Articles | Volume 26, issue 17
Technical note
14 Sep 2022
Technical note |  | 14 Sep 2022

Technical note: Do different projections matter for the Budyko framework?

Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski


Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hess-2022-134', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 May 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Remko C. Nijzink, 19 May 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on hess-2022-134', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 May 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Remko C. Nijzink, 31 May 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (27 Jun 2022) by Adriaan J. (Ryan) Teuling
AR by Remko C. Nijzink on behalf of the Authors (12 Jul 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (29 Jul 2022) by Adriaan J. (Ryan) Teuling
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (10 Aug 2022)
ED: Publish as is (20 Aug 2022) by Adriaan J. (Ryan) Teuling
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for the estimation of the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. The Budyko curve can be defined as a function of a wetness index or a dryness index. We found that differences can occur and that there is an uncertainty due to the different formulations.