Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-25-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-25-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
08 Jan 2010
Earth's Critical Zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances
H. Lin
The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, 116 Agricultural Sciences and Industry Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Related subject area
Subject: Hillslope hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Young and new water fractions in soil and hillslope waters
Energy efficiency in transient surface runoff and sediment fluxes on hillslopes – a concept to quantify the effectiveness of extreme events
Morphological controls on surface runoff: an interpretation of steady-state energy patterns, maximum power states and dissipation regimes within a thermodynamic framework
Soil moisture: variable in space but redundant in time
A history of the concept of time of concentration
Are dissolved organic carbon concentrations in riparian groundwater linked to hydrological pathways in the boreal forest?
The influence of diurnal snowmelt and transpiration on hillslope throughflow and stream response
Slope–velocity equilibrium and evolution of surface roughness on a stony hillslope
Assessment of land use impact on hydraulic threshold conditions for gully head cut initiation
Technical note: Inference in hydrology from entropy balance considerations
Ecohydrological effects of stream–aquifer water interaction: a case study of the Heihe River basin, northwestern China
Hillslope-scale experiment demonstrates the role of convergence during two-step saturation
Impacts of climate variability on wetland salinization in the North American prairies
Resolving structural errors in a spatially distributed hydrologic model using ensemble Kalman filter state updates
Runoff formation from experimental plot, field, to small catchment scales in agricultural North Huaihe River Plain, China
Addressing secondary school students' everyday ideas about freshwater springs in order to develop an instructional tool to promote conceptual reconstruction
Hydrological heterogeneity in Mediterranean reclaimed slopes: runoff and sediment yield at the patch and slope scales along a gradient of overland flow
Effect of hydraulic parameters on sediment transport capacity in overland flow over erodible beds
Large-scale runoff generation – parsimonious parameterisation using high-resolution topography
Estimating surface fluxes over middle and upper streams of the Heihe River Basin with ASTER imagery
Seasonal evaluation of the land surface scheme HTESSEL against remote sensing derived energy fluxes of the Transdanubian region in Hungary
Analysis of surface soil moisture patterns in agricultural landscapes using Empirical Orthogonal Functions
Modelling field scale water partitioning using on-site observations in sub-Saharan rainfed agriculture
Evaluation of alternative formulae for calculation of surface temperature in snowmelt models using frequency analysis of temperature observations
Growth of a high-elevation large inland lake, associated with climate change and permafrost degradation in Tibet
Selection of an appropriately simple storm runoff model
Spatial mapping of leaf area index using hyperspectral remote sensing for hydrological applications with a particular focus on canopy interception
Use of satellite-derived data for characterization of snow cover and simulation of snowmelt runoff through a distributed physically based model of runoff generation
A contribution to understanding the turbidity behaviour in an Amazon floodplain
Global spatial optimization with hydrological systems simulation: application to land-use allocation and peak runoff minimization
Implementing small scale processes at the soil-plant interface – the role of root architectures for calculating root water uptake profiles
Uncertainty in the determination of soil hydraulic parameters and its influence on the performance of two hydrological models of different complexity
Modelling the inorganic nitrogen behaviour in a small Mediterranean forested catchment, Fuirosos (Catalonia)
Soil bioengineering for risk mitigation and environmental restoration in a humid tropical area
Climate and terrain factors explaining streamflow response and recession in Australian catchments
Soil moisture active and passive microwave products: intercomparison and evaluation over a Sahelian site
Characteristics of 2-D convective structures in Catalonia (NE Spain): an analysis using radar data and GIS
The contribution of groundwater discharge to the overall water budget of two typical Boreal lakes in Alberta/Canada estimated from a radon mass balance
Actual daily evapotranspiration estimated from MERIS and AATSR data over the Chinese Loess Plateau
Calibration analysis for water storage variability of the global hydrological model WGHM
Reducing scale dependence in TOPMODEL using a dimensionless topographic index
Spatial variation in soil active-layer geochemistry across hydrologic margins in polar desert ecosystems
Nitrogen retention in natural Mediterranean wetland-streams affected by agricultural runoff
Recent trends in groundwater levels in a highly seasonal hydrological system: the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta
Water availability, demand and reliability of in situ water harvesting in smallholder rain-fed agriculture in the Thukela River Basin, South Africa
Variability of the groundwater sulfate concentration in fractured rock slopes: a tool to identify active unstable areas
Copula based multisite model for daily precipitation simulation
