Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 26, issue 9
Articles | Volume 26, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 26, issue 9
Research article
 | 
03 May 2022
Research article |  | 03 May 2022

Impact of bias nonstationarity on the performance of uni- and multivariate bias-adjusting methods: a case study on data from Uccle, Belgium

Jorn Van de Velde, Matthias Demuzere, Bernard De Baets, and Niko E. C. Verhoest

Viewed

Total article views: 3,886 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,922 878 86 3,886 120 127
  • HTML: 2,922
  • PDF: 878
  • XML: 86
  • Total: 3,886
  • BibTeX: 120
  • EndNote: 127
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Dec 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Dec 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,886 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,667 with geography defined and 219 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
An important step in projecting future climate is the bias adjustment of the climatological and hydrological variables. In this paper, we illustrate how bias adjustment can be impaired by bias nonstationarity. Two univariate and four multivariate methods are compared, and for both types bias nonstationarity can be linked with less robust adjustment.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Understanding compound weather and climate events and related...