Articles | Volume 26, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4279-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4279-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An algorithm for deriving the topology of belowground urban stormwater networks
Taher Chegini
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, 4226 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX 77204, USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, 4226 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Houston, TX 77204, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Donghui Xu, Chang Liao, Gautam Bisht, James J. Benedict, Tian Zhou, Mithun Deb, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3619–3639, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3619-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3619-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study explores how riverine and coastal flooding during hurricanes is influenced by the interaction of atmosphere, land, river, and ocean conditions. Using an advanced Earth system model, we simulate Hurricane Irene to evaluate how meteorological and hydrological uncertainties affect flood modeling. Our findings reveal the importance of a multi-component modeling system, how hydrological conditions play critical roles in flood modeling, and greater flood risks if multiple factors are present.
Lingbo Li, Hong-Yi Li, Guta Abeshu, Jinyun Tang, L. Ruby Leung, Chang Liao, Zeli Tan, Hanqin Tian, Peter Thornton, and Xiaojuan Yang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2713–2733, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2713-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2713-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed new maps that reveal how organic carbon from soil leaches into headwater streams over the contiguous United States. We use advanced artificial intelligence techniques and a massive amount of data, including observations at over 2500 gauges and a wealth of climate and environmental information. The maps are a critical step in understanding and predicting how carbon moves through our environment, hence making them a useful tool for tackling climate challenges.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Hong-Yi Li, Mingjie Shi, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1847–1864, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1847-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1847-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examined how water availability, climate dryness, and plant productivity interact at the catchment scale. Using various indices and statistical methods, we found a 0–2-month lag in these interactions. Strong correlations during peak-productivity months were observed, with a notable hysteresis effect in vegetation response to changes in water availability and climate dryness. The findings help better understand catchment responses to climate variability.
Mengqi Zhao, Thomas B. Wild, Neal T. Graham, Son H. Kim, Matthew Binsted, A. F. M. Kamal Chowdhury, Siwa Msangi, Pralit L. Patel, Chris R. Vernon, Hassan Niazi, Hong-Yi Li, and Guta W. Abeshu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5587–5617, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5587-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5587-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) simulates the world’s climate–land–energy–water system interactions , but its reservoir representation is limited. We developed the GLObal Reservoir Yield (GLORY) model to provide GCAM with information on the cost of supplying water based on reservoir construction costs, climate and demand conditions, and reservoir expansion potential. GLORY enhances our understanding of future reservoir capacity needs to meet human demands in a changing climate.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Zeli Tan, Chang Liao, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1197–1215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to disentangle the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in a fully coupled earth system model. We found that calibrating only one process (i.e., traditional calibration procedure) will result in unrealistic parameter values and poor performance of the water cycle, while the simulated streamflow is improved. To address this issue, we further proposed a two-step calibration procedure to reconcile the impacts from hydrological and hydraulic processes on streamflow.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Fuqiang Tian, Thomas Wild, Mengqi Zhao, Sean Turner, A. F. M. Kamal Chowdhury, Chris R. Vernon, Hongchang Hu, Yuan Zhuang, Mohamad Hejazi, and Hong-Yi Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5449–5472, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5449-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Most existing global hydrologic models do not explicitly represent hydropower reservoirs. We are introducing a new water management module to Xanthos that distinguishes between the operational characteristics of irrigation, hydropower, and flood control reservoirs. We show that this explicit representation of hydropower reservoirs can lead to a significantly more realistic simulation of reservoir storage and releases in over 44 % of the hydropower reservoirs included in this study.
Qi Tang, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Luke P. Van Roekel, Mark A. Taylor, Wuyin Lin, Benjamin R. Hillman, Paul A. Ullrich, Andrew M. Bradley, Oksana Guba, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Tian Zhou, Kai Zhang, Xue Zheng, Yunyan Zhang, Meng Zhang, Mingxuan Wu, Hailong Wang, Cheng Tao, Balwinder Singh, Alan M. Rhoades, Yi Qin, Hong-Yi Li, Yan Feng, Yuying Zhang, Chengzhu Zhang, Charles S. Zender, Shaocheng Xie, Erika L. Roesler, Andrew F. Roberts, Azamat Mametjanov, Mathew E. Maltrud, Noel D. Keen, Robert L. Jacob, Christiane Jablonowski, Owen K. Hughes, Ryan M. Forsyth, Alan V. Di Vittorio, Peter M. Caldwell, Gautam Bisht, Renata B. McCoy, L. Ruby Leung, and David C. Bader
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3953–3995, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3953-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3953-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution simulations are superior to low-resolution ones in capturing regional climate changes and climate extremes. However, uniformly reducing the grid size of a global Earth system model is too computationally expensive. We provide an overview of the fully coupled regionally refined model (RRM) of E3SMv2 and document a first-of-its-kind set of climate production simulations using RRM at an economic cost. The key to this success is our innovative hybrid time step method.
