Articles | Volume 26, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5849-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5849-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note: A sigmoidal soil water retention curve without asymptote that is robust when dry-range data are unreliable
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ GmbH, Soil System
Science Dept., Theodor-Lieser-Strasse 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
Related authors
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6921–6950, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6921-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Water flows ever more slowly in soil when the soil dries out. This can be described by the conductivity curve that accounts for water filling up small spaces, sticking to grains in films, and water vapour diffusion. This paper introduces a relatively simple model for this curve that needs one fewer parameter than most others. It works well for most soils, but some need the extra parameter. The paper also presents a computer program to determine the parameter values of this and other models.
Asha Nambiar and Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-412, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-412, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The way infiltrating water moves in soil affects vegetation as well as groundwater recharge. This flow of soil water is captured by a mathematical function that covers all water contents from very dry to water-saturated. We tested several such functions for different soils and climates to see how model-calculated water fluxes are affected. Luckily, the effects of weather and the soil are much more important than the choice of the mathematical function.
Benedikt J. Werner, Oliver J. Lechtenfeld, Andreas Musolff, Gerrit H. de Rooij, Jie Yang, Ralf Gründling, Ulrike Werban, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6067–6086, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6067-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6067-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from riparian zones (RZs) is an important yet poorly understood component of the catchment carbon budget. This study chemically and spatially classifies DOC source zones within a RZ of a small catchment to assess DOC export patterns. Results highlight that DOC export from only a small fraction of the RZ with distinct DOC composition dominates overall DOC export. The application of a spatial, topographic proxy can be used to improve DOC export models.
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij, Juliane Mai, and Raneem Madi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 983–1007, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-983-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-983-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The way soils capture infiltrating water affects crops and natural vegetation and groundwater recharge. This retention of soil water is described by a mathematical function that covers all water contents from very dry to water saturated. We combined two existing lines of research to improve the behaviour of a popular function for very dry and very wet conditions. Our new function could handle a wider range of conditions than earlier curves. We provide fits to a wide range of soils.
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6921–6950, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6921-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Water flows ever more slowly in soil when the soil dries out. This can be described by the conductivity curve that accounts for water filling up small spaces, sticking to grains in films, and water vapour diffusion. This paper introduces a relatively simple model for this curve that needs one fewer parameter than most others. It works well for most soils, but some need the extra parameter. The paper also presents a computer program to determine the parameter values of this and other models.
Asha Nambiar and Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-412, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-412, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The way infiltrating water moves in soil affects vegetation as well as groundwater recharge. This flow of soil water is captured by a mathematical function that covers all water contents from very dry to water-saturated. We tested several such functions for different soils and climates to see how model-calculated water fluxes are affected. Luckily, the effects of weather and the soil are much more important than the choice of the mathematical function.
Benedikt J. Werner, Oliver J. Lechtenfeld, Andreas Musolff, Gerrit H. de Rooij, Jie Yang, Ralf Gründling, Ulrike Werban, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6067–6086, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6067-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6067-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from riparian zones (RZs) is an important yet poorly understood component of the catchment carbon budget. This study chemically and spatially classifies DOC source zones within a RZ of a small catchment to assess DOC export patterns. Results highlight that DOC export from only a small fraction of the RZ with distinct DOC composition dominates overall DOC export. The application of a spatial, topographic proxy can be used to improve DOC export models.
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij, Juliane Mai, and Raneem Madi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 983–1007, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-983-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-983-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The way soils capture infiltrating water affects crops and natural vegetation and groundwater recharge. This retention of soil water is described by a mathematical function that covers all water contents from very dry to water saturated. We combined two existing lines of research to improve the behaviour of a popular function for very dry and very wet conditions. Our new function could handle a wider range of conditions than earlier curves. We provide fits to a wide range of soils.
Cited articles
Assouline, S. and Or, D.: Conceptual and parametric representation of soil
hydraulic properties: a review, Vadose Zone J., 12, 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2013.07.0121, 2013.
Bittelli, M. and Flury, M.: Errors in water retention curves determined
with pressure plates, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 73, 1453–1460,
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0082, 2009.
Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T.: Hydraulic properties of porous media,
Colorado State University, Hydrology Paper No. 3, 27 pp., 1964.
Davis, J. L. and Annan, A. P.: Ground penetrating radar to measure soil
water content, in: Methods of soil analysis. Part 4 – Physical methods,
edited by: Dane, J. H. and Topp, G. C., Soil Science Society of America,
Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4, 446–463, 2002.
Dettmann, U., SoilHyp: Soil Hydraulic Properties,
https://rdrr.io/cran/SoilHyP/ (last access: 1 April 2022), 2021.
de Rooij, G.: Fitting the parameters of the RIA parameterization of the soil
water retention curve (1.1), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7271284, 2022.
de Rooij, G. H., Mai, J., and Madi, R.: Sigmoidal water retention function with improved behaviour in dry and wet soils, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 983–1007, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-983-2021, 2021.
