Articles | Volume 24, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1543-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1543-2020
Research article
 | 
01 Apr 2020
Research article |  | 01 Apr 2020

Historical and future changes in global flood magnitude – evidence from a model–observation investigation

Hong Xuan Do, Fang Zhao, Seth Westra, Michael Leonard, Lukas Gudmundsson, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Jinfeng Chang, Philippe Ciais, Dieter Gerten, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Tobias Stacke, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, and Yoshihide Wada

Viewed

Total article views: 7,039 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,272 1,672 95 7,039 510 103 120
  • HTML: 5,272
  • PDF: 1,672
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 7,039
  • Supplement: 510
  • BibTeX: 103
  • EndNote: 120
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Aug 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Aug 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,039 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,868 with geography defined and 1,171 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We presented a global comparison between observed and simulated trends in a flood index over the 1971–2005 period using the Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata archive and six global hydrological models available through The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. Streamflow simulations over 2006–2099 period robustly project high flood hazard in several regions. These high-flood-risk areas, however, are under-sampled by the current global streamflow databases.