Heidi Kreibich, Kai Schröter, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Anne F. Van Loon, Maurizio Mazzoleni, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Svetlana Agafonova, Amir AghaKouchak, Hafzullah Aksoy, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Blanca Aznar, Laila Balkhi, Marlies H. Barendrecht, Sylvain Biancamaria, Liduin Bos-Burgering, Chris Bradley, Yus Budiyono, Wouter Buytaert, Lucinda Capewell, Hayley Carlson, Yonca Cavus, Anaïs Couasnon, Gemma Coxon, Ioannis Daliakopoulos, Marleen C. de Ruiter, Claire Delus, Mathilde Erfurt, Giuseppe Esposito, Didier François, Frédéric Frappart, Jim Freer, Natalia Frolova, Animesh K. Gain, Manolis Grillakis, Jordi Oriol Grima, Diego A. Guzmán, Laurie S. Huning, Monica Ionita, Maxim Kharlamov, Dao Nguyen Khoi, Natalie Kieboom, Maria Kireeva, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Waldo Lavado-Casimiro, Hong-Yi Li, Maria Carmen LLasat, David Macdonald, Johanna Mård, Hannah Mathew-Richards, Andrew McKenzie, Alfonso Mejia, Eduardo Mario Mendiondo, Marjolein Mens, Shifteh Mobini, Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Viorica Nagavciuc, Thanh Ngo-Duc, Huynh Thi Thao Nguyen, Pham Thi Thao Nhi, Olga Petrucci, Nguyen Hong Quan, Pere Quintana-Seguí, Saman Razavi, Elena Ridolfi, Jannik Riegel, Md Shibly Sadik, Nivedita Sairam, Elisa Savelli, Alexey Sazonov, Sanjib Sharma, Johanna Sörensen, Felipe Augusto Arguello Souza, Kerstin Stahl, Max Steinhausen, Michael Stoelzle, Wiwiana Szalińska, Qiuhong Tang, Fuqiang Tian, Tamara Tokarczyk, Carolina Tovar, Thi Van Thu Tran, Marjolein H. J. van Huijgevoort, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Sergiy Vorogushyn, Thorsten Wagener, Yueling Wang, Doris E. Wendt, Elliot Wickham, Long Yang, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, and Philip J. Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2009–2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As the adverse impacts of hydrological extremes increase in many regions of the world, a better understanding of the drivers of changes in risk and impacts is essential for effective flood and drought risk management. We present a dataset containing data of paired events, i.e. two floods or two droughts that occurred in the same area. The dataset enables comparative analyses and allows detailed context-specific assessments. Additionally, it supports the testing of socio-hydrological models.
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Chang Liao, Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5473–5491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5473-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5473-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea level rise, storm surge and river discharge can cause coastal backwater effects in downstream sections of rivers, creating critical flood risks. This study simulates the backwater effects using a large-scale river model on a coastal-refined computational mesh. By decomposing the backwater drivers, we revealed their relative importance and long-term variations. Our analysis highlights the increasing strength of backwater effects due to sea level rise and more frequent storm surge.
Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Hong-Yi Li, Zhenduo Zhu, Zeli Tan, and L. Ruby Leung
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 929–942, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-929-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-929-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Existing riverbed sediment particle size data are sparsely available at individual sites. We develop a continuous map of median riverbed sediment particle size over the contiguous US corresponding to millions of river segments based on the existing observations and machine learning methods. This map is useful for research in large-scale river sediment using model- and data-driven approaches, teaching environmental and earth system sciences, planning and managing floodplain zones, etc.
Hong-Yi Li, Zeli Tan, Hongbo Ma, Zhenduo Zhu, Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Senlin Zhu, Sagy Cohen, Tian Zhou, Donghui Xu, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 665–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-665-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-665-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a new multi-process river sediment module for Earth system models. Application and validation over the contiguous US indicate a satisfactory model performance over large river systems, including those heavily regulated by reservoirs. This new sediment module enables future modeling of the transportation and transformation of carbon and nutrients carried by the fine sediment along the river–ocean continuum to close the global carbon and nutrient cycles.