Du, C.: Comparison of the performance of 22 models describing soil water
retention curves from saturation to oven dryness, Vadose Zone J., 19,
e20072, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20072, 2020.
Duan, Q. Y., Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S.: Shuffled complex evolution
approach for effective and efficient global minimization, J.
Opti. Theory Appl., 76, 501–521, 1993.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Effective and efficient global
optimization for conceptual rainfall–runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 28,
1015–1031, 1992.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Optimal use of the SCE–UA global
optimization method for calibrating watershed models, J. Hydrol., 158,
265–284, 1994.
Durner, W.: Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous
pore structure, Water Resour. Res., 30, 211–223, 1994.
Ferré, P. A. and Topp, G. C.: Time domain reflectometry, in: Methods of
soil analysis. Part 4 – Physical methods, edited by: Dane, J. H. and Topp,
G. C., Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA,
434–446, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4, 2002.
Fuentes, C., Haverkamp, R., Parlange, J.-Y., Brutsaert, W., Zayani, K.,
and Vachaud, G.: Constraints on parameters in three soil–water capillary
retention functions, Trans. Porous Media, 6, 445–449, 1991.
Ippisch, O., Vogel, H.-J., and Bastian, P.: Validity limits for the van
Genuchten–Mualem model and implications for parameter estimation and
numerical simulation, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 1780–1789,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.12.011, 2006.
Lawrence, D. M., Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Oleson, K. W., Swenson, S. C., Bonan, G., Collier, N., Ghimire, B., van Kampenhout, L., Kennedy, D., Kluzek, E., Lawrence, P. J., Li, F., Li, H., Lombardozzi, D., Riley, W. J., Sacks, W. J., Shi, M., Vertenstein, M., Wieder, W. R., Xu, C., Ali, A. A., Badger, A. M., Bisht, G., van den Broeke, M., Brunke, M. A., Burns, S. P., Buzan, J., Clark, M., Craig, A., Dahlin, K., Drewniak, B., Fisher, J. B., Flanner, M., Fox, A. M., Gentine, P., Hoffman, F., Keppel-Aleks, G., Knox, R., Kumar, S., Lenaerts, J., Leung, L. R., Lipscomb, W. H., Lu, Y., Pandey, A., Pelletier, J. D., Perket, J., Randerson, J. T., Ricciuto, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., Slater, A., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J., Thomas, R. Q., Val Martin, M., and Zeng, X.: The Community Land Model version 5: Description of new
features, benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 4245–4287,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583, 2019.
Madi, R., de Rooij, G. H., Mielenz, H., and Mai, J.: Parametric soil water retention models: a critical evaluation of expressions for the full moisture range, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1193–1219, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1193-2018, 2018.
National Agricultural Library: UNSODA Database, USDA [data set],
https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/unsoda-20-unsaturated-soil (last access: 22 July 2020), 2015.
Nemes, A., Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., and Wösten, J. H. M.: Description
of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0, J. Hydrol.,
251, 152–162, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00465-6, 2001.
Or, D. and Tuller, M.: Liquid retention and interfacial area in variably
saturated porous media: Upscaling from single–pore to sample–scale model,
Water Resour. Res., 35, 3591–3605, 1999.
Rossi, C., and Nimmo, J. R.: Modeling of soil water retention from
saturation to oven dryness, Water Resour. Res., 30, 701–708, 1994.
Schneider, M. and Goss, K.-U.: Prediction of the water sorption term in
air dry soils, Geoderma, 170, 64–69,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.008, 2012.
Šimůnek, J., van Genuchten, M. Th., and Šejna, M.: Recent
developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages,
Vadose Zone J., 15, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033,
2016.
Solone, R., Bittelli, M., Tomei, F., and Morari, F.: Errors in water
retention curves determined with pressure plates: Effects on the soil water
balance, J. Hydrol., 470–471, 65–74,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.017, 2012.
SWAP Soil Water Atmosphere Plant, https://www.swap.alterra.nl/, last access:
10 August 2022.
Tuller, M. and Or, D.: Water films and scaling of soil characteristic
curves at low water contents, Water Resour. Res., 41, W09403,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004142, 2005.
Twarakavi, N. K. C., Šimůnek, J., and Schaap, M. G.: Can
texture–based classification optimally classify soils with respect to soil
hydraulics?, Water Resour. Res., 46, W01501,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007939, 2010.
van Genuchten, M. Th.: A closed–form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity for unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898,
1980.
Wang, Y., Ma, R., and Zhu, G.: Improved prediction of hydraulic conductivity
with a soil water retention curve that accounts for both capillary and
adsorption forces, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR031297,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031297, 2022.
Short summary
The way soils capture infiltrating water affects crops and natural vegetation as well as groundwater recharge. This retention of soil water is captured by a mathematical function that covers all water contents from very dry to water-saturated. Unfortunately, data in the dry range are often absent or unreliable. I modified an earlier function to be more robust in the absence of dry-range data, and present a computer program to estimate the parameters of the new function.
The way soils capture infiltrating water affects crops and natural vegetation as well as...