Articles | Volume 24, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4135-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4135-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Predicting discharge capacity of vegetated compound channels: uncertainty and identifiability of one-dimensional process-based models
Adam Kiczko
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
Kaisa Västilä
Department of Built Environment, Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland
Freshwater Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Adam Kozioł
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
Janusz Kubrak
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
Elżbieta Kubrak
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
Marcin Krukowski
Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
Related authors
Adam Kozioł, Adam Kiczko, Marcin Krukowski, Elżbieta Kubrak, Janusz Kubrak, Grzegorz Majewski, and Andrzej Brandyk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-74, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-74, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Floodplain trees play a crucial role in increasing flow resistance. Their impact extends beyond floodplains to affect the main channel. The experiments reveal the influence of floodplain trees on the discharge capacity of channels with varying roughness. We determine resistance coefficients for different roughness levels of the main channel bottom. The research contributes to a deeper understanding of open-channel flow dynamics and has practical implications for river engineering.
Francesco Fatone, Bartosz Szeląg, Przemysław Kowal, Arthur McGarity, Adam Kiczko, Grzegorz Wałek, Ewa Wojciechowska, Michał Stachura, and Nicolas Caradot
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3329–3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A novel methodology for the development of a stormwater network performance simulator including advanced risk assessment was proposed. The applied tool enables the analysis of the influence of spatial variability in catchment and stormwater network characteristics on the relation between (SWMM) model parameters and specific flood volume, as an alternative approach to mechanistic models. The proposed method can be used at the stage of catchment model development and spatial planning management.
Monika Barbara Kalinowska, Kaisa Västilä, Michael Nones, Adam Kiczko, Emilia Karamuz, Andrzej Brandyk, Adam Kozioł, and Marcin Krukowski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 953–968, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-953-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-953-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation is commonly found in rivers and channels. Using field investigations, we evaluated the influence of different vegetation coverages on the flow and mixing in the small naturally vegetated channel. The obtained results are expected to be helpful for practitioners, enlarge our still limited knowledge, and show the further required scientific directions for a better understanding of the influence of vegetation on the flow and mixing of dissolved substances in real natural conditions.
Bartosz Szeląg, Adam Kiczko, Grzegorz Wałek, Ewa Wojciechowska, Michał Stachura, and Francesco Fatone
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-109, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-109, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
A methodology for the development of a sewer network performance simulator and risk assesssment is given. The influence of catchment characteristics, sewer network and SWMM parameters on specific flood volume was taken into account in comparison with developed methods. The influence of spatial variability of catchment and sewer network characteristics on the relation between SWMM parameters and sewage flooding was determined, which can be used for spatial planning and urban catchment management.
Francesco Fatone, Bartosz Szeląg, Adam Kiczko, Dariusz Majerek, Monika Majewska, Jakub Drewnowski, and Grzegorz Łagód
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5493–5516, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5493-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5493-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A sensitivity analysis based on a simulator of hydrograph parameters (volume, maximum flow) is shown. The method allows us to analyze the impact of calibrated hydrodynamic model parameters, including rainfall distribution and intensity, on the hydrograph. A sensitivity coefficient and the effect of the simulator uncertainty on calculation results are presented. This approach can be used to select hydrographs for calibration and validation of models, which has not been taken into account so far.
A. Kiczko, R. J. Romanowicz, M. Osuch, and E. Karamuz
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 3443–3455, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3443-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3443-2013, 2013
Adam Kozioł, Adam Kiczko, Marcin Krukowski, Elżbieta Kubrak, Janusz Kubrak, Grzegorz Majewski, and Andrzej Brandyk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-74, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-74, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Floodplain trees play a crucial role in increasing flow resistance. Their impact extends beyond floodplains to affect the main channel. The experiments reveal the influence of floodplain trees on the discharge capacity of channels with varying roughness. We determine resistance coefficients for different roughness levels of the main channel bottom. The research contributes to a deeper understanding of open-channel flow dynamics and has practical implications for river engineering.
Francesco Fatone, Bartosz Szeląg, Przemysław Kowal, Arthur McGarity, Adam Kiczko, Grzegorz Wałek, Ewa Wojciechowska, Michał Stachura, and Nicolas Caradot
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3329–3349, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3329-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A novel methodology for the development of a stormwater network performance simulator including advanced risk assessment was proposed. The applied tool enables the analysis of the influence of spatial variability in catchment and stormwater network characteristics on the relation between (SWMM) model parameters and specific flood volume, as an alternative approach to mechanistic models. The proposed method can be used at the stage of catchment model development and spatial planning management.
