Dear Authors, this paper has generated 2 very good and detailed reviews that I believe can help improve the readability of the manuscript and it's clarity. You have done an excellent job of responding to these comments, which I should point out the reviewers were very enthusiastic about your manuscript and it's publication, and I have no problem with almost everything that you plan to do as final changes and to complete this process. I thank everyone involved for the time and diligence on evaluating this manuscript. I will just make a couple of super quick recommendations:
1) Can you in the supp information on Raven just note that it is extracted from the paper you identify - I think this is great to have as a supp - I think it just needs clarifying where it has come from if copied at the start of that supp
2) Whilst you respond well to reviewer #2 point number 16 I note that there are no suggested changes within the manuscript, but I think it's an important point to clarify to confirm what your assumptions are on 'the same' parameter within your analyses.

I have simply noted publish subject to minor revisions to to clarify all the changes proposed are completed as simply a check by me. There is no barrier to final publication on the strength of the authors responses provided and the positive enthusiasm the reviewers have for the manuscript.

I believe you have ticked all the boxes of the comments received from the reviewers and introduced those into your manuscript. So from my checks of the paper and have no problem with this moving to the final publication stage, best wishes, Jim