Articles | Volume 20, issue 5
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1809–1825, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1809-2016
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1809–1825, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1809-2016

Research article 10 May 2016

Research article | 10 May 2016

Accounting for three sources of uncertainty in ensemble hydrological forecasting

Antoine Thiboult et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (19 Nov 2015) by Thomas Kjeldsen
AR by Antoine Thiboult on behalf of the Authors (27 Jan 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (14 Feb 2016) by Thomas Kjeldsen
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (19 Mar 2016)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (21 Mar 2016)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (30 Mar 2016) by Thomas Kjeldsen
AR by Antoine Thiboult on behalf of the Authors (10 Apr 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (12 Apr 2016) by Thomas Kjeldsen
Download
Short summary
Issuing a good hydrological forecast is challenging because of the numerous sources of uncertainty that lay in the description of the hydrometeorological processes. Several modeling techniques are investigated in this paper to assess how they contribute to the forecast quality. It is shown that the best modeling approach uses several dissimilar techniques that each tackle one source of uncertainty.