Monika Barbara Kalinowska, Kaisa Västilä, Michael Nones, Adam Kiczko, Emilia Karamuz, Andrzej Brandyk, Adam Kozioł, and Marcin Krukowski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 953–968, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-953-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-953-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation is commonly found in rivers and channels. Using field investigations, we evaluated the influence of different vegetation coverages on the flow and mixing in the small naturally vegetated channel. The obtained results are expected to be helpful for practitioners, enlarge our still limited knowledge, and show the further required scientific directions for a better understanding of the influence of vegetation on the flow and mixing of dissolved substances in real natural conditions.
Bartosz Szeląg, Adam Kiczko, Grzegorz Wałek, Ewa Wojciechowska, Michał Stachura, and Francesco Fatone
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-109, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-109, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
A methodology for the development of a sewer network performance simulator and risk assesssment is given. The influence of catchment characteristics, sewer network and SWMM parameters on specific flood volume was taken into account in comparison with developed methods. The influence of spatial variability of catchment and sewer network characteristics on the relation between SWMM parameters and sewage flooding was determined, which can be used for spatial planning and urban catchment management.
Francesco Fatone, Bartosz Szeląg, Adam Kiczko, Dariusz Majerek, Monika Majewska, Jakub Drewnowski, and Grzegorz Łagód
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5493–5516, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5493-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5493-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A sensitivity analysis based on a simulator of hydrograph parameters (volume, maximum flow) is shown. The method allows us to analyze the impact of calibrated hydrodynamic model parameters, including rainfall distribution and intensity, on the hydrograph. A sensitivity coefficient and the effect of the simulator uncertainty on calculation results are presented. This approach can be used to select hydrographs for calibration and validation of models, which has not been taken into account so far.
A. Kiczko, R. J. Romanowicz, M. Osuch, and E. Karamuz
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 3443–3455, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3443-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3443-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Subject: Engineering Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Bayesian calibration of a flood simulator using binary flood extent observations
Intercomparison of global reanalysis precipitation for flood risk modelling
Seamless streamflow forecasting at daily to monthly scales: MuTHRE lets you have your cake and eat it too
An uncertainty partition approach for inferring interactive hydrologic risks
Uncertainty quantification of floodplain friction in hydrodynamic models
Developing a drought-monitoring index for the contiguous US using SMAP
Technical note: Assessment of observation quality for data assimilation in flood models
Sedimentation monitoring including uncertainty analysis in complex floodplains: a case study in the Mekong Delta
Assessing the impact of uncertainty on flood risk estimates with reliability analysis using 1-D and 2-D hydraulic models
The transferability of hydrological models under nonstationary climatic conditions
Why hydrological predictions should be evaluated using information theory
Spatial uncertainty assessment in modelling reference evapotranspiration at regional scale
Confidence intervals for the coefficient of L-variation in hydrological applications
Possibilistic uncertainty analysis of a conceptual model of snowmelt runoff
Mariano Balbi and David Charles Bonaventure Lallemant
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1089–1108, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We proposed a methodology to obtain useful and robust probabilistic predictions from computational flood simulators using satellite-borne flood extent observations. We developed a Bayesian framework to obtain the uncertainty in roughness parameters, in observations errors, and in simulator structural deficiencies. We found that it can yield improvements in predictions relative to current methodologies and can potentially lead to consistent ways of combining data from different sources.
Fergus McClean, Richard Dawson, and Chris Kilsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 331–347, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-331-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-331-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Reanalysis datasets are increasingly used to drive flood models, especially for continental and global analysis. We investigate the impact of using four reanalysis products on simulations of past flood events. All reanalysis products underestimated the number of buildings inundated, compared to a benchmark national dataset. These findings show that while global reanalyses provide a useful resource for flood modelling where no other data are available, they may underestimate impact in some cases.
David McInerney, Mark Thyer, Dmitri Kavetski, Richard Laugesen, Fitsum Woldemeskel, Narendra Tuteja, and George Kuczera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5669–5683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5669-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5669-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasts a day to a month ahead are highly valuable for water resources management. Current practice often develops forecasts for specific lead times and aggregation timescales. In contrast, a single, seamless forecast can serve multiple lead times/timescales. This study shows seamless forecasts can match the performance of forecasts developed specifically at the monthly scale, while maintaining quality at other lead times. Hence, users need not sacrifice capability for performance.
