Articles | Volume 24, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5859-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5859-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
08 Dec 2020
Research article |
| 08 Dec 2020
| 08 Dec 2020
A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
Tian Lan
School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047 Blindern,
0316 Oslo, Norway
Kairong Lin
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Oceanic Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen
University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519000, China
Chong-Yu Xu
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047 Blindern,
0316 Oslo, Norway
Zhiyong Liu
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Oceanic Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen
University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519000, China
Huayang Cai
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519000, China
Related authors
No articles found.
Zitong Jia, Shouzhi Chen, Yongshuo H. Fu, David Martín Belda, David Wårlind, Stefan Olin, Chongyu Xu, and Jing Tang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4064, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4064, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater sustains vegetation and regulates land-atmosphere exchanges, but most Earth system models oversimplify its movement. Our study develops an integrated framework coupling LPJ-GUESS with the 3D hydrological model ParFlow to explicitly represent groundwater-vegetation interactions. Our results add to the evidence that three-dimensional groundwater flow strongly regulates water exchanges, and provides a powerful tool to improve simulations of water cycles in Earth system models.
Kun Xie, Lu Li, Hua Chen, Stephanie Mayer, Andreas Dobler, Chong-Yu Xu, and Ozan Mert Göktürk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2133–2152, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2133-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We compared hourly and daily extreme precipitation across Norway from HARMONIE Climate models at convection-permitting 3 km (HCLIM3) and 12 km (HCLIM12) resolutions. HCLIM3 more accurately captures the extremes in most regions and seasons (except in summer). Its advantages are more pronounced for hourly extremes than for daily extremes. The results highlight the value of convection-permitting models in improving extreme-precipitation predictions and in helping the local society brace for extreme weather.
Qiumei Ma, Chengyu Xie, Zheng Duan, Yanke Zhang, Lihua Xiong, and Chong-Yu Xu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-679, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-679, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a method to estimate the reservoir WLS curve based on the capacity loss induced by sediment accumulation and further assess the potential negative impact caused by outdated design WLS curve on flood regulation risks. The findings highlight that when storage capacity is considerably reduced, continued use of the existing design WLS curve may significantly underestimate, thus posing potential safety hazards to the reservoir itself and downstream flood protection objects.
Tian Lan, Tongfang Li, Hongbo Zhang, Jiefeng Wu, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 903–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops an integrated framework based on the novel Driving index for changes in Precipitation–Runoff Relationships (DPRR) to explore the controlling changes in precipitation–runoff relationships in non-stationary environments. According to the quantitative results of the candidate driving factors, the possible process explanations for changes in the precipitation–runoff relationships are deduced. The main contribution offers a comprehensive understanding of hydrological processes.
Tian Lan, Xiao Wang, Hongbo Zhang, Xinghui Gong, Xue Xie, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-384, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-384, 2025
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological models are vital for water management but often fail to predict water flow in dynamic catchments due to model simplification. This study tackles it by developing an optimized calibration framework that considers dynamic catchment characteristics. To overcome potential difficulties, multiple schemes were tested on over 200 U.S. catchments. The results enhanced our understanding of simulation in dynamic catchments and provided a practical solution for improving future forecasting.
Zhen Cui, Shenglian Guo, Hua Chen, Dedi Liu, Yanlai Zhou, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2809–2829, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble forecasting facilitates reliable flood forecasting and warning. This study couples the copula-based hydrologic uncertainty processor (CHUP) with Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and proposes the novel CHUP-BMA method of reducing inflow forecasting uncertainty of the Three Gorges Reservoir. The CHUP-BMA avoids the normal distribution assumption in the HUP-BMA and considers the constraint of initial conditions, which can improve the deterministic and probabilistic forecast performance.
