Articles | Volume 23, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3279-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3279-2019
Research article
 | 
09 Aug 2019
Research article |  | 09 Aug 2019

Replication of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators following a modified covariance approach to hydrological model parameterization

Annie Visser-Quinn, Lindsay Beevers, and Sandhya Patidar

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (04 Feb 2019) by Pierre Gentine
AR by Annie Visser-Quinn on behalf of the Authors (06 Feb 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (15 Feb 2019) by Pierre Gentine
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (20 Feb 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (15 Mar 2019)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (03 Apr 2019) by Pierre Gentine
AR by Lorena Grabowski on behalf of the Authors (03 May 2019)  Author's response
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (22 May 2019) by Pierre Gentine
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (12 Jun 2019)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (18 Jun 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (28 Jun 2019) by Pierre Gentine
AR by Annie Visser-Quinn on behalf of the Authors (28 Jun 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (12 Jul 2019) by Pierre Gentine
Download
Short summary
The ecological impact of changes in river flow may be explored through the simulation of ecologically relevant flow indicators. Traditional approaches to model parameterization are not well-suited for this. To this end, this paper considers the ability of a modified covariance approach, applied to five hydrologically diverse catchments. An overall improvement in consistency is observed, whilst timing and rate of change represent the best and worst replicated indicators respectively.