Yurui Fan, Kai Huang, Guohe Huang, Yongping Li, and Feng Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4601-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4601-2020, 2020
Guilherme Luiz Dalledonne, Rebekka Kopmann, and Thomas Brudy-Zippelius
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3373–3385, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3373-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3373-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents how the concept of uncertainty quantification can be applied to river engineering problems and how important it is to understand the limitations of numerical models from a probabilistic point of view. We investigated floodplain friction formulations using different uncertainty quantification methods and estimated their contribution in the final results. The analysis of uncertainties is planned to be integrated in future projects and also extended to more complex scenarios.
Sara Sadri, Eric F. Wood, and Ming Pan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6611–6626, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6611-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6611-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Of particular interest to NASA's SMAP-based agricultural applications is a monitoring product that assesses near-surface soil moisture in terms of probability percentiles for dry and wet conditions. However, the short SMAP record length poses a statistical challenge for the meaningful assessment of its indices. This study presents initial insights about using SMAP Level 3 and Level 4 for monitoring drought and pluvial regions with a first application over the contiguous United States (CONUS).
Joanne A. Waller, Javier García-Pintado, David C. Mason, Sarah L. Dance, and Nancy K. Nichols
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3983–3992, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3983-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3983-2018, 2018
N. V. Manh, B. Merz, and H. Apel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3039–3057, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3039-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3039-2013, 2013
L. Altarejos-García, M. L. Martínez-Chenoll, I. Escuder-Bueno, and A. Serrano-Lombillo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1895–1914, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1895-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1895-2012, 2012
C. Z. Li, L. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Q. Zhang, F. L. Yu, and D. H. Yan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1239–1254, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1239-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1239-2012, 2012
S. V. Weijs, G. Schoups, and N. van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2545–2558, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2545-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2545-2010, 2010
G. Buttafuoco, T. Caloiero, and R. Coscarelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2319–2327, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2319-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2319-2010, 2010
A. Viglione
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2229–2242, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2229-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2229-2010, 2010
A. P. Jacquin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1681–1695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1681-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1681-2010, 2010
Cited articles
Aberle, J. and Järvelä, J.: Flow resistance of emergent rigid and
flexible floodplain vegetation, J. Hydraul. Res., 51, 33–45, 2013. a
Abril, J. B. and Knight, D. W.: Stage-discharge prediction for rivers in flood
applying a depth-averaged model, J. Hydraul. Res., 42,
616–629, 2004. a
Abu-Aly, T. R., Pasternack, G. B., Wyrick, J. R., Barker, R., Massa, D., and
Johnson, T.: Effects of LiDAR-derived, spatially distributed vegetation
roughness on two-dimensional hydraulics in a gravel-cobble river at flows of
0.2 to 20 times bankfull, Geomorphology, 206, 468–482,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.017, 2014. a
Antonarakis, A. S., Richards, K. S., Brasington, J., and Bithell, M.: Leafless
roughness of complex tree morphology using terrestrial lidar, Water
Resour. Res., 45, W10401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007666, 2009. a
Arcement, G. J. and Schneider, V. R.: Guide for selecting Manning's roughness
coefficients for natural channels and flood plains, vol. 2339, United States
Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2339, https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp2339, 1989. a
Baptist, M. J., Babovic, V., Rodriguez Uthurburu, J., Keijzer, M.,
Uittenbogaard, R. E., Mynett, A., and Verwey, A.: On inducing equations for
vegetation resistance, J. Hydraul. Res., 45, 435–450, 2007. a
Berends, K. D., Straatsma, M. W., Warmink, J. J., and Hulscher, S. J. M. H.: Uncertainty quantification of flood mitigation predictions and implications for interventions, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1737–1753, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1737-2019, 2019. a
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: model calibration
and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, 1992. a
Blasone, R.-S., Vrugt, J. A., Madsen, H., Rosbjerg, D., Robinson, B. A., and
Zyvoloski, G. A.: Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using
adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling, Adv. Water Resour., 31,
630–648, 2008. a
Budiman, M.: Latin Hypercube Sampling,
available at: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/4352-latin-hypercube-sampling, last access: 16 January 2017. a
Casas, A., Lane, S. N., Yu, D., and Benito, G.: A method for parameterising roughness and topographic sub-grid scale effects in hydraulic modelling from LiDAR data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1567–1579, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1567-2010, 2010. a
Chaudhary, H. P., Isaac, N., Tayade, S. B., and Bhosekar, V. V.: Integrated 1D
and 2D numerical model simulations for flushing of sediment from reservoirs,
ISH J. Hydraul. Eng., 25, 19–27,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1423580, 2019. a
Dalledonne, G. L., Kopmann, R., and Brudy-Zippelius, T.: Uncertainty quantification of floodplain friction in hydrodynamic models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3373–3385, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3373-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d
Forzieri, G., Moser, G., Vivoni, E. R., Castelli, F., and Canovaro, F.:
Riparian vegetation mapping for hydraulic roughness estimation using very
high resolution remote sensing data fusion, J. Hydraul.