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Abhishek, Jiabo Yin, Chongyu Xu, Jun Wang, and Jing Guo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1873–1895, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1873-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1873-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Temporal variability and spatial heterogeneity of climate systems challenge accurate estimation of probable maximum precipitation (PMP) in China. We use high-resolution precipitation data and climate models to explore the variability, trends, and shifts of PMP under climate change. Validated with multi-source estimations, our observations and simulations show significant spatiotemporal divergence of PMP over the country, which is projected to amplify in future due to land–atmosphere coupling.
Danielle M. Barna, Kolbjørn Engeland, Thomas Kneib, Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir, and Chong-Yu Xu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2335, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2335, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating flood quantiles at data-scarce sites often involves single-duration regression models. However, floodplain management and reservoir design, for example, need estimates at several durations, posing challenges. Our flexible generalized additive model (GAM) enhances accuracy and explanation, revealing that single-duration models may underperform elsewhere, emphasizing the need for adaptable approaches.
Pengxiang Wang, Zuhao Zhou, Jiajia Liu, Chongyu Xu, Kang Wang, Yangli Liu, Jia Li, Yuqing Li, Yangwen Jia, and Hao Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2681–2701, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2681-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2681-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Considering the impact of the special geological and climatic conditions of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau on the hydrological cycle, this study established the WEP-QTP hydrological model. The snow cover and gravel layers affected the temporal and spatial changes in frozen soil and improved the regulation of groundwater on the flow process. Ignoring he influence of special underlying surface conditions has a great impact on the hydrological forecast and water resource utilization in this area.
Huayang Cai, Bo Li, Junhao Gu, Tongtiegang Zhao, and Erwan Garel
Ocean Sci., 19, 603–614, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-603-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-603-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
For many problems concerning water resource utilization in estuaries, it is essential to be able to express observed salinity distributions based on simple theoretical models. In this study, we propose an analytical salt intrusion model inspired from a theory for predictions of flood hydrographs in watersheds. The newly developed model can be well calibrated using a minimum of three salinity measurements along the estuary and has been successfully applied in 21 estuaries worldwide.
Huayang Cai, Hao Yang, Pascal Matte, Haidong Pan, Zhan Hu, Tongtiegang Zhao, and Guangliang Liu
Ocean Sci., 18, 1691–1702, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1691-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1691-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Quantifying spatial–temporal water level dynamics is essential for water resources management in estuaries. In this study, we propose a simple yet powerful regression model to examine the influence of the world’s largest dam, the Three Gorges Dam (TGD), on the spatial–temporal water level dynamics within the Yangtze River estuary. The presented method is particularly useful for determining scientific strategies for sustainable water resources management in dam-controlled estuaries worldwide.
Shanlin Tong, Weiguang Wang, Jie Chen, Chong-Yu Xu, Hisashi Sato, and Guoqing Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7075–7098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7075-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7075-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Plant carbon storage potential is central to moderate atmospheric CO2 concentration buildup and mitigation of climate change. There is an ongoing debate about the main driver of carbon storage. To reconcile this discrepancy, we use SEIB-DGVM to investigate the trend and response mechanism of carbon stock fractions among water limitation regions. Results show that the impact of CO2 and temperature on carbon stock depends on water limitation, offering a new perspective on carbon–water coupling.
Tongtiegang Zhao, Haoling Chen, Yu Tian, Denghua Yan, Weixin Xu, Huayang Cai, Jiabiao Wang, and Xiaohong Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4233–4249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4233-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4233-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper develops a novel set operations of coefficients of determination (SOCD) method to explicitly quantify the overlapping and differing information for GCM forecasts and ENSO teleconnection. Specifically, the intersection operation of the coefficient of determination derives the overlapping information for GCM forecasts and the Niño3.4 index, and then the difference operation determines the differing information in GCM forecasts (Niño3.4 index) from the Niño3.4 index (GCM forecasts).
Erwan Garel, Ping Zhang, and Huayang Cai
Ocean Sci., 17, 1605–1621, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1605-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1605-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding tidal hydrodynamics is essential for water resources management in estuarine environments. In this study, we propose an analytical model to examine the fortnightly water level variations due to tidal motions alone in tide-dominated estuaries. Details of the analytical model show that changes in the mean depth or length of semi-arid estuaries affect the fortnightly tide amplitude, which has significant potential impacts on the estuarine ecosystem management.