Solid phase evolution in the Biosphere 2 hillslope experiment as predicted by modeling of hydrologic and geochemical fluxes
Deriving a global river network map and its sub-grid topographic characteristics from a fine-resolution flow direction map
Surface water acidification and critical loads: exploring the F-factor
Marius G. Floriancic, Scott T. Allen, and James W. Kirchner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-437, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-437, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use a 3-year timeseries of tracer data in streamflow and soils to illustrate how water moves through the subsurface to become streamflow. Less than 50% of soil water consists of rainfall from the last 3 weeks. Most annual streamflow is older than 3 months, waters in deep subsurface layers are even older, thus deep layers are not the only source of streamflow. After wet periods more rainfall was found in the subsurface and the stream, suggesting that water moves quicker through wet landscapes.
Samuel Schroers, Ulrike Scherer, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2535–2557, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2535-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2535-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The hydrological cycle shapes our landscape. With an accelerating change of the world's climate and hydrological dynamics, concepts of evolution of natural systems become more important. In this study, we elaborated a thermodynamic framework for runoff and sediment transport and show from model results as well as from measurements during extreme events that the developed concept is useful for understanding the evolution of the system's mass, energy, and entropy fluxes.
Samuel Schroers, Olivier Eiff, Axel Kleidon, Ulrike Scherer, Jan Wienhöfer, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3125–3150, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3125-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3125-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In hydrology the formation of landform patterns is of special interest as changing forcings of the natural systems, such as climate or land use, will change these structures. In our study we developed a thermodynamic framework for surface runoff on hillslopes and highlight the differences of energy conversion patterns on two related spatial and temporal scales. The results indicate that surface runoff on hillslopes approaches a maximum power state.
Mirko Mälicke, Sibylle K. Hassler, Theresa Blume, Markus Weiler, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2633–2653, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2633-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2633-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We could show that distributed soil moisture time series bear a considerable amount of information about dynamic changes in soil moisture. We developed a new method to describe spatial patterns and analyze their persistency. By combining uncertainty propagation with information theory, we were able to calculate the information content of spatial similarity with respect to measurement uncertainty. This does help to understand when and why the soil is drying in an organized manner.
Keith J. Beven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2655–2670, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2655-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2655-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The concept of time of concentration in the analysis of catchment responses dates back over 150 years. It is normally discussed in terms of the velocity of flow of a water particle from the furthest part of a catchment to the outlet. This is also the basis for the definition in the International Glossary of Hydrology, but this is in conflict with the way in which it is commonly used. This paper provides a clarification of the concept and its correct useage.
Stefan W. Ploum, Hjalmar Laudon, Andrés Peralta-Tapia, and Lenka Kuglerová
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1709–1720, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1709-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1709-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Near-stream areas, or riparian zones, are important for the health of streams and rivers. If these areas are disturbed by forestry or other anthropogenic activity, the water quality and all life in streams may be at risk. We examined which riparian areas are particularly sensitive. We found that only a few wet areas bring most of the rainwater from the landscape to the stream, and they have a unique water quality. In order to maintain healthy streams and rivers, these areas should be protected.
Brett Woelber, Marco P. Maneta, Joel Harper, Kelsey G. Jencso, W. Payton Gardner, Andrew C. Wilcox, and Ignacio López-Moreno
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4295–4310, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4295-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4295-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The hydrology of high-elevation headwaters in midlatitudes is typically dominated by snow processes, which are very sensitive to changes in energy inputs at the top of the snowpack. We present a data analyses that reveal how snowmelt and transpiration waves induced by the diurnal solar cycle generate water pressure fluctuations that propagate through the snowpack–hillslope–stream system. Changes in diurnal energy inputs alter these pressure cycles with potential ecohydrological consequences.
