On the choice of calibration metrics for “high-flow” estimation using hydrologic models

Mizukami, Naoki; Rakovec, Oldrich; Newman, Andrew J.; Clark, Martyn P.; Wood, Andrew W.; Gupta, Hoshin V.; Kumar, Rohini

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2601-2019

Articles | Volume 23, issue 6

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2601-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2601-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 23, issue 6

Research article

|

17 Jun 2019

Research article |

| 17 Jun 2019

On the choice of calibration metrics for “high-flow” estimation using hydrologic models

Naoki Mizukami, Oldrich Rakovec, Andrew J. Newman, Martyn P. Clark, Andrew W. Wood, Hoshin V. Gupta, and Rohini Kumar

Download

Final revised paper (published on 17 Jun 2019)
Preprint (discussion started on 03 Aug 2018)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

SC1: 'The NSE criterion', John Ding, 16 Aug 2018
- AC1: 'Reply to Dr. John Ding', Naoki Mizukami, 23 Nov 2018
RC1: 'review', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Oct 2018
- AC2: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #1', Naoki Mizukami, 23 Nov 2018
RC2: 'Referee comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Nov 2018
- AC3: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #2', Naoki Mizukami, 23 Nov 2018

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (29 Nov 2018) by Dimitri Solomatine

AR by Naoki Mizukami on behalf of the Authors (16 Feb 2019) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (20 Feb 2019) by Dimitri Solomatine

RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (06 Mar 2019)

RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (23 Mar 2019)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (06 Apr 2019) by Dimitri Solomatine

AR by Naoki Mizukami on behalf of the Authors (18 Apr 2019) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (06 May 2019) by Dimitri Solomatine

AR by Naoki Mizukami on behalf of the Authors (08 May 2019) Manuscript

Short summary

We find that Nash–Sutcliffe (NSE)-based model calibrations result in poor reproduction of high-flow events, such as the annual peak flows that are used for flood frequency estimation. The use of Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) results in annual peak flow estimates that are better than from NSE, with only a slight degradation in performance with respect to other related metrics.