Cited articles
Ajaaj, A. A., Mishra, A. K., and Khan, A. A.: Urban and peri-urban
precipitation and air temperature trends in mega cities of the world using
multiple trend analysis methods, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 132,
403–418, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2096-7, 2017. a
Boeing, G.: OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and
visualizing complex street networks,
Comput. Environ. Urban, 65, 126–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004, 2017. a
Brandes, U.: A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality,
J. Math. Sociol., 25, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.2001.9990249,
2001. a
Chegini, T., Li, H.-Y., and Leung, L. R.: HyRiver: Hydroclimate Data
Retriever, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3175,
https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03175, 2021. a, b, c
Chow, V. T.: Open-channel Hydraulics, Civil Engineering Series,
McGraw-Hill, https://books.google.com/books?id=OwZSAAAAMAAJ (last access: 19 August 2022),
1959. a
City of Houston: The Public Works GIS (GIMS), Houston Public Works [data set], http://www.gims.houstontx.gov/portalWS/MainPortal.aspx (last access: 17 February 2022), 2021. a
Cuo, L., Lettenmaier, D. P., Mattheussen, B. V., Storck, P., and Wiley, M.:
Hydrologic prediction for urban watersheds with the Distributed
Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model, Hydrol. Process., 22, 4205–4213,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7023, 2008. a
Dewitz, J. and U.S. Geological Survey: National Land Cover Database (NLCD)
2019 Products (ver. 2.0, June 2021),
https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KZCM54, 2021. a, b
EPA: Office of Wastewater Management, Water Permits Division: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permits: Compendium of Clean Specific and Measurable Permitting Examples, National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP), Publication No. 830S16002, 2018. a
Fraga, I., Cea, L., Puertas, J., Suárez, J., Jiménez, V., and
Jácome, A.: Global Sensitivity and GLUE-Based Uncertainty Analysis of
a 2D-1D Dual Urban Drainage Model, J. Hydrol. Eng., 21, 04016004,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001335, 2016. a
Freeman, L. C.: A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness,
Sociometry, 40, 35, https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543, 1977. a
Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., and Moore,
R.: Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone,
Remote Sens. Environ., 202, 18–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031, 2017. a
Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A., and Swart, P. J.: Exploring Network Structure,
Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX, in: Proceedings of the 7th Python in
Science Conference, edited by: Varoquaux, G., Vaught, T., and Millman, J.,
11–15, Pasadena, CA USA, 19–24 August 2008. a
Hettiarachchi, S., Wasko, C., and Sharma, A.: Increase in flood risk resulting from climate change in a developed urban watershed – the role of storm temporal patterns, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2041–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2041-2018, 2018. a
Huang, D., Liu, X., Jiang, S., Wang, H., Wang, J., and Zhang, Y.: Current state
and future perspectives of sewer networks in urban China,
Front. Env. Sci. Eng., 12, 2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1023-1, 2018. a
Jenks, G.: Optimal Data Classification For Choropleth Maps, Occasional paper,
University of Kansas,
https://books.google.com/books?id=HvAENQAACAAJ (last access: 19 August 2022), 1977. a
Kim, S. E., Seo, Y., Hwang, J., Yoon, H., and Lee, J.: Connectivity-informed
drainage network generation using deep convolution generative adversarial
networks, Sci. Rep., 11, 1519, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80300-6, 2021. a
Kirkley, A., Barbosa, H., Barthelemy, M., and Ghoshal, G.: From the betweenness
centrality in street networks to structural invariants in random planar
graphs, Nat. Commun., 9, 2501, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04978-z, 2018. a, b, c
Mannina, G. and Viviani, G.: Separate and combined sewer systems: a long-term
modelling approach, Water Sci. Technol., 60, 555–565,
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.376, 2009. a
Meyers, S. D., Landry, S., Beck, M. W., and Luther, M. E.: Using logistic
regression to model the risk of sewer overflows triggered by compound
flooding with application to sea level rise, Urban Climate, 35, 100752,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100752, 2021. a
Nanía, L. S., León, A. S., and García, M. H.:
