Dear Authors,

Thank you for the detailed responses to the two reviews on your paper.

Overall, both reviewers were quite positive about the study, and I agree with many of their comments. They made some valuable suggestions regarding important topics such as: identifying the research gap and clarifying the motivation; providing an outline (or schematic) of the methodology; attempting to relate the results to the model characteristics (where feasible); clarifying the terminology to avoid misinterpretation; providing further discussion of results and interpretation of findings; and making some of the data available for reproducibility.

I find your proposed modifications appropriate and would like to invite you to go ahead and submit a revised manuscript, which will be returned to the reviewers for further review.

Sincerely,
Louise Slater

Dear Authors,
Thank you for submitting a revised manuscript. We received one re-review of your paper, which is positive and finds all comments were addressed.
The second reviewer did not provide a re-review, however I find that their original comments were addressed well in the revised version of the manuscript.
I am happy with the changes to the author list, and to accept this paper for publication.
Sincerely,
Louise Slater