Articles | Volume 30, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4509-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4509-2026
Research article
 | 
17 Jul 2026
Research article |  | 17 Jul 2026

A systematic evaluation of 15 actual evapotranspiration formulations within conceptual hydrological models

Gabrielle Burns, Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, and Clare Stephens

Viewed

Total article views: 13,693 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
12,003 1,389 301 13,693 809 362 341
  • HTML: 12,003
  • PDF: 1,389
  • XML: 301
  • Total: 13,693
  • Supplement: 809
  • BibTeX: 362
  • EndNote: 341
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 13,693 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 13,603 with geography defined and 90 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 08 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Improving how rainfall-runoff models estimate evapotranspiration is key to better reproducing water partitioning under current conditions, and will increase model realism under future changing conditions. We tested how well different conceptual rainfall-runoff model equations simulate evapotranspiration using Australian catchment and flux tower data. We found one equation consistently worked better than the others. However, even this equation had flaws, pointing to missing vegetation processes.
Share