Hydrologic-Hydraulic Model for Simulating Dual Drainage and Flooding in Urban
Areas: Application to a Catchment in the Metropolitan Area of Chicago,
J. Hydrol. Eng., 20, 04014071,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001080, 2015. a
Naves, J., Anta, J., Puertas, J., Regueiro-Picallo, M., and Suárez, J.:
Using a 2D shallow water model to assess Large-Scale Particle Image
Velocimetry (LSPIV) and Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques in a
street-scale urban drainage physical model, J. Hydrol., 575,
54–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.003, 2019. a
Ntelekos, A. A., Oppenheimer, M., Smith, J. A., and Miller, A. J.:
Urbanization, climate change and flood policy in the United States, Climatic
Change, 103, 597–616, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9789-6, 2010. a
Pang, X., Gu, Y., Launiainen, S., and Guan, M.: Urban hydrological responses to
climate change and urbanization in cold climates, Sci. Total Environ., 817, 153066, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153066, 2022. a
Qian, Y., Chakraborty, T. C., Li, J., Li, D., He, C., Sarangi, C., Chen, F.,
Yang, X., and Leung, L. R.: Urbanization Impact on Regional Climate and
Extreme Weather: Current Understanding, Uncertainties, and Future Research
Directions, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 819–860, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1371-9, 2022. a, b
Rafee, S. A. A., Uvo, C. B., Martins, J. A., Domingues, L. M., Rudke, A. P.,
Fujita, T., and Freitas, E. D.: Large-Scale Hydrological Modelling of the
Upper Paraná River Basin, Water, 11, 882, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050882,
2019. a
Rosenberger, L., Leandro, J., Pauleit, S., and Erlwein, S.: Sustainable
stormwater management under the impact of climate change and urban
densification, J. Hydrol., 596, 126137,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126137, 2021. a
Rossman, L. A. and Simon, M.: Storm Water Management Model User's Manual
Version 5.2, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of
Research and Development, 2022. a
Schreider, S. Y., Smith, D. I., and Jakeman, A. J.: Climate Change Impacts on
Urban Flooding, Clim. Change, 47, 91–115, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005621523177,
2000. a
Seo, Y. and Schmidt, A. R.: Application of Gibbs' model to urban drainage
networks: a case study in southwestern Chicago, USA, Hydrol. Process.,
28, 1148–1158, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9657, 2014. a
Staudt, C. L., Sazonovs, A., and Meyerhenke, H.: NetworKit: A Tool Suite for
Large-scale Complex Network Analysis, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1403.3005, 2015. a
Strogatz, S. H.: Exploring complex networks, Nature, 410, 268–276,
https://doi.org/10.1038/35065725, 2001. a
Teuling, A. J., de Badts, E. A. G., Jansen, F. A., Fuchs, R., Buitink, J., Hoek van Dijke, A. J., and Sterling, S. M.: Climate change, reforestation/afforestation, and urbanization impacts on evapotranspiration and streamflow in Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3631–3652, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3631-2019, 2019. a
Thomason, C. P.: Hydraulic Design Manual, Texas Department of
Transportation, 2019. a
Town of Gilbert, AZ:
https://www.gilbertaz.gov/departments/public-works/environmental-compliance/stormwater,
last access: 12 June 2022. a
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: World Urbanization Prospects 2018: Highlights, United Nations, ISBN 9789210043137, 2019. a
Yang, G., Bowling, L. C., Cherkauer, K. A., and Pijanowski, B. C.: The impact
of urban development on hydrologic regime from catchment to basin scales,
Landscape Urban Plan., 103, 237–247,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.08.003, 2011.
a, b
Yang, L., Smith, J. A., Wright, D. B., Baeck, M. L., Villarini, G., Tian, F.,
and Hu, H.: Urbanization and Climate Change: An Examination of
Nonstationarities in Urban Flooding, J. Hydrometeorol., 14,
1791–1809, https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-12-095.1, 2013. a
© OpenStreetMap contributors:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features:highway,
last access: 3 April 2022. a
Short summary
Belowground urban stormwater networks (BUSNs) play a critical and irreplaceable role in preventing or mitigating urban floods. However, they are often not available for urban flood modeling at regional or larger scales. We develop a novel algorithm to estimate existing BUSNs using ubiquitously available aboveground data at large scales based on graph theory. The algorithm has been validated in different urban areas; thus, it is well transferable.
Belowground urban stormwater networks (BUSNs) play a critical and irreplaceable role in...