Articles | Volume 25, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-603-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Comparative analysis of kernel-based versus ANN and deep learning methods in monthly reference evapotranspiration estimation
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 10 Feb 2021)
- Preprint (discussion started on 22 Jul 2020)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
SC1: 'Referee comment', Hatice Çıtakoğlu, 11 Aug 2020
- AC1: 'Response', MohammadTaghi Sattari, 26 Sep 2020
-
RC1: 'reviewer opinion', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Aug 2020
- AC2: 'Response', MohammadTaghi Sattari, 26 Sep 2020
- AC3: 'Response about completed issues', MohammadTaghi Sattari, 07 Nov 2020
- AC5: 'Response about completed issues', MohammadTaghi Sattari, 07 Nov 2020
-
RC2: 'Comments and Suggestions for Authors', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Sep 2020
- AC4: 'Response about completed issues', MohammadTaghi Sattari, 07 Nov 2020
- EC1: 'Editor's comment', Dimitri Solomatine, 19 Nov 2020
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (19 Nov 2020) by Dimitri Solomatine
AR by MohammadTaghi Sattari on behalf of the Authors (14 Dec 2020)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (15 Dec 2020) by Dimitri Solomatine
RR by Hatice Çıtakoğlu (20 Dec 2020)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (22 Dec 2020) by Dimitri Solomatine
AR by MohammadTaghi Sattari on behalf of the Authors (30 Dec 2020)
Author's response
Manuscript