Articles | Volume 20, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1483-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1483-2016
Research article
 | 
19 Apr 2016
Research article |  | 19 Apr 2016

Hydrologic extremes – an intercomparison of multiple gridded statistical downscaling methods

Arelia T. Werner and Alex J. Cannon

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (26 Oct 2015) by Remko Uijlenhoet
AR by A.T. Werner on behalf of the Authors (18 Nov 2015)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (18 Nov 2015) by Remko Uijlenhoet
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (27 Jan 2016)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (10 Feb 2016)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (24 Feb 2016) by Remko Uijlenhoet
AR by A.T. Werner on behalf of the Authors (04 Mar 2016)
ED: Publish as is (17 Mar 2016) by Remko Uijlenhoet
AR by A.T. Werner on behalf of the Authors (22 Mar 2016)
Download
Short summary
Seven gridded statistical downscaling methods are tested for strength in simulating climate and hydrologic extremes. A recently developed technique, which is a post-processed version of bias corrected constructed analogues where the final bias correction is based on the bias corrected climate imprint method, is shown to be an especially strong method for hydrologic extremes versus other more commonly applied methods, including the popular bias corrected spatial disaggregation method.