafaia, M., Reis, A., Sales, M., Correia, G., Domingos, P., Iwama, A., Rudorff, C., Oliva, P., and Ometto, J. P.: Water quality longitudinal profile of the Paraíba do Sul River, Brazil during an extreme drought event, Limnol. Oceanogr., 62, S131–S146, https://doi.org/10.1002/LNO.10586, 2017.
Passalacqua, P., Belmont, P., Staley, D. M., Simley, J. D., Arrowsmith, J. R., Bode, C. A., Crosby, C., DeLong, S. B., Glenn, N. F., Kelly, S. A., Lague, D., Sangireddy, H., Schaffrath, K., Tarboton, D. G., Wasklewicz, T., and Wheaton, J. M.: Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review, Earth. Sci. Rev., 148, 174–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2015.05.012, 2015.
Pfeiffer, A. M., Collins, B. D., Anderson, S. W., Montgomery, D. R., and Istanbulluoglu, E.: River Bed Elevation Variability Reflects Sediment Supply, Rather Than Peak Flows, in the Uplands of Washington State, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6795–6810, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025394, 2019.
Phillips, J. D.: Geomorphic impacts of flash flooding in a forested headwater basin, J. Hydrol., 269, 236–250, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00280-9, 2002.
Pinter, N., Thomas, R., and Wlosinski, J. H.: Assessing flood hazard on dynamic rivers, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 82, 333–333, https://doi.org/10.1029/01EO00199, 2001.
Pinter, N., Van der Ploeg, R. R., Schweigert, P., and Hoefer, G.: Flood magnification on the River Rhine, Hydrol. Process., 20, 147–164, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5908, 2006a.
Pinter, N., Ickes, B. S., Wlosinski, J. H., and van der Ploeg, R. R.: Trends in flood stages: Contrasting results from the Mississippi and Rhine River systems, J. Hydrol., 331, 554–566, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2006.06.013, 2006b.
Pinter, N., Jemberie, A. A., Remo, J. W. F., Heine, R. A., and Ickes, B. S.: Flood trends and river engineering on the Mississippi River system, Geophys. Res. Lett, 35, 23404, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035987, 2008.
Rabanaque, M. P., Martínez-Fernández, V., Calle, M., and Benito, G.: Basin-wide hydromorphological analysis of ephemeral streams using machine learning algorithms, Earth Surf Process. Landf., 47, 328–344, https://doi.org/10.1002/ESP.5250, 2022.
Rahmati, O., Darabi, H., Haghighi, A. T., Stefanidis, S., Kornejady, A., Nalivan, O. A., and Bui, D. T.: Urban flood hazard modeling using self-organizing map neural network, Water, 11, 2370, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112370, 2019.
Rathburn, S. L., Bennett, G. L., Wohl, E. E., Briles, C., McElroy, B., and Sutfin, N.: The fate of sediment, wood, and organic carbon eroded during an extreme flood, Colorado Front Range, USA, Geology, 45, 499–502, https://doi.org/10.1130/G38935.1, 2017.
Reis, A. H.: Constructal view of scaling laws of river basins, Geomorphology, 78, 201–206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.015, 2006.
Riese, F. M. and Keller, S.: Introducing a framework of self-organizing maps for regression of soil moisture with hyperspectral data, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), July 2018, 6151–6154, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8517812, 2018.
Riese, F. M. and Keller, S.: SuSi: Supervised Self-Organizing Maps for Regression and Classification in Python, Remote Sens., 12, 7, 2019.
Rinaldi, M., Amponsah, W., Benvenuti, M., Borga, M., Comiti, F., Lucía, A., Marchi, L., Nardi, L., Righini, M., and Surian, N.: An integrated approach for investigating geomorphic response to extreme events: methodological framework and application to the October 2011 flood in the Magra River catchment, Italy, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 41, 835–846, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3902, 2016.
Ruiz-Villanueva, V., Badoux, A., Rickenmann, D., Böckli, M., Schläfli, S., Steeb, N., Stoffel, M., and Rickli, C.: Impacts of a large flood along a mountain river basin: the importance of channel widening and estimating the large wood budget in the upper Emme River (Switzerland), Earth Surf. Dynam., 6, 1115–1137, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-1115-2018, 2018.