Eng., 136, 855–867, 2010. a
Forzieri, G., Castelli, F., and Preti, F.: Advances in remote sensing of
hydraulic roughness, Int. J. Remote Sens., 33, 630–654,
2012. a
Fread, D.: Flood routing models and the Manning n, in: International
Conference for Centennial of Manning's Formula and Kuichling's Rational
Formula, 699–708, 1989. a
Freni, G. and Mannina, G.: Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in
water quality modelling: The influence of prior distribution, J.
Hydrol., 392, 31–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.043, 2010. a
Green, J. C.: Comparison of blockage factors in modelling the resistance of
channels containing submerged macrophytes, River Res. Appl., 21, 671–686,
2005. a
Her, Y. and Chaubey, I.: Impact of the numbers of observations and calibration
parameters on equifinality, model performance, and output and parameter
uncertainty, Hydrol. Process., 29, 4220–4237,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10487, 2015. a, b
Her, Y. and Seong, C.: Responses of hydrological model equifinality,
uncertainty, and performance to multi-objective parameter calibration,
J. Hydroinform., 20, 864–885, https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2018.108,
2018. a, b
Jalonen, J. and Järvelä, J.: Estimation of drag forces caused by
natural woody vegetation of different scales, J. Hydrodyn., 26,
608–623, 2014. a
Jalonen, J. and Järvelä, J.: Erratum to Estimation of drag forces
caused by natural woody vegetation of different scales, J. Hydrodyn., 27, p. 319,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(15)60487-5, 2015. a
Jalonen, J., Järvelä, J., Virtanen, J.-P., Vaaja, M., Kurkela, M.,
and Hyyppä, H.: Determining characteristic vegetation areas by
terrestrial laser scanning for floodplain flow modeling, Water, 7, 420–437,
2015. a
Järvelä, J.: Determination of flow resistance caused by
non-submerged woody vegetation, International Journal of River Basin
Management, 2, 61–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2004.9635222, 2004. a
Kalinowska, M. B., Västilä, K., Kozioł, A. P., Rowinski, P. M., Kiczko, A., and Kubrak, J.: Modelling of velocity distribution in a channel partly covered by submerged vegetation, in: Recent Trends in Environmental Hydraulics, edited by: Kalinowska, M. B., Mrokowska, M. M., and Rowinski, P. M., GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences. Springer, Cham, 91–101, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37105-0_8, 2020. a
Kałuza, T., Sojka, M., Strzeliński, P., and Wrózyński, R.:
Application of terrestrial laser scanning to tree trunk bark structure
characteristics evaluation and analysis of their effect on the flow
resistance coefficient, Water, 10, 753,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060753, 2018. a
Khatibi, R. H., Williams, J. J. R., and Wormleaton, P. R.: Identification
Problem of Open-Channel Friction Parameters, J. Hydraul.
