Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 30, issue 14
Articles | Volume 30, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4509-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4509-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 30, issue 14
Research article
 | 
17 Jul 2026
Research article |  | 17 Jul 2026

A systematic evaluation of 15 actual evapotranspiration formulations within conceptual hydrological models

Gabrielle Burns, Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, and Clare Stephens

Viewed

Total article views: 13,112 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
11,638 1,238 236 13,112 706 308 284
  • HTML: 11,638
  • PDF: 1,238
  • XML: 236
  • Total: 13,112
  • Supplement: 706
  • BibTeX: 308
  • EndNote: 284
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 13,112 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 13,063 with geography defined and 49 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 07 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Improving how rainfall-runoff models estimate evapotranspiration is key to better reproducing water partitioning under current conditions, and will increase model realism under future changing conditions. We tested how well different conceptual rainfall-runoff model equations simulate evapotranspiration using Australian catchment and flux tower data. We found one equation consistently worked better than the others. However, even this equation had flaws, pointing to missing vegetation processes.
Read more
Share