Saco, P. M. and Kumar, P.: Kinematic dispersion in stream networks 1. Coupling hydraulic and network geometry, Water Resour. Res., 38, 26–1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000695, 2002.
Saghafian, B.: Time of Concentration and Travel Time in Watersheds, Water Encyclopedia, 469–472, https://doi.org/10.1002/047147844X.SW1033, 2005.
Saharia, M., Kirstetter, P. E., Vergara, H., Gourley, J. J., Hong, Y., and Giroud, M.: Mapping Flash Flood Severity in the United States, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 397–411, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0082.1, 2017.
Sarker, I. H.: Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Overview on Techniques, Taxonomy, Applications and Research Directions, SN Comput. Sci., 2, 420, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1, 2021.
Schlef, K. E., Moradkhani, H., and Lall, U.: Atmospheric Circulation Patterns Associated with Extreme United States Floods Identified via Machine Learning, Sci. Rep., 9, 7171, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43496-w, 2019.
Scorpio, V., Aucelli, P. P. C., Giano, S. I., Pisano, L., Robustelli, G., Rosskopf, C. M., and Schiattarella, M.: River channel adjustments in Southern Italy over the past 150 years and implications for channel recovery, Geomorphology, 251, 77–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.008, 2015.
Scorpio, V., Crema, S., Marra, F., Righini, M., Ciccarese, G., Borga, M., Cavalli, M., Corsini, A., Marchi, L., Surian, N., and Comiti, F.: Basin-scale analysis of the geomorphic effectiveness of flash floods: A study in the northern Apennines (Italy), Sci. Total Environ., 640–641, 337–351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.252, 2018.
Seo, Y. and Schmidt, A. R.: The effect of rainstorm movement on urban drainage network runoff hydrographs, Hydrol. Process., 26, 3830–3841, https://doi.org/10.1002/HYP.8412, 2012.
Seo, Y., Hwang, J., and Noh, S. J.: Analysis of Urban Drainage Networks Using Gibbs' Model: A Case Study in Seoul, South Korea, Water, 7, 4129–4143, https://doi.org/10.3390/W7084129, 2015.
Shen, X., Mei, Y., and Anagnostou, E. N.: A comprehensive database of flood events in the contiguous United States from 2002 to 2013, B. Am Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1493–1502, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0125.1, 2017.
Slater, L.: Hydromorphology, Github [code], https://github.com/LouiseJSlater/Hydromorphology (last access: 29 May 2024), 2019.
Slater, L. J.: To what extent have changes in channel capacity contributed to flood hazard trends in England and Wales?, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 41, 1115–1128, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3927, 2016.
Slater, L. J. and Villarini, G.: Recent trends in U.S. flood risk, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 12428–12436, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071199, 2016.
Slater, L. J., Singer, M. B., and Kirchner, J. W.: Hydrologic versus geomorphic drivers of trends in flood hazard, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 370–376, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062482, 2015.
Slater, L. J., Khouakhi, A., and Wilby, R. L.: River channel conveyance capacity adjusts to modes of climate variability, Sci. Rep., 9, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48782-1, 2019.
Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., Morrison, J. E., Sturdevant-Rees, P., Turner-Gillespie, D. F., and Bates, P. D.: The regional hydrology of extreme floods in an urbanizing drainage basin, J. Hydrometeorol., 3, 267–282, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0267:TRHOEF>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Smith, J. A., Baeck, M. L., Meierdiercks, K. L., Nelson, P. A., Miller, A. J., and Holland, E. J.: Field studies of the storm event hydrologic response in an urbanizing watershed, Water Resour. Res., 41, W10413, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003712, 2005.
Smith, M. B., Koren, V. I., Zhang, Z., Reed, S. M., Pan, J. J., and Moreda, F.: Runoff response to spatial variability in precipitation: An analysis of observed data, J. Hydrol., 298, 267–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.039, 2004.
Sofia, G. and Nikolopoulos, E. I.: Floods and rivers: a circular causality perspective, Sci. Rep., 10, 5175, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61533-x, 2020.
Sofia, G., Nikolopoulos, E., and Slater, L.: It's Time to Revise Estimates of River Flood Hazards, Eos, Washington DC, 101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EO141499, 2020.