Pengxiang Wang, Zuhao Zhou, Jiajia Liu, Chongyu Xu, Kang Wang, Yangli Liu, Jia Li, Yuqing Li, Yangwen Jia, and Hao Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-538, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Combining the geological characteristics of the thin soil layer on the thick gravel layer and the climate characteristics of the long-term snow cover of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the WEP-QTP hydrological model was constructed by dividing a single soil structure into soil and gravel. In contrast to the general cold area, the special environment of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau affects the hydrothermal transport process, which can not be ignored in hydrological forecast and water resource assessment.
Qifen Yuan, Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir, Stein Beldring, Wai Kwok Wong, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5259–5275, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5259-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5259-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Localized impacts of changing precipitation patterns on surface hydrology are often assessed at a high spatial resolution. Here we introduce a stochastic method that efficiently generates gridded daily precipitation in a future climate. The method works out a stochastic model that can describe a high-resolution data product in a reference period and form a realistic precipitation generator under a projected future climate. A case study of nine catchments in Norway shows that it works well.
Leicheng Guo, Chunyan Zhu, Huayang Cai, Zheng Bing Wang, Ian Townend, and Qing He
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-75, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-75, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Overtide is a shallow water tidal component and its interaction with astronomical tides induces tidal wave deformation, which is an important process that controls sediment transport. We use a numerical tidal model to examine overtide changes in estuaries under varying river discharges and find spatially nonlinear changes and the threshold of an intermediate river that benefits maximal overtide generation. The findings inform management of sediment transport and flooding risk in estuaries.
Cited articles
Arora, S. and Singh, S.: The firefly optimization algorithm: convergence
analysis and parameter selection, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 69, 48–52, https://doi.org/10.5120/11826-7528, 2013.
Arsenault, R., Poulin, A., Côté, P., and Brissette, F.: Comparison
of Stochastic Optimization Algorithms in Hydrological Model Calibration, J.
Hydrol. Eng., 19, 1374–1384, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000938, 2014.
Bárdossy, A.: Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 703–710, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-703-2007, 2007.
Beven, K. and Freer, J.: A dynamic TOPMODEL, Hydrol. Process., 15,
1993–2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.252, 2001.
Beven, K. J. and Kirkby, M. J.: A physically based, variable contributing
area model of basin hydrology, Un modèle à base physique de zone
d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant, Hydrol. Sci.
B., 24, 43–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834, 1979.
Beven, K. J., Kirkby, M. J., Schofield, N., and Tagg, A. F.: Testing a
physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three UK
catchments, J. Hydrol., 69, 119–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(84)90159-8, 1984.
Cheng, L., Yaeger, M., Viglione, A., Coopersmith, E., Ye, S., and Sivapalan, M.: Exploring the physical controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves – Part 1: Insights from statistical analyses, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4435–4446, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4435-2012, 2012.
CMDC: Home page, available at: https://data.cma.cn/en/?r=data/online&t=6, last access: December 2020.
Dakhlaoui, H., Ruelland, D., Tramblay, Y., and Bargaoui, Z.: Evaluating the
robustness of conceptual rainfall-runoff models under climate variability in
northern Tunisia, J. Hydrol., 550, 201–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.032,
2017.
Dawkins, R.: Climbing mount improbable, WW Norton & Company, New York, USA, 1997.
Derrac, J., García, S., Hui, S., Suganthan, P. N., and Herrera, F.:
Analyzing convergence performance of evolutionary algorithms: A statistical
approach, Inform. Sciences, 289, 41–58,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.06.009, 2014.
de Vos, N. J., Rientjes, T. H. M., and Gupta, H. V.: Diagnostic evaluation
of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using temporal clustering, Hydrol.
Process., 24, 2840–2850, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7698, 2010.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Effective and efficient global
optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour.