Mark A. Nearing, Viktor O. Polyakov, Mary H. Nichols, Mariano Hernandez, Li Li, Ying Zhao, and Gerardo Armendariz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3221–3229, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3221-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3221-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents novel scientific understanding about the way that hillslope surfaces form when exposed to rainfall erosion, and the way those surfaces interact with and influence runoff velocities during rain events. The data show that hillslope surfaces form such that flow velocities are independent of slope gradient and dependent on flow rates alone. This result represents a shift in thinking about surface water runoff.
Aliakbar Nazari Samani, Qiuwen Chen, Shahram Khalighi, Robert James Wasson, and Mohammad Reza Rahdari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3005–3012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3005-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3005-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We hypothesized that land use had important effects on hydraulic threshold conditions for gully head cut initiation. We investigated the effects using an experimental plot. The results indicated that the use of a threshold value of τcr = 35 dyne cm−2 and ωu = 0.4 Cm S−1 in physically based soil erosion models is susceptible to high uncertainty when assessing gully erosion.
Stefan J. Kollet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2801–2809, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2801-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2801-2016, 2016
Yujin Zeng, Zhenghui Xie, Yan Yu, Shuang Liu, Linying Wang, Binghao Jia, Peihua Qin, and Yaning Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2333–2352, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2333-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2333-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
In arid areas, stream–aquifer water exchange essentially sustains the growth and subsistence of riparian ecosystem. To quantify this effect for intensity and range, a stream–riverbank scheme was incorporated into a state-of-the-art land model, and some runs were set up over Heihe River basin, northwestern China. The results show that the hydrology circle is significantly changed, and the ecological system is benefitted greatly by the river water lateral transfer within a 1 km range to the stream.
A. I. Gevaert, A. J. Teuling, R. Uijlenhoet, S. B. DeLong, T. E. Huxman, L. A. Pangle, D. D. Breshears, J. Chorover, J. D. Pelletier, S. R. Saleska, X. Zeng, and P. A. Troch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3681–3692, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3681-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3681-2014, 2014
U. Nachshon, A. Ireson, G. van der Kamp, S. R. Davies, and H. S. Wheater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1251–1263, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1251-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1251-2014, 2014
J. H. Spaaks and W. Bouten
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3455–3472, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3455-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3455-2013, 2013
S. Han, D. Xu, and S. Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3115–3125, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3115-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3115-2012, 2012
S. Reinfried, S. Tempelmann, and U. Aeschbacher
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1365–1377, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1365-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1365-2012, 2012
L. Merino-Martín, M. Moreno-de las Heras, S. Pérez-Domingo, T. Espigares, and J. M. Nicolau
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1305–1320, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1305-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1305-2012, 2012
M. Ali, G. Sterk, M. Seeger, M. Boersema, and P. Peters
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 591–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-591-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-591-2012, 2012
L. Gong, S. Halldin, and C.-Y. Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2481–2494, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2481-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2481-2011, 2011
W. Ma, Y. Ma, Z. Hu, Z. Su, J. Wang, and H. Ishikawa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1403–1413, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1403-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1403-2011, 2011
E. L. Wipfler, K. Metselaar, J. C. van Dam, R. A. Feddes, E. van Meijgaard, L. H. van Ulft, B. van den Hurk, S. J. Zwart, and W. G. M. Bastiaanssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1257–1271, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1257-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1257-2011, 2011
W. Korres, C. N. Koyama, P. Fiener, and K. Schneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 751–764, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-751-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-751-2010, 2010
H. Makurira, H. H. G. Savenije, and S. Uhlenbrook
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 627–638, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-627-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-627-2010, 2010
C. H. Luce and D. G. Tarboton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 535–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-535-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-535-2010, 2010
J. Liu, S. Kang, T. Gong, and A. Lu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 481–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-481-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-481-2010, 2010
A. I. J. M. van Dijk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 447–458, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-447-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-447-2010, 2010
