Articles | Volume 22, issue 2
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1629–1648, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1629-2018
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1629–1648, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1629-2018

Research article 02 Mar 2018

Research article | 02 Mar 2018

Using hydraulic head, chloride and electrical conductivity data to distinguish between mountain-front and mountain-block recharge to basin aquifers

Etienne Bresciani et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (29 Dec 2017) by Graham Fogg
AR by Etienne Bresciani on behalf of the Authors (10 Jan 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (29 Jan 2018) by Graham Fogg
Download
Short summary
This article tackles the problem of finding the origin of groundwater in basin aquifers adjacent to mountains. In particular, we aim to determine whether the recharge occurs predominantly through stream infiltration along the mountain front or through subsurface flow from the mountain. To this end, we discuss the use of routinely measured variables: hydraulic head, chloride and electrical conductivity. A case study from Australia demonstrates the approach.