Articles | Volume 30, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4509-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4509-2026
Research article
 | 
17 Jul 2026
Research article |  | 17 Jul 2026

A systematic evaluation of 15 actual evapotranspiration formulations within conceptual hydrological models

Gabrielle Burns, Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, and Clare Stephens

Data sets

CAMELS-AUS v2: updated hydrometeorological timeseries and landscape attributes for an enlarged set of catchments in Australia (2.03) K. Fowler et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14289037

Model code and software

AETtesting G. Burns https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21333639

MARRMoT L. Trotter and W. Knoben https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8280679

Download
Short summary
Improving how rainfall-runoff models estimate evapotranspiration is key to better reproducing water partitioning under current conditions, and will increase model realism under future changing conditions. We tested how well different conceptual rainfall-runoff model equations simulate evapotranspiration using Australian catchment and flux tower data. We found one equation consistently worked better than the others. However, even this equation had flaws, pointing to missing vegetation processes.
Share