H. H. Bulcock and G. P. W. Jewitt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 383–392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-383-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-383-2010, 2010
L. S. Kuchment, P. Romanov, A. N. Gelfan, and V. N. Demidov
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 339–350, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-339-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-339-2010, 2010
E. Alcântara, E. Novo, J. Stech, J. Lorenzzetti, C. Barbosa, A. Assireu, and A. Souza
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 351–364, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-351-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-351-2010, 2010
I.-Y. Yeo and J.-M. Guldmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 325–338, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-325-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-325-2010, 2010
C. L. Schneider, S. Attinger, J.-O. Delfs, and A. Hildebrandt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 279–289, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-279-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-279-2010, 2010
G. Baroni, A. Facchi, C. Gandolfi, B. Ortuani, D. Horeschi, and J. C. van Dam
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 251–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-251-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-251-2010, 2010
C. Medici, S. Bernal, A. Butturini, F. Sabater, M. Martin, A. J. Wade, and F. Frances
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 223–237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-223-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-223-2010, 2010
A. Petrone and F. Preti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 239–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-239-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-239-2010, 2010
A. I. J. M. van Dijk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 159–169, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-159-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-159-2010, 2010
C. Gruhier, P. de Rosnay, S. Hasenauer, T. Holmes, R. de Jeu, Y. Kerr, E. Mougin, E. Njoku, F. Timouk, W. Wagner, and M. Zribi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 141–156, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-141-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-141-2010, 2010
M. Barnolas, T. Rigo, and M. C. Llasat
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 129–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-129-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-129-2010, 2010
A. Schmidt, J. J. Gibson, I. R. Santos, M. Schubert, K. Tattrie, and H. Weiss
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-79-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-79-2010, 2010
R. Liu, J. Wen, X. Wang, L. Wang, H. Tian, T. T. Zhang, X. K. Shi, J. H. Zhang, and SH. N. Lv
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 47–58, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-47-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-47-2010, 2010
S. Werth and A. Güntner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 59–78, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-59-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-59-2010, 2010
A. Ducharne
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2399–2412, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2399-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2399-2009, 2009
J. E. Barrett, M. N. Gooseff, and C. Takacs-Vesbach
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2349–2358, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2349-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2349-2009, 2009
V. García-García, R. Gómez, M. R. Vidal-Abarca, and M. L. Suárez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2359–2371, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2359-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2359-2009, 2009
M. Shamsudduha, R. E. Chandler, R. G. Taylor, and K. M. Ahmed
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2373–2385, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2373-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2373-2009, 2009
J. C. M. Andersson, A. J. B. Zehnder, G. P. W. Jewitt, and H. Yang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2329–2347, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2329-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2329-2009, 2009
S. Binet, L. Spadini, C. Bertrand, Y. Guglielmi, J. Mudry, and C. Scavia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2315–2327, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2315-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2315-2009, 2009
A. Bárdossy and G. G. S. Pegram
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2299–2314, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2299-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2299-2009, 2009
K. Dontsova, C. I. Steefel, S. Desilets, A. Thompson, and J. Chorover
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2273–2286, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2273-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2273-2009, 2009
D. Yamazaki, T. Oki, and S. Kanae
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2241–2251, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2241-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2241-2009, 2009
L. Rapp and K. Bishop
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2191–2201, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2191-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2191-2009, 2009
Cited articles
Anderson, S., Blum, J., Brantley, S., Chadwick, O., Chorover, J., Derry, L., Drever, J., Hering, J., Kirchner, J., Kump, L., Richter, D., and White, A.: Proposed initiative would study Earth's weathering engine, EOS, 85, 265–272, 2004.
Anderson, S. P., Bales, R. C., and Duffy, C. J.: Critical zone observatories: Building a network to advance interdisciplinary study of Earth surface processes, Mineral Mag., 72, 7–10, 2008.