Res., 28, 1015–1031, https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985, 1992.
Duan, Q. Y., Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S.: Shuffled Complex Evolution
Approach for Effective and Efficient Global Minimization, J.
Optimiz. Theory App., 76, 501–521, https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00939380,
1993.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K.: Optimal use of the SCE-UA global
optimization method for calibrating watershed models, J. Hydrol.,
158, 265–284, 1994.
Fang, J., Song, Y., Liu, H., and Piao, S.: Vegetation-climate relationship
and its application in the division of vegetation zone in China, Acta
Bot. Sin., 44, 1105–1122, 2002.
Firat, M. and Güngör, M.: Hydrological time-series modelling using
an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, Hydrol. Process., 22, 2122–2132, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6812, 2008.
Fowler, K., Coxon, G., Freer, J., Peel, M., Wagener, T., Western, A., Woods,
R., and Zhang, L.: Simulating Runoff Under Changing Climatic Conditions: A
Framework for Model Improvement, Water Resour. Res., 54, 9812–9832,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023989, 2018.
Gharari, S., Hrachowitz, M., Fenicia, F., and Savenije, H. H. G.: An approach to identify time consistent model parameters: sub-period calibration, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 149–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-149-2013, 2013.
Gibbs, M. S., Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C.: Applying fitness landscape measures to water distribution optimization problems, in: Hydroinformatics, World Scientific, 795–802, 2004.
Gomez, J.: Stochastic global optimization algorithms: A systematic formal
approach, Inform. Sciences, 472, 53–76,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.09.021, 2019.
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O.: Toward improved calibration
of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information,
Water Resour. Res., 34, 751–763, https://doi.org/10.1029/97wr03495, 1998.
Harik, G. R., Lobo, F. G., and Goldberg, D. E.: The compact genetic
algorithm, IEEE T. Evolut. Comput., 3, 287–297, https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.797971, 1999.
Heinrich, J. and Weiskopf, D.: Parallel Coordinates for Multidimensional
Data Visualization: Basic Concepts, Comput. Sci. Eng.,
17, 70–76, https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2015.55, 2015.
Hintze, J. L. and Nelson, R. D.: Violin plots: a box plot-density trace
synergism, Am. Stat., 52, 181–184,
https://doi.org/10.2307/2685478, 1998.
Ho, M., Lall, U., Sun, X., and Cook, E. R.: Multiscale temporal variability
and regional patterns in 555 years of conterminous US streamflow, Water Resour. Res., 53, 3047–3066, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016wr019632, 2017.
Janetzko, H., Stein, M., Sacha, D., and Schreck, T.: Enhancing parallel
coordinates: Statistical visualizations for analyzing soccer data,
Electronic Imaging, 2016, 1–8, 2016.
Johansson, J. and Forsell, C.: Evaluation of Parallel Coordinates:
Overview, Categorization and Guidelines for Future Research, IEEE Trans. Vis.
Comput. Graph., 22, 579–588, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2466992, 2016.
Jones, T. and Forrest, S.: Fitness distance correlation as a measure of
problem difficulty for genetic algorithms, Santa Fe Institute, Working Paper, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216300862 (last access: December 2020), 1995.
Kallel, F., Ophir, J., Magee, K., and Krouskop, T.: Elastographic Imaging of
Low-Contrast Elastic Modulus Distributions in Tissue, Ultrasound Med.
Biol., 24, 409–425, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00287-1,
1998.
Kauffman, S. A.: The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in
evolution, Oxford University Press, California, Santa Clara County, USA, 1993.
Kim, K. B. and Han, D.: Exploration of sub-annual calibration schemes of
hydrological models, Hydrol. Res., 48, 1014–1031,
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.296, 2017.
Klemeš, V.: Operational testing of hydrological simulation models,
Hydrol. Sci. J., 31, 13–24, 1986.
Klotz, D., Herrnegger, M., and Schulz, K.: Symbolic Regression for the
Estimation of Transfer Functions of Hydrological Models, Water Resour.
