Articles | Volume 21, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5709-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5709-2017
Research article
 | 
17 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 17 Nov 2017

New insights into the differences between the dual node approach and the common node approach for coupling surface–subsurface flow

Rob de Rooij

Related authors

Technical note: Finite element formulations to map discrete fracture elements in three-dimensional groundwater models
Rob de Rooij
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-289,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-289, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Karst aquifer discharge response to rainfall interpreted as anomalous transport
Dan Elhanati, Nadine Goeppert, and Brian Berkowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4239–4249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4239-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4239-2024, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: Never train a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network on a single basin
Frederik Kratzert, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, and Grey Nearing
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4187–4201, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4187-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4187-2024, 2024
Short summary
Large-sample hydrology – a few camels or a whole caravan?
Franziska Clerc-Schwarzenbach, Giovanni Selleri, Mattia Neri, Elena Toth, Ilja van Meerveld, and Jan Seibert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4219–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4219-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comment on “Are soils overrated in hydrology?” by Gao et al. (2023)
Ying Zhao, Mehdi Rahmati, Harry Vereecken, and Dani Or
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4059–4063, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-decadal fluctuations in root zone storage capacity through vegetation adaptation to hydro-climatic variability have minor effects on the hydrological response in the Neckar River basin, Germany
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

An, H., and Yu, S.: Finite volume integrated surface- subsurface flow modeling on nonorthogonal grids, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2312–2328, 2014.
Blazek, J.: Computational fluid dynamics: Principles and applications, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2005.
Camporese, M., Paniconi, C., Putti, M., and Orlandini, S.: Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data, Water Resour. Res., 46, W02512, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007536, 2010.
Delfs, J. O., Park, C. H., and Kolditz, O.: A sensitivity analysis of Hortonian flow, Adv. Water Res., 32, 1386–1395, 2009.
de Rooij, R., Graham, W., and Maxwell, R.: A particle-tracking scheme for simulating pathlines in coupled surface-subsurface flows, Adv. Water Res., 52, 7–18, 2013a.
Download
Short summary
The dual node and common node approach are widely used to simulate coupled surface–subsurface flows. In this study it is shown that the dual node approach should be conceptualized as a one-sided finite difference approximation of the vertical head gradients at the land surface. This consistent dual node approach can be more accurate as well as as more numerically efficient than the common node approach.