Arnold, R. W., Szabolcs, I., and Targulian, V. O.: Global soil change, Report of an IIASA-ISSS-UNEP task force on the role of soil in global change, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 1990.
Arnold, R. W. and Wilding, L. P.: The need to quantify spatial variability, in: Spatial variabilities of soils and landforms, edited by: Mausbach, M. J. and Wilding, L. P., SSSA Special Pub. No. 28. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc., Madison, WI, USA, 1–8, 1991.
Ashley, G. M. and Driese, S. G.: Paleopedology and paleohydrology of a volcaniclastic paleosol interval: Implications for early pleistocene stratigraphy and paleoclimate record, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, J. Sediment Res., 70, 1065–1080, 2000.
Atkinson, T. C.: Techniques for measuring subsurface flow on hillslopes, in: Hillslope hydrology, edited by: Kirkby, M. J., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 73–120, 1978.
Bateson, G.: Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity, Dutton, New York, 1979.
Bates, R. L. and Jackson, J. A.: Glossary of Geology (3rd ed), American Geological Institute, Alexandria, Virginia, USA, 425, 1987.
Bell, S.: Landscape: patterns, perception and process, E{&}FN Spon, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, 1999.
Beven, K.: Searching for the Holy Grail of scientific hydrology: Qt=(S, R, $\Delta t$)A as closure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 609–618, 2006.
Bouma, J.: Hydropedology as a powerful tool for environmental policy research, Geoderma, 131, 275–286, 2006.
Bouma, J.: Soils are back on the global agenda: Now what?, Geoderma, 150, 224–225, 2009.
Brantley, S. L., White, T. S., White, A. F., Sparks, D., Richter, D., Pregitzer, K., Derry, L., Chorover, J., Chadwick, O., April, R., Anderson, S., and Amundson, R.: Frontiers in exploration of the critical zone, report of a workshop sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF), Newark, DE, USA, 30, 1–30, 2006.
Brantley, S. L., Goldhaber, M. B., and Ragnarsdottir, K. V.: Crossing disciplines and scales to understand the critical zone, Elements, 3, 307–314, 2007.
Buol, S. W., Southard, R. J., Graham, R. C., and McDaniel, P. A.: Soil genesis and classification (5th Edition), Blackwell/Iowa State Press, Ames, IA, USA, 2003.
Cameron, E. N.: Structure and rock sequences of critical zone of eastern bushveld complex, Am. Mineral., 47, 186, 1962.
Christopherson, R. W.: Elemental Geosystems (5th edition), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2007.
Clark, W. C., Crutzen, P. J., and Schellnhuber, H. J.: Science for global sustainability: toward a new paradigm, in: Earth System Analysis for Sustainability, edited by: Schellnhuber, H. J., Crutzen, P. J., Clark, W. C., Claussen, M., and Held, H., The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1–28, 2004,
Clothier, B. E., Green, S. R., and Deurer, M.: Preferential flow and transport in soil: progress and prognosis, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 2–13, 2008.
Commission of the European Communities: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for the Protection of Soil, COM-232, Brussels, 2006.
Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science, Inc (CUAHSI): Hydrology of a dynamic earth – A decadal research plan for hydrologic science, Washington DC, USA, 2007.
Coventry, R. J.: The distribution of red, yellow, and grey earths in the Torrens Creek area, central north Queensland, Aus. J. Soil Res., 20, 1–14, 1982.
Decker, J. B., Rollins, K. M., and Ellsworth, J. C.: Corrosion rate evaluation and prediction for piles based on long-term field performance, J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 134, 341–351, 2008.
Demas, G. P. and Rabenhorst, M. C.: Factors of subaqueous soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology for submersed environments, Geoderma, 102, 189–204, 2001.
Droogers, P. and Bouma, J.: Soil survey input in exploratory modelling of sustainable land management practices, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 1704–1710, 1997.