Stark, C. P., Barbour, J. R., Hayakawa, Y. S., Hattanji, T., Hovius, N., Chen, H., Lin, C. W., Horng, M. J., Xu, K. Q., and Fukahata, Y.: The climatic signature of incised river meanders, Science, 327, 1497–1501, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184406, 2010.
Stefanovič, P. and Kurasova, O.: Visual analysis of self-organizing maps, Nonlinear Anal.-Model., 16, 488–504, https://doi.org/10.15388/na.16.4.14091, 2011.
Stephens, T. A. and Bledsoe, B. P.: Probabilistic mapping of flood hazards: Depicting uncertainty in streamflow, land use, and geomorphic adjustment, Anthropocene, 29, 100231, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANCENE.2019.100231, 2020.
Stephens, T. A. and Bledsoe, B. P.: Flood Protection Reliability: The Impact of Uncertainty and Nonstationarity, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2021WR031921, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031921, 2023.
Stott, T.: Review of research in fluvial geomorphology 2010–2011, Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 37, 248–258, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313477124, 2013.
Stover, S. C. and Montgomery, D. R.: Channel change and flooding, Skokomish River, Washington, J. Hydrol., 243, 272–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00421-2, 2001.
Surian, N., Righini, M., Lucía, A., Nardi, L., Amponsah, W., Benvenuti, M., Borga, M., Cavalli, M., Comiti, F., Marchi, L., Rinaldi, M., and Viero, A.: Channel response to extreme floods: Insights on controlling factors from six mountain rivers in northern Apennines, Italy, Geomorphology, 272, 78–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.002, 2016.
Swenson, L. M. and Grotjahn, R.: Using Self-Organizing Maps to Identify Coherent CONUS Precipitation Regions, J. Climate, 32, 7747–7761, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0352.1, 2019.
Székely, G. J., Rizzo, M. L., and Bakirov, N. K.: Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances, Ann. Stat., 35, 2769–2794, https://doi.org/10.1214/009053607000000505, 2007.
Tate, E.: Déjà Vu All Over Again: Trends in Flood Drivers Point to Continuing Vulnerability, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61, 50–55, https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2019.1637688, 2019.
Torres-Matallana, J. A.: Spatial Watershed Aggregation and Spatial Drainage Network Analysis, https://rdrr.io/cran/Watersheds/ (last access: 29 May 2024), 2016.
Tweel, A. W. and Turner, R. E.: Contribution of tropical cyclones to the sediment budget for coastal wetlands in Louisiana, USA, Landsc. Ecol., 29, 1083–1094, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0047-6, 2014.
Ultsch, A. and Lötsch, J.: Machine-learned cluster identification in high-dimensional data, J. Biomed. Inform., 66, 95–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.011, 2017.
U.S. Geological Survey: Historical mean daily streamflow records, https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/sw, USGS [data set], (last access: 16 July 2024), 2021a.
U.S. Geological Survey: Historical field measurements of channel properties, https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv/?referred_module=sw (last access: 16 July 2024), 2021b.
Valentine, A. and Kalnins, L.: An introduction to learning algorithms and potential applications in geomorphometry and Earth surface dynamics, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 445–460, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-445-2016, 2016.
Vesanto, J. and Alhoniemi, E.: Clustering of the self-organizing map, IEEE Trans. Neural. Net.w, 11, 586–600, https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846731, 2000.
Villarini, G. and Smith, J. A.: Flood peak distributions for the eastern United States, Water Resour. Res., 46, 6504, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008395, 2010.
Vincent, L., Vincent, L., and Soille, P.: Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations, IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell., 13, 583–598, https://doi.org/10.1109/34.87344, 1991.
Wandeto, J. M. and Dresp-Langley, B.: Reprint of: The quantization error in a Self-Organizing Map as a contrast and colour specific indicator of single-pixel change in large random patterns, Neural Networks, 120, 116–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.017, 2019.
Wang, H., Chen, X., Moss, R. H., Stanley, R. J., Stoecker, W. V., Celebi, M. E., Szalapski, T. M., Malters, J. M., Grichnik, J. M., Marghoob, A. A., Rabinovitz, H. S., and Menzies, S. W.: Watershed segmentation of dermoscopy images using a watershed technique, Skin Res. Technol., 16, 378, https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0846.2010.00445.X, 2010.
Wehrens, M. R.: Package “kohonen”, https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.kohonen, 2019.
