Articles | Volume 26, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022
Research article
 | 
03 May 2022
Research article |  | 03 May 2022

Impact of bias nonstationarity on the performance of uni- and multivariate bias-adjusting methods: a case study on data from Uccle, Belgium

Jorn Van de Velde, Matthias Demuzere, Bernard De Baets, and Niko E. C. Verhoest

Viewed

Total article views: 3,053 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,307 687 59 3,053 80 65
  • HTML: 2,307
  • PDF: 687
  • XML: 59
  • Total: 3,053
  • BibTeX: 80
  • EndNote: 65
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Dec 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Dec 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,053 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,845 with geography defined and 208 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
An important step in projecting future climate is the bias adjustment of the climatological and hydrological variables. In this paper, we illustrate how bias adjustment can be impaired by bias nonstationarity. Two univariate and four multivariate methods are compared, and for both types bias nonstationarity can be linked with less robust adjustment.