Eng. ASCE, 123, 1078–1088,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:12(1078), 1997. a
Kiang, J. E., Gazoorian, C., McMillan, H., Coxon, G., Le Coz, J., Westerberg,
I. K., Belleville, A., Sevrez, D., Sikorska, A. E., Petersen-Øverleir, A., Reitan, T., Freer, J., Renard, B., Mansanarez, V., and Mason, R.: A comparison of methods for streamflow uncertainty estimation,
Water Resour. Res., 54, 7149–7176, 2018. a
Kiczko, A. and Mirosław-Świa̧tek, D.: Impact of Uncertainty of
Floodplain Digital Terrain Model on 1D Hydrodynamic Flow Calculation, Water,
10, 1308, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101308, 2018. a
Kiczko, A., Kozioł, A., Kubrak, J., Krukowski, M., Kubrak, E., and Brandyk,
A.: Identification of vegetation parameters for compound channel discharge
as inverse problem, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Land
Reclamation, 49, 255–267, https://doi.org/10.1515/sggw-2017-0020, 2017. a, b, c, d, e
Kiczko, A., Szela̧g, B., Kozioł, A., Krukowski, M., Kubrak, E., Kubrak,
J., and Romanowicz, R. J.: Optimal Capacity of a Stormwater Reservoir for
Flood Peak Reduction, J. Hydrol. Eng., 23, 4018008,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001636, 2018. a
Klopstra, D., Barneveld, H. J., Van Noortwijk, J. M., and Van Velzen,
E. H.: Analytical model for hydraulic roughness of submerged vegetation,
in: Proceedings of the 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, Theme A, Managing Water: Coping with Scarcity and Abundance, San Francisco, 775–780, 1997. a
Knight, D. W., Omran, M., and Tang, X.: Modeling depth-averaged velocity and
boundary shear in trapezoidal channels with secondary flows, J.
Hydraul. Eng., 133, 39–47, 2007. a
Kozioł, A. P. and Kubrak, J.: Measurements of Turbulence Structure in a
Compound Channel, in: Rivers–Physical, Fluvial and Environmental Processes,
Springer, 229–254, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17719-9_10, 2015. a, b
Kozioł, A. P., Kubrak, J., and Ciepielowski, A.: A hydraulic model of
discharge capacity for rivers with forest vegetation on flood lowland, in:
Model application for wetlands hydrology and hydraulics, edited by: Kubrak,
J., Okruszko, T., and Ignar, S., Center of Excellence in
Wetland Hydrology Wethydro, Warsaw, Warsaw Agricultural University Press,
Warsaw, 103–111, 2004. a
Kubrak, E., Kubrak, J., Kozioł, A., Kiczko, A., and Krukowski, M.: Apparent
Friction Coefficient Used for Flow Calculation in Straight Compound
Channels, Water, 11, 745, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040745, 2019a. a, b, c
Kubrak, E., Kubrak, J., Kuśmierczuk, K., Kozioł, A. P., Kiczko, A.,
Rowiński, P. M., Kozioł Adam Paweł, Kiczko, A., Kozioł,
A. P., Kiczko, A., and Rowiński, P. M.: Influence of stream
interactions on the carrying capacity of two-stage channels, J.
Hydraul. Eng., 145, 6019003,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001585, 2019b. a, b, c
Kuczera, G. and Mroczkowski, M.: Assessment of hydrologic parameter
uncertainty and the worth of multiresponse data, Water Resour. Res.,
34, 1481–1489, https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR00496,
1998. a
Liu, Z., Merwade, V., and Jafarzadegan, K.: Investigating the role of model
structure and surface roughness in generating flood inundation extents using
one- and two-dimensional hydraulic models, J. Flood Risk Manag.,
12, e12347, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12347,
2019. a
Mantovan, P. and Todini, E.: Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment:
Incoherence of the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 330, 368–381,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2006.04.046, 2006. a, b
Marcinkowski, P., Kiczko, A., and Okruszko, T.: Model-based analysis of
macrophytes role in the flow distribution in the anastomosing river system,
Water, 10, 953, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070953, 2018. a
Marcinkowski, P., Kiczko, A., and Okruszko, T.: Model-based evaluation of
restoration measures efficiency in the anastomosing section of the River
Narew, Ecol. Eng., 130, 213–227,
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLENG.2019.02.022, 2019. a
Myers, W.: Momentum Transfer In A Compound Channel, J. Hydraul. Res., 16, 139–150, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221687809499626, 1978. a, b
Pasche, E.: Flood Modelling in Urban Rivers–the State-of-the-Art and Where to
Go, in: Advances in Urban Flood Management, edited by: Ashley, R., Garvin,
S., Pasche, E., Vassilopoulos, A., and Zevenbergen, C., CRC
