Articles | Volume 26, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022
Technical note
 | 
14 Sep 2022
Technical note |  | 14 Sep 2022

Technical note: Do different projections matter for the Budyko framework?

Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski

Viewed

Total article views: 3,927 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,849 956 122 3,927 279 129 167
  • HTML: 2,849
  • PDF: 956
  • XML: 122
  • Total: 3,927
  • Supplement: 279
  • BibTeX: 129
  • EndNote: 167
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Apr 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Apr 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,927 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,787 with geography defined and 140 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 09 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for the estimation of the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. The Budyko curve can be defined as a function of a wetness index or a dryness index. We found that differences can occur and that there is an uncertainty due to the different formulations.
Share