Articles | Volume 19, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3969-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3969-2015
Research article
 | 
25 Sep 2015
Research article |  | 25 Sep 2015

Performance and robustness of probabilistic river forecasts computed with quantile regression based on multiple independent variables

F. Hoss and P. S. Fischbeck

Related subject area

Subject: Rivers and Lakes | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Using the classical model for structured expert judgment to estimate extremes: a case study of discharges in the Meuse River
Guus Rongen, Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles, and Matthijs Kok
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2831–2848, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2831-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2831-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ensemble streamflow data assimilation using WRF-Hydro and DART: novel localization and inflation techniques applied to Hurricane Florence flooding
Mohamad El Gharamti, James L. McCreight, Seong Jin Noh, Timothy J. Hoar, Arezoo RafieeiNasab, and Benjamin K. Johnson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5315–5336, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5315-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5315-2021, 2021
Short summary
Assessment of uncertainties in soil erosion and sediment yield estimates at ungauged basins: an application to the Garra River basin, India
Somil Swarnkar, Anshu Malini, Shivam Tripathi, and Rajiv Sinha
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2471–2485, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2471-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2471-2018, 2018
Short summary
Sediment and nutrient budgets are inherently dynamic: evidence from a long-term study of two subtropical reservoirs
Katherine R. O'Brien, Tony R. Weber, Catherine Leigh, and Michele A. Burford
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4881–4894, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4881-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4881-2016, 2016
Short summary
Using high-frequency water quality data to assess sampling strategies for the EU Water Framework Directive
R. A. Skeffington, S. J. Halliday, A. J. Wade, M. J. Bowes, and M. Loewenthal
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2491–2504, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2491-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2491-2015, 2015
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexander, M., Harding, M., and Lamarche, C.: Quantile Regression for Time-Series-Cross-Section-Data, Int. J. Stat. Manage. Syst., 4, 47–72, 2011.
Bogner, K., Pappenberger, F., and Cloke, H. L.: Technical Note: The normal quantile transformation and its application in a flood forecasting system, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1085–1094, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1085-2012, 2012.
Brier, G. W.: Verification of Forecasts Expressed in Terms of Probability, Mon. Weather Rev., 78, 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2, 1950.
Demargne, J., Wu, L., Regonda, S. K., Brown, J. D., Lee, H., He, M., Seo, D.-J., Hartman, R., Herr, H. D., Fresch, M., Schaake, J., and Zhu, Y.: The Science of NOAA's Operational Hydrologic Ensemble Forecast Service, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 79–98, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00081.1, 2013.
Hsu, W. and Murphy, A. H.: The attributes diagram A geometrical framework for assessing the quality of probability forecasts, Int. J. Forecast., 2, 285–293, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(86)90048-8, 1986.
Download
Short summary
This paper further develops the method of quantile regression (QR) to generate probabilistic river stage forecasts. Besides the forecast itself, this study uses the rate of rise of the river stage in the last 24 and 48h and the forecast error 24 and 48h before as predictors in QR configurations. When compared to just using the forecast as an independent variable, adding the latter four predictors significantly improved the forecasts, as measured by the Brier skill score and the CRPS.