Press, available at: https://www.routledge.com/Advances-in-Urban-Flood-Management/Ashley-Garvin-Pasche-Vassilopoulos-Zevenbergen/p/book/9780367389512 (last access: 14 April 2020), 71–102, 2007. a
Pasche, E. and Rouvé, G.: Overbank Flow with Vegetatively Roughened
Flood Plains, J. Hydraul. Eng., 111, 1262–1278, 1985. a
Romanowicz, R., Beven, K. J., and Tawn, J.: Bayesian Calibration of Flood
Inundation Models, Floodplain Processes, edited by: Anderson, M. G., Walling, D. E., and Bates, P. D., Wiley, 333–360, 1996. a
Romanowicz, R. J. and Kiczko, A.: An event simulation approach to the
assessment of flood level frequencies: risk maps for the Warsaw reach of the
River Vistula, Hydrol. Process., 30, 2451–2462,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10857, 2016. a
Rowiński, P., Västilä, K., Aberle, J., Järvelä,
J., and Kalinowska, M. B.: How vegetation can aid in coping with river
management challenges: A brief review, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 18,
345–354, 2018. a
Schwanghart, W.: Recursive Douglas-Peucker Polyline Simplification, available at:
https://github.com/wschwanghart/topotoolbox/blob/master/GIStools/dpsimplify.m, last access: 1 December 2010. a
Sellin, R. H. J.: A laboratory investigation into the interaction between the
flow in the channel of a river and that over its flood plain, Houille
Blanche, 20, 793–802, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116943, 1964. a
Shields, J. F. D., Coulton, K. G., and Nepf, H.: Representation of vegetation
in two-dimensional hydrodynamic models, J. Hydraul. Eng.,
143, 2517002, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001320, 2017. a, b, c
Soong, T. W. and DePue, P. M.: Variation of Manning's Coefficient with Channel
Stage, Water Resources Center, University of Illinois, USA, 1996. a
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., Lee, S. U., and Batchelder, R.: Appraisal of
the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method, Water
Resour. Res., 44, W00B06, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006822, 2008. a
Straatsma, M. and Huthoff, F.: Uncertainty in 2D hydrodynamic models from
errors in roughness parameterization based on aerial images, Phys.
Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36, 324–334,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.02.009,
2011. a, b, c
Tang, X. and Knight, D. W.: Lateral depth-averaged velocity distributions and
bed shear in rectangular compound channels, J. Hydraul.
Eng.., 134, 1337–1342, 2008. a
Tang, Y., Marshall, L., Sharma, A., and Smith, T.: Tools for investigating the
prior distribution in Bayesian hydrology, J. Hydrol., 538,
551–562, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2016.04.032,
2016. a
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F., Dutta, D., and Kim, S.:
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and
uncertainty analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 90, 201–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006, 2017. a
Västilä, K. and Järvelä, J.: Environmentally
preferable two-stage drainage channels: considerations for cohesive sediments
and conveyance, International Journal of River Basin Management, 9,
171–180, 2011. a
Wolski, K., Tyminski, T., and Dabek, P. B.: Assessment of the effect of
vegetation on the transition of the flood wave using hydraulic 2D models,
in: E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, vol. 44, p. 195, 2018. a
Yen, B. C.: Open Channel Flow Resistance, J. Hydraul. Eng., 128, 20–39,
2002. a
Yu, K., Chen, Y., Zhu, D., Variano, E. A., and Lin, J.: Development and
performance of a 1D–2D coupled shallow water model for large river and lake
networks, J. Hydraul. Res., 57, 852–865,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2018.1534286, 2019. a, b
Zhang, J., Zhong, Y., and Huai, W.: Transverse distribution of streamwise
velocity in open-channel flow with artificial emergent vegetation,
Ecol. Eng., 110, 78–86, 2018. a
Zinke, P., Olsen, N. R. B., and Bogen, J.: Three-dimensional numerical
modelling of levee depositions in a Scandinavian freshwater delta,
Geomorphology, 129, 320–333, 2011. a
Short summary
The study compares the uncertainty of discharge curves for vegetated channels, calculated using several methods, including the simplest ones, based on the Manning formula and advanced approaches, providing a detailed physical representation of the channel flow processes. Parameters of each method were identified for the same data sets. The outcomes of the study include the widths of confidence intervals, showing which method was the most successful in explaining observations.
The study compares the uncertainty of discharge curves for vegetated channels, calculated using...