Articles | Volume 20, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4177-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4177-2016
Research article
 | 
17 Oct 2016
Research article |  | 17 Oct 2016

Describing the interannual variability of precipitation with the derived distribution approach: effects of record length and resolution

Claudio I. Meier, Jorge Sebastián Moraga, Geri Pranzini, and Peter Molnar

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (11 Mar 2016) by Erwin Zehe
AR by Jorge Sebastian Moraga on behalf of the Authors (15 Jun 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (15 Jun 2016) by Erwin Zehe
RR by Günter Blöschl (19 Jun 2016)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (13 Jul 2016)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (01 Aug 2016) by Erwin Zehe
AR by Jorge Sebastian Moraga on behalf of the Authors (11 Aug 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (12 Aug 2016) by Erwin Zehe
AR by Jorge Sebastian Moraga on behalf of the Authors (20 Aug 2016)
Download
Short summary
We show that the derived distribution approach is able to characterize the interannual variability of precipitation much better than fitting a probabilistic model to annual rainfall totals, as long as continuously gauged data are available. The method is a useful tool for describing temporal changes in the distribution of annual rainfall, as it works for records as short as 5 years, and therefore does not require any stationarity assumption over long periods.