Res., 53, 9402–9423, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr021253, 2017.
Lan, T., Lin, K. R., Liu, Z. Y., He, Y. H., Xu, C. Y., Zhang, H. B., and
Chen, X. H.: A Clustering Preprocessing Framework for the Subannual
Calibration of a Hydrological Model Considering Climate-Land Surface
Variations, Water Resour. Res., 54, 10034–10052, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023160,
2018.
Lan, T., Lin, K., Xu, C.-Y., Tan, X., and Chen, X.: Dynamics of hydrological-model parameters: mechanisms, problems and solutions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1347–1366, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1347-2020, 2020.
Lin, K. R., Zhang, Q., and Chen, X. H.: An evaluation of impacts of DEM
resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty, J.
Hydrol., 394, 370–383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.012, 2010.
Maier, H. R., Kapelan, Z., Kasprzyk, J., Kollat, J., Matott, L. S., Cunha,
M. C., Dandy, G. C., Gibbs, M. S., Keedwell, E., Marchi, A., Ostfeld, A.,
Savic, D., Solomatine, D. P., Vrugt, J. A., Zecchin, A. C., Minsker, B. S.,
Barbour, E. J., Kuczera, G., Pasha, F., Castelletti, A., Giuliani, M., and
Reed, P. M.: Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water
resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 62, 271–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.013, 2014.
Manfreda, S., Mita, L., Dal Sasso, S. F., Samela, C., and Mancusi, L.:
Exploiting the use of physical information for the calibration of a lumped
hydrological model, Hydrol. Process., 32, 1420–1433, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11501, 2018.
Mitchell, M.: An introduction to genetic algorithms, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, England, 1998.
Motavita, D. F., Chow, R., Guthke, A., and Nowak, W.: The comprehensive
differential split-sample test: A stress-test for hydrological model
robustness under climate variability, J. Hydrol., 573, 501–515,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.054, 2019.
NASA: ASTER Global Digital Elevation Map Announcement, available at: https://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gdem.asp, last access: December 2020.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual
models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10,
282–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
Nijzink, R. C., Samaniego, L., Mai, J., Kumar, R., Thober, S., Zink, M., Schäfer, D., Savenije, H. H. G., and Hrachowitz, M.: The importance of topography-controlled sub-grid process heterogeneity and semi-quantitative prior constraints in distributed hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1151–1176, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1151-2016, 2016.
Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., and Saltelli, A.: Ratings and rankings: voodoo or
science?, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A Stat., 176, 609–634, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01059.x, 2013.
Pathiraja, S., Marshall, L., Sharma, A., and Moradkhani, H.: Hydrologic
modeling in dynamic catchments: A data assimilation approach, Water
Resour. Res., 52, 3350–3372, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017192, 2016.
Pathiraja, S., Anghileri, D., Burlando, P., Sharma, A., Marshall, L., and Moradkhani, H.: Time-varying parameter models for catchments with land use change: the importance of model structure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2903–2919, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2903-2018, 2018.
Pfannerstill, M., Guse, B., and Fohrer, N.: Smart low flow signature metrics
for an improved overall performance evaluation of hydrological models, J.
Hydrol., 510, 447–458, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.044, 2014.
Piel, F. B., Patil, A. P., Howes, R. E., Nyangiri, O. A., Gething, P. W.,
Williams, T. N., Weatherall, D. J., and Hay, S. I.: Global distribution of
the sickle cell gene and geographical confirmation of the malaria
hypothesis, Nat. Commun., 1, 104, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1104, 2010.
Piotrowski, A. P., Napiorkowski, M. J., Napiorkowski, J. J., and Rowinski,
P. M.: Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Algorithms: Performance versus
speed, Inform. Sciences, 384, 34–85,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.12.028, 2017.
Pokhrel, P., Yilmaz, K. K., and Gupta, H. V.: Multiple-criteria calibration
of a distributed watershed model using spatial regularization and response
signatures, J. Hydrol., 418, 49–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.004, 2012.
