Articles | Volume 20, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1483–1508, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1483-2016
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1483–1508, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1483-2016

Research article 19 Apr 2016

Research article | 19 Apr 2016

Hydrologic extremes – an intercomparison of multiple gridded statistical downscaling methods

Arelia T. Werner and Alex J. Cannon

Viewed

Total article views: 4,124 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,937 2,055 132 4,124 94 95
  • HTML: 1,937
  • PDF: 2,055
  • XML: 132
  • Total: 4,124
  • BibTeX: 94
  • EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jun 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jun 2015)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 18 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
Seven gridded statistical downscaling methods are tested for strength in simulating climate and hydrologic extremes. A recently developed technique, which is a post-processed version of bias corrected constructed analogues where the final bias correction is based on the bias corrected climate imprint method, is shown to be an especially strong method for hydrologic extremes versus other more commonly applied methods, including the popular bias corrected spatial disaggregation method.