Articles | Volume 26, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022
Technical note
 | 
14 Sep 2022
Technical note |  | 14 Sep 2022

Technical note: Do different projections matter for the Budyko framework?

Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski

Viewed

Total article views: 2,962 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,164 709 89 2,962 201 89 115
  • HTML: 2,164
  • PDF: 709
  • XML: 89
  • Total: 2,962
  • Supplement: 201
  • BibTeX: 89
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Apr 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Apr 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,962 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,875 with geography defined and 87 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 07 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for the estimation of the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. The Budyko curve can be defined as a function of a wetness index or a dryness index. We found that differences can occur and that there is an uncertainty due to the different formulations.
Share