Rahnamay Naeini, M., Yang, T., Sadegh, M., Agha Kouchak, A., Hsu, K.-L.,
Sorooshian, S., Duan, Q., and Lei, X.: Shuffled Complex-Self Adaptive Hybrid
EvoLution (SC-SAHEL) optimization framework, Environ. Modell. Softw., 104,
215–235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.019, 2018.
Sorooshian, S., Duan, Q., and Gupta, V. K.: Calibration of rainfall-runoff
models: Application of global optimization to the Sacramento Soil Moisture
Accounting Model, Water Resour. Res., 29, 1185–1194,
https://doi.org/10.1029/92wr02617, 1993.
Vrotsou, K., Forsell, C., and Cooper, M.: 2D and 3D Representations for
Feature Recognition in Time Geographical Diary Data, Inform.
Visual., 9, 263–276, https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2009.30, 2010.
Vrugt, J. A., Diks, C. G. H., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Verstraten, J.
M.: Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the
strengths of global optimization and data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 41, W01017, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003059, 2005.
Vrugt, J. A. and Beven, K. J.: Embracing equifinality with efficiency:
Limits of Acceptability sampling using the DREAM (LOA) algorithm, J.
Hydrol., 559, 954–971, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.026, 2018.
Wagener, T., Boyle, D. P., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: A framework for development and application of hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 13–26, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-13-2001, 2001.
Wang, S., Huang, G. H., Baetz, B. W., Cai, X. M., Ancell, B. C., and Fan, Y.
R.: Examining dynamic interactions among experimental factors influencing
hydrologic data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter, J. Hydrol., 554,
743–757, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.052, 2017.
Wang, S., Ancell, B., Huang, G., and Baetz, B.: Improving Robustness of
Hydrologic Ensemble Predictions Through Probabilistic Pre-and
Post-Processing in Sequential Data Assimilation, Water Resour. Res.,
54, 2129–2151, 2018.
Weinberger, E.: Correlated and Uncorrelated Fitness Landscapes and How to
Tell the Difference, Biol. Cybern., 63, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00202749, 1990.
Weise, T.: Global optimization algorithms-theory and application,
Self-published, 2009.
Westra, S., Thyer, M., Leonard, M., Kavetski, D., and Lambert, M.: A
strategy for diagnosing and interpreting hydrological model nonstationarity,
Water Resour. Res., 50, 5090–5113, 2014.
Wright, S.: The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection
in evolution, 1932.
Xiong, M., Liu, P., Cheng, L., Deng, C., Gui, Z., Zhang, X., and Liu, Y.:
Identifying time-varying hydrological model parameters to improve simulation
efficiency by the ensemble Kalman filter: A joint assimilation of streamflow
and actual evapotranspiration, J. Hydrol., 568, 758–768,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.038, 2019.
Yadav, M., Wagener, T., and Gupta, H.: Regionalization of constraints on
expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged
basins, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1756–1774,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.01.005, 2007.
Yao, Z. and Wu, L.: 3D-Parallel Coordinates: Visualization for time varying
multidimensional data, in: 7th IEEE International Conference on Software
Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), 26–28 August 2016, Beijing, China, 655–658, 2016.
Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Automatic calibration of
conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Sensitivity to calibration data, J.
Hydrol., 181, 23–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02918-4, 1996.
Yokoo, Y. and Sivapalan, M.: Towards reconstruction of the flow duration curve: development of a conceptual framework with a physical basis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2805–2819, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2805-2011, 2011.
Zhang, X., Srinivasan, R., Zhao, K., and Liew, M. V.: Evaluation of global
optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally
intensive hydrologic model, Hydrol. Process., 23, 430–441,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7152, 2009.
Zhang, Y., Jia, S., Huang, H., Qiu, J., and Zhou, C.: A novel algorithm for
the precise calculation of the maximal information coefficient, Sci. Rep., 4,
6662, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06662, 2014.