Elsherif, N., Gough, W. B., Restivo, M., Craelius, W., Henkin, R., and Caref, E. B.: Electrophysiological basis of ventricular late potentials, PACE, 13, 2140–2147, 1990.
Freer, J., McDonnell, J. J., Beven, K. J., Peters, N. E., Burns, D. A., Hooper, R. P., Aulenbach, B., and Kendall, C.: The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1269, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000872, 2002.
Hillel, D.: Out of the earth – civilization and the life of the soil, The Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
Hole, F. D.: Soils of Wisconsin, Wis. Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull, Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA, 87, 1976.
Hole, F. D. and Campbell, J. B.: Soil landscape analysis, Rowman & Allanheld Publishers, Totowa, NJ, USA, 1985.
Jacobson, M. C., Charlson, R. J., Rodhe, H., and Orians, G. H.: Earth system science from biogeochemical cycles to global changes, Elsevier, London, UK, 2000.
Jenny, H.: Factors of soil formation-A system of quantitative pedology, McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 1941.
Johnston, M. E., Croasdale, K. R., and Jordaan, I. J.: Localized pressures during ice-structure interaction: Relevance to design criteria, Cold. Reg. Sci. Technol., 27, 105–117, 1998.
Jørgensen, S.: Preface, in: Steps towards an evolutionary physics, edited by: Tiezzi, E., WIT Press, Boston, 2006.
Jørgensen, S., Fath, B., Bastianoni, S., Marques, J., Müller, F., Nielsen, S., Pattern, B., Tiezzi, E., and Ulanowicz, R.: A new ecology – Systems perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007.
Keeling, R. F.: Recording earth's vital signs, Science, 319, 1771–1772, 2008.
Kirchner, J. W.: Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004362, 2006.
Kubiena, W. L.: Micropedology, Collegiate Press, Ames, IA, USA, 1938.
Lam, A., Bierkens, M. F. P., and van den Hurk, B. J. J. M.: Global patterns of relations between soil moisture and rainfall occurrence in ERA-40, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D17116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008222, 2007.
Lehmann, P., Hinz, C., McGrath, G., Tromp-van Meerveld, H. J., and McDonnell, J. J.: Rainfall threshold for hillslope outflow: an emergent property of flow pathway connectivity, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1047–1063, 2007.
Xiao-Yan Li, Zhi-Peng Yang, Yue-Tan Li, and Henry Lin: Connecting ecohydrology and hydropedology in desert shrubs: stemflow as a source of preferential flow in soils, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1133–1144, 2009.
Likens, G. E., Bormann, F. H., and Johnson, N. M.: Acid rain, Environment, 14, 33-40, 1972.
Likens, G. E. and Bormann, F. H.: Acid rain: a serious regional environmental problem, Science, 184, 1176–1179, 1974.
Lilly, A. and Lin, H. S.: Using soil morphological attributes and soil structure in pedotransfer functions, in: Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology, edited by: Pachepsky Y. and Rawls, W., Elsevier, London, UK, 115–142, 2004.
Lin, H. S: Hydropedology: ridging disciplines, scales, and data, Vadose Zone. J., 2, 1–11, 2003.
Lin, H. S.: Letter to the editor on "From the earth's critical zone to mars exploration: Can soil science enter its golden age?", Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 69, 1351–1353, 2005.
Lin, H. S.: Cattle vs. ground beef: What is the difference?, Soil Surv. Hori., 48, 9–10, 2007.
Lin, H. S.: Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes, J. Hydrol., in review, 2010a.
Lin, H. S.: On the study of soils and the Critical Zone: Time vs. space, evolution vs. conservation, biology vs. physics, and beyond, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., in review, 2010b.
Lin, H. S. and Zhou, X.: Evidence of subsurface preferential flow using soil hydrologic monitoring in the Shale Hills Catchment, Euro. J. Soil Sci., 59, 34–49, 2008.
Lin, H. S., Bouma, J., Wilding, L., Richardson, J., Kutilek, M., and Nielsen, D.: Advances in hydropedology, Adv. Agron., 85, 1–89, 2005.
