Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 24, issue 5
Articles | Volume 24, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2791-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2791-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 24, issue 5
Research article
 | 
29 May 2020
Research article |  | 29 May 2020

Modelling rainfall with a Bartlett–Lewis process: new developments

Christian Onof and Li-Pen Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 4,744 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,446 1,205 93 4,744 473 103 129
  • HTML: 3,446
  • PDF: 1,205
  • XML: 93
  • Total: 4,744
  • Supplement: 473
  • BibTeX: 103
  • EndNote: 129
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Aug 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Aug 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,744 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,198 with geography defined and 546 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Nov 2025
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
The randomised Bartlett–Lewis (RBL) model is widely used to synthesise rainfall time series with realistic statistical features. However, it tended to underestimate rainfall extremes at sub-hourly and hourly timescales. In this paper, we revisit the derivation of equations that represent rainfall properties and compare statistical estimation methods that impact model calibration. These changes effectively improved the RBL model's capacity to reproduce sub-hourly and hourly rainfall extremes.
Read more
Share