Articles | Volume 24, issue 3
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1565–1586, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1565-2020
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1565–1586, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1565-2020

Research article 01 Apr 2020

Research article | 01 Apr 2020

Can we trust remote sensing evapotranspiration products over Africa?

Imeshi Weerasinghe et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (11 Oct 2019) by Shraddhanand Shukla
AR by Lorena Grabowski on behalf of the Authors (03 Jan 2020)  Author's response
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (21 Jan 2020) by Shraddhanand Shukla
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (14 Feb 2020)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (02 Mar 2020) by Shraddhanand Shukla
AR by Imeshi Weerasinghe on behalf of the Authors (04 Mar 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
Water resource allocation to various sectors requires an understanding of the hydrological cycle, where evapotranspiration (ET) is a key component. Satellite-derived products estimate ET but are hard to evaluate at large scales. This work presents an alternate evaluation methodology to point-scale observations in Africa. The paper enables users to select an ET product based on their performance regarding selected criteria using a ranking system. The highest ranked products are WaPOR and CMRSET.