Lin, H. S., Bouma, J., Pachepsky, Y., Western, A., Thompson, J., van Genuchten, M. Th., Vogel, H., and Lilly, A.: Hydropedology: Synergistic integration of pedology and hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 42, W05301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004085, 2006a.
Lin, H. S., Kogelmann, W., Walker, C., and Bruns, M. A.: Soil moisture patterns in a forested catchment: A hydropedological perspective, Geoderma, 131, 345–368, 2006b.
Lin, H. S., Singha, K., Chittleborough, D., Vogel, H.-J., and Mooney, S.: Advancing the emerging field of hydropedology, EOS Trans., 89, 490, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO480009, 2008a.
Lin, H. S., Brook, E., McDaniel, R., and Boll, J.: Hydropedology and Surface/Subsurface Runoff Processes, in: Encyclopedia of Hydrologic Sciences, edited by: Anderson, M. G., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., https://doi.org/10.1002/0470848944.hsa306, 2008b.
Maxwell, R. M. and Kollet, S.: Interdependence of groundwater dynamics and land-energy feedbacks under climate change, Nat. Geosci., 1, 665–669, 2008.
McClain, M. E., Boyer, E. W., Dent, C. L., Gergel, S. E., Grimm, N. B., Groffman, P. M., Hart, S. C., Harvey, J. W., Johnston, C. A., Mayorga, E., McDowell, W. H., and Pinay, G.: Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, Ecosystems, 6, 301–312, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0161-9, 2003.
McDonnell, J. J., Sivapalan, M., Vache, K., Dunn, S., Grant, G., Haggerty, R., Hinz, C., Hooper, R., Kirchner, J., Roderick, M. L., Selker, J., and Weiler, M.: Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 43, W07301, https://doi.org/10.1029/(2006)WR005467, 2007.
McKenzie, N., Jacquier, D., Isbell, R., and Brown, K.: Australian soils and landscapes: An illustrated compendium, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia, 2004.
Monod, J.: Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology, English Translation by Austryn Wainhouse, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1971.
Narasimhan, T. N.: Pedology: A hydrogeological perspective, Vadose Zone J., 4, 891–898, 2005.
Nicolis, G.: Introduction to nonlinear science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
National Research Council (NRC): Opportunities in the hydrologic sciences, National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA, 1991.
National Research Council (NRC): Basic research opportunities in earth science, National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA, 2001.
National Research Council (NRC): Groundwater fluxes across interfaces, National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA, 2004.
National Research Council (NRC): Frontiers in soil science research – Report of a workshop, National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA, 2009.
NSF Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education (NSF AC-ERE): Complex environmental systems: Pathways to the future, NSF Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education, Arlington, VA, USA, 12, 2005.
Phillips, J. D. and Slattery, M. C.: Antecedent alluvial morphology and sea-level controls on form-process transition zones in the lower trinity river, Texas. River. Res. Appl., 24, 293–309, 2008.
Pielke, R. A., Avissar, R., Raupach, M., Dolman, A. J., Zeng, X. B., and Denning, A. S.: Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems: influence on weather and climate, Glob. Change Biol., 4, 461–475, 1998.
Prigogine, I.: Time, Structure and Fluctuations, Nobel Lecture, 8 December, 1977, From Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1971–1980, Editor-in-Charge: Frängsmyr, T., edited by: Forsén, S., World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1993, http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1977/prigogine-lecture.pdf, 1977.
Rabenhorst, M. C., Bell, J. C., and McDaniel, P. A.: Quantifying soil hydromorphology, SSSA Special Pub. # 54, Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc, Madison, WI, 1998.
Richter, D. D.: Humanity's transformation of Earth's soil: Pedology's new frontier, Soil Sci., 172, 957–967, 2007.
Richter, D. D. and Mobley, M. L.: Monitoring Earth's Critical Zone, Science, 326, 1067–1068, 2009.