Wehrens, R. and Buydens, L. M. C.: Self- and Super-organizing Maps in R: The kohonen Package, J. Stat. Softw., 21, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v021.i05, 2007.
Wehrens, R. and Kruisselbrink, J.: Flexible Self-Organizing Maps in kohonen 3.0, J. Stat. Softw., 87, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v087.i07, 2018.
Wei, P., Lu, Z., and Song, J.: Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 142, 399–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.018, 2015.
Wendland, W. M.: Climate changes: impacts on geomorphic processes, Eng. Geol., 45, 347–358, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(96)00021-X, 1996.
Wicherski, W., Dethier, D. P., and Ouimet, W. B.: Erosion and channel changes due to extreme flooding in the Fourmile Creek catchment, Colorado, Geomorphology, 294, 87–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.030, 2017.
Wohl, E.: Forgotten Legacies: Understanding and Mitigating Historical Human Alterations of River Corridors, Water Resour. Res., 55, 5181–5201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024433, 2019.
Wohl, E., Brierley, G., Cadol, D., Coulthard, T. J., Covino, T., Fryirs, K. A., Grant, G., Hilton, R. G., Lane, S. N., Magilligan, F. J., Meitzen, K. M., Passalacqua, P., Poeppl, R. E., Rathburn, S. L., and Sklar, L. S.: Connectivity as an emergent property of geomorphic systems, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 44, 4–26, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4434, 2019.
Woodget, A. S., Dietrich, J. T., and Wilson, R. T.: Quantifying Below-Water Fluvial Geomorphic Change: The Implications of Refraction Correction, Water Surface Elevations, and Spatially Variable Error, Remote Sens., 11, 2415, https://doi.org/10.3390/RS11202415, 2019.
Woods, R. and Sivapalan, M.: A synthesis of space-time variability in storm response: Rainfall, runoff generation, and routing, Water Resour. Res., 35, 2469–2485, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900014, 1999.
Wu, Q., Ke, L., Wang, J., Pavelsky, T. M., Allen, G. H., Sheng, Y., Duan, X., Zhu, Y., Wu, J., Wang, L., Liu, K., Chen, T., Zhang, W., Fan, C., Yong, B., and Song, C.: Satellites reveal hotspots of global river extent change, Nat. Commun., 14, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37061-3, 2023.
Wu, Y. and Li, Q.: The Algorithm of Watershed Color Image Segmentation Based on Morphological Gradient, Sensors, 22, 8202, https://doi.org/10.3390/S22218202, 2022.
Zanchetta, A. D. L. and Coulibaly, P.: Hybrid Surrogate Model for Timely Prediction of Flash Flood Inundation Maps Caused by Rapid River Overflow, Forecasting, 4, 126–148, https://doi.org/10.3390/FORECAST4010007, 2022.
Zhang, S., Guo, Y., and Wang, Z.: Correlation between flood frequency and geomorphologic complexity of rivers network – A case study of Hangzhou China, J. Hydrol., 527, 113–118, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2015.04.060, 2015.
Zhang, Y., Smith, J. A., and Baeck, M. L.: The hydrology and hydrometeorology of extreme floods in the Great Plains of Eastern Nebraska, Adv. Water Resour., 24, 1037–1049, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00037-9, 2001.
Ziervogel, G., New, M., Archer van Garderen, E., Midgley, G., Taylor, A., Hamann, R., Stuart-Hill, S., Myers, J., and Warburton, M.: Climate change impacts and adaptation in South Africa, WIRES Clim. Change, 5, 605–620, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.295, 2014.
Zischg, A. P., Hofer, P., Mosimann, M., Röthlisberger, V., Ramirez, J. A., Keiler, M., and Weingartner, R.: Flood risk (d)evolution: Disentangling key drivers of flood risk change with a retro-model experiment, Sci. Total Environ., 639, 195–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.056, 2018.
Short summary
Flooding worsens due to climate change, with river dynamics being a key in local flood control. Predicting post-storm geomorphic changes is challenging. Using self-organizing maps and machine learning, this study forecasts post-storm alterations in stage–discharge relationships across 3101 US stream gages. The provided framework can aid in updating hazard assessments by identifying rivers prone to change, integrating channel adjustments into flood hazard assessment.
Flooding worsens due to climate change, with river dynamics being a key in local flood control....