Rinaldo, A., Banavar, J. R., and Maritan, A.: Trees, networks, and hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 42, W06D07, https://doi.org/10.1029/(2005)WR004108, 2006.
Ryan, P. R., Delhaize, E., and Jones, D. L.: Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots, Annu. Rev. Plant. Phys., 52, 527–560, 2001.
Schaetzl, R. J. and Anderson, S.: Soils–genesis and geomorphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005.
Soil Science Society of America: Glossary of Soil Science Terms, https://www.soils.org/publications/soils-glossary, accessed on 28 November, 2009.
Soil Survey Division Staff.: Soil Survey Manual, US Dept. Agri. Handbook No. 18, US Gov. Printing Office, Washington DC, USA, 1993.
Sommer, M. and Schlichting, E.: Archetypes of catenas in respect to matter a concept for structuring and grouping catenas, Geoderma, 76, 1–33, 1997.
Sophocleous, M.: Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science, Hydrogeol. J., 10, 52–67, 2002.
Tandarich, J. P., Darmody, R. G., and Follmer, L. R.: The pedo-weathering profile: a paradigm for whole regolith pedology from the glaciated midcontinental United States of America, in: Whole regolith pedology, edited by: Cremeens, D. L., Brown, R. B., and Huddleston, J. H., SSSA Special Pub. No. 34, Madison, WI, USA, 97–117, 1994.
Tiezzi, E: Steps towards an evolutionary physics, WIT Press, Boston, 2006.
Toffler, A.: Forword: Science and change, in: Order out of Chaos, edited by: Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I., Bantam Books, Toronto, 1984.
Tsakalotos, D. E.: The inner friction of the critical zone, Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie – Stochiometrie Und Verwandtschaftslehre, 68, 32–38, 1909.
Tromp-van Meerveld, H. J. and McDonnell, J. J.: Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow 2: The fill and spill hypothesis: an explanation for observed threshold behaviour in subsurface stormflow, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02411, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003800, 2006.
Uhlenbrook, S.: Catchment hydrology – a science in which all processes are preferential, Hydrol. Process., 20, 3581–3585, 2006.
Ulanowicz, R. E.: The dual nature of ecosystem dynamics, Ecol. Model., 220, 1886–1892, 2009.
USDA-NRCS: Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States (Version 4.0), USDA-NRCS, Ft. Worth, TX, USA, 1998.
USDA-NRCS: Land resource regions and major land resource areas, National Soil Survey Handbook, US Gov. Printing Office, Washington DC, USA, 2006.
Vepraskas, M. J.: Redoximorphic features for identifying aquic conditions, North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin No. 301, NC, USA, 1992.
Vogel, H. J. and Roth, K.: Moving through scales of flow and transport in soil, J. Hydrol., 272, 95–106, 2003.
von Bertalanffy, L.: General System theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, New York: George Braziller, revised edition 1976, 1968.
Weinberg, G. M.: An introduction to general systems thinking, Silver anniversary edition, Dorset House Publishing, New York, 1975.
Wilcox, B. P., Wilding, L. P., and Woodruff, C. M.: Soil and topographic controls on runoff generation from stepped landforms in the Edwards Plateau of Central Texas, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L24S24, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030860, 2007.
Wilding, L. P. and Lin, H. S,: Advancing the frontiers of soil science towards a geoscience, Geoderma, 131, 257–274, 2006.
Wilhelm, H. J., Zhang, H., Chen, F. L., Elsenbroek, J. H., Lombard, M., and deBruin, D.: Geochemical exploration for platinum-group elements in the bushveld complex, South Africa, Miner. Deposita., 32, 349–361, 1997.
Young, I. M. and Crawford, J. W.: Interactions and self-organization in the soil-microbe complex, Science, 304, 1634–1637, 2004.
Young, M. H., Lin, H. S., and Wilcox, B. P.: Introduction to special section on bridging hydrology, soil science, and ecology: Hydropedology and ecohydrology, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L24S20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031998, 2007.
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(8841 KB) - Metadata XML
Special issue